Scribd
Upload
495 views19 pages

Feed Forward Control

Feedforward control can enhance the performance of control systems by measuring and accounting for identifiable disturbances before they impact the main process, such as measuring the temperature of a feed stream and adjusting the heat to a reactor. Examples include measuring the steepness of an approaching hill and adjusting the car's acceleration pedal, or hearing a toilet flush and adjusting the shower water temperature. The effectiveness of feedforward control depends on being able to measure and model the disturbance signal to generate a compensating manipulated variable that counters its impact.

Uploaded by

sujithadharani9813
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
495 views19 pages

Feed Forward Control

Feedforward control can enhance the performance of control systems by measuring and accounting for identifiable disturbances before they impact the main process, such as measuring the temperature of a feed stream and adjusting the heat to a reactor. Examples include measuring the steepness of an approaching hill and adjusting the car's acceleration pedal, or hearing a toilet flush and adjusting the shower water temperature. The effectiveness of feedforward control depends on being able to measure and model the disturbance signal to generate a compensating manipulated variable that counters its impact.

Uploaded by

sujithadharani9813
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Feedforward Control

So far, most of the focus of this course has been on feedback control. In certain situations, the performance of control systems can be enhanced greatly by the application of feedforward control. What you need to look for are two key characteristics:
1. An identifiable disturbance is affecting significantly the measured variable, in spite of the attempts of a feedback control system to regulate these effects, and 2. This disturbance can be measured, perhaps with the addition of instrumentation.

Also, we would be interesting in controlling the source of the disturbance locally, before it affects our main process, if that were possible. If it is possible, we would usually implement cascade control, not feedforward control.

Examples of Feedforward Control


Shower
Hear toilet flush (measurement) Adjust water to compensate Feedback is when you wait for the water to turn hot before changing the setting

Car approaching hill


See how steep the hill is (measurement) Push on pedal to keep steady speed Feedback is to wait for slowing before adjusting pedal

Chemical system
Measure something in feed stream
like Twater,return in heating plant

Change heat to reactor

Example
Feedback control loop

Goal: Cool down hot water with cold water stream Controlled & measured variable: Tout Manipulated variable: flow rate of hot stream (qhot)

Portion of Block Diagram


D GD

U GP
+ +

How do we manipulate U(s) to cancel the effect that D(s) will have on Y(s)?

Derivation
1. Write an algebraic equation for the block diagram
Y(s) = D(s)Gd(s) + U(s)Gp(s)

2. If Y(s) is to be unaffected by D(s), then we want Y(s) = 0 3. Solve for U(s) in terms of D(s)
U(s) = [-Gd(s)/Gp(s)]D(s) So Gff = -Gd(s)/Gp(s)

If Gd and Gp are first order


G p (s ) =
Therefore,

K pe

p s

ps + 1

Kd e Gd (s ) = ds +1

d s

K d e d s dynamic s +1 K d p s + 1 (d p )s d e G ff (s ) = = p s Kp ds +1 K pe ps + 1 = K d static Kp

When is Gff not feasible?


K d p s + 1 (d p )s G ff (s ) = e Kp ds +1
When p > d, the function will grow without bounds

Modify block diagram


D GD Gff U GP
+ +

+ +

Feed Forward with Feedback Trim


D Gd Gff E
+ -

Yd P Gv U GP Yu
+ +

Ysp Km

~ Ysp

Gc

Ym

Gm

Back to equipment diagram

Measure the disturbance (fluctuating cold water inlet flow rate) Adjust controller through model (Gff)

Seborgs version

Figure 15.11

Disturbance Rejection Performance


Disturbance Rejection Performance of Single Loop PI Controller Disturbance Rejection Performance of PI With Feed Forward

reactor exit temperature constant set point

constant set point

rapid control action from feed forward

disturbance variable steps

disturbance variable steps

Feedback (PI)

Feedforward with Feedback (PI)

Practice
0.6e 37 s G p (s ) = 39 s + 1 0.25e 57 s Gd (s ) = 31s + 1

K d 0.25 = = 0.417 K p 0.60

d p = 57 37 = 20
G ff = 0.417 39 s + 1 20 s e 31s + 1

Physically Realizable Gff


1. The exponential term must be negative
p < d

2. The order of the numerator must be less than or equal to that of the denominator

(s + 1)(s + 2 )(s + 3) (s + 4 )(s + 5) (s + 1)(s + 3) (s + 4 )(s + 5) (s + 1)(s + 3)


s3 + s2 + s + 1

Physically unrealizable

Physically realizable

Physically realizable

Comparison of Feedforward & Cascade

Cascade Sensors Controllers Valve Model Restrictions 2 2 1 0 tsettling small for inner loop

Feedforward 2 1 1 1 p < d

Recommendation
Use cascade first Use feedforward when
Disturbance can be isolated There is no inner loop variable that responds to the manipulated variable Cannot use the same valve to control the disturbance

Feed Forward vs Cascade


Jacketed Reactor
FeedForward with Feedback Cascade

Feed Forward vs Cascade


Jacketed Reactor
FeedForward with Feedback Cascade

Control Station Example


Jacketed Reactor

Volunteer needed

You might also like