Layout till This Point
Coordinating facilities planning with
Chapter 6 other organizational units
Facility requirements a product design,
process design, schedule design
Layout Planning Models Activity relationships and space
requirements
Personnel requirements
Basic Layout Types Layout Procedures
Fixed product layouts Construction type
the workstations are brought to the material develop a new layout “from scratch”
Product layouts
Improvement type
based on the processing sequence
generate layout alternatives based on an
Group layout; Product family layout
existing layout
high degree of intradepartmental flow
Process layout
high degree of interdepartmental flow
3 4
Apple’s Plant Layout Procedure Apple’s Plant Layout Procedure
Procure the basic data Determine storage requirements
Analyze the basic data Plan service and auxiliary activities
Design the procedure process Determine space requirements
Plan the material flow pattern Allocate activities to total space
Consider building types
Consider the general material handling plan
Construct master layout
Calculate equipment requirements
Evaluate, adjust, and check the layout with the
Plan individual workstations appropriate persons
Select specific material handling equipment Obtain approvals
Coordinate groups of related operations Install the layout
Design activity interrelationships Follow up on implementation of the layout
5 6
1
Reed’s Plant Layout Procedure Layout Planning Chart
Analyze the product or products to be produced
Determine the process required to manufacture the
Flow process, including operations,
product transportation, storage, and inspections
Prepare layout planning charts
Standard times for each operation
Determine workstations
Analyze storage area requirements Machine selection and balance
Establish minimum aisle widths
Establish office requirements Manpower selection and balance
Consider personnel facilities and services Material handling requirements
Survey plant services
Provide for future expansion
7 8
Muther’s
Systematic Layout
Planning (SLP)
Procedure
9 10
Space Relationship Diagram
Relationship Diagram
11 12
2
Alternative Block Layout Algorithmic Approaches
The relative placement of departments on the
basis of their “closeness ratings” or “material
flow intensities” is one that can be reduced to
an algorithmic process.
Algorithm classification
Type of input data
qualitative “flow” data (relationship chart)
quantitative flow matrix (from-to chart); numerical
values of closing rating ~ mostly used
both qualitative and quantitative (BLOCPLAN, used one
at a time)
13 14
Algorithm Classification Algorithm Classification
Objective function Normalized adjacency score (efficiency rating)
“distance-based”: Minimizing the sum of flows times
distances (from-to chart) - QAP
Normalized adjacency score for an X
relationship
“adjacency-based”: maximizing an adjacency score
(relationship chart)
15 16
Algorithm Classification
Layout representation
discrete (grid size<->computational
burden)
continuous (rectangular building and
department shapes)
department cannot be split
Any grid assigned to a department must be
“reachable” form any other such grid
enclosed void (atrium)
17 18
3
Relationship Diagramming for
Algorithm Classification New Layouts
Layout improvement Step 1. Select the first department to enter the layout
- select the department with the greatest # of “A”
start with an initial layout
Step 2. Select the second department to enter the
improve through incremental changes layout – have an “A” with the 1st department
Layout construction Step 3. Select the third department to enter the layout
develop a layout from scratch - AA, AE, AI, A*, EE, EI, E*, II, I*
given dimension (basic assumption in the Step 4. Determine the fourth department to enter the
book) layout - AAA, AAE, AAI, AA*, AEE, AEI
Step n. Department n is placed according to the rules
“green field”: site plan
described in Steps 3 and 4
19 20
Pairwise Exchange Method for
Layout Improvement Example
Minimize the total cost of transporting Four departments with equal size
materials among all departments in a Material flow matrix
facility
Rectilinear distance, from centroid to
centroid
Distance matrix
21 22
Pairwise Exchange Method
Remark
does not guarantee to yield the optimal
solution: local optimality
may cycle back to one alternative
symmetric layout may occur
can be accomplished only if the
department pair considered are of equal
size or if they share a common border
23 24
4
Graph-Based Construction Adjacency graphs for
Method for New Layouts alternative block layouts
It is often used with an adjacency-
based objective.
1960s Krejcirik; 1970s Seppanen and
Moore; similar to Muther’s SLP
25 26
Graph-Based Construction
Method for New Layouts
The score does not account for distance, nor
does it account for relationships other than
those between adjacent departments
Dimensional specifications of departments are
not considered; length of common boundaries
between adjacent departments are not
considered
The arcs do not intersect (planarity; 共平面)
The score is very sensitive to the assignment
of weights
27 28
Graph-Based Construction
Method for New Layouts
1. Select the department pair with the largest
weight
2. Select the third department that has the
largest sum of the weights with the first two
departments to enter
3. Pick the fourth department to enter on a face
(a bounded region of a graph) of the graph
4. Determine an adjacency graph ->
reconstruct a corresponding block layout
29 30
5
Computer-Aided Layout
Techniques
31 32
Evaluation and Interchange in
CRAFT Dummy Departments
Interchanges are only possible if
Depts. are the same size; or
May be used to
Adjacent (a necessary but not sufficient condition) Fill building irregularities
Estimate the potential saving for an
interchange Represent obstacles or unusable areas in
For evaluation only the centroids are swapped the facility (fixed location)
(error?)
Select the best among all possible Represent extra space in the facility
interchanges
Aid in evaluating aisle locations in the final
Actually perform the interchange
Path-dependent heuristic (locally optimal) layout
Try different initial solutions or exchange options
the error in estimated cost may go either
direction 33 34
Example 6.1
35 36
6
37 38
39 40
The Impact of Change Flexibility
Plant layout situations Can be achieved by
Changes in the design of existing product, utilizing modular office equipment,
the introduction of new products workstations, and material handling
equipment
Changes in the processing sequence for
installing general purpose production
existing products equipment
Changes in production quantities and utilizing a grid-based utility and services
schedules - the need for capacity changes system
Changes in production strategies using modular construction
41 42
7
Flexible Layout
43