0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16K views6 pages

Court Ruling on Malibu Media v. Pelizzo

This order overrules the defendant's objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation regarding the defendant's motion for attorney's fees and costs. The magistrate judge recommended granting in part and denying in part the defendant's motion. Specifically, the magistrate judge concluded the defendant was not entitled to recover fees under the Copyright Act but was entitled to a partial award of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. The district court reviewed the record de novo and found the magistrate judge's factual findings were not clearly erroneous and the law was correctly applied. Therefore, the court adopted the report and recommendation and overruled the defendant's objections.

Uploaded by

J Doe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16K views6 pages

Court Ruling on Malibu Media v. Pelizzo

This order overrules the defendant's objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation regarding the defendant's motion for attorney's fees and costs. The magistrate judge recommended granting in part and denying in part the defendant's motion. Specifically, the magistrate judge concluded the defendant was not entitled to recover fees under the Copyright Act but was entitled to a partial award of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. The district court reviewed the record de novo and found the magistrate judge's factual findings were not clearly erroneous and the law was correctly applied. Therefore, the court adopted the report and recommendation and overruled the defendant's objections.

Uploaded by

J Doe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Case 1:12-cv-22768-PAS Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2014 Page 1 of 6

UNI TED STA TES D I STR I C T C O URT SOU THER N DI STRI C T OF FLO R I DA

CASE NO.1 22276 8CI VSEl TZ/ Sl M ONTON


M ALI BU M EDI A ,LLC,

Pl a i nt i

LEO PELI ZZO

Def en da nt .
/

ORDER OVERRULI NG DEFENDANT' S OBJECTI ONS. ADOPTI NG M AGI STM TE' S


REPO RT AN D REC OM M ENDA TI O [Link] D CLO SI N G CA SE

THI S MATTER i sb e f o r et h eCo u r tu p o n De f e n d a n t ' sOb j e c t i o n s( DE 5 4 1t ot h eRe p o r ta n d


Re c omme n da t i on ( R & R) i s s u e d by t h e Hon or ab l e An dr e a Si mont on ( DE 53 4 .I nt he R & R,
Ma g i s t r a t eJ u dge Si mo nt on r e c om m e ndsgr a n t i ng i n pa r t a nd de nyi ng i n par tDef en da nt ' sM o t i on f o r

At t or ne y' sFe e san dCos t s( DE41 1 .Ast ot heDe f en da nt ' sc l ai m ofr i g htt oa t t or n e y' sf e esa ndc os t s
unde rt h eCop yr i gh tAc t , t heR & R c onc l ude st ha tt h eDe f e nda nti sno te nt i t l e dt or e c ove r .( DE 53 1 .
Howe ve r ,w i t hr e ga r dt ot he De f e nda nt ' s cl a i m ofr i ghtt oa t t or n e y' sf ee sa nd cos t s pu r s u a nt t o 28

U. S. C.j1 927, t heR & R r e c omme ndst ha tDe f en da n ti se nt i t l edt or e c ove rapa r t i ala wa r d.1 d.

De f e nd a nt ' sob j e c t i onss ugg es tt ha tt heR & R e r r e di nf a i l i n gt oc ons i de rc er t a i nf a c t swhi c h


Pe r t a i nt ot he M a gi s t r at e' sr es ol u t i on oft wo o ft he f ourFo ge r t y'f a c t or sus e di n de t e r mi ni ng whe t he r De f e n da nt i se nt i t l e dt oa t t or ne y' sf e es a nd c os t s pur s u a nt t ot h e Copy r i g ht A c t . Four of t he s i x

o b j e c t i o nsc on c er nS mo t i v at i on' 'whi l et wo oft hes i x co nc e r ni s f r i vol ous nes s . ' ' 1 d. Af t e rha vi ng r e vi e wed,deno v o,Magi s t r a t eJ udg e Si mont on' sR & R,t her e c or d,a ndt heOb j e c t i ons ,t heCo ur t
t l nds t hatt he M agi s t r at e Judge' sf i ndi ngs of f act ar e not cl ear l y er r oneous and t hat t he M agi s t r a t e

1Fo r @v . Fa ge nt as y,I nc . ,51 0U. S.51 7,53 4n.l 9( 1 994) .

Case 1:12-cv-22768-PAS Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2014 Page 2 of 6

J udg e ha sc or r e c t l ya ppl i e dt he l a w t ot he f a c t s . Th e r e f o r e ,t h e Ob j e c t i o n sa r eo v e r r u l e da n dt h e

Ma gi s t r a t eJ udg e' sR & R i sa f f i r me da nd a d opt e d.


1 .Fact ualBackground

Th e und er l yi ng ac t i on i nt hi s ca s ec onc e r ns Pl ai n t i f f M al i bu M e di a , LLC' Sc op yr i gh t


i nf r i n ge me nt c o m pl ai n ta l l egi n g De f en da nt Le o Pel i z z oi nf r i nge d Pl a i nt i m sc opyr i gh t ed wor ks by

us e oft he pe e r t ope e r Gl es ha r i ng s of t wa r e Bi t Tor r e n t . Pl a i nt i f fi de nt i f i ed t he De f e n da nta st he


i n f r i ng e rofi t sc opy r i g ht e d ma t er i a lb yo bt a i ni ng a s ub poe na or d e r i ng Def e n dan t ' sl n t e r ne tSe r vi c e Pr ovi der ,Hot wi r e Co mmuni c a t i ons ,t o pr ovi de t he i d en t i t y of t he i ndi vi dua la s s oc i a t ed wi t ht he

i nf r i ngi ngI n t e r n etPr o t oc ola ddr es s( DE 4791 .Pl a i n t i T sc ompl ai n t( DE 6)wasme tb yDe f e nda nt ' s
mot i o nt odi s mi s s( DE 71whi c hwa sul t i ma t el yde ni e d( DE 1 6 1 .
On M a r c h 1 3, 20l 3, Pl a i nt i f f de pos e d t he A s s i s t a nt Gen e r al Couns el of H o t wi r e Com m u ni c a t i o ns w h oi nf or me d Pl a i n t i f ft ha tt h e r e was a v er yr e alpos s i bi l i t yt ha tt he l nt e r ne t Pr o t oc olad dr e s s us ed t oi nf r i ng e Pl a i nt i f rsco pyr i gh t e dwo r ks wasus e d by a ni ndi vi du alot he rt ha n

t h e De f e nd a nt( DE 38 1 1 . The r e a he r ,Pl a i nt i f fof f er e dt o di s mi s st hec as e( DE 476) . De f e nd an t ,


howe ve r ,woul do nl ya gr e et o do s oi f ,a mon g ot he rt hi ngs ,t he Pl a i nt i f fa gr e ed t o pa y $1 7, 50 0i n

a t t or ne y' sf e e s( DE 4 71 4 1 .Pl a i nt i f rsCouns e lr e s pond e dt oDef e n da nt ' sco unt e r of f e rbyi nf o r mi n g


De f e nda n tt ha t he i i wi l ll os ee ve r yt hi ng he owns a nd owe m y cl i e nt s hund r e ds of t hous a nds of

dol l a r s . ' '( DE 41 21 . Thepa r t i e sa t t e nde dme di a t i onon Apr i l4,201 3,a twhi c h Pl a i n t i f f ' sc ou ns e l i ndi c a t e dhi si nt e ntt odi s mi s st h eca s e( DE 491 .
Af t e r pr opou ndi ng an of f e rt o pa y a por t i on ofPl a i nt i f rs f e e st ot ha tpoi n ti nt h el i t i ga t i o n,

wh i c h De f e n d a n te l e c t e dt or e j e c t ,P l a i n t i f ff i l e d amo t i o nt od i s mi s si t sc o mp l a i n twi t hp r e j u d i c e
( DE 3 71 . Th e Cou r tgr a n t e dt he mot i on a n dr e s e r v e df orl a t e ra ny de t e r mi na t i on o fa ppr op r i a t e a t t or n e y' sf e e s( DE401 .

Case 1:12-cv-22768-PAS Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2014 Page 3 of 6

I l . Def e ndant ' sObj e c t i o ns

De f e n d a n tf i l e ds i xo b j e c t i o n st ot h e Ma g i s t r a t e ' sr e s o l u t i o no fh i sM o t i o nf o rAt t o r n e y ' s


F e e sa n d Co s t s . Mo s ti mp o r t a n t l y ,i tmu s tb en o t e dt h a tma n yo ft h eo b j e c t i o n su p o n wh i c h
De f e nda n tno wh an gshi sha twe r enotr ai s e di n hi so r i gi n almo t i on. W hi l et he s e ne wa r g ume nt sf ai l
t o un de r mi ne t he M a gi s t r a t eJ udge' sR & R,t he Cou r ti sb y no m e a ns un dera n obl i ga t i on t oa ddr e s s

t hene wa r g ume nt s . Wi l l i amsv .Mc Ne i l ,557F. 3 d1 287 ,1 29 2( 11 t h Ci r .2009 )( k $ r A)di s t r i c tco ur t


ha s di s c r e t i on t od ec l i ne t oc ons i de ra p a r t y' sa r gum e n t whe nt he a r g um en ti s no tf i r s tpr e s en t e dt o

t h ema g i s t r a t e j u d g e . ' ' ) .F o r t h er e a s o n sd i s c u s s e db e l o we a c ho b j e c t i o ni so v e r r ul e d .


Ob j ec t i on1

Thi so b j e c t i ona r g uest h a tt heR & R e r r edi nf a i l i ngt oc ons i de rt hef a c tt ha tPl ai nt i f fs er v e d
Hot wi r e Com m u ni c a t i ons w i t h as ub poe na r e que s t i ng t he na m e, a dd r e s s ,t e l ep hone nu mb e r ,a nd e ma i ladd r e s s of t h e pe r s on a s s i g ned t h ei nf r i ngi ng l n t e nw t Pr ot oc ol a dd r e s s 24. 238. 22. 20 7, bu t f a i l e dt or e qu es tc onf i r ma t i on t ha tM r .Pe l i zz o' sa c c oun tw as a s s i gne dt ha tadd r es sa te xa c t l y 5: 37 pm .o n Fe br ua r y6 ,201 2. Thoug h De f e n da ntdoesn oti ndi c a t eh ow t hi sf ac tunde r mi ne st h e R & R,
i t woul d pr es um abl y go t ot he M agi s t r a t e' sr es ol ut i o n of t he s e c ond of t he f ou r Foge r t yf ac t or s , nam el yi i m ot i vat i on. ' '

De f e n da ntma ke sgen e r a lcl a i mst hr ou ghouthi sob j e c t i onst hatPl a i n t i f fi smot i v a t e dby t h e
d es i r et oe x t or ts e t t l e me n t so utofa nd f unds f r om i nnoc e n ti n t e r n e tus e r s who,i n or de rt oa voi dt h e e mb a r r a s s me n ta s s oc i a t e d wi t h be i ng a c c us e d of i n f r i ngi ng a dul tvi d eo con t e nt ,ar e wi l l i ng t o pa y Pl ai n t i f ft o go a wa ywi t h outr e g ar dt ot he m e r i t s of i t sc as e. A s s t a t e di nt h e R & R an dr e i t er a t e d

h e r e ,i i De f en da nth as ( s t i l l )no tdi r ec t e dt h e Co ur tt oa ny e vi de nc et h atwoul ds u ppor te ve na n


i nf e r e nc et ha tPl a i nt i f ff i l ed t hi ss ui tt os ha me De f e nd a nti nt o a pr e s ui ts e t t l e me n t . ' '( DE 53 1 .

Ac co r di ngl y, t heob j e c t i oni sove r r ul e d.

Case 1:12-cv-22768-PAS Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2014 Page 4 of 6

Ob j ec t i on1 1

De f end a nt ' sn ex tob j e c t i on a r gue st h a tPl a i n t i f f ' sf a i l ur et oa t t e mptapr e s ui tr e s ol ut i o n of

t h i sd i s p u t ec a l l si n t oq u e s t i o n Pl a i n t i f rss u b j e c t i v e mo t i v a t i o ni nf i l i n gs u i t . Th eu n d e r s i g n e d ,
h owe ve r ,a gr e es t ha ts i x phone c a l l st ot he nu mbe r pr o vi de db yt he Def e nda nt ' sI nt e r n e t Se r vi c e
Pr o vi de ri nr e s p ons et o as ub poe na a r es um c i e ntt o de mo ns t r a t e a goo df a i t ha t t e mp tt or es ol ve t h e

di s pu t e wi t hou t ne e df o rI i t i ga t i o n. Thoug h Def e n da nt i ns i nua t es Pl a i nt i f f ' sa t t emp t s we r e ha l f h ea r t e da tb es t ,Pl a i n t i f fhasonl ya dm i t t ed t ha ti twa s up on i t ss i x t ha t t e m ptt oc on t a c tDe f e nd a ntt h a t

i tI e a r ne dt hel i n eha d be endi s c onne c t e d. ( DE 57a t7) . ThePl ai nt i f fne e dn ota vai li t s el fofe ve r y
f o r m of c om m u ni c a t i on, t el ep hone , el e c t r on i c ma i l ,c e r t i f i e d ma i la n do t he r s ,t o be r eg a r de da s ha v i ng a t t e m pt e d ap r es ui tr e s ol ut i o n oft h e di s pu t e . Ac c or di ngl y ,t hi so b j e c t i oni so venul e d.

Ob je c t i on1 1 1

Ob j ec t i on1 I Is e e mst os ug ge s tt ha t ,a gai n, be c aus ePl a i nt i f fdi dnot ,i na ddi t i o nt oa t t e mp t i ng


t oc a l lDe f e nda n ts i xt i me s ,s end hi m el e c t r oni co rc e r t i f l e d mai l ,t h e co mpl a i n twasf s l e df ora n
i mpr ope rpu r pos e. A s a d dr e s s e ds u pr a,Pl a i nt i f rs num e r ous a t t e mp t st oc on t a c tDef e n da ntc ou pl e d wi t ho t he re vi d e nc ec ons i de r e di nt he R & R, a r es uf Gc i e ntt oi ndi c a t et ha tt h ei m pe t us f orf i l i ng s ui t

i nt h i sc a s ewa st op r o t e c t av a l i dc o p y r i g h t , a l b e i t o fd e b a t a b l es o c i a l v a l u e .Ass u c h , Ob j e c t i o nl l 1
i so ve nul ed.

Ob j ec t i on1V

Th ef o u r t ho b j e c t i o na p p e a r st oa d d r e s st h ef i r s to ft h eFo g e r t yf a c t o r s ,n a me l yl f r i v o l i t y . ' '


Fo ge r t y 51 0 U. S.a t 534 n. 1 9. De f en da nt s e e m st o al l e ge t ha tonc e Pl a i n t i f fw a sp r ovi de d wi t h pas s por ta n d vi s ad oc um e n t a t i on de m ons t r a t i ng t ha tM r . Pe l i z z o ha d no tb ee ni nt he U ni t e dS t a t esf or ar a nge of da t e si n cl udi ng Fe br ua r y 6,201 2,Pl a i n t i f rs cl ai m s be c am e f r i vol o us .A s t h eR & R
m akes cl ear,d s pl ai nt i f f w oul d have been wel lw i t hi ni t sr i ght st ot es tt he ver aci t y of Def endant ' s

as s e r t i ons ( a nd doc u me n t s jt hr oug h di s c ov e r y. ' '( DE 531 . Thi sob j e c t i on doe s no ti na ny wa y


un de r mi net h e R & R, a ndt husi sove r r ul e d.
4

Case 1:12-cv-22768-PAS Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2014 Page 5 of 6

Ob je c t i o nI Z

De f e n d a n t ' st s f t ho b j e c t i o nt a k e si s s u ewi t ht h eR & R' sc o n c l u s i o nt h a tPl a i n t i f psd e c i s i o n


ast ot het i mi ng o ft heAs s i s t a n tGe ne r a lCouns e l ' sd e pos i t i on i i wasno tt her es ul toff o otdr a ggi ngby

Pl ai n t i f rscou ns el . ' '( DE 541 . Def e nda ntg oe son t o not e ' 't het i mi ng oft h et s l i ngofPl a i nt i f rs
c o m pl ai nta se vi de nc e of i t s co nt e nt i on t ha t4 4 pl ai n t i f fi ss e l f s e r v i n gl y ma ni pul a t i n gt he da t au po n

whi c hi tr el i e s . ' '1 d. Al t hough De f e nd a ntb el i e ve si ti i s af et o as s u me' 't ha tPl ai nt i f fkne w Ho t wi r e


Communi c a t i on' sda t ar e t e nt i on pol i c ya nd wa spumos e l y ma ni pul a t i n gi ti n ba df a i t h,cou r t sofI a w a r e noti nt he bus i n es s ofa s s umi ng. Th e M agi s t r a t eJ udg e' s co nc l u s i on was ba s ed on t e s t i mony c o nt a i ne di n Pl a i nt i f rsCouns e l ' ss wor n de cl a r at i on. No t as s umpt i ons ' 'a bo utwha tPl a i nt i f fkne w,
wi t hou t m or e , ca ni n an y wa yu nde r mi ne t he R & R. Suc h as s u m pt i o ns ar e nei t h er s a f e nor
per s uasi ve.

Ob j ec t i on V 1
ns Pl a i nt i f rs m e t ho ds t o d et e c tp ot en t i a li nf r i ng e r s . De f e n d a n t ' s 5n a lo b j e c t i o n concer
Spe c i sc al l y , De f e n da nt t a ke si s s ue w i t ht he R & R ' sc o ncl us i on t h a tS s t he de t e c t i o n me t ho ds e m pl o ye d by l PP Li mi t e d ...ha ve bee nr e l i e du pon i n hun dr e ds of l a ws ui t sa c r os st he cou nt r ya nd

byl a we nf or c e men tt ol o c a t ec r i mi n al s . ' '( DE 53a t9) . Thi sc onc l us i oni sba s e dupont hea m da vi t
ofa t we n t y t w o ye a r ve t e r a n oft h e Pal m Be a c h Co unt y She r r i f fs D e pa r t me nt . El ev e n of Om c e r , a nd l a t erDe t ec t i ve Pai g e' s ye a r sw i t ht he She r r i f rs D e pa r t me ntwe r es pe nti nt he comput erc r i me s
uni t . Def endant ' s at t empt st o char act er i ze Pl ai nt i t r si nqui r y as one f or a s t at i cl nt er net Pr ot ocol

a dd r e s s ,r a t h e rt ha n a dy nam i cl nt e r ne tPr ot oc ola dd r es sa r eu npe r s u as i ve. Pl ai n t i f ps s ubp oe na a nd


exhi bi t s at t ached t her et oi ns t r uct ed H ot wi r e Com m uni cat i ons t o pr oduce d d docum ent ss uf f i ci ent t o i de nt i f yt het r ue nam e,t el ephone num berand em ai laddr essofeach pers on who w as as si gned one of

t heI Pa dd r e s s e ss e tf or t hi n Ex hi bi tA' ' onFe br ua r y26, 201 2a t5: 37PM. ( DE 492j .Re ga r dl es so f

Case 1:12-cv-22768-PAS Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2014 Page 6 of 6

ho wo ne c ha r a c t e r i z esPl a i n t i f ps i nqui r y ,Def e nda nt ' sa c c oun twa sa s s i gn ed t ot he i nf r i ngi ng l n t e r n e t

P r o t o c o l a d d r e s so nt h ed a t es p e c i f i e d .Co n s e q u e n t l y , De f e n d a n t ' sGn a l o b j e c t i o ni so v e r r u l e d .


1 1 1 .Pl ai nt i f fCouns el ' sC onduc t

I ta ppe a r st ha tPl a i nt i f rsCouns e lha sa cc e pt e dt hi soppor t uni t yt oi mpr ov e hi sa ppr o a ch t o


c ont l i c t si nt hi sa nd f ut ur ec a s e s . Th e Cour te xpe c t st ha t Couns el ' sf ut ur e co nduc tw i l le xhi bi tt he

hi ghe s tl e v el sofpr o f es s i o nal i s m. l fn ot ,he doess oa thi so wn pe r i l . Le tt hi sc a s eb eaI e a r ni n g


e xpe r i e nc ef o ra l li n vol ve d.
[Link] usi on

Ha vi n gc ar e f ul l yr e vi ewe d, de n ov o,M a gi s t r at eJ u dge Si mont on' sR & R,t h er e cor d, a nd t h e

Ob j e c t i o n s , i t i sh e r e b y
ORDERED t hat

( 1 )Al l o ft h eDe f e n d a n t ' so b j e c t i o n sa r eOVERRULED;


( 2 )Th eRe por ta ndRe c omme nda t i on( DE 53 )i sAFFI RM ED a ndADOPTED, a nd
i nc om or a t ed by r e f e r e nc ei n t ot hi sOr d er ;

( 3 )De f e nda n t ' sMot i o nf orAt t or n ey' sFe e s( DE41 )i sGRANTED I N PART; ( 4 )Sa nc t i o ns ,i nt hef or mo fa t t or ne y' sf e e s , ar ea wa r de dt oDe f e nda n ta nda ga i ns tPl a i nt i f rs
c ou ns e li nt hea mou ntof$ 6, 815. 50pu r s uan tt o28U. S. C.j 1 927; ( 5 )Thi sc as ei sCLOSED.
M .7 yofM a r c h, 201 DONE a nd ORDERED i nM i a mi ,Fl or i da t hi s X & da 4.

PAT Cl A A .SEI T UN I TED STATES DI STRI CT JUDG E cc: A1 lCounselofRecor d Honor abl e A ndr ea Si m ont on

V? *

You might also like