0% found this document useful (0 votes)
89 views20 pages

Equity Scheme Performance Evaluation Report

The document provides an analysis of the performance of various equity focused mutual funds over a 5 year period from July 2009 to July 2014. It analyzes funds grouped into four broad categories: large cap, mid and small cap, infrastructure, and diversified. For each category, key performance metrics of selected funds are compared against category and market benchmarks using analytical tools in the Finvasia software. Overall, the analysis finds that ICICI Prudential focused bluechip fund was the best performing large cap fund, with a 121% return over the period, while DSP Blackrock top 100 fund saw the lowest gains. A similar detailed analysis is provided for the other categories as well.

Uploaded by

tush991
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
89 views20 pages

Equity Scheme Performance Evaluation Report

The document provides an analysis of the performance of various equity focused mutual funds over a 5 year period from July 2009 to July 2014. It analyzes funds grouped into four broad categories: large cap, mid and small cap, infrastructure, and diversified. For each category, key performance metrics of selected funds are compared against category and market benchmarks using analytical tools in the Finvasia software. Overall, the analysis finds that ICICI Prudential focused bluechip fund was the best performing large cap fund, with a 121% return over the period, while DSP Blackrock top 100 fund saw the lowest gains. A similar detailed analysis is provided for the other categories as well.

Uploaded by

tush991
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Draft report: Measuring and evaluating performance of focus equity

schemes
Measuring and evaluating performance of focus equity Schemes
Identifying and classifying equity schemes by category/investment objectives
Comparing these schemes within specific category and with benchmark on various parameters
Attribution analysis of all the above identified schemes
Preparing a report with the observations and conclusions basis the findings from above
Report
1) Objectives( defne broader objective of the report as specifed in the earlier mail)
-Then divide into sub categories viz Large ap !unds"#iversifed !unds etc
$) Tools used for comparison( %ention the !act that &ou are using '(L)* *+press soft,are and
mention the name of the specifc performance comparison tool-sa& bar chart"ratio anal&sis table
etc)
-) %ention the choice list of schemes in each categor&
.) /nsert the chart0table 0graph for comparison in the anal&sis of each categor&12elo, each graph or
table "mention the observations
and inference0conclusion
3) (t the end of each chapter sa& large cap"midcap etc "mention the overall conclusion
Introduction
The Mutual Funds Industry in India, as of July 2014, has approximately 10 lakh Crore Assets under Manaement
!AMFI, 2014"# $ut of this, e%uity&oriented s'hemes a'ross funds 'ommand total A(M of )s 2#2 lakh Crore, or
approximately 22*# The purpose of this report is to o+,e'ti-ely measure and e-aluate the performan'e of sele'ted
e%uity fo'used s'hemes o-er the last fi-e years# The s'hemes are rouped and analy.ed /ith peers of the same asset
'lass, in-estment pattern and in-estment o+,e'ti-e in order to deri-e a +etter pi'ture of their o-erall performan'e#
Furthermore, this report /ill attempt to analy.e the se'tor /ise +reakdo/n of 012 3la'k)o'k promoted funds and link
them to any ma,or 'hanes in performan'e -is&4&-is the appli'a+le peer roup and index#
Selection and Analysis Criteria
The funds sele'ted fall into four +road in-estment 'ateories5 6are Cap, Mid 7 1mall Cap, Infrastru'ture and
0i-ersified# The funds 'hosen for ea'h 'ateory /ere sele'ted /ith t/o 'riteria5 A(M -alue and ae# The funds short&
listed are 'onse%uently +oth the larest and most popular funds as /ell as some of the most -enera+le# The funds are
'ompared to the 819 +en'hmark, C8: 8IFT;, as /ell as a 'ateory appropriate +en'hmark to +etter refle't their
performan'e 'ompared to the o-erall market as /ell as /ithin their spe'ifi' 'ateory#
The timeframe sele'ted, < years from July 200= to July 2014, allo/s for a lon&term performan'e analysis# It also
'oin'ides rouhly /ith the term of the pre-ious o-ernment, the ele'tion of the ne/ one and the tumultuous times in
+et/een, thus allo/in for some interestin o+ser-ations# The tool used to a''umulate the data and 'ompare the
performan'e is the F9 Analyti's soft/are usin the Indian Mutual >alue )esear'h 0ata+ase#
Method5
The data /ill +e analy.ed usin -arious parameters to i-e a 'omprehensi-e pi'ture of the funds respe'ti-e
performan'es# The follo/in tools /ill +e used5
Performance Tables are the most +asi' indi'ation of the funds performan'es in the i-en timeframe# The raphi'al
representation of the funds performan'es 'an +e 'ompared easily as /ell as the o-erall rise in the -alue of the fund in
the period taken# Rolling Charts paint a more a''urate and pre'ise pi'ture of the a'tual performan'e of the funds +y
a-erain returns on a month&to&month +asis# Bar Charts ela+orate on this +y usin the rollin 12&month return to
-isally depi't the indi-idual funds performan'e e-ery month# Scatter Charts hihliht the )isk -s# )eturn of ea'h of
the funds# SIP Charts indi'ate the returns that a systemati' in-estment plan that starts out /ith )s <000 and in-ests )s
<000 e-ery month /ould enerate# The Performance Table ela+orates on the performan'e 'hart +y i-in the total
)$I from -arious time periods to date# Ratio Tables 'ontain key information and ratios that i-e a +roader perspe'ti-e
on the funds# The Holdings Comparison details the -arious se'urities that ea'h fund holds# Finally, the Correlation
Table lists the 'orrelation +et/een the listed funds and the respe'ti-e indi'es#
Furthermore, the funds promoted +y 012 3la'k)o'k /ill +e analy.ed further usin the histori'al +reakdo/n of the
holdins /hi'h may 'ast some liht on the se'toral 'ontri+utions to the funds performan'e#
6are Cap
This report /ill analy.e < ma,or funds in the 6are Cap 'ateory, namely, A" ICICI 2rudential Fo'used 3lue'hip
9%uity Fund, 3" (TI $pportunities Fund, C" ?0FC Top 200 Fund, 0" Franklin Templeton Franklin India 3lue'hip
Fund and 9" 012 3la'k)o'k Top 100 9%uity Fund# The +en'hmarks used for 'omparision are the 819 C8: 8IFT;
and the 819 C8: 100#
2erforman'e Chart5
The performan'e 'hart paints a positi-e pi'ture for all the s'hemes 'on'erned as /ell as the t/o indi'es# 2rima fa'ie,
there seems to +e a stron relation +et/een the funds and the indi'es, due to the o-er/helmin representation of 6are
Cap sto'ks in the 8IFT; index# The eneral trends in this raph indi'ate that the funds sa/ a ro'ky rise in -alue until
the third %uarter of a''ountin year 2010&11 !hen'eforth referred to as simply @yearA unless spe'ified other/ise", after
/hi'h there is a steady do/n/ard trend until Jan A12# That month sa/ a sharp up ti'k /hi'h remained steady for a fe/
months until a steady rise in fund performan'e until May A14# May A14 sa/ a massi-e in'rease in -alue for funds as
/ell as the indi'es from a rane of 4<&=0* to an impressi-e 12B&C0* in a matter of /eeks, possi+ly due to the massi-e
ele'toral -i'tory +y a 8arendra Modi&led 80A# The funds ha-e 'ontinued to reister steadily risin ains sin'e then#
An analysis of the indi-idual funds re-eals that ICICI 2rudential has 'onsistently +een the +est performin fund for
nearly the entire period, /ith the final )$I at 121* in July @14, as opposed to a D0&D<* ain for the t/o +en'hmark
indi'es# (TI also performs impressi-ely reisterin an in'rease of 111* o-er < years# ?0FC, /hile sustainin a
medio're performan'e from Jan A12 on/ards, reistered the sharpest rise of any fund in May A14, /ith a 40* in'rease#
2urely in terms of total )$I, 012 3la'k)o'k has +een the /orst performin fund amonst the < for the < year period#
)ollin Chart
The rollin 'hart sheds some more liht on the relati-e performan'e of the 'ompanies# It is adfa
3ar Chart
1'atter Chart
1I2 Chart
2erforman'e Ta+le
)atio Ta+le
?oldins Comparison
!Appendix A"
Correlation Ta+le
Name
DSP
BlackRock -
Top 100
Equity
Regular Gth
TR(RO! i"
N
#ra"kli"
Templeto" -
#ra"kli" "$ia
Bluechip Gth
TR(RO! i"
N
%D#& -
Top '00
Gth
TR(RO! i"
N
&&
Pru$e"tial -
#ocu(e$
Bluechip
Equity
Regular Gth
TR(RO! i"
N
NSE &N)
100
TR(RO! i"
N
NSE &N)
N#T*
TR(RO! i"
N
+T -
Opportu"itie(
Gth TR(RO! i"
N
DSP BlackRock
Top 100 Equity
Regular Gth
TR(RO! i" N
0,-. 0,-. 0,-/ 0,-. 0,-. 0,-/
#ra"kli"
Templeto"
#ra"kli" "$ia
Bluechip Gth
TR(RO! i" N
0,-. 0,-0 0,-0 0,-1 0,-0 0,-/
%D#& Top '00
Gth TR(RO! i"
N
0,-. 0,-0 0,-0 0,-0 0,-/ 0,-2
&& Pru$e"tial
#ocu(e$
Bluechip Equity
Regular Gth
TR(RO! i" N
0,-/ 0,-0 0,-0 0,-1 0,-1 0,-/
NSE &N) 100
TR(RO! i" N
0,-. 0,-1 0,-0 0,-1 1,00 0,-/
NSE &N)
N#T* TR(RO!
i" N
0,-. 0,-0 0,-/ 0,-1 1,00 0,-/
+T
Opportu"itie(
Gth TR(RO! i"
N
0,-/ 0,-/ 0,-2 0,-/ 0,-/ 0,-/
Mid and 1mall Cap

2erforman'e Chart
)ollin Chart
3ar Chart
1'atter Eraph
1I2 Chart
2erforman'e Ta+le
)atio Ta+le
?oldin Comparison
!Appendix 3"
Correlation Ta+le
Name
DSP
BlackRock
- Small a"$
3i$ &ap
Regular
Gth
TR(RO! i"
N
#ra"kli"
Templeto"
- #ra"kli"
"$ia Prima
Gth
TR(RO! i"
N
%D#& - 3i$
&ap
Opportu"itie(
Gth TR(RO!
i" N
&&
Pru$e"tial
- 4alue
Di(co5ery
Regular
Gth
TR(RO! i"
N
D#& -
Premier
Equity
Regular
Gth
TR(RO!
i" N
NSE
&N)
3i$cap
TR(RO!
i" N
NSE
&N)
N#T*
TR(RO!
i" N
Relia"ce -
Equity
Opportu"itie(
Ret Gth
TR(RO! i" N
DSP
BlackRock
Small a"$ 3i$
&ap Regular
Gth TR(RO!
i" N
0,-6 0,-. 0,-2 0,-2 0,-/ 0,1' 0,-6
#ra"kli"
Templeto"
#ra"kli" "$ia
Prima Gth
TR(RO! i" N
0,-6 0,-/ 0,-1 0,-6 0,-2 0,1/ 0,-'
%D#& 3i$
&ap
Opportu"itie(
Gth TR(RO!
i" N
0,-. 0,-/ 0,-2 0,-' 0,-. 0,1. 0,-2
&&
Pru$e"tial
4alue
Di(co5ery
Regular Gth
TR(RO! i" N
0,-2 0,-1 0,-2 0,-0 0,-2 0,12 0,-6
D#&
Premier
Equity
Regular Gth
TR(RO! i" N
0,-2 0,-6 0,-' 0,-0 0,-1 0,1' 0,-1
NSE &N)
3i$cap
TR(RO! i" N
0,-/ 0,-2 0,-. 0,-2 0,-1 0,10 0,-2
NSE &N)
N#T*
TR(RO! i" N
0,1' 0,1/ 0,1. 0,12 0,1' 0,10 0,-1
Relia"ce
Equity
Opportu"itie(
Ret Gth
TR(RO! i" N
0,-6 0,-' 0,-2 0,-6 0,-1 0,-2 0,-1
Infrastru'ture
2erforman'e Chart
)ollin Chart
3ar Chart
1'atter Chart
1I2 Chart
2erforman'e Ta+le
)atio Ta+le

You might also like