RULE 129 SECTION 1 & 2 JUDICIAL NOTICE
1. State Prosecutors vs. Muro 236 S 505
2. People vs. Reangores 334 S 624
3. People vs. Tundag 324 S 704
RULE 4 SECTION 4 - JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS
1. Aguerra vs. Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. 271 S 1
2. Philamgen vs. CA 296 S 171
3. Alano vs. CA 283 S 269
4. People vs. Solayao 262 SCRA 255
RULE 130 SECTION 1 OBJECT AS EVIDENCE
1. People vs. Manalo 219 S 656
2. People vs. Malimit - 264 S 167
3. People vs. Jumamoy 221 S 333
4. People vs. Flores 328 S 461
RULE 130 SECTION 3 BEST EVIDENCE RULE
1. Borje vs. Sandiganbayan 125 S 736
2. Widora vs. CA 212 S 360
3. People vs. Tandoy 192 S 28
4. Security Bank & Trust Co. vs. Triumphs Lumber & Construction Corp. 301 S
537
RULE 130 Section 9 PAROL EVIDENCE RULE
1. Inciong vs. CA 257 S 578
2. National Irrigation Administration vs. GAMIT - 215 S 436
3. Gurango vs. IAC 215 S 332
4. CKH Industrial & Development Corp. vs. CA 272 S 333
RULE 130 SECTION 20 WITNESSES
1. People vs. Tarreo 218 S 494
2. People vs. Balanon 233 S 679
3. People vs. Baid 336 S 656
4. People vs. CA 349 S 451
RULE 130 SECTION 22 DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF MARRIAGE
1. Ordoo vs. Daquigan 62 S 270
2. People vs. Castaeda Jr. 88 S 562
3. People vs. Francisco 78 P 694
4. Arroyo vs. CA - 203 S 270
RULE 130 SECTION 24 DISQUALIFICATION BY RESON OF PRIVVILEDGE
COMMUNICATION
COMMUNICATION
1. US vs. Antipolo 27 P 726
2. Lim vs. CA 214 S 273
3. Krolen vs. CA 233 S 146
4. Fortich vs. CA 268 S 153
RULE 130 SECTION 23 DEAD MAN STATUTE RULE
1. Razon vs. IAC 207 S 234
RULE 130 SECTION 26 - ADMISSION OF A PARTY
1. People vs. Agustin 240 S 541
2. Tusson vs. CA - 241 S 695
3. People vs. Chua Uy 327 S 335
4. People vs. Cepela 324 S 390
RULE 130 SECTION 27 OFFER OF COMPROMISE NOT ADMISSIBLE
1. People vs. Lase 219 S 584
2. Trabs Pacific Industrial Supplies vs. CA 235 S 494
3. People vs. Buemio 265 S 582
4. people vs. Amisca 277 S 215
RULE 130 SECTION 30 ADMISSION BY SILENCE
1. US vs. Bay 27 P 485
2. People vs. Condemna 23 S 910
3. People vs. Provo 37 S 19
4. People vs. Puesca 87 S 130
RULE 130 SECTION 32 CONFESSION
1. People vs. Agustin 240 S 541
2. People vs. Salazar 266 S 607
3. People vs. Tiozon 198 S 236
4. People vs. Tujon 215 S 559
RULE 130 Section 36- HEARSAY RULE
1. People vs. Valero 112 S 650
2. People vs. Damaso - 212 S 547
3. Agcaoli vs. Molina 249 S 482
4. Peole vs. Briosa 37 S 235
RULE 130 Section 37 DYING DECLARATION
1. People vs. De Joya 203 S 343
2. People vs. During 215 S 469
3. People vs. Amaca 277 S 215
4. US vs. Antipolo 27 P 726
RULE 130 Section 42 PART OF THE REG GESTAE
1. People vs. Tiozon 198 S 236
2. People vs. Naranja 108 P 781
3. People vs. Palomones 336 S 80
1. People vs. Tiozon 198 S 236
2. People vs. Naranja 108 P 781
3. People vs. Palomones 336 S 80
4. People vs. Raquel 265 S 248
RULE 130 Section 44 ENTRIES IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
1. People vs. Bernaldez 294 S 317
2. People vs. Divina 221 S 209
3. People vs. leones 117 S 382
4. People vs. Crisostomo 160 S 47
5. Ferin vs. CA 325 S 25
RULE 130 Section 47 TESTIMONY OR DEPOSITION AT FORMER
PROCEEDING
1. De Leon vs. People 210 S 151
RULE 130 Section 48 OPINION RULE
1. Lim vs. CA 214 S 273
2. People vs. Galleno 291 S 761
RULE 130 Section 49 OPINION OF EXPERT WITNESS
1. Cebu Shipyard & Engineering Works, Inc. vs. William Lines, Inc.
306 S 762
RULE 131 Section 1 BURDEN OF PROOF
1. Jimenez vs. NLRC 256 S 84
2. Mallari vs. CA 265 S 456
RULE 131 Section 2 CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTIONS
1. Lozano vs. De Los Santos 274 S 452
2. SEAFDEC vs. NLRC 206 S 283
3. Salen vs. Dinglasan 198 S 623
4. LRT vs. Natividad 397 S 75
5. Del San Transport Lines vs. C&A Const. Inc. 412 S 524
RULE 132 Section 3 DISPUTABLE PRESUMPTIONS
1. People vs. De Guzman 229 S 795
2. People vs. Navajo 220 S 524
3. People vs. Castaeda 252 S 247
4. People vs. Simbulan 214 S 537
5. People vs. Balluda 318 S 503
6. Feria vs. CA 325 S 525
RULE 132 Section 2 PROCEEDINGS TO BE RECORDED
1. People vs. Obingayon 55 S 465
2. Duminaco vs. CA 122 S 218
3. Tabuena vs. Sandiganbayan 268 S 332
RULE 132 Section 3 RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF A WITNESS (IN
RELATION TO THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION)
RELATION TO THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION)
1. People vs. Salveron 228 S 92
2. People vs. Malimit 264 S 167 (supra)
RULE 132 Section 4 ORDER IN THE EXAMINATION OF AN
INDIVIDUAL WITNESS
1. People vs. Salas 143 S 163
2. Bachrach Motors Co. Inc. vs. CIR 86 S 27
3. People vs. Paderno 226 S 810
RULE 132 Section 10 LEADING AND MISLEADING QUESTIONS
1. People vs. Caparas 118 S 68
RULE 132 Section 13 HOW WITNESS IMPEACHED BY EVIDENCE OF
INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS
1. US vs. Baluyot 40 P 385
2. People vs. Relocio 86 S 227
3. People vs. Winston De Guzman 288 S 356
RULE 132 Section 19 CLASSES OF DOCUMENTS
1. Joson vs. Baltazar 194 S 114
2. Sales vs. CA 211 S 858
3. Lucente vs. Evangelista 396 S 627
4. Yturralde vs. Arurin 28 S 407
RULE 132 Section 20 PROOF OF PRIVATE DOCUMENTS
1. Raz vs. IAC 184 S 720
2. Ong vs. People 342 S 372
RULE 132 Section 22 HOW GENUINESS OF HANDWRITING PROVED
1. Layno vs. People 213 S 686
2. Jacob vs. CA 224 S 189
3. Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumph Lumber & Construction
Corp. 301 S 537 (Supra)
4. Filipina Sy vs. CA 330 S 550
RULE 132 Section 23 PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE
1. Dupilas vs. Cabacungan 36 P 254
RULE 132 Section 34 OFFER OF EVIDENCE
1. Catuira vs. CA 236 S 398
1. Catuira vs. CA 236 S 398
2. Vda, De Onate vs. CA 250 S 283
3. Sy vs. CA 330 S 550 (supra)
4. Makasiray vs. People 291 S 154
5. Tuazon vs. CA 241 S 695
6. Rumbaus vs. CA 253 S 78
7. People vs. Barellano 319 S 567
8. People vs. Sanchez 308 S 264
RULE 133
Section 1 PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE, HOW DETERMINED
Section 2 PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
1. People vs. Mejia 55 S 453
2. People vs. Matrimonio 215 S 613
3. People vs. Gondora 265 S 408
4. People vs. Cabiles 248 S 207
5. People vs. Lorenzo 240 S 269
6. People vs. Rigodon 238 S 27
7. Tin vs. People 362 S 594
RULE 133 Section 4 CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE WHEN SUFFICIENT
1. People vs. Salvarne 270 S 766
2. People vs. Malimit 264 S 167 (supra)
3. People vs. Ramon 240 S 191
4. People vs. Adoa 239 S 67
RULE 133 Section 5 SUBSTANCIAL EVIDENCE
1. Fabella vs. CA 282 S 256
2. PAL vs. NLRC 263 S 638
3. Villaflor vs. CA 280 S 297
4. Ang Tihoy vs. CIR 69 P 635
2
