0% found this document useful (0 votes)
358 views4 pages

Consti 2 Midterms Transcript

This document contains a transcript from a constitutional law class discussing due process under Section 1, Article III of the Philippine Constitution. The key points discussed are: 1) Due process has both substantive and procedural aspects, with substantive focusing on the validity of laws and procedural on enforcement. 2) While the Constitution does not define due process, the framers intentionally left it undefined to allow courts flexibility in different situations. 3) Requirements of due process in judicial proceedings include an impartial court with proper jurisdiction, notice and an opportunity to be heard. 4) There are some exceptions where due process is not required such as preventive suspensions of public officials or issuance of temporary restraining orders.

Uploaded by

Katie Go
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
358 views4 pages

Consti 2 Midterms Transcript

This document contains a transcript from a constitutional law class discussing due process under Section 1, Article III of the Philippine Constitution. The key points discussed are: 1) Due process has both substantive and procedural aspects, with substantive focusing on the validity of laws and procedural on enforcement. 2) While the Constitution does not define due process, the framers intentionally left it undefined to allow courts flexibility in different situations. 3) Requirements of due process in judicial proceedings include an impartial court with proper jurisdiction, notice and an opportunity to be heard. 4) There are some exceptions where due process is not required such as preventive suspensions of public officials or issuance of temporary restraining orders.

Uploaded by

Katie Go
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Consti 2 Midterm Transcript Atty. Galeon [Type text] Garcy Kate Go LLB 1 eh!

"
#$% &'(C%)) CLA$)%
)ection 1
*o person shall +e depri,ed o- li-e li+erty and property
.itho/t d/e process o- la.0 nor shall the person +e denied
e1/al protection o- the la..
2/stice Cr/34 The concept o- #/e &rocess .as exec/ted +y
God at the Garden o- %den0 a-ter Adam and %,e ate the
-or+idden -r/it0 s/mmoned them to a hearin5 altho/5h he
already 6ne. .hat happened +/t still a--orded them a chance
to explain themsel,es. God instit/ted the concept o- d/e
process.
Concept or ori5in in %n5land0 as enshrined Ma5nacarta0
centered mainly on the proced/ral aspects o- d/e process0
thr/st is centered more on the implementation o- the la..
Concept .as exported to the $) s/ch that it ass/mes t.o
aspects4
1. )/+stanti,e aspect
2. &roced/ral aspect
7hat is d/e process8
9- .e exam the constit/tions0 yo/ cannot -ind any
partic/lar pro,ision on .hat d/e process is.
There is no partic/lar de-inition o- the term d/e process.
9s this the res/lt o- o,ersi5ht o- the -ramers o- the
constit/tion8 (r is this intentional8
:ramers intended not to de-ine +eca/se there .ill +e a
tendency that the co/rts .ill +e +o/nd +y that de-inition.
The omission to de-ine the term d/e process0 .as
intentional0 to 5i,e the co/rt eno/5h room to apply the
principle o- d/e process 5i,en the pec/liar circ/mstances
pertainin5 in each sit/ation.
*ot the res/lt o- an omission.
7e can only descri+e .hat d/e process is +eca/se there is no
exact de-inition.
9n one case0 -ormer 2/stice :ernando descri+ed d/e process
as re-errin5 ;to the responsiveness to the supremacy of
reason and obedience to the dictates of justice.< =e merely
descri+ed .hat the term is all a+o/t.
2/stice :ran6-/rter4 the embodiment of the supporting idea
of burden?
)ection 1 Art
*o person shall +e depri,ed o- li-e0 li+erty or property
.itho/t d/e process o- la....
#e-inition o- terms /nder section 1 article
&erson4
*at/ral persons li6e h/man +ein5s0 protection incl/des
protection o- property0 indi,id/al -reedom0 li-e or animal
existence0 not only :ilipino Citi3ens +/t also -orei5ners
inside o/r territorial >/risdiction and
2/ridical persons li6e corporations or partnerships +/t
only limited to the protection o- property ri5hts.
#epri,ation4
9- property is ta6en a.ay0 there is depri,ation o- property
ri5ht
9- the li-e is ta6en a.ay0 there is depri,ation o- the li-e o-
the person
=o. a+o/t i- there is merely an imposition o- a
prohi+ition in the exercise o- ones ri5ht0 .ith respect to
the en>oyment o- the thin50 .o/ld that amo/nt to
depri,ation8 ?%)0 does not only mean act/al
dispossession.
Note: .hat is prohi+ited is depri,ation WITHOUT d/e
process. )ec1 allo.s depri,ation o- li-e0 li+erty or property
PROVIDED that there is o+ser,ance o- d/e process. )imilarly0
i- property is ta6en -or p/+lic /se /pon payment o- >/st
compensation0 depri,ation that is allo.ed0 there is
o+ser,ance o- d/e process @payment o- >/st compensationA
Li-e4
#oes it merely re-er to o/r animal existence8
*ot only re-ers to physical or animal existence0 also
incl/des o/r en>oyment o- God 5i,en -ac/lties. %x. 9- yo/
are 5ood in sin5in50 the state cannot prohi+it yo/ -rom
p/rs/in5 yo/r sin5in5 career.
Li+erty4
Means -reedom
7hat is protected is o/r -reedom to do .hat is ri5ht0 and
not the -reedom to do .hat is .ron5
(ne cannot exercise his ri5ht to the pre>/dice o- others
:reedom o- speech0 .e cannot /se it to the pre>/dice o-
the ri5hts o- others
&roperty4
&ertains to anythin5 that is capa+le o- [Link]
May +e real property @landsA0 personal property @laptopA0
intan5i+le property or tan5i+le property.
=o. a+o/t p/+lic o--ice0 is that protected8 *o0 no one
can claim that a p/+lic o--ice is ,ested .ith a property
ri5ht
License or a -ranchise .o/ld not come /nder the p/r,ie.
o- property. They are mere pri,ile5es.
Consti 2 Midterm Transcript Atty. Galeon [Type text] Garcy Kate Go LLB 1 eh!"
)$B)TA*T9B% A)&%CT
1. )omethin5 to do .ith the intrinsic ,alidity o- the la.
2. :ocal point is not on the en-orcement o- the la..
. Central point o- in1/iry is the existence or a+sence o- a
valid governmental purpose
C. 9- con5ress .o/ld enact a la. then .e can attac6 the
same that it does not enshrine d/e process s/ch that it
does not in,ol,e a lawful su!e"t or the s/+>ect has no
+earin5 on p/+lic interest.
D. :or a la. to +e ,alid4 it m/st ha,e a la.-/l s/+>ect and
im+/ed .ith a la.-/l 5o,ernmental p/rpose.
&'(C%#$'AL A)&%CT
)omethin5 to do .ith the manner +y .hich the la. is
imposed
9mmortal cry o- #emosticles to %/ridiaris4 ;Strike but
hear me first<
Case4
'e-errin5 to the la. .hich proceeds /pon in1/iry and renders
p/nishment a-ter trial
&res/pposes the re1/irement o- noti"e and #earing
As a r/le0 .hen yo/ tal6 a+o/t d/e process0 it has
somethin5 to do .ith notice and hearin5
?not ,s 9AC
)C4 Boid %.( +eca/se it imposed p/nishment @con-iscation o-
cara+aosA .itho/t the +ene-it o- prior hearin5. 9t is a5ainst
concept o- proced/ral d/e process. 9t imposed the
p/nishment .itho/t the +ene-it o- a trial.
$s applied in !udi"ial pro"eedings% due pro"ess would
re&uire t#e e'isten"e of t#e following re&uirements:
1. There sho/ld +e an impartial co/rt or tri+/nal .hich is
clothed .ith the [Link] to determine the matter +e-ore
it.
a. *ot all co/rts can try any crimes0 apportioned
and de-ined +y con5ress itsel-.
+. *o /se i- co/rt is already +iased in -a,o/r o- a
partic/lar party0 m/st not side .ith a partic/lar
party. '/le 1"4 2/d5e may +e inhi+ited -rom
handlin5 a case0 i- the spo/se or child is ha,in5 a
pec/niary interest in the co/rt then the >/d5e
m/st inhi+ited himsel- -rom handlin5 the
partic/lar case.
2. Co/rt sho/ld ac1/ire >/risdiction o- the person o- the
de-endant or o,er the s/+>ect matter o- the action.
a. Ci,il case collection o- s/m o- money0 ho. can
the co/rt ac1/ire >/risdiction o,er the person o-
the de-endant8 9- accion in persona @a--ects the
pri,ate ri5hts o- the partiesA >/risdiction i-
ac1/ired thro/5h s/mmons .hereas de-endants
are re1/ired to [Link] or e,en .itho/t
s/mmons0 the de-endant -iles his [Link] then
he has s/+mitted already to the >/risdiction. 9-
the de-endant -iles a motion to dismiss then he
is not /nder the >/risdiction o- the co/rt.
+. 9- accion quasi in rem @a--ects the property or
ri5ht o- 5eneral p/+licA >/risdiction may +e
ac1/ired thro/5h p/+lication o- [Link] o-
5eneral circ/lation. )/mmons may +e had
thro/5h p/+lication e,en tho/5h respondent
does not recei,e the s/mmons0 a-ter the last
p/+lication o- the s/mmons the co/rt already
ac1/ired >/risdiction o,er the person o- the
de-endant
c. Criminal case ho. can the co/rt ac1/ire
>/risdiction o,er the acc/sed8 As soon as the
acc/sed is placed /nder arrest and not
arrainment. The moment that the acc/sed is
arrested then the co/rt is deemed to ha,e
ac1/ired >/risdiction already o- the person o-
the acc/sed.
. There sho/ld +e an opport/nity to +e heard on the part
o- the de-endant.
a. The co/rt m/st a--ord the parties the
opport/nity to +e heard.
+. Ta6e note that .hat is re1/ired is only an
opportunity to +e heard0 i- a person -etters [Link]
-rom the chance 5i,en to him then his chance to
+e heard is deemed to +e .ai,ed +y him. 9- the
de-endant does not -ile an [Link] then his ri5ht
to +e heard is deemed to +e .ai,ed @did not
a,ail o- his ri5htA
c. 9- a-ter arrai5nment >/mped +ail0 he cannot say
that he .as denied d/e process.
d. Act/al hearin5 is not necessary
e. Trial type hearin5 is not [Link] necessary
@e,idence and cross examinationsA
-. La+or cases trial type hearin5 is not re1/ired0
s/+mission o- ar5/ments is eno/5h0 .hat is
re1/ired is only an opport/nity to +e heard
@5eneral r/leA
5. %xceptions4
i. Case a5ainst p/+lic o--icial0 the person
is placed /nder pre,enti,e s/spension0
,alid e,en .itho/t 5i,en the
opport/nity to +e heard
ii. 9ss/ance o- Temporary 'estrainin5
(rder @&oll/tion ad>/dication +oard4
9ss/ance o- ex parte @e,en +e-ore trial
or hearin5A T('. )ec D '/le DE4 '/les o-
Ci,il &roced/re
iii. Cancellation o- passport o- the person
.ho is so/5ht -or the commission o- an
o--ense
Consti 2 Midterm Transcript Atty. Galeon [Type text] Garcy Kate Go LLB 1 eh!"
i,. 9ss/ance o- a .arrant o- arrest e,en
.itho/t hearin5 the side o- the acc/sed
-irst0 s/ch that i- the in-ormation is
already -iled in co/rt0 >/d5e .ill
e,al/ate the s/--iciency o- e,idence0 i-
so then co/rt may iss/e a .arrant o-
arrest
,. 'estraint or attachment o- property -or
tax delin1/ency is ,alid
,i. Clos/re o- resta/rants that are -o/nd to
+e /nsanitary
,ii. %ntertainment h/+ i- -o/nd to +e
sho.in5 illicit sho.s0 clos/re o-
esta+lishment may +e ,alidly ordered
,iii. */isance per se @Ca+rera ,s Lapid4
-ishpond demolished .hich is a
n/isance per seA
C. There sho/ld +e rendition o- >/d5ement only a-ter trail.
a. )ec 1C Art E4 decisions m/st partic/larly and
distinctly set -orth the -acts o- the case and the
la. on .hich it is +ased
+. #ecisions sho/ld mention the -acts o+tainin5 in
a 5i,en case0 e,idence presented +y the parties0
as .ell as the la. relied /pon +y the co/rt on
.hich the decision is +ased
=o. a+o/t puli"ation re&uirement8 9- the la. is not
p/+lished then can .e say there is ,iolation o- proced/ral
d/e process8
(E)% the la. can +e said to ha,e not ta6en e--ect.
=o. a+o/t appeal8 9s appeal part o- proced/ral d/e
process8 9s it a constit/tional ri5ht8
It depends. As a r/le0 appeal is not a constit/tional 'i5ht0
it is not an inte5ral part o- d/e process. 9t is only a
stat/tory ri5ht0 can +e a,ailed o- only .hen there is a la.
allo.in5 appeal. Con,ersely0 .here the la. does not
allo. yo/ to -ile an appeal0 yo/ cannot in,o6e that yo/
are denied d/e process.
As a r/le0 appeal may +e pro,ided -or +y con5ress /pon
reFenactment o- a la.. B/t cannot pass a la. depri,in5
the appellate >/risdiction o- the )/preme Co/rt
Cases .hich appeal as a matter o- ri5ht4
1. )ec D &ar 2 Art E )C appellate >/risdiction o,er
cases a+o/t the ,alidity o- a la.0 treaty0 national
a5reement or la. or presidential decrees0
orders0 instr/ctions and ordinances
2. Cases in,ol,in5 the ,alidity o- imposin5 tax0
polls0 penalties imposed p/r,ie. o- the
appellate >/risdiction o- the )C
. Appeal to the )/preme Co/rt .here the iss/e is
the >/risdiction o- the trial co/rt0 5/aranteed the
remedy o- appeal.
C. Criminal case and penalty imposed +y the trial
co/rt a-ter hearin5 is recl/sion perpet/a or
hi5her0 acc/sed can appeal
&eople ,s Mateo
)C4 9n a criminal case imposin5 a penalty o- recl/sion
perpet/a or hi5her0 any s/ch appeal sho/ld -irst +e -iled .ith
the Co/rt o- Appeals
D. 7here iss/e is the p/re 1/estion o- la.0 ri5ht o-
appeal may +e had.
&reliminary 9n,esti5ation normally i- yo/ -ile a criminal case0
yo/ need to -ile a criminal complaint then therea-ter the
prosec/tion o--ice concerned shall iss/e a s/+poena to the
respondent directin5 the respondent to -ile his co/nter
a--ida,it .ithin 1! days -rom the s/+poena to5ether .ith the
a--ida,it o- co/nter complaint. A-ter -ilin5 o- complaint0
normally the respondent is a--orded .ith the opport/nity to
s/+mit his [Link] or co/nter o- the complaint.
9s this an inte5ral component o- proced/ral d/e process8
It depends*
9- the penalty imposa+le -or the o--ense is imprisonment
ran5in5 -rom C years 2 months and one day0 then
preliminary in,esti5ation is a matter o- ri5ht. 9- the
o--ense char5e is m/rder .here penalty exceeds C years
2 months one day0 responded sho/ld +e re1/ired to
s/+mit his co/nter a--ida,it at the preliminary
in,esti5ation le,el
7here penalty imposa+le is imprisonment [Link] than C
years 2 months and one day0 preliminary in,esti5ation is
not a matter o- ri5ht. 9- char5e is ,iolation o- B& 220
preliminary in,esti5ation is not a matter o- ri5ht.
&roced/ral d/e process is [Link] applica+le to
Administrati,e &roceedin5s.
As applied0 pres/pposes the -ollo.in5 re1/irements
1. There sho/ld +e an opport/nity o- a hearin5.
9ncl/des the opport/nity to hear one side and to
present oneGs e,idence
2. The co/rt m/st consider the e,idence presented +y
the parties
. %,idence presented m/st +e s/+stantial
C. #ecision o- the co/rt m/st ha,e somethin5 to
s/pport itsel-0 meanin50 it m/st +e +ased on
e,idence0 the -acts o+tainin5 in the case.
D. The co/rt sho/ld consider the e,idence that are
presented d/rin5 the hearin5 or o+tained thro/5h
the records and is made 6no.n to the parties
a. $y ,s )andi5an Bayan
H. Tri+/nal m/st not only rely on the recommendation
o- his s/+ordinates
Consti 2 Midterm Transcript Atty. Galeon [Type text] Garcy Kate Go LLB 1 eh!"
". The tri+/nal m/st render the decision in s/ch a .ay
that the parties may 6no. the iss/es in the case.
%I$AL &'(T%CT9(* CLA$)%
%1/al protection incl/des >/ridical and nat/ral persons
:orei5ners are a--orded e1/al protection o- the la.
The term is not partic/larly de-ined0 intended +y the
-ramers as not to restrict the application and to 5i,e
[Link] to >/d5es on the application. (- e,ery case.
#oes not mean that it sho/ld +e 5i,en /ni,ersal
application0 not applica+le to all persons0 i- so0 it .o/ld
res/lt to ine1/ality.
)er,ed .here there is e1/ality amon5 e1/als.
&ersons or thin5s +elon5in5 to the same class m/st +e treated
ali6e.
7o/ld permit a ,alid classi-ication0 +/t peripheral or
s/per-icial distinction is not a ,alid classi-ication.
9- the distinction is +ased on s/+stantial di--erence
)/+stanti,e 1/ality is not eno/5h0 may +e in,alid i- in the
application there is ine1/ality.
2/stice Cr/30
?e6o ,s hop6ins
%,en i- the la. appears in its -ace ,alid0 i- there is ine1/ality in
the application or en-orcement0 it .ill +e declared as in,alid
&eople ,sBera
Grants to apply -or pro+ation0 +/t in the implementation0 to
pro,ide salary o- the pro+ation o--icer0
sC4 .hile the act may +e ,alid in
#octrine4 s/+stanti,e 1/ality is not eno/5h
Generally0 s/per-icial di--erences is not a ,alid 5ro/nd in s/ch
classi-ication
%xceptionsJ9nstances .here physical di--erences is ,alid
%x. 7omen is prohi+ited in .or6in5 in port areas
'ecr/itment o- mem+ers o- the armed -orces0 re5/lation in
hei5ht .hich m/st +e at least DKC0 ,alid.
May +e re5arded as ,alid
$fter all% e&ual prote"tion of t#e law% re&uirements:
1. Classi-ication m/st +e +ased on s/+stantial distinction
9nchon5 ,s =ernande3
)C4 held ,alidity in prohi+itin5 aliens -rom o.nin5
+/siness
I/into ,s comelec
)c4 there is ,alid di--erentiation +[Link] an elected and
appointed p/+lic o--icial
Appointed o--icers shall +e deemed ipso -acto resi5ned
/pon -ilin5 o- the certi-icate o- candidacy0 may not
en5a5e in any partisan acti,ity. %lected p/+lic o--icials are
not deemed ipso
La5man ,s (choa
)c4 there is no s/+stantial distinction +[Link] arroyo
admin and past administrations.
Cha,e3 ,s &c55
)c4 n/lli-ied compromise a5reement +[Link] heirs o-
Marcos and &CGG
2. Germane to p/rpose o- the la.
There m/st +e rele,ance to the p/rpose o- the le5islation
#/n5lao ,s comelec
La. prohi+itin5 elected p/+lic o--icials .ho already
retired -rom ser,ice0 and +een paid their retirement
+ene-its0 prohi+ited -rom r/nnin5 -or the same position.
. M/st not +e limited to existin5 conditions
(rmoc s/5ar company inc
&artic/lalry sin5led o/t /nder the 1/estioned ordinance0
,iolation o- the e1/al protection o- the la.
L/tes ,s araneta
)pecial assessment tax .as imposed -or the reha+ilitation
o- the .hole s/5ar company.
C. M/st +e e1/ally applied to all mem+ers o- the same class
La5man ,s ochoa
&ast administration o- arroyo .as sin5led o/t
)c4 there sho/ld not +e any -/rther classi-ication amon5
those o- the same class
Leipo ,s hop6ins
)c4 la. is ,alid on its -ace0 +/t in the implementation0 it
allo.s -/rther classi-ication0 there is /n-airness0 or
ar+itrariness in the implementation or application o- the
la.s.
Tatad ,s G' 12CH!
Balidity i- 'AE1E! secD
9mported cr/de oil to the &hilippines tax rate L
9- -inished prod/ct tax imposed is "L
)c4 ,iolati,e o- e1/al protection cla/se to the ne. players
o- those that m/st import -inished prod/ct0 di--erential is
pre>/dicial to the interest o- the ne. players in the oil
ind/stry

You might also like