A Unified Approach for Stability
Bracing Requirements
LEROY A. LUTZ and JAMES M. FISHER
Columns and beam flanges in compression often require
intermediate lateral bracing to satisfactorily carry the required load. Usually this is a finite number of braces at a
spacing S. Many engineers are familiar with the ideal stiffness 4 Pcr^S needed to fully brace the compression member
over the length S, and that the required stiffness is generally
taken as twice the ideal stiffness, or 8 Pcr^S. If the compression member does not need to be fully braced at each
support point, due to either the magnitude of loading required or the size of member used, considerably less
bracing stiffness may be required than would be calculated
by using 8 Pcr^SA means to evaluate an accurate value of required stiffness is important for examining structural members whose
integrity is questionable because of limited bracing stiffness
and strength, and for obtaining economical bracing design
for members repeated many times in a structure. No simple
technique other than continuous bracing expressions, exists
for obtaining the less-than-full bracing integrity.
In this paper, the bracing stiffness required for the range
from continuous point bracing to a single point brace is
presented. The required brace strength is also summarized.
The bracing expressions are given in the form most familiar
for point bracing. The expressions provide an understanding of the relationship between bracing stiffness and buckHng behavior of the compression member. Furthermore, an
expression for tangent modulus of elasticity is proposed as a
means to apply the bracing expressions for all levels of
critical load less than the yield load.
where: L = the overall member length
kc = the continuous bracing stiffness
m = the number of Vi sine waves in the
buckled shape
Timoshenko shows k^L'^/'n'^EI = m\m + 1)^ at buckling.
.-. P,,= (iT^EI/L^)[m^ + (m + lf]
Since m^ + (m-^ if = 2m^ + 2m + l = 2m{m + 1) + 1,
P,, = {iT^EI/L^)[2m(m + 1) + 1]
= (TT^EI/L^)[2L^/iT^VkJEi + 1]
=
Thus, P^r = 2\/k^EI + PE
:. the ideal continuous bracing stiffness
k,=
(P,,-PEf/4EI
Neglecting PE for
or k, = PJ/4EI.
P,,PE,
From Timoshenko and Gere, Theory of Elastic Stability,^
(1)
(2)
Per = 2Vk,EI
For the case of inelastic action replace E
with E,. Using P^, = ir^EJ/L^,
L, = HVEJ/P,,
(3)
where L^ = the effective length of the buckled column.
.:K =
(u^PJ4)(Pj7r^E,I)
= iT^Pcrl4L^. Thus, the ideal continuous bracing
stiffness is:
k, - 2.5 PJL,^
BRACING STIFFNESS FOR CONTINUOUS
BRACING SYSTEMS
P,r = (TT^EI/L^){m^ + k,LVm^7T''EI)
2ElVkJEI+iT^EI/L^
(4)
BRACING STIFFNESS WITH A FINITE NUMBER
OF SUPPORTS
For finite braces at a spacing equal to S, where S is small
relative to L^,
K, =
KS={2.5PJLe^)S
(5)
See Fig. 1. Based on Winter's work^ when S equals L^,
LeRoyA. Lutz, Ph.D., P.E., and James M. Fisher, Ph.D., P.E., are
Vice Presidents of Computerized Structural Design, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
FOURTH QUARTER / 1985
K, = APJL,
(6)
Equation 6 is often used when S is less than L^, with S
being substituted for L^. This is not correct. The results
163
with three and four intermediate braces replotted using an
absissa of KISIPE- It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the bracing
expression, Eq. 5, provides a solution for Per with good
accuracy to approximately three-quarters of their maximum PcrIPE value. Based on bracing Eqs. 5 and 6, bracing
stiffness over the entire range of S less than or equal to L^
can be conservatively calculated from the expression
TTTTTTTT
1 -S-J
_ I
U..
Fig. 1. Finite bracing at spacing S
K^ = [2.5 + l.5{SILeY][PerSILe^]
from such calculations can grossly overestimate the bracing
stiffness required. One must remember that the length L^ in
Eq. 6 defines the required buckhng length of the member.
Using a 5 which is less than L^ in Eq. 6 presumes a shorter
mode shape, which requires more stiffness than is necessary.
For a small 5, relative to L^, Eq. 5 provides an accurate
solution for bracing stiffness. However, as S increases relative to Lg, using Eq. 5 results in a substantial error.
Solutions are presented in Ref. 3 for critical buckling
loads {Per) for cases when brace stiffness is less than the
stiffness required to force the column to buckle in its highest mode, i.e., the number of one-half waves equal to the
number of braces plus one. Solutions are presented for one,
two, three and four intermediate brace points, as well as for
columns continuously braced.
Shown in Fig. 2 are the solutions from Ref. 3 for cases
(7)
This equation provides a transition between the continuous bracing equation, which has a numerical coefficient
of approximately 2.5, and the solution for finite full bracing, which has a maximum numerical coefficient of 4.
The accuracy of Eq. 7 is illustrated in Fig. 2, where it has
been plotted for the cases of four and three intermediate
brace points. Also shown in Fig. 2 is the expression APcrlS.
When the number of intermediate braced points is less
than three, it has been found that Eq. 7 becomes overly
conservative as 5 approaches L^.
BRACING STIFFNESS FOR LESS THAN THREE
INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
Provided in Ref. 2 for a single intermediate brace, Fig. 3, is
the relationship:
P^^ = PE + (3/16){KiL) for PE<Pcr^TT^EJ/S^
EXACT SOLUTION
FOUR SUPPORTS
100
Fig. 2. Solution for three or more intermediate supports
164
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION
The empirical equation:
/^, = 3F,,5/L/
(9)
is suggested for more accurate solutions, as shown in Fig. 4.
EVALUATION OF THE TANGENT MODULUS OF
ELASTICITY
Fig. 3. One intermediate brace
The tangent modulus E^ equals E as long as the member
remains elastic. Using the CRC expression to represent the
inelastic region,
P,, =
Py[l-.5(LJrC,f]
for P,,>.5 Py.
If IS is substituted for L, one obtains
^ , = (8/3)(P,,-P)/5
(8)
(10)
Solving for L^ in Eq. 10,
where,
L, = rC, V2(l - PJPy)
PE = the buckling load with no intermediate support
(11)
with rC, = VT/A VlTi^E/Fy
This relationship is plotted in Fig. 4.
Also plotted in Fig. 4 for the one intermediate support
condition is the commonly used expression Ki = IPcrl^
(see Ref. 1). It is recommended the designer requiring
more accuracy use Eq. 8.
For the situation where two intermediate supports exist
(Fig. 5) the "exact" solution from Ref. 2 is again replotted
in Fig. 4 in terms of KISIPE along with the commonly used
equation Ki = 3PcrlS (see Ref. 2). One can see from Fig. 4
the discrepancy between the exact solution and the commonly used expression for Ki when full P^r is not necessary.
= irVlET/Wy by definition,
the equivalent length L, = T:V(4EI/Py)(l - PJPy)
from Eq. 3
= TTVEJ/PZ
From this
E,=
(4EPJPy)(l-PJPy)
(12)
when PJPy>.5 or LJr < Q
Using E"^ in Eq. 3, the procedure for determining the ideal
stiffness Ki can be used for all Per < Py
/
EXACT SOLUTION
TWO SiUPPORTS
^
. ^ / - ^ ^y
-7
V K . 2^
^.-4^
/
/
\'
I/)
5+
3+
EXACT SOLUTION
ONE SUPPORT
TWO
SUPPC"RTS
^^
2+
Ki . " ^ (ftr-PE^
ONE
SUPPORT
iz:
K
10
25
30
Fig. 4. Solution for one and two intermediate supports
FOURTH QUARTER/1985
165
Note that Et = E since Pcr< .5 Py = .5(50)(6)
= 150 kips,
orL^/r=131.1>Q=107.
... K,eq = 8(100)7157.3 = 5.09 kips/in.
Method 3: Using Eq. 18, the required stiffness need not
be more than:
K^^^ = [5 + 3(128.4/157.3)^](100)(128.4)/(157.3)^
Jm
Fig. 5. Two intermediate braces
= 3.29 kips/in.
REQUIRED BRACE FORCE AND STIFFNESS
The brace force required:
Fre,
= Kactd
(13)
where d = the maximum lateral displacement immediately
preceding failure and Kact = the furnished stiffness,^
the F^e^ for an initially imperfect column is Ki{do + d),
where d^ is the initial out-of-straightness.
.-. K,,, = K,(dJd+l)
(14)
.-. d=[K,/(K,,,^,,-K,)]d,
(15)
It is generally accepted that the required stiffness K^g^ must
be at least twice Ki so that d = d^'^d^ is usually set at 5'/500,
but can be 5/250 or any value that appears reasonable for
the particular situation. Thus, for design purposes, the
following equations are recommended:
For a single intermediate support,
K,req 5.33(P - PE)IS ; PE<Pcr^Tr^E,I/S^ (16)
For two intermediate supports,
/ ^ _ = 6 P , , 5 / L / ; PE<Pcr^ v^E,I/S^
For three or more intermediate supports,
K,,^ = [5 + 3(5/L,)lF,,5/L/; P,,>P^
(17)
(18)
The required brace force.
Freq " <^o^//(l ~ f^il^act)\
Kact' ^^req
(19)
The following three example problems illustrate the apphcation of the proposed bracing expressions:
Example 1
This example is presented to illustrate the wide range of
required stiffnesses which can be obtained. Assume a section with r^ = 1.2 in., ^ = 6in.^,/^ = 8.64 in."* and F^ = 50
ksi. The column is to carry a P^r of 100 kips and is to be
braced with intermediate point braces as shown in Fig. 1
with a bracing spacing 5 = 128.4 in. Determine the bracing
stiffness required.
Method 1: Using the expression
Keq ^ SPJS = 8(100)7128.4 = 6.23 kips/in.
Method 2: Using Eq. 6 with a factor of safety = 2.0,
From Eq. 3 L^ = IT VE^TZP^
= 'TrV29,000(8.64)/100 = 157.3 in.
166
Example 2
This example illustrates the determination of brace spacing
to achieve a desired column capacity with a specific column.
A column (Fy = 36 ksi) is to be laterally braced about its
weak axis so the column can carry a Per of 200 kips. Assume
the column is braced sufficiently about its strong axis and
more than two intermediate braces are required. The furnished braces are assumed to have a stiffness of 5.00 kips/in.
/3, = 37.1 in.^ and A = 9.13
Solution:
Find L^.
From Eq. 3, L^ = TTVEJ/PCT
Py = (A)(Fy) = 9.13 X 36 = 328.68 kips
PJPy = 200/328.68 = 0.608.
SincQ PJPy> .5,
From Eq. 12, E, = (4EPJPy)(l - PJPy) = 21 Ml ksi
.-. L,^ 22AM in., say 225 in.
Try a bracing spacing of 225 in., i.e., S = 225 in.
From Eq. 18,
Kreq - [5 + 3(225/225)4]200(225)/(225)2 = 7.11 kips/in.
Since only 5 kips/in. is available from each brace, the braces
must be spaced at a closer interval.
Try S = 205 in.
K,,^ = [5 + 3(205/225)^]200(205)/(225)2
= 5.72 kips/in. > 5.00 n.g.
Try 180 in., K^eq = 4A3 kips/in. < 5.00 o.k.
Use braces at 180 in. o.c.
From Eq. 19,
Freq == (^o)2.215/(l - 2.215/5.00)
Note: K, = K,,^/2 = 2.215
= (do) 3.977
Assuming d^ = 5/500 = 180/500 = 0.36 in.,
F,,^ = 3.977 (.36) = 1.43 kips
Example 3
This example illustrates evaluation of column capacity for a
given column and bracing situation. Determine the critical
buckhng load for the W12x40 column shown in Fig. 6.
Assume the column sections shown are pinned at their ends
and sidesway is prevented at their ends. Also, assume A36
steel is used.
For the W12 x40: r^ = 1.93, r^ = 5.13, A = 11.8
For the W12 x 26: / , = 204, S^ = 33.4
C = 126.1
ENGINEERING JOURNAL / AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION
Solution:
1. Determine the stiffness provided {Kact) by the strong
axis of the W12x26 bracing the weak axis of the
W12 X 40. Assume the two intermediate supports on the
W12 X 40 exert forces in the same direction. The minimum stiffness of the supports can be found from the
deflection equation for a simple beam loaded with two
equal symmetric loads.
A
={Pxl6EI){?>la-3a^-x^)
A = (Pa/6EI){31a - Aa^)
MP = [(8)/6E/][3(24)(8) - 4(8)^] 1,728
= 4,423,680/6;/
= 4,423,680/[6(29,000)(204)]
= .125 kip/in.
If fully braced, LJr = 8(12)/1.93 = 49.7 and F^ = 18.38 ksi
Paiiow = 18.38(11.8) = 216.9kips
and Per =-216.9(1.7) = 369kips
and Kreg = 6PJS = 6(369)/(8)(12) - 23 kips/in.
.*. the W12 X 40 is only partially braced.
2. From Eq. 17, for two intermediate braces.
For
PE<Pcr<'^^EJ/S^,
From Eq. 11, L^ = r Q V2(l -
Therefore, the stiffness K^ct = 1/.125 = 8.0 = kips/in.
The axial stiffness of the W8 x Slties can be neglected.
The connections of the ties to the columns are assumed
to be rigid.
PJPy)
Per can be found by substituting L^ from Eq. 11 into Eq.
17, and substituting K^ct for K^^qThe result is,
P,, = Py/[3SPy/(K,,,r^C,^) + l]
Thus, Pe, = F^/(3)(96)(424.8)/[(8.0)(1.93)^(126.1)^] + 1
Per
= .795 Py
= 337.6kips
and L, = (1.93)(126.1) V2(l - .795)
= 155.8 in. = 12.98 ft
Since Pcr> -^ Py, an acceptable solution has been found.
Had Per been less than half of Py,
00
L / = Ti^ Ell Per (Euler buckling) and substitution into Eq.
17 would yield
Per = VITREI K^jes.
3. Determine the allowable buckling load of the W12 x 40.
WI2X26
//r^ = 24(12)75.13 = 56.14
\J
LJry = 155.8/1.93 = 80.75 controls
o
00
-X
CNJ
W8X3K
TIES /
Fa = 15.27, thus the allowable load is
15.27(11.8) - 180.2 kips
The brace force required from Eq. 13 is K^etd. lid = d^
with de, considered to be .375 in., F^^^ = 8.0(.375) = 3.0
kips
The stress in the W12 x 26 would be
3.0kips(8ft)(12)/33.4 = 8.62 ksi
REFERENCES
00
-N>"
Fig. 6. Example 3
FOURTH QUARTER / 1985
1. Timoshenko and Gere Theory of Elastic Stabihty
2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
2. Winter, George Lateral Bracing of Columns and
Beams Trans. ASCE, Vol. 125, 1960, pp. 807-845.
3. Green, Giles G., George Winter and T. R. Cuykendal Light Gage Steel Columns in Wall-braced Panels
Bulletin No. 35, Part 2, Engineering Experiment Station,
Cornell University, October 1947.
167
