Spatial Heterogeneity in Resource Distribution Promotes Facultative Sociality in Two Trans-Saharan Migratory Birds
Spatial Heterogeneity in Resource Distribution Promotes Facultative Sociality in Two Trans-Saharan Migratory Birds
Abstract
Background: Migrant populations must cope not only with environmental changes in different biomes, but also with the
continuous constraints imposed by human-induced changes through landscape transformation and resource patchiness.
Theoretical studies suggest that changes in food distribution can promote changes in the social arrangement of individuals
without apparent adaptive value. Empirical research on this subject has only been performed at reduced geographical
scales and/or for single species. However, the relative contribution of food patchiness and predictability, both in space and
time, to abundance and sociality can vary among species, depending on their degree of flexibility.
Methodology/Principal Findings: By means of constrained zero-inflated Generalized Additive Models we analysed the
spatial distribution of two trans-Saharan avian scavengers that breed (Europe) and winter (Africa) sympatrically, in relation
to food availability. In the summering grounds, the probability of finding large numbers of both species increases close to
predictable feeding sources, whereas in the wintering grounds, where food resources are widespread, we did not find such
aggregation patterns, except for the black kite, which aggregated at desert locust outbreaks. The comparison of diets in
both species through stable isotopes revealed that their diets overlapped during summering, but not during wintering.
Conclusions/Significance: Our results suggest that bird sociality at feeding grounds is closely linked to the pattern of spatial
distribution and predictability of trophic resources, which are ultimately induced by human activities. Migrant species can
show adaptive foraging strategies to face changing distribution of food availability in both wintering and summering
quarters. Understanding these effects is a key aspect for predicting the fitness costs and population consequences of
habitat transformations on the viability of endangered migratory species.
Citation: Cortés-Avizanda A, Almaraz P, Carrete M, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Delgado A, et al. (2011) Spatial Heterogeneity in Resource Distribution Promotes
Facultative Sociality in Two Trans-Saharan Migratory Birds. PLoS ONE 6(6): e21016. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021016
Editor: Brock Fenton, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Received February 15, 2011; Accepted May 16, 2011; Published June 22, 2011
Copyright: ß 2011 Cortés-Avizanda et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the project CGL2004-00270 of Spanish Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,
decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
* E-mail: [email protected]
Introduction competitive ability [10–11] and life history traits [12]. Recently,
some authors have suggested that behavioural flexibility, i.e. the
The distribution of key resources affects the spatial structure and ability of individuals to express distinct behaviours in different
the social organization of animal populations [1–3]. Large contexts through innovation and learning processes [13–14],
aggregations of food may relax intraspecific competition, thus might also influence the balance between migratory and resident
promoting the recruitment of individuals without any apparent strategies in environments with sharp seasonal changes [15].
adaptive value [3–5]. Nevertheless, most studies showing this link Obligate migratory species are logically enforced to respond to
between animal distributions and resource availability are variable conditions when moving from summering to wintering
theoretical [4]. When empirical studies were performed, they grounds. Within this scenario, however, the lack of studies tracking
were done at a reduced geographical scale (usually local) and/or the response of migrant organisms to large-scale changes in the
from a monospecific approach [6], so generalizations beyond the degree of heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of food resources
population level (i.e., guilds or communities) are difficult to make. is striking. Recent research suggests that animals, in particular
Migratory species, from invertebrates to vertebrates, develop birds, may develop specific behavioural strategies to compensate
their life cycles in distant biomes, occupying wintering grounds far for the negative effects of environmental variability [16–17]. Thus,
from their breeding areas [7]. Explanations proposed to it seems important to discern whether migrant birds have flexible
understand migration include variation among species in depen- responses to variations in environmental conditions between
dence on temporally and spatially variable food resources [8–9], summering and wintering grounds, such as changes in the
availability of food resources. In addition, this information may be scenarios that these trans-Saharan migrants encounter deter-
useful in understanding large-scale variability in the role of limiting mine parallel or asymmetric responses in their distribution,
factors on the viability of populations of migrant species of abundance and trophic strategies in the two visited biomes. We
conservation concern [18–19]. hypothesize that the spatial distribution of our focal species will
Here, we examined the spatial response of individuals to closely follow that of clumped resources in Europe, whereas in
changes in the distribution and availability of feeding resources sub-Saharan Africa the species will be widespread, only showing
between wintering and summering grounds using as a study aggregated distributions linked to pulsed resources (i.e. the
system two long-lived migratory and facultative scavenger birds, desert locust outbreaks). According to the envisaged intraspecific
the black kite Milvus migrans and the globally endangered differences in spatial aggregated distribution we predict that
Egyptian vulture Neophron percnopterus. These species have trophic overlap between the two species will be higher in their
relatively similar foraging strategies and diets (relying on summering areas compared to wintering ones.
invertebrates and small to medium-sized vertebrates) and,
although being territorial during breeding, they can feed Results
together thus potentially competing for similar resources [20–
21]. Previous studies of our monitored and other western Bird abundance and food resource availability
European populations of Egyptian vultures and black kites Egyptian vultures were detected in 20.6% of the African (n = 85)
indicate that individuals winter in the Sahelian region, between and in 35.2% of the European (n = 141) point counts, while the
Senegal and Mali, as do the rest of the Western Palearctic frequencies of detection of black kites were 34.7% and 50.7%,
populations [22], also overlapping their wintering areas. respectively. Large numbers of both Egyptian vultures and black
Throughout their annual cycles, these species exploit food kites feeding together were detected at predictable European
resources that are strongly affected by human economies [23]. feeding sources (i.e. rubbish dumps and vulture restaurants),
Specifically, in the European summering grounds, birds rely on reaching maximums around 73 and 143 birds, respectively. At
rubbish dumps and supplementary feeding stations (so-called those places, large numbers of another six different species were
vulture restaurants) created after the prohibition of abandon- also found (see Table 1). At the few predictable African feeding
ment of carcasses derived from extensive livestock in the field sources (slaughterhouses), Egyptian vultures were absent and only
[24–25]. In contrast, food availability in the African wintering black kites, reaching a maximum of 500 birds, and two raven
areas is mostly unpredictable, since livestock is under an species used them.
extensive regime and widespread in the field [23], with Availability of food resources was different in summering and
predictable carcasses only available at very few dispersed wintering grounds. In 91.9% (n = 99) of the African transects, we
slaughterhouses in the vicinity of cities. In sub-Saharan biomes, detected some kind of livestock while in Europe only 13% (n = 77)
moreover, there are particular emerging phenomena such as the of transects contained livestock (x2 = 107.144; P,0.0001) (Fig. 1).
outbreaks of desert locusts Schistocerca gregaria. This superabun- When we considered each livestock species separately, we also
dant pulsed resource plays a key role in this arid ecosystem by detected higher frequencies of presence in transects performed in
providing food for some predators that aggregate in their wintering grounds (Africa: sheep and goat = 78.8%; cat-
surroundings [see 26 for details]. Under this framework, we tle = 62.6%; horse = 61.6%; dromedary = 36.4%; Europe: sheep
specifically test whether the variability in the ecological and goat = 11.7%; cattle = 1.3%; N6M exact Test; P = 0.0024).
Table 1. Abundance of scavenger species (measured as the maximum number of individuals observed per day during all surveys)
at European (n = 8) and African (n = 3) predictable feeding sources.
Neophron percnopterus 30 34 40 29 73 10 59 58 18
Milvus migrans 55 41 0 143 100 26 6 1 4 500 300 45
Gyps fulvus 100 20 0 0 35 505 259 357 522
Gypaetus barbatus 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Milvus milvus 11 24 0 3 15 13 1 2 5
Aquila chrysaetos 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Buteo buteo 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ciconia ciconia 0 160 30 0 51 0 0 0 0
Larus cachinnans 0 130 5 0 150 0 0 0 0
Corvus corax 60 97 2 2 109 0 5 8 4
Corvus corone 6 50 0 0 0 0 1 9 0
Corvus ruficollis 55 1 1
Corvus albus 110 20 100
Pica pica 0 3 0 0 1 3 1 4 0
N survey days 6 8 4 2 8 7 12 8 7 3 2 2
Egyptian Vulture
Wintering 78 1.251 (0.810) 20.979 (0.717) 21.320 2 2 2 35.957
Wintering 5.642 (3.251) 24.173 (1.979) 2 6.302 7.718 2 5.189
Wintering 0.600 (0.405) 0.034 (2) 21.895 1.119 8.839 2 81.327
Summering 65 4.195 (2.654) 21.703 (1.194) 28.910 2 2 2 26.841
Summering 20.727 (0.653) 1.639 (0.680) 2 2.97 2 0.021 (0.010)* 2143.762
Summering 1.389 (0.349) 3.271 (2.533) 28.859 8.793 2 20.086 (0.044)* 58.645
Black Kite
Wintering 64 0.301 (0.575) 20.204 (0.186) 26.310 2 2 2 2280.850
Wintering 0.330 (0.458) 20.273 (0.164) 2 8.909 0.006 (0.001) * 2 2446.654
Wintering 0.459 (0.251) 20.002 (2) 28.063 8.256 0.005 (0.001) * 2 222.526
Summering 49 1.052 (0.378) 20.403 (0.197) 27.970 2 2 2 2232.916
Summering 0.357 (0.378) 0.215 (0.231) 2 4.752 2 20.059 (0.013) * 2321.818
Summering 1.408 (0.513) 0.014 (0.243) 27.605 8.183 2 20.119 (0.036) * 297.737
Models were fitted using a COZIGAM with a Poisson link function and measuring the joint effects of distance to the nearest feeding source (distance) and human
presence (slope in Europe and cattle in Africa) on the spatial abundance of Egyptian Vultures and black
kites in their summering (Europe) and wintering (Africa) grounds
Results for each spatial unit are shown for all seasons pooled in a single model. The table shows the proportion of 0 counts (% 0) in the dataset for each spatial unit.
A linear model with a logit link function relates the probability of Zero-inflation (pi) to the covariates through the estimated spatial abundance in the GAM; in this model
a is a constant and d is a parameter measuring the homogeneity of Zero-inflation. The column for the ‘‘Effect of covariates’’ contains the estimated degrees of freedom
(e.d.f) for each non-parametric term in the GAM, unless a parametric (functionally linear) term is selected; in these cases, denoted with the symbol ‘*’, the parametric
estimate is shown instead. Statistically significant terms are shown in bold. Human density was measured as the density of cattle in Africa and the slope of the terrain in
Europe. {The BIC denotes the Bayesian Information Criterion; the model minimizing this quantity is selected as the best descriptor of the dataset within the pool of
fitted models, and is shown in bold type.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021016.t002
to different pressures and management decisions that have unpublished). Although the information is partial [31–32] these
favoured their patchiness across years. As a consequence of these diet differences probably also took place in Europe some decades
differences, the same birds must aggregate during summering, ago within a scenario of healthier Mediterranean ecosystems,
when food is clumped and patchily distributed, but can remain important extensive grazing and low number of predictable
widely and near randomly distributed during wintering, when feeding points [33]. For its part, d13C values show a slight
resources are widespread. But changes in bird distribution go enrichment with trophic level, but can reveal micro-habitat
beyond the species level, and interspecific trophic overlap also information on terrestrial ecosystems used due to the differential
becomes apparent in the summering scenario of resource importance in the distribution of C3 and C4 plants [30,34]. In our
aggregation. Conversely, when both species track resources in results, the marginally significant differences in stable carbon
the less managed habitats, they have the opportunity to find and isotopes in African samples again seem to indicate a higher
exploit pulsed resources when possible. Indeed, during the desert consumption by black kites of arthropods dependant on C4
locust outbreaks, the black kites shifted their spatial distribution in herbaceous vegetation [26].
a conspicuous way, increasing group sizes markedly. In contrast,
the spatial distribution of the Egyptian vulture did not change after On the adaptive value of changing grouping patterns
the appearance of locust outbreaks. The above-described scenarios, where bird populations change
These findings show that variability in the response to their local abundances following resource distribution, raise a key
environmental changes differs between species, leading to question: are bird aggregations in European locations with
scenarios with different degrees of resource partitioning, diet predictable food adaptive or, on the contrary, a maladaptive
overlap and, consequently, interspecific competition and proba- result of the global scarcity of food and/or trophic distribution
bility of coexistence [4,28–29]. Stable isotope analyses demon- patterns? Clumped food seems to lead to high intra- and
strated that the diets of our focus species completely overlapped in interspecific competition [25,35–36], which may negatively affect
European summering areas, whereas in the African wintering individual fitness [3,6]. But on the other hand, the role of some
grounds, they were segregated. It is well-known that stable aggregations (particularly roosts) in mate finding [37] and
nitrogen isotope values show a stepwise enrichment with each information transfer [38–39] has been described. It should be
trophic level [30]. In our case, there is a between-species difference taken into account, however, that although roosts and abundant
in average d15N (10.1 vs. 12.9) during wintering, indicating food resources are frequently associated [33], selective forces
separated trophic levels. The analyses of pellets of the two species leading to both kinds of aggregations may not be the same. In fact,
in the study area revealed that black kites relied on a mixed diet of at an interspecific level, individuals clump at feeding places but
arthropods and carcasses of domestic ungulates whereas Egyptian clearly separate for roosting even when the habitat requirements
vultures consume more wild and domestic vertebrates (authors are very similar (pers. obs.), which lends evidence to a scenario of
Figure 2. Plots of the additive terms (s (?) in equation 1) of the COZIGAM fitted to the Egyptian vulture (a–c) and black kite (d–f) in
their summering grounds (Europe). In a) and d) the contour plot of the spatial effect in Eqn. 1, s(Latitude, Longitude), is shown. The coloured
surface depicts the local probability density of the spatial distribution of counts, from low density areas (red) to high density areas (white). These
colours correspond to areas with low and high bird density, respectively. The right diagrams show the partial residual plots for the effect of distance
to the nearest feeding source (vulture restaurants and/or rubbish dumps; b, e) and human distribution (measured as the slope of the terrain; c, f) on
the estimated spatial abundance of each species. The additive function is depicted as a solid black line, while the dotted lines show the 95%
confidence intervals. For clarity, the location of each data point is presented as a rug plot along the bottom of each plot. Note that the terms have
been scaled to have a 0 mean to make the model identifiable [37].
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021016.g002
competition for food. At an intraspecific level, trade-offs between population dynamics of migrant birds. In particular, it would be
social costs and benefits could represent a challenge to properly interesting to focus on the individual response to a changeable
managing endangered species. In our study model, for example, environment, as well as on its consequences at the population
implications of changes in food distributions on aggregations level. Populations composed of individuals behaving differently
would be different for vultures and kites, as the latter seem to be might have higher probabilities of success under changeable
able to exploit different resources while the former, more environments that those formed by more homogeneous individuals
endangered species, is less variable. Clearly, although the study [43–44]. Thus, under a scenario of global change, this approach
of the adaptive value of living in groups is an old topic in ecology can be useful in establishing probabilities of population persistence
[40–41] some main questions still remain unanswered. and conservation priorities.
In conclusion, our results show that the spatial distribution of
food might not only affect the behaviour and success of local Conservation implications for trans-Saharan migrant
individuals [6,41–42], but can also shape the foraging strategies of birds
entire populations, going beyond the species and potentially More than 50% of European birds are trans-Saharan migrants,
triggering consequences at multispecies levels. Future research and many of them show long-term population declines [19]. This
should focus on the output of these strategies in the long-term is particularly true for some species like our focal Egyptian vulture,
Figure 3. Plots of the additive terms of the COZIGAM fitted to the Egyptian vulture (a–c) and the black kite (d–f) in their wintering
grounds (Africa). In a) and d) the contour plot of the spatial effect is shown. The right diagrams show the partial residual plots for the effect of
distance to the nearest food source (nearest town with slaughterhouses; b, e) and the degree of humanization (cattle, measured as the number of
livestock; c, f) on the estimated spatial abundance of each species. See Fig. 2 for further details.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021016.g003
which is considered ‘‘globally endangered’’ [45]. Thus, the considered of major concerns for the population viability of many
identification of potential limiting factors operating at wintering predatory species [52–53]. In fact, in Europe the few food
and breeding grounds is a key point to understanding their resources available for avian scavengers are carcasses derived from
population trends [46–47]. Recent studies suggest that mortality intensive livestock, which are clumped and predictably disposed at
rates of migrant birds are mainly determined by factors operating supplementary feeding points [25]. Interspecific competition,
at wintering grounds. In particular, survival rates of short and which is enhanced in these situations, can promote the extinction
long-lived species, including the Egyptian vulture, have been of a species, even when it is a slow process not likely to be observed
positively associated with rainfall in the Sahelian region [48–50]. on the time scale of most scientific studies [54]. Besides ecological
Regarding our results, we found that foraging avian scavengers in aspects of species and individual aggregations, other constraints
Africa follow a distribution pattern very similar to that in which such as the spread of illness, veterinary drugs and other
these scavenger species have co-evolved, i.e. environments where contaminants [55–56] are also negatively affecting species using
food resources are dispersed and sometimes appeared as pulsed these feeding points. Indeed, preliminary analysis shows that the
events [51]. However, the Sahel region has degraded during detrimental effects of ingested antibiotics and the acquisition of
recent decades as a consequence of a severe drought and human pathogens at feeding points may decrease the health of vultures
activities [23]. In this scenario, social and searching strategies - with a lethal potential, especially in nestlings and fledglings [57].
such as those described in this paper, could be scarcely efficient The relative importance of these negative factors operating
when food resources are highly depleted in space and/or time. during summer should be compared to that existing in the African
In the European breeding areas, landscape transformation and wintering grounds in order to properly assess conservation criteria
habitat loss have affected the availability of food resources, being and priorities. Meanwhile, the appropriate management of trophic
Figure 4. Contour plots of the spatial effect estimated by the COZIGAM fitted to the abundance of Egyptian vulture (a, b) and black
kite (c, d) in Africa in two different years. For this plot only, the effect is shown for each species during the year without a locust outbreak (a, c)
and the year with an outbreak (b, d).
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021016.g004
resources focused on reducing feeding costs for birds should be and the Ebro Valley. The area has great orographic and climatic
promoted. In this sense, future actions in Africa should focus on variation, with altitudes ranging between 300 to 2,400 m a.s.l.
reducing the impoverishment of environments, avoiding landscape (Fig. 6). Human populations concentrate in valleys with large
transformation by human overexploitation. In Europe, new towns and villages [25]. This region holds one of the most
management procedures should be implemented to generate a important European populations of both avian scavengers [25,48].
rather more heterogeneous pattern of food availability for birds, There are 380 breeding territories of Egyptian vultures (ca. 30% of
for example by promoting traditional, extensive agro-grazing the Iberian population) with several communal roosts where
practices [24], thus increasing individual health conditions and hundreds of birds regularly gather [25,33]. Although no precise
reducing intraguild competition. information is available for black kites, the species is abundant
with more than 500 breeding pairs [58].
Materials and Methods In the Western Sahel region, the relief is mostly barren
with sparse rocky outcrops. Human population density is low
Study areas (3 inhabitants/km2; United Nations World Population Prospects;
Our study was performed in the Ebro Valley (Northern Spain) http://esa.un.org/unpp/). Large concentrations of people inhabit
and in the Western Sahel region (Southern third of Mauritania a few cities such as Nouackchott, Kiffa, Aioun and Nema [26].
and the adjacent areas of Senegal and Mali), covering the Nomadic shepherds inhabit temporary sparse settlements (Fig. 6).
summering and wintering grounds of the Egyptian vulture and the In this area there are no breeding populations of the two study
black kite populations (Fig. 6). The first region extends over species but large concentrations of Western Palaearctic migrants
10,000 km2 lying between the Pyrenees, the Iberian mountains can be found [23]. Indeed, radiotracking studies carried out in
Figure 6. Maps of the studied areas with observation points (black dots) and predictable feeding sources (white dots).
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021016.g006
zero-inflation, denoted by pi, is a monotone function of the accumulate along some gradient of the predictor variable. The
expected values of the response variable, denoted by mi. Using a response, with expected values denoted as mi in Eqn. 1a, is
logit link function, this restriction is written as modelled non-parametrically with a Generalized Additive Model
[27]. For Europe, this model can be written in a simplified form as
logit(pi )~azd(mi ) ð1aÞ
m~czsðLatitude, LongitudeÞzsðDistanceÞzsðSlopeÞ ð1bÞ
where a is a constant and d is a parameter measuring the amount
of homogeneity in zero inflation. Interestingly, if d is found to be while for Africa it would be written as
distinct from 0 this would indicate that the distribution of 09s is not
homogeneous, which means that a large proportion of zero counts m~czsðLatitude, LongitudeÞzsðDistanceÞzsðCattleÞ ð1cÞ
where c is a parametric constant and s (?) are the smooth functions their feathers in wintering and in breeding regions [72–73]. For
measuring the non-parametric effects of covariates on the this study, we only sampled skins of individuals collected in
response. The term s(Latitude, Longitude) measures the non- February-April, after their immediate arrival from wintering areas.
parametric spatial component of the abundance survey [64]. From each skin, we sampled two feathers: one new, brilliant and
Although a preliminary analysis with a non-parametric spline with non-abraded edges, presumably grown in Africa, and another
correlogram [66] suggested that the abundance data for both one older, with faded colour and with worn fringes presumably
species lack spatial autocorrelation, we included the spatial term in grown during the previous year in Europe. Very old feathers were
eqn. 1c to check whether some spatial residual variation can be not considered to avoid mixing samples of unclear origin.
detected after estimating the covariate effects. Laboratory procedures. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope
Eqns. 1b and c were fitted to the dataset for the corresponding assays were performed on 0.5 and 1 mg subsamples of feathers
spatial unit (Africa or Europe), and we further constructed that were combusted in an elemental analyzer (Carlo Erba
alternative models by sequentially dropping the spatial term or 1500NC) on-line with a Delta Plus XL mass spectrometer (EA-
the terms for the distance to the nearest feeding source and for IRMS). Analysis of d13C and d15N were in triplicate. The overall
human presence. For each covariate effect in eqn. 1 we tested precision of analyses was 60.1 % for d13C and d15N. The stable
whether a non-parametric (‘‘wiggly’’) function is preferred over a isotope composition is reported as d values per mil: d = (Rsample/
constant or parametric (‘‘functionally linear’’) one by testing if the Rstandar –1) *1000, where R = 13C/12C for d13C or 15N/14N for
estimated degrees-of-freedom (e.d.f.) of the non-parametric d15N values. The international reference standard for 13C/12C is
function deviates significantly from a pure parametric one, where PDB (Pee Dee Belemnites, a fossil marine carbonate of biogenic
e.d.f = 1 [27]. We measured the statistical performance of each origin) and for 15N/12N in the AIR (average of Atmospheric Air).
model by subtracting the log-likelihood of each COZIGAM. We Analytical procedures. For both carbon and nitrogen,
then calculated the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) of each differences in isotopic signatures between the two study species
fitted model [67]. This information criterion more heavily within each biome were tested first for the two isotopes combined
penalizes over-parameterized models with respect to alternative (MANOVA), then for carbon and nitrogen taken separately (one-
information criteria, such as the AIC. The model minimizing the
way ANOVA) [74]. Values are expressed as means 6 SE. The
BIC was selected as the best model. All the statistical analyses were
statistical software used was SPSS version 17.0.
conducted in R 2.11.1 [68], using the COZIGAM 2.0.3 package
[64].
Acknowledgments
Trophic overlap between species We thank Josefina Barreiro and José Cabot for allowing access to
Feather collection. We used stable isotope analyses to collections of the MNCN and the EBD (CSIC). We are particularly
examine the diet overlap of our focal species in Africa and grateful to N. Markina and M. Rodriguez for their help during fieldwork.
Europe. This methodology has been applied to studies on trophic M. de la Riva helps with digital cartography and two anonymous reviewers
made helpful comments on earlier version of the manuscript.
relationships within vertebrate communities as well as to address
specific questions regarding temporal and spatial variability in
diets [69–70]. Here, we performed stable isotope analyses of Author Contributions
nitrogen (15N/14N, d15N) and carbon (d13C/12C, d13C) from Conceived and designed the experiments: AC-A MC JAS-Z JAD.
feathers [30,71] collected on 41 black kite and 36 Egyptian vulture Performed the experiments: AC-A MC JAS-Z FH JAD. Analyzed the
skins deposited in the Museum of Natural History of Madrid and data: AC-A PA MC JAD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools:
in the Estación Biológica Doñana (CSIC). Focal species moult AD. Wrote the paper: AC-A PA MC JAS-Z FH JAD.
References
1. Macdonald DW (1983) The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301: distribution, and conservation. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institutions Press.
379–384. pp 493–504.
2. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) An optimal use of patchy environment. Am 13. Piersma T, Drent J (2003) Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal
Nat 100: 603–609. design. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 228–233.
3. Johnson DDP, Kays R, Blackwell PG, Macdonald DW (2002) Does the resource 14. Lefebvre L, Reader SM, Sol D (2004) Brains, innovations and evolution in birds
dispersion hypothesis explain group living? Trends Ecol Evol 17: 563–570. and primates. Brain Behav Evol 63: 233–246.
4. Tokeshi M (1999) Species coexistence: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. 15. Sol D, Lefebvre L, Rodrı́guez-Teijeiro JD (2005) Brain size, innovative
London: Wiley-Blackwell Science Ltd. propensity and migratory behaviour in temperate Palaearctic birds. Proc Royal
5. Revilla E, Palomares F (2002) Spatial organisation, group living and ecological Soc Lond B 272: 1433–1441.
correlates in low-density populations of Eurasian badgers, Meles meles. J Anim 16. Grimm V, Revilla E, Goenevend J, Kramer-Schadt S, Shwager M, et al. (2005)
Ecol 71: 497–512. Importance of buffer mechanism for population viability analysis. Cons Biol 19:
6. Eide NE, Jepsen JU, Prestrud P (2004) Spatial organization of reproductive 578–580.
Arctic foxes Alopex lagopus: responses to changes in spatial and temporal 17. Wichmann MC, Groeneveld J, Jeltsch F, Grimm V (2005) Mitigation of climate
availability of prey. J Anim Ecol 73: 1056–1068. change impacts on raptors by behavioural adaptation: ecological buffering
7. Bowlin MS, Bisson IA, Shamoun-Baranes J, Reichard JD, Sapir N, et al. (2010) mechanisms. Global Planet Change 47: 273–281.
Grand challenges in migration biology. Integ Comp Biol 50: 261–279. 18. Newton I (2004) Population limitation in migrants. Ibis 146: 197–226.
8. Levey DJ, Stiles FG (1992) Evolutionary precursors of long-distance migration: 19. Sanderson FJ, Donald PF, Pain DJ, Burfield IJ, van Bommel FPJ (2006) Long-
resource availability and movement patterns in Neotropical landbirds. Am Nat term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds. Biol Cons 131:
140: 447–476. 93–105.
9. Chesser RT, Levey DL (1998) Austral migrants and the evolution of migration in 20. Donázar JA (1992) Muladares y basureros en la biologı́a y conservación de las
the New World birds: diet, habitat, and migration revisited. Am Nat 152: aves en España. Ardeola 39: 29–40.
311–319. 21. Blanco G (1994) Seasonal abundance of black kites associated with the rubbish
10. Cox GW (1985) The evolution of avian migration systems between temperate dump of Madrid, Spain. J Raptor Res 28: 242–245.
and tropical regions of the New World. Am Nat 126: 451–474. 22. Garcı́a-Ripollés C, López-López P, Urios V (2010) First description of migration
11. Pérez-Tris J, Tellerı́a JL (2002) Migratory and sedentary blackcaps in sympatric and wintering of adult Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus tracked by GPS
non-breeding grounds: implications for the evolution of avian migration. J Anim satellite telemetry Bird Study 57: 261–265.
Ecol 71: 211–224. 23. Anadón JD, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Carrete M, Donázar JA, Hiraldo F (2010)
12. Greenberg RS (1982) Demographic aspects of long-distance migration. In: Large scale human effects on an arid African raptor community. Anim Cons 13:
Keast A, Morton ES, eds. Migrant birds in the neotropics: ecology, behavior, 495–504.
24. Donázar JA, Margalida A, Carrete A, Sánchez-Zapata JA (2009) Too sanitary 50. Mihoub JB, Gimenez O, Pilard P, Sarrazin F (2010) Challenging conservation of
for vultures. Science 326: 664. migratory species: Sahelian rainfalls drive first-year survival of the vulnerable
25. Cortés-Avizanda A, Carrete M, Donázar JA (2010) Managing supplementary Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni. Biol Cons 143: 839–847.
feeding for avian scavengers: guidelines for optimal design using ecological 51. Houston DC (1979) The adaptation of scavengers. In: Sinclair, ARE, Norton-
criteria. Biol Cons 143: 1707–1715. Griffiths M, eds. Serengeti, dynamics of an ecosystem. Chicago: Chicago
26. Sánchez-Zapata JA, Donázar JA, Delgado A, Forero M, Ceballos O, et al. University Press. pp 236–286.
(2007) Desert locusts outbreaks in the Sahel: resource competition, predation 52. Villafuerte R, Viñuela J, Blanco JC (1998) Extensive predator persecution
and ecological effects of pest control. J Appl Ecol 44: 263–269. caused by population crash in a game species: the case of red kites and rabbits in
27. Wood SN (2006) Generalized Additive Models. An Introduction with R. Spain. Biol Cons 84: 181–188.
London: Chapman and Hall. 53. Delibes-Mateos M, Delibes M, Ferreras P, Villafuerte R (2008) Key Role of
28. Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science European Rabbits in the Conservation of the Western Mediterranean Basin
185: 27–39. hotspot. Cons Biol 22: 1106–1117.
29. Bolnick DI, Ingram T, Stutz WE, Snowberg LK, Lau OL, et al. (2010) 54. Mooney HA, Cleland EE (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species.
Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 5446–5451.
population and individual niche width. Proc R Soc Lond B 277: 1789–1797.
55. Blanco G, Lemus JA, Grande J, Gangoso L, Grande JM, et al. (2007)
30. Rubenstein DR, Hobson KA (2004) From birds to butterflies: animal movement
Geographical variation in cloacal microflora and bacterial antibiotic resistence in
patterns and stable isotopes. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 256–263.
a threatened avian scavenger in relation to diet and livestock farming practices.
31. Donázar JA, Ceballos O (1988) Alimentación y tasas reproductoras del
Alimoche (Neophron percnopterus) en Navarra. Ardeola 35: 3–14. Env Microbiol 9: 1738–1749.
32. Veiga JP, Hiraldo F (1990) Food habits and the survival and growth of nestlings 56. Lemus JA, Blanco G (2009) Cellular and humoral immunodepression in vultures
in two sympatric kites (Milvus milvus and Milvus migrans). Hol Ecol 13: 62–71. feeding upon medicated livestock carrion. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 276:
33. Donázar JA, Ceballos O, Tella JL (1996) Communal roosts of Egyptian vulture 2307–2313.
(Neophron percnopterus): Dynamics and implications for the species conservation. In: 57. Lemus JA, Blanco G, Grande J, Arroyo B, Garcı́a-Montijano M, et al. (2008)
Muntaner J, Muntaner J, eds. Biologı́a y conservación de las rapaces Antibiotics threaten wildlife: circulating quinolone residues and disease in avian
Mediterráneas. Madrid: SEO/Birdlife Monografı́a nu4. pp 189–201. scavengers. PLoS ONE 3: e 1444. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001444.
34. Carrete M, Serrano D, Tella JL, López G, Illera JC, et al. (2009) Goats, birds 58. Blanco G, Viñuela J (2004) Black kite. In: Madroño A, Gonzales C, Atienza JC,
and emergent diseases: direct and indirect effects of a biological invasion. Ecol eds. Libro Rojo de las Aves de España. Madrid: Dirección General de
Appl 19: 840–853. Diversidad- SEO/ Birdlife. pp 116–120.
35. Mönkkönen M, Forsman JT, Thomson RL (2004) Qualitative geographical 59. Jenness J (2004) Nearest features (nearfeat.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x, v.
variation in interspecific interactions. Ecography 27: 112–118. 3.8a. Jenness Enterprises. Available: http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/
36. Robb GN, McDonald RA, Chamberlain DE, Bearhop S (2008) Food for nearest_features.htm.
thought: supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian 60. Barry SC, Welsh AH (2002) Generalized additive modelling and zero inflated
populations Front Ecol Env 6: 476–484. count data. Ecol Model 157: 179–188.
37. Blanco G, Tella JL (1999) Temporal, spatial and social segregation of red-billed 61. Agarwal D, Gelfand A, Citron-Pousty S (2002) Zero-inflated models with
choughs between two types of communal roost: a role for mating and territory application to spatial count data. Env Ecol Stat9: 341–355.
acquisition. Anim Behav 57: 1219–1227. 62. Martin TG, Wintle BA, Rhodes JR, Kuhnert PM, Field SA, et al. (2005) Zero
38. Hiraldo F, Heredia B, Alonso JC (1993) Communal roosting of wintering red tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of
kites Milvus milvus (Aves, Accipitridae): social feeding strategies for the zero observations. Ecol Lett 8: 1235–1246.
exploitation of food resources. Ethology 93: 117–124. 63. Wenger SJ, Freeman MC (2008) Estimating species occurrence, abundance, and
39. Marzluff J, Heinrich B, Marzluff C (1996) Raven roosts are mobile information detection probability using zero-inflated distributions. Ecology 89: 2953–2959.
centres. Anim Behav 51: 89–103. 64. Liu H, Chan KS (2010) Introducing COZIGAM: An R Package for
40. Ward P, Zahavi A (1973) The importance of certain assemblages of birds as Unconstrained and Constrained Zero-Inflated Generalized Additive Model
‘information-centres’ for food finding. Ibis 115: 517–534. Analysis. J Stat Soft 35: 1–26.
41. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. New York: Oxford University
65. Chiogna M, Gaetan C (2007) Semiparametric zero-inflated poisson models with
Press.
application to animal abundance studies. Environmetrics 18: 303–314.
42. Overington SE, Dubois F, Lefebvre L (2008) Food unpredictability drives both
66. Bjørnstad ON, Falck W (2001) Nonparametric spatial covariance functions:
generalism and social foraging: a game theoretical model. Behav Ecol 19:
estimation and testing. Env Ecol Stat 8: 53–70.
836–841.
43. Sol D, Garcia N, Iwaniuk A, Davis K, Meade A, et al. (2010) Evolutionary 67. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical
Divergence in Brain Size between Migratory and Resident Birds. PLoS ONE information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5(3): e9617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009617. 68. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for
44. Carrete M, Tella JL (2011) Inter-individual variability in fear of humans and statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
relative brain size of the species are related to contemporary urban invasion in ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL. Available: http://www.R-project.org.
birds. PLoS ONE 6(4): e18859. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018859. 69. Fry B (2006) Stables Isotopes Ecology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
45. BridLife 2007 Species factsheet: Neophron percnopterus. http:// www.birdlife. 70. Inger R, Bearhop S (2008) Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian
org. ecology. Ibis 150: 447–461.
46. Sillett TS, Homes RT, Sherry TW (2000) Impacts of a global climate cycle on 71. Michener RM, Lajtha K (2007) Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental
the population dynamics of a migratory bird. Science 288: 2040–2042. Science, second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
47. Cotton PA (2003) Avian migration phenology and global climate change. Proc 72. Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1980) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle
Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 12219–12222. East and North Africa. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Grande JM, Serrano D, Tavecchia G, Carrete M, Ceballos O, et al. (2009) 73. Forsman D (2007) The Raptors of Europe and the Middle East: a handbook of
Survival in a long-lived territorial migrant: effects of life-history traits and field identification. London, UK.
ecological conditions in wintering and breeding areas. Oikos: 118: 580–590. 74. Popa-Lisseanu AG, Delgado A, Forero MG, Rodrı́guez A, Arlettaz R, et al.
49. Schaub M, Kania W, Köppen U (2005) Variation of primary production during (2007) Bats’ conquest of a formidable foraging niche: the myriads of nocturnally
winter induces synchrony in survival rates in migratory white storks Ciconia migrating songbirds. PLoS ONE 2(2): e205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000205.
ciconia. J Anim Ecol 74: 656–666.