0% found this document useful (0 votes)
665 views42 pages

Ash Handling Systems

The document discusses options for eliminating fly ash and bottom ash from ash ponds, including vacuum, pressure, and mechanical conveying systems. It provides details on several system types and compares their costs, installation requirements, maintenance needs, and other factors. The analysis shows that different systems may be best depending on a plant's specific criteria and needs.

Uploaded by

Suman Dey
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
665 views42 pages

Ash Handling Systems

The document discusses options for eliminating fly ash and bottom ash from ash ponds, including vacuum, pressure, and mechanical conveying systems. It provides details on several system types and compares their costs, installation requirements, maintenance needs, and other factors. The analysis shows that different systems may be best depending on a plant's specific criteria and needs.

Uploaded by

Suman Dey
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

2009 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference - May 4-7, 2009 in Lexington, KY, USA

http://ww.flyash.info/

DryBottomAshHandling
Options&NewTechnology
WorldofCoalAshConference2009

EliminationofFlyAshfromAshPonds
Options&Advantages
p
g
VacuumSystemtoSilo
Nochangesunderprecip,usesexistingintakes
N h
d
i
i ti i t k
Limitonconveyingcapacityvs.distance

Dilute
DilutePressureSystemtoSilo
Pressure System to Silo
MostPressureSystemsareDry
Vacuum/PressureTransferSystemtoSilo
V
/P
T
f S t
t Sil
Useexistingashintakes
Nolimitonconveyingcapacityanddistance

DensePressuretoSilo
Canreplacevacuumsystem
Limitonconveyingcapacityanddistance

DryFlyAshConveying
Dilute/DenseFlowRegimes
g

DryFlyAshConveying
Capacityvs.Distance
p y

DryFlyAshConveying
VacuumSystemtoSilo
y

DryFlyAshConveying
PressureSystem
y
MostAlreadyDry
y y

DryFlyAshConveying
Vacuum/PressureTransferStation

DryFlyAshConveying
Vacuum/PressureTransferStation

DryFlyAshConveying
EnclosedVacuum/PressureTransferStation

DryFlyAshConveying
Vacuum/PressureTransferSilo

DryFlyAshConveying
Vacuum/PressureTransferSiloInstallation

DryFlyAshConveying
PressureFeedersUnderTransferSilo

DryFlyAshConveying
PressureFeedersUnderTransferSilo

DryFlyAshConveying
PressureLinetoRemoteSilo

DryFlyAsh
DensePhasePressure CanReplaceVacuumSystem
p
y

15

DryBottomAshConveying

1940s1950s:UCCdevelops
drybottomashconveying
withNUVEYOR pneumatic
ashconveyingsystems,
g
gravitydischargeashpit
y
g
p
hoppers.
RenditionofaUCCNUVEYORsystemfora
utilityboiler,includinggravitydischarge
ashpithopper.

DryBottomAshConveying
Temperature
p

DryBottomAshConveying
SlagFalls
g

EliminationofBottomAshfromAshPonds
Options&Advantages
p
g
ReCirculatingWaterSystem
Nochangesunderboiler,usesexistinghopper
No changes under boiler uses existing hopper
Switchtonewsystemin3dayoutage

SubmergedFlightConveyor
g
g
y
SFC
Mosteconomicalchoice
Simplesolutionifspaceisavailable

DryHopperPneumaticConveying
i C
i
PAX
Nowater,returnsheatbacktoboiler
Easiest100%dryoptiontogetoutofboilerbuilding

VibratoryConveying VAX
Nowater,returnsthemostheatbacktoboiler
Continuousremovalofbottomash

DryBottomAsh ReCirculationSystem

DryBottomAsh ReCirculationSystem

DryBottomAsh SFC

DryBottomAsh SFC

DryBottomAsh SFC

DryBottomAsh PAXSystem

DryBottomAsh PAXSystem

DryBottomAsh VAX

DryBottomAsh VAX

DryBottomAsh VAX

DryBottomAsh
FeaturesComparison
p

ReCircTanks

SFC

PAX

VAX

DesignandmaterialCosts

$5M

$2M

$3.5M

$3.5M

InstallationCost

$4.5M

$1.5M

$3.5M

$2.5M

PreOutageConstruction
Duration

6 months
6months

2 months
2months

2 months
2months

2 months
2months

OutageConstruction

3days

3weeks

8weeks

6weeks

OutageStartUp

2 3days

1 2days

3 4days

1 2days

9months

9months 12months 12months

Costs

OutageRequirement

LeadTime

DryBottomAsh
FeaturesComparison
p

Boiler&YardSpace

MultipleUnitsynergies

Re Circ Tanks
ReCircTanks

SFC
SFC

PAX
PAX

VAX
VAX

YardPipingCorridor

Yes

No

Yes

No

BoilerHouseExitCorridor
forMechanicalConveyor

No

Yes

No

Yes

YardFootPrint

6500sqft

StorageBinServesmore
Storage
Bin Serves more
thanoneboiler

Yes

1500sqft 1500sqft 1000sqft

No

Yes

No

DryBottomAsh
FeaturesComparison
p

OperationsandMaintenance
O
ti
dM i t
Costs

RecircTanks

SFC

PAX

VAX

HighPressurePumps

Yes

No

No

No

Vacuum/Pressure
Blowers

No

No

Yes

No

Refractory

Yes existing

Usually
none

Yes

Usually
none

No

Yes
Yes
Secondary
Conveyor

Yes(3)

Yes(1)

Yes

No

ConveyorChain
Replacement

Crushers
Conveying
Conveying
pipeline/valves

No

Yes

Yes existing Usually


(3)
none
Yes

No

DryBottomAsh
FeaturesComparison
p

Re Circ Tanks
ReCircTanks

SFC
SFC

PAX
PAX

VAX
VAX

Makeupwater

100gpm

50gpm

None

None

Cooling Water
CoolingWater

400 gpm
400gpm

400 gpm
400gpm

None

None

ConveyingWater
(recirculating)

2500gpm

None

None

None

Pumps

600HP

50HP

None

None

Blowers/Fans

None

None

200 HP
200HP

50 HP
50HP

MechanicalDrives

50HP

100HP

50HP

75HP

WaterConsumption

Power Consumption
PowerConsumption

DryBottomAshDecisionAnalysis

Technology Alternatives
1 = Worst, 5 = Best

Scale 1-5

Criteria for Determing Technology Selection

WT

Re-Circ
System

SFC

PAX

SC Total SC Total SC Total

VAX

SC

Total

Water Usage/Availability

Outage Time Available

Total Installed Cost

Operation & Maintenance Cost

Power Consumption

Boiler House Corridor Availability

Multiple Unit Synergies

Weighted Total Score

DecisionAnalysisFavorsReCirculationSystem

Technology Alternatives
1 = Worst, 5 = Best

Scale 1-5

Criteria for Determing


g Technology
gy Selection

WT

Re-Circ
System

SC Total

SFC

PAX

SC Total

SC Total

VAX

SC Total

Water Usage/Availability

10

10

Outage Time Available

25

20

10

15

Total Installed Cost

10

Operation & Maintenance Cost

10

Power Consumption

10

Boiler House Corridor Availability

25

15

25

15

Multiple Unit Synergies

25

10

20

10

Weighted Total Score

87

79

81

74

DecisionAnalysisFavorsSFCSystem

Technology Alternatives
1 = Worst, 5 = Best

Scale 1-5

Criteria for Determing Technology Selection

WT

Re-Circ
System

SC Total

SFC

PAX

SC Total

SC Total

VAX

SC Total

Water Usage/Availability

12

20

20

Outage Time Available

25

20

10

15

Total Installed Cost

20

12

12

Operation & Maintenance Cost

15

12

Power Consumption

10

Boiler House
Ho se Corridor A
Availability
ailabilit

Multiple Unit Synergies

Weighted Total Score

55

80

64

74

DecisionAnalysisFavorsPAXSystem

Technology Alternatives
1 = Worst, 5 = Best

Scale 1-5

Criteria for Determing


g Technology
gy Selection

WT

Re-Circ
System

SC Total

SFC

PAX

SC Total

SC Total

VAX

SC Total

Water Usage/Availability

10

15

25

25

Outage Time Available

T t l Installed
Total
I t ll d Cost
C t

15

Operation & Maintenance Cost

15

12

Power Consumption

12

15

Boiler House Corridor Availability

25

15

25

15

Multiple Unit Synergies

25

10

20

10

Weighted Total Score

77

86

96

89

DecisionAnalysisFavorsVAXSystem

T h l
Technology
Alternatives
Alt
ti
1 = Worst, 5 = Best

Scale 1-5

Criteria for Determing Technology Selection

WT

Re-Circ
System

SC Total

SFC

PAX

SC Total

SC Total

VAX

SC Total

Water Usage/Availability

10

15

25

25

Outage Time Available

Total Installed Cost

15

Operation & Maintenance Cost

15

12

Power Consumption

20

10

25

Boiler House Corridor Availability

10

10

Multiple Unit Synergies

Weighted Total Score

44

77

69

82

PreAssemblyOptions

PreAssemblyOptions

PreAssemblyOptions

ThanksforListening!

Q
Questions?

You might also like