Designing Better Maps
presented by: Tim Haithcoat
University of Missouri Columbia
with materials of:
Dennis Fizsimons, SW Texas State University George McCleary, Jr., University of Kansas
Design is a Choice
The theory of the visual display of quantitative information consists of principles that generate design options and that guide choices among options. The principles should not be applied rigidly or in a peevish spirit; they are not logically or mathematically certain; and it is better to violate any principle than to place graceless or inelegant marks on paper.
2
Design is a Choice
Most principles of design should be greeted with some skepticism, for work authority can dominate our vision, and we may come to see only through the lens of word authority rather than with our own eyes.
3
Design is a Choice
What is to be sought in designs for the display of information is the clear portrayal of complexity. Not the complication of the simple, rather the task of the designer is to give visual access to the subtle and the difficult -that is, the revelation of the complex.
Generalization
Selection Classification Simplification Exaggeration Symbolization Induction
5
Classification
Unclassed
Classed
Simplification
less
more
Exaggeration
less
more
Symbolization
Abstract
Representational
Induction
. . . . . . . .
Positive
Negative
Visual Variables
Texture
or
Color
or
Shape
Pattern Direction
Hue R Y G
Size
Value
Point 0-D Spatial Dimension
Line 1-D
R Y G
Area 2-D or more Qualitative
YG
Quantitative
after: Jacques Bertin. Graphics and Graphic Information Processing. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1981.
Visual Variables Typography
Size Value Direction Texture Form Color
Foreground
Increasing Visual Hierarchy
Background
Modified from: Borden Dent, Cartography - Thematic Map Design, 3rd ed. p. 264.
Scale/ Resolution
200%
150%
100%
75%
50%
Map Type & Symbolization (1 of 3)
Symbol Point Map Type Dot Map Characteristics
flow of distribution & relative spatial density (high/medium/ low relative density) interval construction - ordinal reading Related & limiting variables used in construction Specific point or areal unit -- actual location, centroid or weighted center Good for: high/low values in close proximity Symbolizing totals Aggregate data for several locations or areas
Point
Graduated Symbols
15
Map Type & Symbolization (2 of 3)
Symbol Line Map Type Characteristics Flow/ Network Isarithmic
Width of line represents data along route Segmented or uniform
Line/ Surface Volume
Isometric - points/isoplethic - areas Form of distribution & gradients most important Distribution treated as surface of a volume Surface contours - ridges, troughs, peaks, etc. - arrangement or direction of magnitudes Commensurable - data values can be derived Planimetric - correct horizontal position (within accuracy limits of map) For continuous data only
19
Map Type & Symbolization (3 of 3)
Symbol Area Map Type Choropleth Characteristics
Data by areal units - enumeration units Relative location most important Totals seldom mapped; usually derived values or averages (mean, median, mode) Ratios/densities - account for area Ratios, percentages, proportions eliminate area For discontinuous data only (or data treated as such) Data by areal units Continuous (connected) or discontinuous (separated) Data scaled proportionately as units area
Area
Cartogram
20
Dot Map
Graduated Symbol
Common Quantitative Map Types
Choropleth
Isoline
Spatial Dimension
Point
0-Dimension
Line
1-Dimension Continental Divide Railroad Highway Trail Highway Interstate 2 Lanes 4 Lanes 6 Lanes
Area
2-Dimensions or more Brown Jones Smith Wilson High Medium Low Very Low 1945 1947 1950 1954
Persons per Square mile
Nominal
Post Office Church Airport
Ownership
Ordinal Measurement Level
City Town Village
Crop Yield
Interval
Population
1000 500 200
Date of Annexation 1000 500 100 Population Density
% Unemployed
Vehicles (per hour)
Ratio
10 - 15 5 - 9.9 .1 - 4.9
>400 200-400 50-199 <50
The Map Design Process:
Planning
What information do you need to convey? Is a map the best way to communicate this information? What problem or question needs to be addressed? What information needs to be included? Is data readily available? Who is the audience? Is there a given style for this type of map? Will the map be part of a series? Sketch out several layout designs Reality: money, materials, equipment, labor, & time How will I proceed? 23
The Map Decision Triangle Quality
Time
Cost
24
The Map Design Process:
Composing
What map elements need to be visually dominant? What will be the final size of the map? How will the map be reproduced? Does the title or caption clearly identify the map purpose? Does each map element directly contribute to your purpose? Are sufficient base data present to support the spatial distribution? Do I need to define any map elements in a legend? Does the map communicate pattern(s)? Is the map too complex? Too Simple? 25
The Map Design Process:
Editing & Proofreading (1 of 2)
Has the quality of the data been overstated? Have sources of statistical or borrowed data been cited? Are there any typographic, grammar, or spelling errors? Are there any geographical errors? Is the map legible and readable? Has anything been omitted? Have I communicated the information? How do I know?
26
The Map Design Process:
Editing & Proofreading (2 of 2)
Does the visual hierarchy reflect levels of importance? Do all of the map elements work as a whole? Can anything be omitted? Am I willing to let this map stand as a measure of my ability and accomplishment?
27
Map Critique Checklist (1 of 2)
The overall look of the map Subjective, or emotional, reactions to the map (authoritativeness, pleasingness,) Content of the map Potential uses Appropriateness of a map for the purpose Projection Accuracy, precision General mapping method Point symbols Line symbols Color - aesthetics, suitability for representing content Other area symbols Type style, size, placement Details
28
Map Critique Checklist (2 of 2)
Suitability for the audience Execution & printing quality Layout Scale of map Clarity of scale indicators - literal & graphic Legend clarity Title clarity & adequacy Quality of the paper Map size, format, folding Context of the map (series, individual; accompanied or not by text,) Use of the map in practice (e.g. road
map/street map cannot be tested strictly in an armchair)
Overall effectiveness
29
Factors Affecting Choropleth Maps
Data quality
Appropriate size, shape & number of enumeration units Scale of resolution Availability -- alternatives (surrogate variables) Data preprocessing -- rate, ratio, or percentage (derived values)
Number of classes
Classed or unclassed 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 or n classes
30
Factors Affecting Choropleth Maps
(continued)
Method of Classification
Subjective/natural breaks Optimization, standard deviation, equal intervals, quantiles, etc..
Legend Design
Actual values, rounded values, continuous range values
31
Factors Affecting Choropleth Maps
(continued)
Symbolization
Value shadings:
Graded sequence - percentage (100% black - 0% white) Graded sequence (no 100% or 0%) Graded sequence which reflects actual data values (class means)
Color/hue: natural versus arbitrary Value shading of a hue or multiple hues
Texture of value shadings:
Resolution - fine to course Dots versus lines
32
