CB-PAST FORM 2 COMPETENCY-BASED PERFORMANCE: APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR MASTER TEACHERS (CB-PAST MT) Name Title School Division
PART I COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE A. DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS Within the appraisal period Set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners Utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners. Paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners Provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks. Recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities. Adopted strategies to address needs of differently-able learners. Showed fairness and consideration to all learners, regardless of socio-economic backgrounds. Mentored peers in the grade/year level of the area of specialization in using strategies that address diversity of learners. B. CURRICULUM CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY Within the appraisal period Delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches, and strategies Developed and/or implemented innovative and functional teaching approaches and strategies every year as follows. MT I II: at least one MT III IV: at least two Used intergrative approaches in teaching such as Content Based Instruction (CBI), Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach (MILA), and multidisciplinary approach, among others. Explained learning goals, instructional procedure Linked the current content with past and future lessons. Aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resource appropriate to the learners. Created situations that encourage learners to use higher order thinking skills through the use of the local language among others if needed. engaged and sustained learners interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them. Integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time. Selected prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives Provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits. used Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources for planning and designing teaching learning activities. Served as demonstration teacher and/or consultant MT I: at least school and district level MT II: school, district and division levels MT III: school, district, division and regional levels MT IV: school, district, division, regional and national tasks BB Appraisal Rating B P HP BB Appraisal Rating B P HP
Position School Year First Semester District Second Semester
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
10. 11. 12. 13. 14.
15. Assumed leadership in the improvement of instructional program MT I: in at least two grade/year levels MT II: in at least three grade/year levels MT III: in at least four grade/three year levels MT IV: in all grade/year levels 16. Conducted classroom observations MT I: in at least two grade/year levels MT II: in at least three grade/year levels MT III: in at least four grade/three year levels MT IV: in all grade/year levels 17. Conducted instructional training programs in the school, district, or division 18. Mentored a peer on how to plan and conduct action research C. PLANNING, ASSESSING AND REPORTING Within the appraisal period I Constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests. used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques (porticos, journals, rubrics, etc.) interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning. Identified teaching-learning difficulties and possible causes. managed learning remediation activities used tools for assessing authentic learning Provide timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners progress. 10. led in the analysis and utilization of test results MT I: in at least two grade/year levels MT II: in at least three grade/year levels MT III: in at least four grade/three year levels
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
BB
Appraisal Rating B P
HP
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
MT IV: in all grade/year levels II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGES D. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Within the appraisal period I Provided gender fair opportunities for learning Maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions. Used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capabilities of learners for higher learning Inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves Handled behaviour problems quickly and with due respect to childrens rights Created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher. Maintained a model classroom, which is no conducive to teaching and learning. E. COMMUNITY LINKAGES Within the appraisal period I Involved the home/community in sharing accountability for learners achievement Used varied and available community resources (human, materials) to support learning Used community as a laboratory for learning Got involved in community information of school and achievements. Shared to the community information on school events and achievements. Led learners to apply classroom learning to the home and community Informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures Planned, organized and led a school-community activity as a model for peers such as Clean and Green, Brigada Eskwela, sports clinic, waste management etc. BB Appraisal Rating B P HP Appraisal Rating B P
BB
HP
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS F. SOCIAL REGARD FOR LEARNING
Within the appraisal period I Followed and implemented school policies and procedures Demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions. Maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times. Demonstrated appropriate behaviour in dealing with students, peers, superiors and other stakeholders Maintained oneself as a role model of students and peers. BB Appraisal Rating B P HP
1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4
G. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Within the appraisal period I Maintained stature and behaviour that upheld the dignity of teaching Manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude and others. Demonstrated personal educational philosophy of teaching in classroom Updated myself with recent developments in education through readings, attendance in continuing professional education, or trainings/seminars and similar activities. Participated actively in professional organizations. Reflected on the quality of my own teaching Improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, students, peers, superiors and others. Used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weaknesses Accepted accountability for learners outcomes 10. Abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers 11. Organized and implemented activities with peers for personal growth and professional development like educational tours, school visit retreats, conference etc. BB Appraisal Rating B P HP
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
PART II-THE PLUS FACTOR I. PLUS FACTOR FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE 1. Conducted meetings/home visitations of students at least four (4) times to improve teaching learning situations. 2. Acted as resource person in at least four (4) processional development activities (i.e. seminar, workshop, trainings, conference) in either pre-service or in-service trainings in the school, district or division. 3. Provided professional assistance to peers on how to plan and conduct action research. 4. Initiated, organized and conducted a training program for teachers. 5. Designed evaluation and monitoring program for the school, district or division. 6. Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division. 7. Increased the difference in the achievement rate or the division post test over the prt test by 5% or higher in all classes taught. 8. No dropout rate during the appraisal period. 9. Others related to Instructional Competence (specify) II. NO PLUS FACTOR FOR SCHOOL, HOME COMMUNITY LINKAGES (All items are included as required) III. PLUS FACTOR FOR PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS 1. Received award for recognition as exemplary teacher for both personal and professional attributes by a recognized body or agency at the school, district, division, regional and national level. 2. Earned a higher relevant degree. 3. Published at least one (1) article in professional magazines/periodicals related to the field of specialization. 4. Published at least one (1) article in professional magazines/periodicals related to the field of specialization. 5. Received a scholarship/fellowships/travel/research/observation grant or secondment of not less than one (1) year, through a competitive selection. The credit shall be earned after the scholarship/grant/secondment has been finished. If less than one year, it shall be prorated in months.
6. represented the DepEd in the regional, national, or international forum related to the current assignment. 7. others related to Personal Growth and Professional Development Characteristics (Please specify)
CB-PAST MT Summary of Ratings Template
Criteria Assigned Weight in CB-PAST (disregarded in the No. of Items
Formative Appraisal)
Score
Mean
(Score + no. of Items)
Description of the TPI
Weighted Average (Mean X Weight)
I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 8 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30% 18 C. Planning, Assessing and Reporting 20% 10 Sum of Weighted Average of A, B & C II. HOME, SCHOOL & COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 7 E. Community Linkages 10% 8 Sum of Weighted Average of D & E III. PERSONAL GROWTH & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 5 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional 10% 11 Development Sum of Weighted Average of F & G Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G only for Formative Appraisal) Descriptive for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal Plus Factor (for the Summative Appraisal) Each item gets 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average) Summative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G and the Plus Factor earned) Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal
TEACHER PERFORMANCE INDEX (TPI)
3.51-4.00-Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all time, a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributed, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are complete beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident. 2.51-3.50-Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas. 1.51-2.50-Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job. 1.00-1.50-Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teachers may need immediate instructional support. OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING DESCRIPTION AND CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUMMATIVE APPRAISAL Description of Overall Performance CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS Rating Noted: A teacher who does meet the critical requirement will get the lower performance rating. Outstanding 3.51 or higher and no performance index or below proficient in any of the standards. Very Satisfactory 2.51 or higher and no performance index or below basic in any of the standards. Satisfactory 1.51-2.50 and no performance index value below basic in any of the standards. Below Basic 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index values below basic in any of the standards.
Remarks
Agreements:
I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflects the true and honest evaluation for my teaching performance. Ratee: Teacher (Name & Signature) Date: CONFERRED WITH: Date: Recommending Approval: Date: Approved by: ROMEO M. ALIP, Ph. D., CESO V Schools Division Superintendent Date: _______________________________ DIVINA J. FLORES District Supervisor AURORA V. ENRIQUEZ_________ Principal II
CB-PAST FORM 1
COMPETENCY-BASED PERFORMANCE: APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS (CB-PAST) Name Position Title School ARSENIO SANTOS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL District Division BULACAN School Year 2012 2013 First Semester
PART I COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE
_______ CALUMPIT Second Semester
A. DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS
Within the appraisal period, I 1. Set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 2. Utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners. 3. Paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 4. Provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks. 5. Recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities. 6. Adopted strategies to address needs of differently-able learners. 7. Showed fairness and consideration to all learners, regardless of socio-economic backgrounds. B. CURRICULUM CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY Within the appraisal period, I 1. Delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches, and strategies 2. Used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and value in teaching 3. Explained learning goals, instructional procedures, and content clearly and accurately to students 4. Linked the current content with past and future lessons. 5. Aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners. 6. Created situations that encourage learners to use higher order thinking skills through the use of the local language among others if needed. 7. Engaged and sustained learners interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them. 8. Integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 9. Established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time. 10. 10. Selected prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives 11. 11. Provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits. 12. 12. Used Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources for planning and designing teaching learning activities. Appraisal Rating B P 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 BB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 HP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
BB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
HP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
C. PLANNING, ASSESSING AND REPORTING Within the appraisal period I 1. Constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests. 2. Used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques (portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc.) 3. Interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning. 4. Identified teaching-learning difficulties and possible causes. 5. Managed learning remediation activities 6. Used tools for assessing authentic learning 7. Provide timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth 8. Kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 9. Conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners progress. II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGES D. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Within the appraisal period I 1. Provided equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 2. Maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions. 3. Used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capabilities of learners for higher learning 4. Inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves BB 1 1 1 1 Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 HP 4 4 4 4 Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3
BB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
HP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
5. Handled behaviour problems quickly and with due respect to childrens rights 6. Created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher. E. COMMUNITY LINKAGES Within the appraisal period I 1.Involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners achievement 2. Used varied and available community resources (human, materials) to support learning 3. Used community as a laboratory for learning 4. Got involved in / shared community information of school and achievements. 55 5. Led students to apply classroom learning to the community 6. Informed learners parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
BB 1 1 1 1 1 1
Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3
HP 4 4 4 4 4 4
III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS F. SOCIAL REGARD FOR LEARNING Appraisal Rating Within the appraisal period I BB B P 1.Abide by and implemented school policies and procedures. 1 2 3 2. Demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions. 1 2 3 3.Maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times. 1 2 3 4.Demonstrated appropriate behaviour in dealing with students, peers, and superiors 1 2 3 G. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Within the appraisal period I 1. Maintained stature and behaviour that upheld the dignity of teaching 2. Manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude collegiality among others. 3. Demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in classroom 4. Updated myself with recent developments in education 5. Participated actively in professional organizations. 6. Reflected on the quality of my own teaching 7. Improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, students, peers, superiors and others. 8. Used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weaknesses 9. Accepted accountability for learners outcomes 10. Abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers BB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
HP 4 4 4 4
HP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
10.
PART II-THE PLUS FACTOR.
I. PLUS FACTOR FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period, for peers, cooperating teachers resources teachers in the inservice and, pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school (District or division) Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to instructional competence Innovated teaching strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. Increased the difference in the achievement rate of division post test over the pre test by 2.5% or higher on all classes taught. Maintained zero drop out rate of reduced drop out late in the class. II. PLUS FACTOR FOR SCHOOL, HOME COMMUNITY LINKAGES 1. Organized and implemented at least one (1) home-school-implemented-community project in rating period which resulted to enhance resulting outcomes 2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics laboratory, model classroom, others) 3. Made at least one (1) best practices on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of their children. 4. 5. 6. Conducted at least one action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school, community involvement. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage parents to support their children in their school activities, to reduce absenteeism and tardiness. Others not included but related to school, home, and community involvement.
III. PLUS FACTOR FOR PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS Received award for recognition as exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and in non-academic contests recognized at least at the division level. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and the like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed) Other not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics.
CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template
Assigned Weight in CBPAST(disregarded in No. of Items the Formative Appraisal) Mean (Score + Description of the TPI Weighted Average no. of (Mean X Weight) Items)
Criteria
Score
I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30% 12 C. Planning, Assessing and Reporting 20% 9 Sum of Weighted Average of A, B & C II. HOME, SCHOOL & COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 E. Community Linkages 10% 6 Sum of Weighted Average of D & E III. PERSONAL GROWTH & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional 10% 10 Development Sum of Weighted Average of F & G Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G only for Formative Appraisal) Descriptive for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal Plus Factor (for the Summative Appraisal) Each item gets 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average) Summative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G and the Plus Factor earned) Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal
TEACHER PERFORMANCE INDEX (TPI)
3.51-4.00-Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all time, a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributed, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are complete beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident. 2.51-3.50-Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas. 1.51-2.50-Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job. 1.00-1.50-Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teachers may need immediate instructional support.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING DESCRIPTION AND CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUMMATIVE APPRAISAL
Description of Overall Performance Rating Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Below Basic Remarks Agreements: I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflects the true and honest evaluation for my teaching performance. Ratee: Teacher (Name & Signature) Date: CONFERRED WITH: AURORA V. ENRIQUEZ Principal II CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS Note: A teacher who does NOT meet the critical requirement will get the next lower level of the overall performance rating. 3.51 or higher and no performance index or below proficient in any of the standards. 2.51 or higher and no performance index or below basic in any of the standards. 1.51-2.50 and no performance index value below basic in any of the standards. 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index values below basic in any of the standards.
Date: Recommending Approval: Date Approved by: Date: JOHANNA N. GERVACIO, Ph. D. Asst. Schools Division Superintendent DIVINA J. FLORES District Supervisor
CB-PAST FORM 1
COMPETENCY-BASED PERFORMANCE: APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS (CB-PAST) Name RUTH R. SANTOS Position Title School ARSENIO SANTOS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL District Division BULACAN School Year 2012 2013 First Semester
PART I COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE
TEACHER 1________ CALUMPIT Second Semester
A. DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS
Within the appraisal period, I 1. Set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners 2. Utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners. 3. Paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners 4. Provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risks. 5. Recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities. 6. Adopted strategies to address needs of differently-able learners. 7. Showed fairness and consideration to all learners, regardless of socio-economic backgrounds. B. CURRICULUM CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY Within the appraisal period, I 1. Delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches, and strategies 2. Used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and value in teaching 3. Explained learning goals, instructional procedures, and content clearly and accurately to students 4. Linked the current content with past and future lessons. 5. Aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate to the learners. 6. Created situations that encourage learners to use higher order thinking skills through the use of the local language among others if needed. 7. Engaged and sustained learners interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them. 8. Integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson 9. Established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time. 10. 10. Selected prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the learning objectives 11. 11. Provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits. 12. 12. Used Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources for planning and designing teaching learning activities. Appraisal Rating B P 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 BB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 HP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
BB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
HP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
C. PLANNING, ASSESSING AND REPORTING Within the appraisal period I 1. Constructed valid and reliable formative and summative tests. 2. Used appropriate non-traditional assessment techniques (portfolios, journals, rubrics, etc.) 3. Interpreted and used test results to improve teaching and learning. 4. Identified teaching-learning difficulties and possible causes. 5. Managed learning remediation activities 6. Used tools for assessing authentic learning 7. Provide timely and accurate feedback to learners to encourage them to monitor and reflect on their own learning growth 8. Kept accurate records of grades/performance levels of learners 9. Conducted regular meetings with learners and parents to report learners progress. II. SCHOOL, HOME, COMMUNITY LINKAGES D. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Within the appraisal period I 1. Provided equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender 2. Maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions. 3. Used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capabilities of learners for higher learning 4. Inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves 5. Handled behaviour problems quickly and with due respect to childrens rights BB 1 1 1 1 1 Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 HP 4 4 4 4 4 Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3
BB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
HP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
6. Created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and the teacher. E. COMMUNITY LINKAGES Within the appraisal period I 1.Involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners achievement 2. Used varied and available community resources (human, materials) to support learning 3. Used community as a laboratory for learning 4. Got involved in / shared community information of school and achievements. 55 5. Led students to apply classroom learning to the community 6. Informed learners parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures
BB 1 1 1 1 1 1
Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3
HP 4 4 4 4 4 4
III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS F. SOCIAL REGARD FOR LEARNING Appraisal Rating Within the appraisal period I BB B P 1.Abide by and implemented school policies and procedures. 1 2 3 2. Demonstrated punctuality in accomplishing tasks and attendance on all occasions. 1 2 3 3.Maintained appropriate appearance and decorum at all times. 1 2 3 4.Demonstrated appropriate behaviour in dealing with students, peers, and superiors 1 2 3 G. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Within the appraisal period I 1. Maintained stature and behaviour that upheld the dignity of teaching 2. Manifested personal qualities like enthusiasm, flexibility, caring attitude collegiality among others. 3. Demonstrated my educational philosophy of teaching in classroom 4. Updated myself with recent developments in education 5. Participated actively in professional organizations. 6. Reflected on the quality of my own teaching 7. Improved my teaching performance based on feedback from the mentors, students, peers, superiors and others. 8. Used self-assessment to enhance strengths and correct my weaknesses 9. Accepted accountability for learners outcomes 10. Abide by the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers BB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appraisal Rating B P 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
HP 4 4 4 4
HP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
10.
PART II-THE PLUS FACTOR.
I. PLUS FACTOR FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE Acted as a mentor/coach in professional development to at least 2 peers. Served as a demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period, for peers, cooperating teachers resources teachers in the inservice and, pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management. Conducted one (1) action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school (District or division) Acted as coordinator, chairperson in activities, projects that relate to instructional competence Innovated teaching strategies, classroom management and assessment to enhance learning. Increased the difference in the achievement rate of division post test over the pre test by 2.5% or higher on all classes taught. Maintained zero drop out rate of reduced drop out late in the class. II. PLUS FACTOR FOR SCHOOL, HOME COMMUNITY LINKAGES 1. Organized and implemented at least one (1) home-school-implemented-community project in rating period which resulted to enhance resulting outcomes 2. Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens, Mathematics laboratory, model classroom, others) 3. Made at least one (1) best practices on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of their children. 4. 5. 6. Conducted at least one action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school, community involvement. Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage parents to support their children in their school activities, to reduce absenteeism and tardiness. Others not included but related to school, home, and community involvement.
III. PLUS FACTOR FOR PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS Received award for recognition as exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication, initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies. Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and in non-academic contests recognized at least at the division level. Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree. Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and the like which have competitive screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed) Other not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics.
CB-PAST Summary of Ratings Template
Assigned Weight in CBPAST(disregarded in No. of Items the Formative Appraisal) Mean (Score + Description of the TPI Weighted Average no. of (Mean X Weight) Items)
Criteria
Score
I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE 60% A. Diversity of Learners 10% 7 B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy 30% 12 C. Planning, Assessing and Reporting 20% 9 Sum of Weighted Average of A, B & C II. HOME, SCHOOL & COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 20% D. Learning Environment 10% 6 E. Community Linkages 10% 5 Sum of Weighted Average of D & E III. PERSONAL GROWTH & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 20% F. Social Regard for Learning 10% 4 G. Personal, Social Growth & Professional 10% 10 Development Sum of Weighted Average of F & G Formative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G only for Formative Appraisal) Descriptive for Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal Plus Factor (for the Summative Appraisal) Each item gets 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average) Summative Performance Rating (Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G and the Plus Factor earned) Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical requirement for Summative Appraisal
TEACHER PERFORMANCE INDEX (TPI)
3.51-4.00-Highly Proficient. Teacher performance consistently exceeds expectations. Displays at all time, a consistently high level of performance related skills, abilities, attributed, initiatives and productivity. All assignments/responsibilities are complete beyond the level of expectation. Self-direction of the teacher is evident. 2.51-3.50-Proficient. Teacher performance often exceeds expectations. Displays a high level of competency related skills abilities, initiatives and productivity, exceeding requirements in many of the areas. 1.51-2.50-Basic. Teacher performance meets basic expectations based on standards. Displays basic level of work and performance outputs as required outcomes or expectations of the job. 1.00-1.50-Below Basic. Teacher performance on the job and outputs frequently fall below standard Work outputs consistently low, regularly fails to meet required outcomes needing repetition of duty or by completion of others. The teachers may need immediate instructional support.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING DESCRIPTION AND CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUMMATIVE APPRAISAL
Description of Overall Performance Rating Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Below Basic Remarks Agreements: I hereby certify that my self-ratings reflects the true and honest evaluation for my teaching performance. Ratee: RUTH R. SANTOS Teacher (Name & Signature) Date: CONFERRED WITH: AURORA V. ENROQUEZ Principal CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS Note: A teacher who does NOT meet the critical requirement will get the next lower level of the overall performance rating. 3.51 or higher and no performance index or below proficient in any of the standards. 2.51 or higher and no performance index or below basic in any of the standards. 1.51-2.50 and no performance index value below basic in any of the standards. 1.00 or higher with at least one performance index values below basic in any of the standards.
Date: Recommending Approval: Date Approved by: Date: JOHANNA N. GERVACIO, Ph. D. Asst. Schools Division Superintendent DIVINA J. FLORES District Supervisor
