0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 350 views 17 pages SEO Strategies for Document Optimization
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
210 Chapter 8
FG P
Reactor
Regenerator Reactor
/
FG \
. J
f ev |
Regenerator
x
A F + A
Stacked ype Side-by-Side ype
F = Feed, P = Products, $= Steam, FG = Fle gas, A= Air
Figure 8.6 FCCtype configuration
and regenerator are separate vessels adjacent to each other. The Stacked or
Orthoflow type reactor is mounted on the top of the regenerator. There
have been many developments and modifications over the last few years to
improve both performance and/or efficiency, or to develop special purpose
FCC. The basic two types of FCC are shown in Figure 8.6
8.9. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
‘The process flow diagram for the side-by-side FCC unit is shown in
Figure 8.7. Steam and VGO heated up to 316-427 °C (600-800 °F) are fed
to the bottom of the riser, which is a long vertical pipe. The regenerated hot
catalyst at 649-760 °C (1200-1400 °F) is also fed to the bottom of the riser.
‘The riser is the main reactor in which the endothermic reactions take place
‘The residence time in the riser is 210 s. At the top of the riser, the gaseous
products flow into the fractionator, while the catalyst and some heavy liquid
hydrocarbon flow back in the disengaging zone. Steam is injected into the
stripper section, and the oil is removed from the catalyst with the help of
some baffles installed in the stripper. The oil is stripped in this way from the
catalyst and the spent catalyst is sent to the regenerator at a temperature oflui
Catalytic Cracking zu
Jesse 4b [ee
— > i
8 cca
Cyclone’ Seat ae pe
Figure 8.7 Fluid catalytic cracking process flow sheet
482-538 °C (900-1000 °F). The coke in the spent catalyst, produced in the
cracking reaction, is burned off in the regenerator by introducing excess air,
which is used to ensure the efficient combustion of coke. The produced flue
gas exits at the top of the regenerator. The hot flue gas contains carbon
dioxide, carbon monoxide water and excess air at the regenerator tempera~
ture, These gases are sent to the power recovery unit to produce super-
heated steam. The operation of the FCC remains in a steady state as long as a
heat balance exists between the heat produced in the regenerator and the
heat consumed in the reactor.
In both the reactor and the regenerator, hydrocyclones are installed to
catch any solid particles carried out in the overheated stream. The product
gases from the reactor are sent to the fractionator which produces light gases,
heavy gasoline (main product), light cycle gas oil (LCO), heavy cycle gas oil
(HCO) and decant slurry. The light gases are sent to the gas concentration
unit where flue gas, propane, butane, LPG and light gasoline are produced,
‘The operating conditions are usually adjusted to produce the maximum
amount of gasoline from the VGO as shown in Table 8.4 (Parkash, 2003).
The decant slurry from the bottom of the fractionator is a mixture of
heavy aromatics and fine catalyst particles. These particles are formed during
the circulation of the catalyst and are carried out to the fractionator. The
filtered decant can be used as an aromatic solvent or recycled back to the
riser with the HCO.22 Chapter 8
Table 8.4 Reactor and regenerator operating condition for max
gasoline production (Parkash, 2003)
Variable
Reactor Feed Rate, MBPSD 40
Feed Temperature, “F 446
Catalyst/Oil Ratio 54
Catalyst Circulation Rate, tons/min 21.7
Catalyst Makeup Rate, tons/day 25
Riser Outlet Temperature, °F 991
Dispersion Steam, wt% feed 09
Stripping Steam, tons/ton catalyst 0.0213,
Reactor Pressure, psig 30
Regenerator Pressure, psig 33
Regenerator Temperature, °F 1341
Flue Gas Temperature, °F 1355,
8.10. MODES OF FLUIDISATION IN FCC UNIT
‘The modes of fluidisation are used to operate the different parts of
the FCC unit (Tominaga and Tameki, 1997). The regenerator is run at the
higher velocity of the stable turbulent fluidisation. The line connecting
the regenerator to the riser is carried out at the ‘bubbling fluidisation’ zone
‘The riser is operated at the ‘pneumatic transport’ zone, where the catalyst
and products are carried out from the riser. In the stripper section, where
steam is injected, the mode is ‘bubbling fluidisation’. The regenerated
catalyst is transported back in the left line in a ‘pneumatic transport’
mode. The fluidisation modes are summarised in Table 8.5.
8.11. FCC YIELD CORRELATIONS
‘The yields of the products involved in fluid cracking are obtained by
the regression of plant data compiled by Maples (1993) using a zeolite
catalyst. The correlations given in Table 8.6 require target conversion
(LV%), feed API and sulphur in the feed. Conversion is defined as the
percentage of the oil fed that has been cracked into lighter fractions than
gasoline and lighter products:
conv%=(
volume of oil feed
‘lume of eyclestock
r
Volume of oil feed ) 100 (8.12)Fluidised Catalytic Cracking 23
Table 8.5 Modes of fluidisation in FCC
Location inFCC
Regenerator
Line for ca
Riser
Stripper
Mode of fluidisation
Turbulent fuidisation: to attain uniform
burning temperature in bed.
lyst transport Bubbling Suidisation
from regenerator to riser
Pneumatic transport: Catalyst and products are
carried out thom riser. Plug flow has a few
seconds of residence time.
Bubbling Muidisation: St.
stripper to vaporise and recover heavy oil
and reduce coke formation,
wn is injected in the
Lift line from regenerator to Pneumatic transport,
Table 8.6 FCC yield correlations
Products
Coke wt%
LCO LV%
Gases wt%
Gasoline LV%
iCy LV%
nC, LV%
Cy LW%
Cy LV%
C3 LW%
HCO
‘We S in Gases
We S in LCO
Wes s
HCO
S in Coke"
Gasoline API
LCO API
Correlation
0.05356 x CONV = 0.18598 x API + 5.966975
0.0047 x CONV? = 0.8564 x CONV + 53.576
0.0552 x CONV + 0.597
0.7754 x CONV = 0.7778.
0.0007 x CONV? + 0.0047 x CONV + 1.40524
0.0002 » CONV? + 0.019 x CONV + 0.0476
0.0993 x CONV = 0.1556
0.0003 x CONV? + 0.0633 x CONV + 0.0143
100 - CONV = (LCO LV)
3.9678 x (we S in feed) + 0.2238
1.04994 x (wt% S in feed) + 0.00013
S in feed) + 0.0135
wt S in feed — we S in gases — wt S LCO— wt% S HCO
0.19028 x CONV + 0.02772 x (Gasoline LV%) + 64.08
0.34661 x CONV + 1.725715 « (Feed API)
* Assuming no sulphur in gasoline24 Chapter 8
The recycle stock is the portion of the feedstock which is not cracked to
fractions lighter than gasoline. For example, for 75% conversion, the cycle
stock is 25%,
Example E8.1
A feed of 20,000 BPD of AGO (650-850 °F) having an API of 24 and a sulphur
content of 0.2 wt, is mixed with another of feed of 15,000 BPD of VGO
(850-1050 °F) that has an API of 15 and a sulphur content of 0.35 wt. They
ire used ay a teed co FOC unit, Use dhe FCC correlations to find the material
balance around the reactor unit. Assume a conversion of 75 LV%. Figure E8.1
shows the reactor input and output streams.
Solution:
AGO = 20000 (bbl/day) x 318.6 (Ib/bbl) x (1. day/24 h) = 265,000 Ib/h
VGO = 15000 (bbl/day) x 338 (Ib/bbl) x (1 day/24 h) = 211250 Ib/h
S in AGO = 265000 x 0.2/100 = 530 Ib/h
Sin VGO = 211250 x 0.35/100 = 739 Ib/h
S in feed = 1269/476250 x 100 = 0.266%
Conversion = ((Vol. of feed - Vol. of cycle stock)/Vol. of feed) x 100 = 75%
Cycle stock = unconverted portion below gasoline = (LCG + HCGO) = 25
API of mixture:
Total feed = 476,250 Ib/h
SG for AGO = 0.9099 and SG for VGO = 0.9659
2 5
‘Then SG for mixed feed = 2°" __(@, 9999). 150 _(9,9659)
2H000-+ 15000 0000+ T5000
= 0.9339
regents |
Cyl,
R Gast
NZ
Spent
Catalyst
I
AGO + VGO + Steam
Figure E8.1 Reactor inputand outputstreamsFluidised Catalytic Cracking
This gives feed API = 20.02
A summary of the feed mixture is shown in Table E8.1.1
Using the above data and the yield correl
235
jons from Table 8.6, the material
balance and product properties can be calculated as shown in Table E8.1.2
Table E8.1.1 Feed properties
Gases wt
eLV%
co LV%
HGO wt%
S in HS we%
Sin LCO we%
Sin HCO we%
S in Coke wt%
Gasoline API
LCO API
53.576
0.0552 x (75) ~ 0.597 47
0.7754 x (75) — 0.7778 57.4
0.0007 x (75)? + 0.0047 x (75) + 5.7
1.40524
0.0002 x (75)? + 0.019 x (75) + 26
0.0476
0.0993 (75) — 0.1556 73
0.0436 x (75) - 0.8714 24
0.0003 x (75)? + 0.0633 x (75) + 64
0.0143
100-75 ~ 15.8
3.9678 x (0.266) + 0.2238
1.04994 > (0.266) + 0.00013
1.88525 x (0.266) + 0.0135
(1269 — 289 — 226 — 237)/29,813 1.734
=0.19028 x (75) + 0.02772 x (59.1) 514
+ 64.08
0.34661 x (73) + 1.725715 x 85
(20.02)
Stream) BPD API we S IbS/h
AGO 20,000 24 02 530
vGO 15,000 15 0.35 739
20.02 1269
Table £8.1.2 Yields and properties of products
Ibjh
Coke wt% 0.05356 x (75) — 0.18598 x (20.02) 6.3 30,004
+ 5.966975
LCO LV% 0.0047 x (75)? 0.8564 x (75) + 15.8 81,337
16,375
7735
22,356
6230
16,987
46,027
289
226
237
517236 Chapter 8
8.12. MATERIAL AND ENERGY BALANCES
‘The material and energy balance around the reactor and regenerator
can be calculated by defining the input and output streams.
8.12.1. Material Balance
8.12.11. Reactor Material Balance
‘The input and output streams to the reactor (Figure 8.8) are:
Reactor input:
* Oil feed (VGO) to the riser: F (BPD) or ine (Ib/h)
# Injection steam: S), (1b/h)
© Regenerated catalyst: sax (Ib/h)
Reactor output:
‘* Masses of products im;, as calculated from FCC yield correlations
‘These correlations require some feed properties such as: API, sulphur
content and degree of severity expressed as conversion.
# Spent catalyst circulation rate tmese (Ib/h)
‘* Steam present in cracked products, Sout (Ib/h)
‘Thus, a material balance around the reactor is
»
Ime = Sin ~ Meat = J hs + Sour = Mae (8.13)
Flue gases Products 2
ya ay
a - e
‘Og t 7 1 Q,
i 1 ! 1 Sout, Q,
I ‘neal 1 Sou, Qsout
| |Regeneratorle M2] Reactor | |
\ Ta {1
2 1
“A i
“| K
Exothermic — ry
reactions 1 ~
1 Endothermic
| reactions
Feed oil Sin, Asin
m, Q,
Figure 8.8. Inputand output streams for reactor and regenerator in FCC unitFluidised Catalytic Cracking 217
where p is the total number of vapour products and assuming Six does
not condense and is present in the exiting vapour products at the same
rate (Si) = Soue)- mj is the mass of each product that can be calculated
using the FCC correlations. The produced coke is present in spent
catalyst. Thus
Meoke = Mscat — Mear
Equation (8.13) can be rewritten as follows:
my = > m+ Moke (8.14)
ia
8.12.1.2. Regenerator Material Balance
Regenerator input:
© Spent catalyst circulation rate teas (Ib/h)
# Air for coke burning mi, (Ib/h)
Regenerator output:
© Flue gases 1 (b/h)
© Regenerated catalyst tea: (Ib/h)
‘Thus, the material balance around the regenerator produces:
Iie Moar = YM Mo (8.15)
a
where 1 is the mass of each gas produced from the coke burning which may
contain CO3, CO, H2O, SO2, No and Os (from excess air)
8.12.2. Energy Balance
8.12.2.1. Reactor Heat Balance
Heat input:
© Heat of feed oil Q;- (Btu/h) at inlet feed temperature (T))
‘© Heat of steam injected Qs (Btu/h) at T,
‘* Heat of regenerated catalyst Qoar (Btu/h) at regenerator outlet temper-
ature (Tic)
Heat output
‘* Heat in vapour products, Q, (Btu/h) at reactor outlet temperature
(Tr)
‘© Heat of spent catalyst Qoac (Btu/h) at Try238 Chapter 8
© Heat of exit steam Q.our (Btu/h) at Tre
‘Then the energy balance can be expressed as
me Cpe Te = To} + el AH) + tMhea¢ Cr cat (Tires — To} ~ Sin Cp Ts = To)
= (Te = To) mi Crs ~ teat Ch scat( Tit — To) + SourCps( Tr — To)
(8.16)
Since, Meoke = Mscat ~ Meae ANA Sj, = Sou, then equation (8.16) becomes.
me Cps( Tr — To) + me( AH) + tex Coat Titeg — Te} + Sin p(T = Ti}
= (Tr = To) mi Ces + coke Gr.coke( Tie — To)
(8.17)
8.12.2.2. Regenerator Heat Balance
Heat input:
© Heat of spent catalyst Que (Btu/h) at Ty
© Heat of input air for coke burning Q,i, (Btu/h) at Ty,
© Heat of coke combustion qeoke (Btu/h)
Heat output:
© Heat of flue gas Qi, (Btu/h) at They
© Heat of regenerated catalyst Quay (Btu/h) at Tiroy
‘Thus the heat balance around the regenerator can expressed as
Ie Cp ail Tar — Ty) + Moke CP coke( Tr — To) + deoke
a . . (8.18)
= (Titeg — To) > MCo.g) + MearCr cae Theeg — Te) ‘
Example 8.2
Find the catalyst circulation rate for the FCC unit used in example E8.1 by
carrying out a heat balance around the regenerator, A sketch of the stream flows,
and temperatures around the regenerator is presented in Fig. E8.2.1
Data:
Heat of combustion of coke, AHe = 0.393 x 10° kj/kmol,
Chew = LID KI/kg.K,
Cosie = 29.6 kJ/kmol.K, Cp, = 32.6 kJ/kmol.K, Cp.co, = 46.9 kJ/kmol.K,
Crcoke = 21.1 kI/kg.K -
Solution:
Coke produced = 29,813 Ib/h = 13,551 kg/h (from example E8.1)
Coke = 13,551 kg/h = 1129 kmol/h
qeoke = 1129 (kmol/h) X 0.393 x 10° (kJ/kmol) = 443.8 x 10° (K/h)Fluidised Catalytic Cracking 219
M2, Meas
Treg = 700 C
Mecat + Moke
Tooat= Ta = 520 0
Regenerator m
Treg = 690
Figure E8.2.1 Regenerator
Air required = Op required/0.21
Op required:
C +0, —=CO,
Oe required = 1129 kmol/h
meo2 = 1129 kmol/h
mg, = air required = 1129/0.21 = 5376 kmol/h
myo = 5379 x 0.79 = 4247 kmol/h
‘Thus, the heat balance from equation (8.18) gives
5376 x 29.6(200 — 15} ~ may 1-11 x (520 — 15} ~ 13551 21.1 x (520—15)
| 443.8 x 10® = (700 = 15)/1129 46.9 | 4247 > 32.6) | snes 1.11(690 15)
58 x 10° kg/h = 43.0 t/min = 0.717 t/s
8.13. KINETIC MODEL FoR FCC REACTOR
‘The FCC process involves a network of reactions producing a large
number of components. Therefore, lumping models can be used to describe
the reaction system in terms of the feed and a defined number of products,
‘Three, four and up to over ten lumps can be used theoretically. A three
lump model (Figure 8.9) assumes that VGO produces two products: gaso-
line and a combined product of gas and coke, where y refers to the mass
fraction of each lump and k is the reaction rate constant.
A more realistic model is the four-lump model (Figure 8.10) in which
VGO produces gasoline, gas and coke.
Assuming that the VGO cracking rate is second order and gasoline rate is,
first order. The three and four lump models in Figures 8.9 and 8.10,
respectively, are shown below. In these models the catalyst deactivation
rate ¢) is considered equal for all reactions,220
veoy,) ——“* + Gasoline (y,)
«6 he
‘Gas + Coke!
Wa)
Figure 8.9 Three-lump model
veo yy) ——K2 _, Gasoline ys)
Tet
Coke (y4) Gas (ys)
Figure 8.10 Four-lump model
‘Theee-lump model:
for VGO
dy; 5 P 2
n= a = -hiyié — byie = (kn + eid
for gasoline
dy 2 2
=p = kivid ~ kayad = (ki, ~ heya)
for gas + coke
dys 2
=a, = levis kn)d
Four-lump model:
for VGO
Nd — kisyid — kaye
avid — kayad — kad = (kyt
kosya
for gas
dys 2
nap = (ken kayy )o
Chapter 8
(8.19)
(8.20)
(8.21)
(8.22)
koaya)
(8.23)
(8.24)Fluidised Catalytic Cracking 221
Table 8.7 Experimental data at 548.9 °C and catalyst to oil ratio (C/O) = 4
(Ancheyta-Juarez and Murillo-Hernandez, 2000)
Conversion VGO Gasoline
(wt%) (wt%) (wt %)
82.38 17.62 54.16
7118 28.82 48.65
62.04 37.96 43.85
49.26 50.74 37.67
for coke
dy, >
aH (kuyt | kavr)o (8.25)
Experimental data reported by AncheytaJuarez and Murillo-Hernandez
(2000), which are shown in Table 8.7, can be used to evaluate the reaction
rate constants
Example £8.3,
Use the experimental data given in Table 8.7 with @ equal to 1.0. Estimate the
reaction rate constants for the three-lump model
Solution:
For a three-lump model and @ = 1
an pasty
te (£8.3.1)
dys .
2 E8.3.2)
+ (B8.3.2)
Y _ (ey? oye) (E8.3.3)
Initial conditions at = 0 are at yi = 1, yo = O and ys = 0. Initial guesses for ky, ko
and k3 are assumed. Equations (E8.3.1), (E8.3.2) and (E8.3.3) are solved numer-
ically in the Excel worksheet. The resulted values for y,, y2 and ys, at time
corresponding to the space velocity in Table 8.7, are compared with the
experimental composition listed in Table 8.7. The Solver in the Excel work~
sheet is used to minimise the difference by changing the values of ky, ky and ke
‘The resulting k values are
ky = 23 bo!) ky = 3.1 bo! and ky = 7.5 hot
Predicted yields are plotted as solid lines versus conversion in Figure E8.3. The
experimental data are also plotted from Table 8.7 as symbols in the same figure.222 Chapter 8
= VGO
x Gasoline
© Gas+Coke
— Predicted
Yield, wit fraction
0 02 0.4 06 08 1
Conversion, wt fraction
Figure E8.3. Experimental and predicted gas
sas and coke yields
8.14. CONCENTRATION AND TEMPERATURE PROFILES
IN THE RISER
Itis possible to calculate the concentration profile for each component in
the riser reactor by differential material balance in the riser. If the four-lump
model discussed earlier is considered, it is possible to derive the following
equation for each lump VGO, gasoline, gases and coke (Jia et al., 2003)
For VGO
[ki2 — kis + Realy (8.26)
For gasoline
p , ,
Pe (tay? = (kas + hes 01] (8.27)
For gases
(8.28)
For coke
(8.29)Fluidised Catalytic Cracking 223
Where
A, = Cross-sectional area of the riser
Hydrocarbon gases void fraction
Hydrocarbon gases mass flow rate in the riser (kg/s)
@ = Catalyse activity
Density of gas phase in the riser (kg/m?)
= = Axial distance in the riser (m)
Numerical integration of equation (8.26) co (8.29) will give the yield
profile of each component along the length of the riser. The value ¢, , Pg
and nj, have to be updated along the length of the riser.
Updating these values along the riser length can be carried out using the
following equations:
Peaetllg
Pelle 8.30)
Paea T Pout ™
where if = tlg/ttpy tg is the velocity of the gas (m/s) which is gas flow rate
divided by riser cross-sectional area, 1, is the particle velocity in the riser and
is defined as
Uy = ———————_ 8.31
» Apel a
The hydrocarbon gases flow rate is calculated from
mg = mvcolyi | y2+ ys) 8.32)
‘The density p, has to be updated as a function of temperature change in the
riser, which is calculated from a temperature profile generated from the
energy balance equation
The coke content of the catalyst C., varies with coking time according
to
Co = 2.43 x 107822? (8.33)
And the deactivation function with respect to coke content can be
determined:
1
1. 69.47(100:
Coking time f, can be calculated at each riser interval as
dtc AD!
ao TS] RT
Meal | = | mg. = Y4 Pea
T i
¢
(8.34)
‘The energy balance equation gives224 Chapter 8
(ki2AHi2 + kisAHiy + kisAFhs)yt
(Ro AHay + kesAHbs Jy
(8.36)
The boundary conditions are at > = 0, yr = 1, yo = ys = ys =0, Tr = To
and 1, =0.
Example £8.4
‘The cracking of gas oil is carried out through a 33 m riser height with an 0.8 m
inside diameter. Typical industrial FCC riser data (Ali and Corriou, 1997) are
listed in Table E8.4.1
Kinetic and energy data (Abul-Hamayel, 2003) are listed in Table B8.4.2.
Typical molec ities (Ahari et al., 2008) are given in
Table E8.4.3.
Solve the riser ma
ar weights and heat capa
m
tration and temperature profile versus riser height
id energy balance equations and plot the concen-
Table £8.4.1 Typical FCC riser data
Feed
Catalyst flow Catalyst Feed Riser
LD. Height flowrate rate temperature temperature _ pressure
(m) (m) —_ (kg/s) (kg/s) (K) (K) (atm)
O8 33 144 20 960 494 29
Table £8.4.2 Kinetic constants and energies for four-lump model at 823 K
ka hes ky
(wefrach) + — (wefrach) * —(wefrach) $y (h)* ey (h)
121 35 21 12 3
Ha (Keal) Hy (Keal/ Hy (Keal/ Hay (keal/ Hay (kal
mol) mol) mol) mol) mol)
28 19 15, 34 30,
Table £8.4.3 Kinetic constants and energies for four-lump
model at 823 K
Molecular weight
(kg/kmol) ) (ike K)
333 33
106.7 KH
40.0 33
4 1.087
Z 1.087Fluidised Catalytic Cracking 225
Solution:
Utilising the operating data the p, was calculated at initial conditions of temper-
ature and pressure
P(Mw) __2.9(333)
RT 0.082(494)
3.84 kg/m?
Gas velocity 4, was then calculated at pg
At 2=0 of the riser
n=Lp=y=ya=0
20 (1 + 0 + 0) = 20kg/s
Ps
20
23.8405)
1.67 m/s
Then 1, and 6, are calculated simultaneously as follows
ees 36
O58) —
20}
&=
23.8:
44)(36/(1
‘The catalyst activity can be determined as
1
“1 -469.47(0.24302)
Coking time /, can be calculated from equation (8.35) as
en 0.5(8}(1.67/up)
(E8.4.1)
dz
0.082T,
29
144(1.67/up) | iS iz
| Blan p08)
Simple energy balance on the catalyst and the feed is performed to calculate the
riser inlet temperature at z =0, T; = Ty = 821.8 K
At yy = Land yy =0
[ke AHi2 + kuAHis +ksAHs)] (E8.4.2)
-3))
Equations E8.4.1 and E8.4.2 should be solved numerically at boundary
conditions of y and values of k and H from Table E8.4.2. Gas density is then
calculated at the estimated riser temperature. Then the differential equations
(8.26) to (8.29) are solved in Excel, using the Euler method. The procedure is
repeated to calculate T, and 1, then the product compositions,
Figure E8.4.1 shows the FCC riser composition profiles as a function of
riser height. The
Figure E8.4.2.
emperature and activity. of cazalyst profiles are shown in226 Chapter 8
10
“VEO
ost \?
(3)Gases
2 06
2 (2)Gasoline
5 04
8 (4)Coke
02 ,
0.0 |.
o)0S~CS~*~«S SSCS
Riser height (m)
Reactor
. effluent
ol TSE Tt" [Separator
x Catalyst Az <
\ in
—__>
time in the riser time in
separator
Figure E8.4.1 Product concentration profiles along the riser
825 1.00
0.98
820
0.96
092 |
8 &
E 810 0.90 8
& é
0.88
805
0.86
800 0.84
Riser height (rm)
1-2. Temperature and catalyst activity profile in the riser