X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy XPS, ESCA
Photon inn electron out
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
XPS and AES are surface sensitive techniques
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Surface Sensitivity
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Surface sensitivity
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Photo emission process is often envisaged as three steps
Absorption and ionisation - (initial state effect) Response from atom and creation of photoelectron -(final state effect) Transport of electron to surface and escape - (extrinsic loss)
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
XPS ESCA
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Introduction X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy works by irradiating a sample material with mono energetic soft x-rays causing electrons to be ejected. Identification of the elements in the sample can be made directly from the kinetic energies of these ejected photoelectrons. The relative concentrations of elements can be determined from the photoelectron intensities.
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
XPS - ESCA
Surface sensitive analysis technique based on photoelectric effect. Depth of analysis ~4-40 nm. All elements except Hydrogen. Wide range of materials: Polymers, Ceramics, metals . (vacuum compatible) Applications: corrosion, catalysis, thin films, surface coatings, segregation Gives information on chemical composition and chemical state.
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
History
1887 Heinrich Hertz /1888 Wilhelm Hallwaches
illuminating metal surfaces resulted in electronic emission
1900 Max Planck -black body radiation 1905 Einstein - light is quantized
E=h 1950 Kai Siegbahn 1981 : Nobel Prize
studied photoejection of electrons with x-rays
1950: Instrumentation 1960: Chemical Applications
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Absorbing X-rays emitting Photoelectrons
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
A closer look
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Relaxation - Auger
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
XPS Peaks
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Basic equations:
The relationship governing the interaction of a photon with a core level is:
KE= h - BE KE = kinetic energy of ejected photoelectron h = characteristic energy of X-ray photon BE = binding energy of the atomic orbital from which the electron originates. = spectrometer work function
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
XPS example: Gold
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Electronic structure and spectroscopy
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Binding energies?
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Spin-Orbit Coupling
Cu 2p 2p3/2
2p1/2
Orbital=p l=1 s=+/-1/2 ls=1/2,3/2
19.8 : 2 925
Peak Area 965
955 945 935 Binding Energy (eV)
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
XPS spectra of Palladium
BE= h - KE
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
WHAT IS THIS?
Survey scan : Most elements have major photoelectron peaks below 1100 eV, so a range from 1100 - 0 eV is usually sufficient. Al anode Mg anode ?
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Energy resolution ~1 eV
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Chemical shift binding energies in C 1s peak
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Chemical shift
Functional Group hydrocarbon amine alcohol, ether Cl bound to C F bound to C carbonyl C-H, C-C C-N C-O-H, C-O-C C-Cl C-F C=O Binding Energy (eV) 285.0 286.0 286.5 286.5 287.8 288.0
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Chemical shift
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Inelastic Background
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Plasmon loss
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Instrumentation
Surface analysis by XPS requires irradiating a solid in an Ultra-high Vacuum (UHV) chamber with monoenergetic soft X-rays and analysing the energies of the emitted electrons.
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
XPS instrument at UIO?
Kratos Axis Ultra new in 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Instrument
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Chambers Vacuum and Pumps Sources Monochromator Analysers
Specimen handling Planning experiments
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Dual anode X-ray source
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Alternative X-ray sources
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Monochromator
N=2dsin For Al K =8.3
_
1010 planes in quartz: d= 4.25
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Monochromated X-rays
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Flooded or focused X-ray beam
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
CHA with standard input lens
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Pass Energy and Resolution
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Pass Energy
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Ion Etching
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Survey scan : Most elements have major photoelectron peaks below 1100 eV, so a range from 1100 - 0 eV is usually sufficient. Al anode Mg anode ?
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Detail Scans
For purposes of chemical state identification, for quantitative analysis of minor components and peak deconvolution or other mathematical manipulation of data.
Scan should be wide enough to encompass the background on both sides of the region of interest - yet with small enough step size - within a reasonable time. Radiation-sensitive peaks should be run first. Sufficient Signal / noise . Pass Energy ? E same for all scans !
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Oxidation of Titanium
Oxidation of Ti: Titanium has a big shift. Ti-metal (Tio) to TiO2 (Ti4+). Ti 2p-scan of Ti-metal and TiO2 Binding energies: metal:Ti 2p3/2=451.4 Ti 2p1/2=457.57 oxide:Ti 2p3/2=458.8 Ti 2p1/2=464.34 1.Not the same shift for the two spin doublets. 2. Metals have more asymmetric peaks than insulators/oxides. 3. Weak peak at 450.7eV - ghost (X-ray with higher energy = K)
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Density of state DOS
DOS Ti-metal
Degree of asymmetry proportional to DOS at EF
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Depth information from XPS
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Depth information from Ag-anode
Greater analysis depth The Al 2p spectra shown (Figure 3) were acquired with (a) Al and (b) Ag sources. Spectrum (b) is a clear illustration of the greater analysis depth of the Ag source as the element : oxide ratio is greater than that acquired with the Al source. An oxide thickness of 1.8nm indicated here was confirmed by independent angle resolved measurements.
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Binding Energy Referencing
BE = hv - KE - spec- Ech Where: BE= Electron Binding Energy KE= Electron Kinetic Energy spec= Spectrometer Work Function Ech= Surface Charge Energy Ech can be determined by calibrating the instrument to a spectral feature. C1s at 285.0 eV Au4f7/2 at 84.0 eV
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Binding Energy Referencing
When analysing insulating samples more care is required because of sample charging and the uncertainty in the location of the Fermi Level within the band gap. The term Binding energy is often used without specifying the reference level.
Take care when evaluating spectra !
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Charge neutralization for insulating samples
Low-energy electrons from a cold cathode flood gun alleviates positive charging
Low-energy source of positive ions alleviates the surrounding negative charge
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Auger parameter
The Auger parameter is defined as:
A.P. = K.E(Auger) - K.E.(photoelectron) + Photon Excitation Energy = K.E.(Auger) + B.E.(photoemission)
Where K.E.(Auger) and B.E.(photoemission) are normally measured for the most intense photoemission and sharpest Auger lines available.
Its advantage as a probe of charges in screening energy is that (unlike photoemission or Auger line measurements taken separately) it is independent of energy referencing problems whilst still being measurable to a high precision. Hence small shifts in its value can be measured and interpreted.
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
http://www.uksaf.org/data/table.html
Specimen preparation and handling
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Analysis of Multi-Layer Paint Cross Section
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Analysis of Materials for Solar Energy Collection by XPS Depth ProfilingThe amorphous-SiC/SnO2 Interface
Photo-voltaic Collector The profile indicates a reduction of the SnO2 occurred at the interface during deposition. Such a reduction would effect the collectors efficiency.
SnO2
Sn
Solar Energy
Conductive Oxide- SnO2 p-type a-SiC a-Si 500 496 492 488 484 480
Depth Binding Energy, eV Data courtesy A. Nurrudin and J. Abelson, University of Illinois
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
Probing Glass Coatings
Windows are coated with complex Multi-layer thin films to meet demands: 1) Energy conservation 2) Appearance 3) Durability
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
XPS Analysis of Pigment from Mummy Artwork
Pb3O4
Egyptian Mummy 2nd Century AD World Heritage Museum University of Illinois
PbO2 C O 150 145 140 135 130
Binding Energy (eV)
Pb Pb
N Ca Na Cl
Pb
500
MEF 3100 Spring 2007
400
300
200
100
XPS analysis showed that the pigment used on the mummy wrapping was Pb3O4 rather than Fe2O3
Binding Energy (eV)
Databases
MEF 3100 Spring 2007