Unbraced Column Verification Example
AISC Design Examples
AISC 13th Edition
ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com
H-9
Example H.4
W-Shape Subject to Combined Axial Compression and
Flexure
Given: Select an ASTM A992 W-shape with a 10 in. nominal depth to carry nominal axial compression
forces of 5 kips from dead load and 15 kips from live load. The unbraced length is 14 ft and the ends are
pinned. The member also has the following nominal required moment strengths, not including second-order
effects:
MxD = 15 kip-ft
MyD = 2 kip-ft
MxL = 45 kip-ft
MyL = 6 kip-ft
The member is not subject to sidesway.
Solution:
Material Properties:
ASTM A992
Fy = 50 ksi
Fu = 65 ksi
Calculate the required strength, not considering second-order effects
LRFD
ASD
Pu = 1.2(5.00 kips) + 1.6(15.0 kips)
= 30.0 kips
Mux = 1.2(15.0 kip-ft) + 1.6(45.0 kip-ft)
= 90.0 kip-ft
Muy = 1.2(2.00 kip-ft) + 1.6(6.00 kip-ft)
= 12.0 kip-ft
Pa = 5.00 kips + 15.0 kips
= 20.0 kips
Max = 15.0 kip-ft + 45.0 kip-ft
= 60.0 kip-ft
May = 2.00 kip-ft + 6.00 kip-ft
= 8.00 kip-ft
Try a W1033
Geometric Properties:
W1033
A = 9.71 in.2
Sx= 35.0 in.3
Sy= 9.20 in.3
Lp = 6.85 ft
Zx = 38.8 in.3
Zy = 14.0 in.3
Lr = 12.8 ft
Ix = 171 in.4
Iy = 36.6 in.4
Manual
Table 1-1
Table 3-1
Calculate the available axial strength
Commentary
Table
C-C2.2
For a pinned-pinned condition, K = 1.0.
Since KLx = KLy = 14.0 ft and rx > ry, the y-y axis will govern.
LRFD
Pc = cPn = 253 kips
ASD
Pc = Pn/c = 168 kips
Manual
Table 4-1
H-10
Calculate the required flexural strengths including second order amplification
Use Amplified First-Order Elastic Analysis procedure from Section C2.1b.
member is not subject to sidesway, only P- amplifiers need to be added.
B1 =
Since the
Cm
1 Pr / Pe1
Eqn. C2-2
Cm = 1.0
X-X axis flexural magnifier
Pe1 =
2 EI x
( K1 Lx )
2 ( 29,000 ksi ) 171in.4
( (1.0 )(14.0 ft )(12 in./ft ) )
Eqn. C2-5
= 1730 kips
LRFD
ASD
= 1.0
= 1.6
1.0
B1 =
= 1.02
1 1.0 ( 30.0 kips /1730 kips )
B1 =
Mux = 1.02(90.0 kip-ft) = 91.8 kip-ft
Max = 1.02(60.0 kip-ft) = 61.2 kip-ft
1.0
= 1.02
1 1.6 ( 20.0 kips /1730 kips )
Eqn. C2-2
Y-Y axis flexural magnifier
Pe1 =
2 EI y
( K1 Ly )
2 ( 29,000 ksi ) 36.6 in.4
( (1.0 )(14.0 ft )(12 in./ft ) )
) = 371 kips
Eqn. C2-5
LRFD
ASD
= 1.0
= 1.6
1.0
B1 =
= 1.09
1 1.0 ( 30.0 kips / 371kips )
B1 =
Muy = 1.09(12.0 kip-ft) = 13.1 kip-ft
May = 1.09 (8.00 kip-ft) = 8.76 kip-ft
1.0
= 1.09
1 1.6 ( 20.0 kips / 371kips )
Eqn. C2-2
Calculate the nominal bending strength about the x-x axis
Yielding limit state
Mnx = Mp = FyZx = 50 ksi(38.8 in.3) = 1940 kip-in or 162 kip-ft
Eqn. F2-1
Lateral-torsional buckling limit state
Since Lp < Lb < Lr, Equation F2-2 applies
From Manual Table 3-1, Cb = 1.14
Manual
Table 3-1
H-11
Lb - L p
Mnx = Cb M p - ( M p -0.7 Fy S x )
M Mp
L - L
p
r
Eqn. F2-2
14.0 ft - 6.85ft
Mnx = 1.14 1940 kip-in. - 1940 kip-in. - 0.7 ( 50 ksi ) 35.0 in.3
21.8 ft - 6.85ft
= 1820 kip-in. M 1940 kip-in., therefore use:
Mnx = 1820 kip-in. or 152 kip-ft
))
controls
Local buckling limit state
Per Manual Table 1-1, the member is compact for Fy = 50 ksi, so the local buckling limit state
does not apply
Manual
Table 1-1
Calculate the nominal bending strength about the y-y axis
Section F6.2
Since a W1033 has compact flanges, only the yielding limit state applies.
Eqn. F6-1
Mny = Mp = FyZy M 1.6FySy
= 50 ksi(14.0 in.3) M 1.6(50 ksi)(9.20 in.3)
= 700 kip-in < 736 kip-in., therefore
Use Mny = 700 kip-in. or 58.3 kip-ft
LRFD
ASD
b = 0.90
Mcx = bMnx = 0.90(152 kip-ft) = 137 kip-ft
Mcy = bMny = 0.90(58.3 kip-ft) = 52.5 kip-ft
b = 1.67
Mcx = Mnx/b = 152 kip-ft/1.67 = 91.0 kip-ft
Mcy = Mny/b = 58.3 kip-ft/1.67 = 34.9 kip-ft
Section F2
Check limit for Equation H1-1a
LRFD
ASD
P
Pr
30.0 kips
= u =
= 0.119, therefore,
253 kips
Pc c Pn
use Specification Equation H1.1b
M
M
Pr
+ rx + ry M 1.0
2 Pc
M cy
M cx
91.8 kip-ft
30.0 kips
13.1 kip-ft
+
+
2(253 kips) 137 kip-ft
52.5 kip-ft
Pa
Pr
20.0 kips
=
=
= 0.119, therefore
168 kips
Pc Pn / c
use Specification Equation H1.1b
M
M
Pr
+ rx + ry M 1.0
2 Pc
M cy
M cx
61.2 kip-ft
20.0 kips
8.76 kip-ft
+
+
2(168 kips) 91.0 kip-ft
34.9 kip-ft
0.0593 + 0.920 = 0.979 M 1.0
0.0595 + 0.924 = 0.983 M 1.0
o.k.
o.k.
Section H1.1
Eqn. H1.1b
Project: Verification Example
Engineer: Javier Encinas, PE
Descrip: Unbraced Column Example
ASDIP Steel 3.2.5
STEEL COLUMN DESIGN
GEOMETRY
Column Designation ........
W10X33
Steel Yield Strength Fy ....
50.0
Modulus of Elasticity Es ...
29000
Member Length L ............
14.00
Effective Length Kx-factor
1.00
Effective Length Ky-factor
1.00
Unbraced Length Lb ........
14.00
ksi
ksi
ft
ft
OK
Area ..
Depth
bf ......
tw .....
tf .......
k des .
Ix ......
Page # ___
7/20/2014
www.asdipsoft.com
9.7
9.7
8.0
0.29
0.44
0.94
171.0
PROPERTIES
in
Sx ...
in
Zx ...
in
rx ....
in
Iy ....
in
Sy ...
in
Zy ...
in
ry ....
SERVICE LOADS (ASD)
Loads from a 1st-Order Analysis to be Amplified (kip, k-ft)
Axial Moment X Moment Y
Total Axial in the Story ....
100
Story Shear ......
No Lateral Translation ..... 20.0
60.0
8.0
Interstory Drift ..
0.0
0.0
Lateral Translation Only ..
0.0
M1/M2 Ratio ....
Amplified Loads ..............
20.0
61.1
8.8
Cm-factor .........
X-X
300
2.30
1.00
0.30
35.0
38.8
4.19
36.6
9.2
14.0
1.94
Y-Y
300
1.50
1.00
0.36
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
kip
in
COMPRESSION
Slenderness Ratio Kx L / rx ......
40.1
Slenderness Ratio Ky L / ry ......
86.6
Max. Slenderness Ratio ............
86.6 OK
Limit States
Nominal Pn
Flexural Buckling
280.6 kip
Torsional Buckling
360.2 kip
Flexural-Torsional Buckling
N.A. kip
Nominal Strength Pn .........
280.6 kip
Safety Factor ................
1.67
Allowable Strength Pn/ ....
168.0 kip
P / Pn/ Design Ratio .............
0.12
OK
BENDING ABOUT Y-Y
Limit States
Nominal Mn
Yielding
58.3 k-ft
Lateral-Torsional Buckling
N.A. k-ft
Flange Local Buckling
N.A. k-ft
Web Local Buckling
N.A. k-ft
Nominal Strength Mn ........
58.3 k-ft
Safety Factor ................
1.67
Allowable Strength Mn/ ...
34.9 k-ft
M / Mn/ Design Ratio ...........
0.25
OK
1
Project: Verification Example
Engineer: Javier Encinas, PE
Descrip: Unbraced Column Example
ASDIP Steel 3.2.5
STEEL COLUMN DESIGN
Page # ___
7/20/2014
www.asdipsoft.com
BENDING ABOUT X-X
Moment at 1/4 point of Lb ...
46.0 k-ft
Moment at 1/2 point of Lb ...
60.0 k-ft
Moment at 3/4 point of Lb ...
46.0 k-ft
L. T. Buckling Cb-factor .......
1.14
Limit States
Nominal Mn
Yielding
161.7 k-ft
Lateral-Torsional Buckling
152.2 k-ft
Flange Local Buckling
N.A. k-ft
Web Local Buckling
N.A. k-ft
Nominal Strength Mn ........
152.2 k-ft
Safety Factor ................
1.67
91.1 k-ft
Allowable Strength Mn/ ...
M / Mn/ Design Ratio ...........
0.67
OK
COMBINED FORCES
AISC Equation {H1-1a) ...........
N.A.
AISC Equation {H1-1b) ...........
0.98
OK
LOCAL BUCKLING
Flanges in Flexure ................
Compact
Flanges in Compression .......
Non-slender
Web in Flexure ....................
Compact
Web in Compression ............
Non-slender
Project: Verification Example
Engineer: Javier Encinas, PE
Descrip: Unbraced Column Example
STEEL COLUMN DESIGN
ASDIP Steel 3.2.5
Column Designation ............
W10X33
Page # ___
7/20/2014
www.asdipsoft.com
Area ..
9.7
in
Sx ...
35.0
in
Steel Yield Strength Fy ......
50.0
ksi
Depth
9.7
in
Zx ...
38.8
in
Modulus of Elasticity Es .....
29000
ksi
bf ......
8.0
in
rx ....
4.19
in
Member Length L ...............
14.00
ft
tw .....
0.29
in
Iy ....
36.6
in
Effective Length Kx-factor ..
1.00
tf .......
0.44
in
Sy ...
9.2
in
Effective Length Ky-factor ..
1.00
k des .
0.94
in
Zy ...
14.0
in
Unbraced Length Lb ...........
14.00
Ix ......
171.0
in
ry ....
1.94
in
Axial
ft
OK
Moment X
Total Axial in the Story ......
100
No Lateral Translation .......
20.0
X-X
Moment Y
Y-Y
Story Shear ........
300
300
kip
60.0
8.0
Interstory Drift ....
2.30
1.50
in
Lateral Translation Only ....
0.0
0.0
0.0
M1/M2 Ratio ......
1.00
1.00
Amplified Loads .................
20.0
61.1
8.8
Cm-factor ...........
0.30
0.36
Slender unstiffened Qs = 1.00 ,
Slender stiffened Qa = 1.00 ,
Slenderness ratio
1.00 * 14.00 / 4.19 = 40.1
Slenderness ratio
1.00 * 14.00 / 1.94 = 86.6
Q = Qs * Qa = 1.00
Maximum slenderness ratio = Max (40.1, 86.6) = 86.6
3.14 * 29000
86.6
Elastic buckling
AISC E7
AISC E3
= 38.2 ksi
AISC Eq. E3-4
(38.2 >= 0.44 * 1.00 * 50.0 = 22.0)
Flexural buckling stress
AISC Eq. E3-2
Fcr = 1.00 * 50.0 * (0.658)
= 28.9 ksi
AISC Eq. E4-4
=[
* 29000 * 791.0
(1.00 * 14.0 * 12)
+ 11200 * 0.6 ]
1
171.0 + 36.6
= 70.1 ksi
(70.1 >= 0.44 * 1.00 * 50.0 = 22.0)
Torsional buckling
AISC Eq. E3-2
Fcr = 1.00 * 50.0 * (0.658)
Compressive strength
= 37.1 ksi
28.9 * 9.7 = 280.6 kip
AISC Eq. E3-1
Controlling limit state: Flexural Buckling
Compressive design ratio =
20.0
280.6 / 1.67
= 0.12 < 1.0 OK
AISC E1
Project: Verification Example
Engineer: Javier Encinas, PE
Descrip: Unbraced Column Example
STEEL COLUMN DESIGN
ASDIP Steel 3.2.5
Page # ___
7/20/2014
www.asdipsoft.com
AISC Eq F1-1
= 12.5 * 61.1 * 1.0 / (2.5 * 61.1 + 3 * 46.0 + 4 * 60.0 + 3 * 46.0 = 1.14
Plastic moment
50.0 * 38.8 = 1940.0 k-in
Nominal strength
AISC Eq. F2-1
1940.0 / 12 = 161.7 k-ft
Lp = 82.2 in
AISC Eq. F2-5
rts = 2.2 in
AISC Eq. F2-7
9.7 - 0.4 = 9.3 in
c = 1.0
(doubly symmetric I-shape)
AISC Eq. F2-8a
AISC Eq. F2-6
Lr = 261.9 in
AISC Eq. F2-4
1.14 * * 29000.0
Fcr = 75.8 ksi
Nominal strength
AISC Eq. F2-2
Mnx = 1.14 * [1940.0 - (1940.0 - 0.7 * 50.0 * 35.0)(14.0 * 12 - 82.2) / (261.9 - 82.2)] / 12 = 152.2 k-ft
X - Controlling limit state: Lateral-Torsional Buckling
=
X - Flexural design ratio =
61.1
152.2 / 1.67
= 0.67 < 1.0 OK
AISC F1
Min (50.0 * 14.0, 1.6 * 50.0 * 9.2) = 700.0 k-in
Nominal strength
700.0 / 12 = 58.3 k-ft
Nominal strength
(compact flanges)
AISC Eq. F6-1
Y - Controlling limit state: Yielding
Y - Flexural design ratio =
8.8
58.3 / 1.67
= 0.25 < 1.0 OK
AISC F1
Project: Verification Example
Engineer: Javier Encinas, PE
Descrip: Unbraced Column Example
STEEL COLUMN DESIGN
ASDIP Steel 3.2.5
Allowable axial strength
280.6
1.67
= 168.0 kip
Page # ___
7/20/2014
www.asdipsoft.com
AISC E1
Allowable flexural strength
152.2
1.67
= 91.1 kip
AISC F1
Allowable flexural strength
58.3
1.67
= 34.9 kip
AISC F1
Combined forces ratio =
20.0
2 * 168.0
+ [
61.1
91.1
+ [
+
8.8
34.9
] = 0.98
AISC Eq. H1-1b
< 1.0
OK