0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 281 views 20 pages Naca Report 572
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save Naca Report 572 For Later
REPORT No. 572
DETERMINATION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF TAPERED WINGS
By Ravwon F. ANpeRsow
SUMMARY
‘ables and charts for use in determining the character-
istics of tapered wings are presented. ‘Theoretical factors
are given from which the following characteristice of
tapered wings may be found: The epan lift distribution,
the indueed-angle-of-attack distribution, the lift-ouree
slope, the angle of zero lift, the induced drag, the aero-
dynamic-center position, and the pitehing moment about
the aerodynamié center.
‘The wings considered cover the complete range of taper
ratios and a range of aspect ratioe from 2 to £0. The
factors given include the effects of sweepback and twiet
and apply to wings having a straight taper plan form with
rounded tips and an elliptical plan form. The general
formulas of the usual wing theory are also given from
‘which the characteristics of a wing of any form may be
* ealewlated when the section characteristica are known
from experiment.
In addition to the tables and charts, test resulte are
given for nine tapered winge, including wings with sweep-
Sack and iwist. The teat results verify the values com-
puted by the methods presented in the firat part of the
report. A final section is given oudlining a method for
estimating the lift coeficient at which a tapered wing
Begins to stall. This method, which ehould be useful for
‘estimating the mazimum lift cooficient of tapered wings,
is applied to one of the wings tested.
INTRODUCTION
A large amount of work has been done on the deter-
mination of tapered-wing chatacteristice from airfoil
theory. Glauert has given some of tho characteristics
‘of wings with straight toper for a limited rango of
aspect ratios (references 1 and 2). Hucber has given
other characteristics of wings with straight teper for a
Targe range of aspect ratios (reference 3). Several
‘other papers have given various characteristics of
tapered wings. Tho data of all the papers, however,
have been limited by one or moro of the following
factors: Range of aspect ratio and taper ratio, number
of characteristics given, and omission of data on wings
with sweepback and twist. In order to provide more
complete information, date are given in this report for
a large range of espect ratios, for the complete range
290023739
of taper ratios, and for wings with sweepback and twist,
As eirplane wings aro usually rounded at the tips, the
data are given for wings with rounded tips.
In addition to the theoretical characteristics, the
results of tests of nine tapered wings, including wings
with sweepback end twist, and a comparison of some
of the test results with theoretical values are presented.
‘The characteristics are given for wings having a
straight taper and rounded tips and for wings having
an elliptical plan form, with an aspect-ratio range from
2 to 20, For these wings, formulas are given using
factors that are presented in tables and charts. From
the formulas and factors tho following characteristies
of tapered wings may be determined: Span lift distri-
bution, induced-angle-of-attack distribution, lift-curve
slope, angle of zero lift, induced drag, serodynamic-
center position, and pitching moment ebout the aero-
dynamic center.
METHOD OF OBTAINING DATA
basic conczPTs
‘When obtaining the data used to determine the char-
acteristics of wings, a tapered wing is considered to con-
sist of a series of airfoil sections that may vary in shape,
chord length, and in angle of attack from root to tip.
Each airfoil section is assumed to have an aerodynamic
center through which the lift and drag act and about
which the pitching moment is constant.
With the section characteristics as e basis, character-
istics of the entire wing aro obtained by integration
across the span. Formulas for the integrations will
first be given for a wing of any shape and zero dihedral;
that is, the aerodynamic centors of all the sections along
the span lie in a plane which passes through the root
chord and which is perpendicular to the plano of sym-
metry. Wings of particular shape will be considered
later and a method for including the effect of dihedral
will be given,
For any tapered wing the span lift distribution may
be considered to consist of two parts. One part, which
will be called the “basic distribution,” is the distribu-
tion that depends principally on the twist of the wing
and occurs when the total lift of the wing is zero; it
does not change with tho angle of attack of the wing.
503,504
‘Tho second part of the span lift distribution, which
vill be called the “additional distribution,” is the lift
due to change of the wing angle of attack; it is inde-
pendent of the wing twist and maintains the same form
throughout the reasonably straight part of the lift curve.
In the designation of the characteristics of a wing,
lower-case letters will be used for section characteris-
tics and uppet-caso letters for the characteristics of the
entiro wing. ‘Tho basic and additional section lift coef-
ficients are then cj, and cj. A complete list of sym-
bols follows. It is conveniont to find the additional
lift coafiicient for a wing O, of 1 and itis then designated
Gig, The two coefficients aro related by ¢=Oveig.
‘Tho total lift coefficient at any section is found from
the basic and additional evofficients from
c4y= Cay + Cats
where cj, is tho lift coefficient perpendicular to the local
relative ‘wind at any section as distinguished from c,
which is perpendicular to the relative witld at a dis-
tance. For convenience, however, ¢; will be used and
may be considered equal to ¢,
A, aspect ratio, B/S.
2, span.
¢, chord at any section along the span.
cs tip chord (for rounded tips, ¢, is the fictitious
chord obtained by extending the leading and
‘wailing edges to the extremo tip).
6m, chord at root of wing or plano of symmetry.
S, wing area.
B, angle of sweepback, measured between the
lateral axis and a line through the acrody-
namic centers of the wing sections. (Seo
fig. 1.)
«,acrodynamic twist in degrees from root to tip,
measured between the zero-lift directions of
the center and tip sections, positive for
weshin.
3, longitudinal coordinate, parallel to the root
chord.
y, lateral coordinate, perpendicular to plane of
symmetry.
2, vertical coordinate in the plane of symmetry,
perpendicular to the root chord.
<1 2 coordinate of wing aerodynamic center.
‘, wing lift-curve slope, per degree.
o, Wing section lift-curve slope, per degree.
1m, wing lift-curve slope, per radian.
‘me, Wing seotion lift-curve slopo, por radian.
, angle of attack at any section along the span.
ax, Wing angle of attack measured from the chord
of the root section.
aay absolute wing angle of attack measured from
the zero-lift direction of the root section.
ax,,, angle of zero lift of the root section,
ax, angle of zero lift of the tip section,
REPORT NO. 672 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTER FOR AERONAUTICS
Grgay» Wing angle of attack for zero lift,
‘a, section induced anglo of attack.
¢1, section lift coefficient perpendicular to the
distant relative wind.
Subseripts for o:
0, refers to section lift cocfficiont
perpendicular to the looal rela-
tive wind.
8, refers to basic lift (C,
4, refers to additional lift (any C2).
ai, refers to additional lift (O,=1).
cag section induced-dreg coefficient.
ay, Section profle-drag coefficient.
me. Section Pitching-moment coefficient about sec-
tion aerodynamic conter.
1, sootion lit.
‘yg section pitching moment due to additional lift
forces.
‘M,, wing pitching moment due to additional lift
forces.
Omg Wing pitching-moment coefficient due to addi-
tional litt forces.
Onyy Wing pitching-moment coefficient duo to basic
Iift forces.
Ony Wing pitching-moment coefficient due to the
Pitching moments of the wing sections.
Onze Wing pitching-moment coefficient about its
aerodynamic center.
,, wing lift coofficient.
Coy, Wing induced-drag coefficient,
(GENERAL PORMULAS
Formulas in terms of the section characteristics, —
‘The induced angle of attack at any section is obtnined
from ¢, by
amas
‘The section inducod-drag coofficient is obtained from
a, and ¢; from
cues
and the induced-drag coefficient for the entire wing
may be obtained by integration across the semispan.
from the section values:
7
PP awcety
In order to obtain the aerodynamic center and the
pitching moment of tho wings, a system of roferonce
‘axes was used; tho origin was at the aerodynamic contor
of the root section and the axes were as shown in figure
1. ‘The 2 axis (fg. 1 (a)) is parallel to the root chord,
and the y axis (6g. 1 (b)) is perpendicular to the plane
of symmetry with positive directions following tho
‘veotors. ‘Tho wing axis is tho loous of the acrody-
namic centers of the sections and lies in the zy plane.
‘Tho lift J and the coefficient ¢ of any section along the
span are represonted in figure 1.
On
aDETERMINATION OF THB CHARACTBRISTICS OF TAPERED WINGS
‘A typical section with the aerodynamic center
located at o distance z from the y axis bes » moment
arm of
005 a
and a pitching moment about the leteral axis (ig. 1)
duo to the additional lift force of
m=—2 008 ade
but the lift increment of any section is
lmengo
and the pitching moment for the entire wing is obtained
from
29 008 a, fo, dy
Wing cerodymemic center
Root-zection ‘
“CP ey tacon
Between, rook and tle
G
Ip-sectin crore \,
pereesnamie cone at cwteieton Vp section
9 Datesitin et,
®)
Wing cerecymanie “Genter Construction Tp Shction
(lhe wn Wa ome
(0) Distorted ete og.
Pitching-moment coefficients for the entire wing will
be based on a chord length of S/b so that
Ma
n= a9
‘Tho pitching-moment coefficient due to’the additional
lft forees then becomes
‘2
On,= cos 2
‘Tho additional lift forces have @ centroid through
which tho lift may be considered to act. This point
is the acrodynamic conter of the wing and its x coordi-
exdy
505
(Soo fig. 1.) ‘This dis-
The term
nate will be designated 2.
tanco corresponds to d in reference 4.
Gz, then may also be expressed
=u, c08 20,
IE tho provious expression for Om, is used, 2... is
obtained as e fraction of S/b by
@)
‘Tho moment due to the drag forces hns been omitted
bocause it is rolatively small, except for wings with
Jarge amounts of sweopbeck or dihedral.
‘Tho pitching moment of tho basic lift forces is
couple and is therefore independent of the axis about
which it is determined. ‘The lateral axis was used to
facilitate computation but, when the pitching moment
is used, it is convenient to consider it constant about
‘an exis through the serodynamic center. According
to the mothod previously used, the pitehing-moment
coefficient due to the basic lift forees is
ny 3 fo, cxdy ®)
‘The 05 auizay (the cosine of the angle of zero lift of
the wing messured from the root chord) has been
omitted because it is practically equal to unity.
In addition to the basic lift forces, the pitching
moment of each section also contributes to the pitching
moment of the wing, which is obtained by
®,
‘The total momeiit about the aerodynamic center is
then the sum of the two foregoing parts
Ogg, = Om, + Om,
Formulas in terms of the coefficients of the Fourier
series.—In order to obtain data from the foregoing
formulas, the spanwiso distribution of the lift coofficient
(following Gleuert) was expressed as the Fourier series:
ath, in ne
whore @ is related to the distance along the span (fig. 1)
by y= (b/2) cos @ and only odd values of n are used.
When ois expressed in tho foregoing manner, it is
possible to obtain the inducod angle of attack in the
form
on, 08
a= 2nd, ee
Also the coeflicients A, may bo expressed in, the form
Ape Bye + One506
where a, is the absolute anglo of attack of the root
section; that is, the angle of attack of the root section,
measured from its direction of zero lift, and « is the
wing twist measured between the zero-lift directions
of the root and tip sections.
When tho preceding expressions for ¢ and a, are
substituted in the foregoing formulas, the charaoteris-
ties are obtained in terms of the coefficients B, and C,,
which in turn are grouped into factors.
From (1) the induced-drag coefficiont may be ob-
tained in the form:
where A is the aspect ratio, and
ae ‘Joa
aa eo 8% )]
oC)
Jn the determination of the aerodynamic-conter
position, the wing axis is considered to be a straight line
and the angle of sweopback is 6 (fig. 1), then
a=[y|tone
and from (2) the x coordinate of the aerodynamic
center is obtained as
tae
. Sp — HA tne
where
2 (Bi, Bs Bs, By
BGG BT
B, [sin [(n—2)/2] sin lot2)=/21))
Se eo)
From (3) the moment due to the basic lift forces
becomes
Ony=— Gee tan 8
where ay is the section lift-curve slope for the aaa and
2a 4 (Bs
Gam 241 (2. +e. )-3G# 4B. )]
Phe term Op, is equal to Onin reference 4.)
Also from equation (4) the pitching moment of the
wing due to the pitching moments of the sections is
expressed as
Cn,=Be,
where ¢,,, is constant across the span and
2b pe
ef ety
In addition to the foregoing formulas, the following
formulas were obtained in terms of B, and Q, for other
REPORT NO. 572 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS
characteristics. The basic and additional lifts at any
point along the span were expressed by the dimension-
less: a
and
so that
and
co
By tho introduction of the slope for an elliptical wing,
aay bo expressed
‘Tho angle of attack of a wing may then by given by
o,
ayn tay, Je
whore ay is the angle of attack measured from the chord
of the root section, and ai, is tho angto of zero lft of the
root section.
‘Tho general formulas and the factors used with them
have now been outlined. ‘The manner of obtaining the
data will be completed by explaining the mothod of
finding the coofficients B, and Q, used in computing
the factors,
Determination of the coefficients of the Fourier
sories.—The coefficients B, and C, depend on the shape
‘of the wing. ‘The two wing shapes used are shown on
figure 1. Wing (b) hes a straight teper plan form with
rounded tips and (c) an elliptical plan form. ‘The
tapered wing is shown with sweepback and the elliptical
‘wing without, but either wing may or may not have
sweepback. ‘The rounded tip of the tapered wing is
formed within a trapezoidal tip of length c,, and the
taper of the wing is determined by the tip to root
chord ratio exc, The aerodynamic contors of the
airfoil sections lie on a straight lino cross the semispan
‘and form the wing axis. ‘Tho elliptical wing is formed
by distorting an ellipse until the wing axis becomes
straight. In order to determine the wing axis, theDETERMINATION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF TAPERED WINGS
aerodynamic centers of the airfoil sections were taken
at the quarter-chord point. The straight wing axis
may then be given sweepback with each chord moving,
parallel to its original position. The same process
would be used to change the sweepback of tho tapered
wing.
For the wings considered, the twist varies linearly
from root to tip and the total angle of twist is «. AS
shown in figure 1, « is the twist measured between the
zero-lft directions of the root and tip sections
Tapered wing—For the tapered wing the coefficients
By tnd C, were determined from the equation
(4b 4)
ae=BAy sin nO Tt
@)
where é is the absolute angle of attack at any section;
that is, the angle of attack measured from the zero-ift
direction for the section. ‘The coofficients B, and C,
are related to A, by
Ay Buta} One
where as, is the absolute angle of attack of the root
section, ‘The value of mg used in the preceding equa-
tion was 5.79 per radian, which approximates the lift-
curve slope of good airfoil sections. For tho linear
taper a, becomes
sh 008 6
For a wing of any particular aspect ratio and taper
ratio, equation (5) wes satisfied at four points along
the semispan by the usual method (except for e/
for which six points were necessary to obtain sufficient
accuracy), and values of By and C, for n=1, 3, 5, and
7 were found.
The elliptical wing.—For the elliptical wing the fore-
going fundamental equation may be simplified and a
new series of coefficionts, independent of aspect ratio,
may be obtained. ‘The cocfficient A, for n=3, 5,7
© may be obtained in the form
where ky is determined from
i sin 5
ee)
‘The factors for the elliptical wing then take the form
cos Oia (1+
+h (Re
4A) Co zap |
507
2h
SHR) ar) wee)
22, (em, constant along the spas)
‘Tho foregoing factors were obtained for tho elliptical
wing and for a straight-tapor wing with trapezoidal tips
for a range of aspect ratios from 3 to 20 and of taper
ratios from 0 to 1, ‘The factors were also obtained for
the tapered wing with rounded tips for » sufficient
number of aspect ratios and taper ratios so that the
complete range could be covered using the factors for
the wing with trapezoidal tips as a guide. Cross plots
‘were then made to obtain figures 2 to 9 and the values
for wings with rounded tips presented in tables I and
TL. Although the factors become less reliable es the
aspect ratio is decreased, it wns considered desirable to
extrapolate the curves to an aspect ratio of 2 as the
factors in the low-espect-ratio rango may be of use in
tho absence of other date. Additional spanwise lift
distribution data computed for the elliptical wing are
given in table TIT.
USE OF TABLES AND CHARTS
In order to find tho characteristics of a wing having
straight taper and rounded tips or having an elliptical
plan form, the tables and charts may be used directly.
‘The properties of the wing should first be determined;
that is, the taper ratio ¢/¢y aspect ratio A, span 5, the
area §, the aerodynamic twist ¢ in degrees, the angle of
sweepback 8, and the average value of ‘section lift-
curve slope, as well as the section lift-curve slope as,
the section pitching-moment cocfficiont ém,,,, and the
chord ¢ et convenient stations along the seraispan.
‘Tho chord and dy should be found at the spanwise
stations given in tables I and II to facilitate finding
tho spanwiso lift distribution. ‘Then, for the values of
cde, and A, values of Zy and Z, may be found from
tables I and II by interpolation if necessary. ‘The
section lift coefficients c,, and ci, are then found for each
station along the semispan from508 REPORT NO. 672 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS
soo
|
24
f
of
Sn goat wt wh
80} — Ripe wea "|
ee ee ee ee
Faced rok
‘eon 2—Chara ong so
wars ne
200
32}
‘Siroighi Taser wing mith ro
olf — —Flipteot nig ae
ore + 4s 6 7 8S 70
Tooei ratio
oon (Chart or dearly nts ator
Cur SEs Cpaattesre
alent
‘Siroighi Siaper ning with rownted Tes,
= = Biipteal nog
oe 4 6 6 oe F 6
Aspect rate
‘Fon Chart fr detaining Indsou rng lca
7520
‘Siroight- taper wing with rounded Ti
es el
ra
Ascot? ratio.
Pioows 4—Ctart fr detent ange of atte
en Sthayth meget
ae SR fer wig mh reer testo
Czar a me get eae rete)
Aspect rofio
‘Rogne 5—Obart or deteriaiag dud dag ater
lspech Pole 3,
taper wing with rounded
hotles who) ne
ore 4s 8 8 To
Teper Patio, Ci/er
‘Paver 7—Chartfor detaining picng moment de tosetoa moment.DETERMINATION OF THB CHARACTERISTICS OF TAPERED WINGS
and o; for any valuo of Q, for the wing is obtained from
erty tOr Cig,
cose}
0264
024}
016]
or2|
Ssh, eee oa wih od
Biola! wis
oye 3 4 8 6 7 8 Ss 10
Teper roti, t/e
ouee chart doting ing omit do Paes,
ee
20}
H
18
18}
“SI-oIghI" Taper wing with ro
MA — Bite,
“G2 469-10 E14 1818-20
Aspect ratte
‘oome ¢—Chat fr datarmningsredyzamtcesnterpeston,
Bpenawns
‘The actual basic, additional, and total lifts for any
section of the wing may then be obtained from
‘Values of may be computed for the various spanwise
stations and the curve of the span lift-distribution may
be plotted. ‘Typical semispan lift-distribution curves
aro shown in figure 10.
‘Tho semispan induced angle-of-attack distribution
may be obtained from
eynae Zt
eof
where
ema t age
509
Gr,
Git Je
‘Tho remaining characteristics are obtained simply
by finding the required factor for the desired values of
ee, and A from the charts and by computing the
characteristics from the formulas previously given,
using the average value of ay where ay is required. The
formulas are summarized here for convenience.
Lifteurve slope:
Angle of attack corresponding to any O;:
cE ay Te
Angle of zero lift:
Agate Te
Induced-drag coofficiont:
Co E+ Caen a0
ese eee des mae a es Og emer:
Distance along semisoon feet
‘oe atypia Maen,
Pitching-moment coefficient about an axis through
‘tho aerodynamic center:
nga =Omt Om,
On EC ma...
Omy=— Gated tan 8
Acrodynamic-conter position (z coordinate):
Fee
HA tan B
Although On, may usually be determined from the
foregoing formule, equation (4) should be used if
Cng.e, Vaties considerably across the span.
Ilustrative exemple—In order to illustrate the
method of using the charts, an example will be worked510
out for a wing with straight taper and rounded tips
having the following characteristics:
REPORT Ne
=12
10 [Link]. ft.
Construction tip section:
N. A.C. A. 2400
= 0.099
Root section:
NAC. A. 4415,
= 0.097
en 8.8° ey =H?
Cg o4= —0-083 nae, 0.084
‘The angle of twist measured between the chords of the
root and construction tip sections is —5° (washout).
Then, by the use of the angles of zero lift of the root
and tip sections and by reference to figure 1, the angle
of acrodynamic twist is determined to be —7.1°.
‘The chord at several stations along the semispan
and the calculation of the lift distribution are given
in table TV. In the table, a and cm,,,, are assumed
to have a linear variation along tho semispan. Values
of Ly and L, were obtained from tables I and II for
fan aspect ratio of 6 and a taper ratio of 0.5 and the
basic, additional, and total lift distributions were com-
puted end plotted in figure 10. ‘The pitching-moment
coefficient cn, varies so much along the semispan
that Ca, cannst be found by use of the factor Z but
must be found from (4). Accordingly, cm,.c 18
plotted against y in figure 11 and Cp, is found from the
area under the curve to be —0.072.
oe 6810727461820
+
Tstctce Seng semper fe!
oi ete er eee
Can BfiPeantreee
From figures 2 to 9 andthe equations on page 7
the remaining factors and characteristics are deter-
572 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEB FOR AERONAUTICS
‘Method for wing of special form.—If it is desired to
find the charactoristies of a wing having a chord dis-
tribution that lies betweon the chord distributions of
the tapered and elliptical wings, such as a wing with a
constant-chord conter section, an interpolation may be
made betwean the values for the tapered and elliptical
‘wings to find most of the cheracteristics.
‘The lift distribution for such wings may be found by
an approximate method that has been tried for a few
wings having parallel center sections and has given
satisfactory results. ‘The method has been taken from
referonco 5 with the symbols converted to the notation
of this report. Approximate values of Zs, which will
bo designated Z,’, may be calculated from
v-Gh) act)
VGe °
oe
‘The procedure is to choose a number of points at con-
veniont intervals along the semispan (12 points should
be sufficient for the usual plan forms); then from the
hy
is calculated. The value of ae may then be found and
from the values of y and ¢, Ly’ at each point along the
semispan miay bo computed. ‘The values of Z,’ should
correspond to » C, approximately equal to 1, The
actual C;, may be found from
a= fea ge)
and C,may be conveniently found from the area under a
curve of L,’ plotted against pfp- Finally, Z, may be
found from L,=L.'/C;, Values of ti, may then be
calculated by the previously indicated method and, if
desired, Cp, and “£-* may be found from equations (1)
and (2).
‘5
Tf a wing has considerable dihedral or a curved wing
axis, an integration may bo made directly from the
section cheracteristics. For this purpose, the best
procedure would be to resolve the section values ei,
and ¢g, into components along and parallel to the 2
and 2 axes, where tho 2 axis is perpendicular to tho
zz axis and lies in the plene of symmetry. Owing to
L’=
where
fe
8
values of ¢ at those points the mean value of.
dihedral, there will be e vertical coordinate of the aero-DETERMINATION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF TAPERED WINGS bil
to the desired anglo of twist and the sections between
the root and tip were then formed by using straight,
lines between corresponding stations of the root and
tip sections, Formation of the wings in this manner
results in a nonlinear distribution of twist slong the
semispan. In plan view the quarter-chord points of
dynamic center and a pitching moment about the aero-
dynamic center of the force components in the z direo-
tion, ‘The coordinates of the aerodynamic center and
of the pitching moment about it may be found from
integrations like (2) and (8) by substituting the appro-
priate values of the z and 2 force components. For
example, 2,.z, Would be found from
Es
oud
where
‘The values of z,.¢, and Cz, may bo found by plotting
the sections lie on a straight line neross the semispan;
the eweepback was measured between this line and
the lateral axis,
‘Three different amounts of sweepback, 0°, 15%, and
30°, and three types of airfoil sections, symmetrical,
‘eambered, and roflexed, were used.
As the wings differ primarily in airfoil section,
sweepback, and twist, a conveniont designating number
3
he:
Lp
8
reg,
Ratio of litt to
are algae
See ws Keon
pecans EE
[Corrected for funnetwoll effect |
prerteny
eos acenen
iY SER
a ee
eet and cao against the distance slong the semispan
and finding the aree under the curves.
‘TESTS OF TAPERED WINGS
In order to provide test data on tapered wings,
including wings with sweepback and twist, and to
provide a check on the previously outlined method of
computing characteristics, nine tapered wings were
tested. Tho plan forms and sections of the wings are
shown in figures 12 to 20. ‘The aspect ratio of all the
wings wes 6; the taper ratio of eight of the wings was
0.5 and of one wing was 0.25. For all the wings the
thickness ratio of the root section was 15 percent and
of the tip sections 9 percent. ‘Tho tip section was set
130062—s1—94
i216 20 24 28 32
Higle of attach a (degrees) réferted %e reat chard
‘Roves 12—epered NAC. A.OD0-9 aba,
20 24 6 8 10 22 id
“Lith coefficient
Congrats
was used to distinguish the wings, such as 24-30-8.50.
In this number 24 designates the N. A. C. A. airfoil
mean line, i. e., 2 means 0.2 chord maximum camber
and 4 that the maximum camber is at 0.4 chord; 30
gives the sweopback in degrees; and 8.50 gives the
‘washout in degrees,
‘The wings are listed in table V. ‘The frst two wings
haye no sweepback and no twist and differ only in
airfoil section. ‘The noxt two have increased swoop-
back. ‘The five remaining wings are examples of
various methods of combining sweepback, twist, and
airfoil section to obtain wings having a small positive
pitching moment; such wings would be suitable for
tailless airplanes. ‘The amounts of twist and of512
couanrrEE FOR AERONAUTICS
Fo
Soee|
44 F020)
Be 0 Saad
is iB tte. zg
3 aa 40 98 Jor
Bree Te se §.
cae x 38
4 268
a4 Ks wake,
ReH # 08. 208 =
Bl H t aR
g Bet
a! 612 ial
5 PETE 4.08 $002
8 f 2 104 d
3 yer To o
@ A sees Yelijvec): 685 g
Ste teBigtn oc \,
-4 Pres (a 289 sen adeeoo)? 8-2 Tarver, 20-0
inverse Thc fear Vor 779 Saale terete aon
a [Corrected for funnetwall effect. }~* § Done: 9-2/-34 ee VOT 173
6 S07 8 2 bw 2 2 se pad 6 oo 2
Haider Goch ct léegeees) referred fo reat chord ‘inh coethaient 6
‘Frouns 13 —Tupered N. A. O. A. 24-0-Oarfoll, Cong MUS
ele = tllat
Vales Hale 5-8
By eae + F
ela %2 [393 | a eee
BRAptare Fractive AN. :
Feels ft oe
Blea | 4 EA Hs .25 §.o1e
Ble SSeS Dene eek ot
Wel 6 | ol eestor 16 32 §.014
eae te 208 bor
24 | A aged 010)
10% 208 Se
S20] seots
6 a8 168 Se
8 1 eRe §
2 Lye =
3 tI
4
é
g I
& ital, cer elinpac 30 §
See abn ores, bre ton. 3.4
~ (stheleims e203 RN=3/ 00000 2615-0
freee? Barta Poe eset! even
7 ‘Corrected for tunnebwall effect. | 3 [Dote: 9:24-34_ Test: Secor 78
pope pe bp 6 to oe EE oe
Tear Sch a teestees)referlaa te ros od ‘ineodednd
‘POU Tapered NAO. A sete,DETERMINATION OF THB CHARACTRAISTIGS OF TAPERED WINGS
2 8-4 0 4 8 12 i 20 25 2B ae
513
“202 4 6 6 2 it
woe
Es $02
aA &
A ie
l22 4a Soe
0 0 Foy
18 36 8.01
ss
14 20% 80
2a FF r28 248 $ on
ee
20} 408.208 8.008}
7 7 g ot
e 0316 8 Sco
Bee
3 f =
P e812
$ S12 hod
g #06 Sood
% HE 04 yO)
g s ¢
3 oo Sai
é Tp farrain sete tellnsecy $39 :
- Pres etncins O09 Hiab ibo0 |? 8-2] a
hers iecieChcte Rar bare tn etfectine) 460,000
- Corrected for tunnel-wall effect. j~4 3 te: 9-25-34 Test: [Link]. 1175 |
Angle of attack, a (degrees) referred %0 root chord
zt if =
Lg | ig 2)
Fs s a
| 7
3 fq
Fal S| Fflective AN]
2) 2g: B Ot
|| bleed TT
Te “Efod 0G9-|_ Effective I
20) 5 Sr oe Say TERE
24) f
820 AA
pe Hi
be /
——
2
$ 1
3 4
3 H 4
a {
& A toiZ4 80-850 Valifoecj 696}
ce {Sdagin ored der Soon |.
Sol Pres (atnetoimsco8 RN-4/ 04000] 2
here cre tte fear Or H78)
~8 Lh ]corrected tor tepnelwall affect [4
Bos 0 4 6 6 Se
Angle of attack, a (degrees) referred Yo root chord
‘ove —topere NA. 0.4. 490-4 aro
‘own 6 —Teperst NACA 24800,
“Lith coethcient
UFPoll, PaSO- B50
Ri (effective) 6,160,000
tes 9-e6-34 Test WAT 1
520 24 6 8 12 4
Litt coettcients
CaMlt
z ie aH
= 2 44
2 Feo 40
Z| a 36
4 18.32
aol a cwadar” Tae M4 28
24 aon
20| A 20% 208 one
ve j [Link]
4 eee
4.08
{ ie 2 04
thee oo
bir toiter, 2
‘Bain by
(slot SS68 ints iBt.000) + 8
iecibien avers
-oH JSrrechederRemetwal etech 4B
g
Ratio of lift fo drag, L/D
fees 0 4 8 em eM 28
Tipit of ottoch ct (degrees) referred te root chord
roves 1. —ipenstN. A. 0,4. 2R TGA,
Ta aioe Tp
Seca aac
Blea fa eel
ae e Je 4
ee a ls8 eifective AX.
2:8) 22) 12 é
Siiel38 |S fet
8) S8| SES exci ee
£ a -£ fod 08 750
ol Ses o ae i
24
Sea
Bs)
e {
af ;
g 4
4 pe Hl
e4 LSiBRO Welle) 3
nd Se Spain oceg din, apap L.,
BS (thc EES nado
cee cee Diane far arn)
: Loerie er hemes efach
Airfoil, PRIS-B.50
ant (erfecrive) 8.240.000
aren 0-534 Test. 07 1180
02.4 6 8 10 2 i418
‘Lith coettcient.
Cog
FRIED,
aN (effective) 2.090.000
Dares Se Pad Tesh VAS. I;
oo 0 4 6 2 BOOM mB we “20 2 4 6 8 10 Bid
Angle of attach, ee (degrees).referred to rect chord
‘Foca ik Taped N. A. ©. A, Ret ae
“ith coefficient G.
anaesDBYERMINATION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF TAPERED WINGS
B ze
iz Rood
Ks g
ra gece
| Saozo}
:
3 Sard
3 Foard
as § ord
2a SS ova
aa R30
S20] cs
0 105
3 my 004)
a 2
s 5 002|
3 4
8 i
@ LT Hirtoingo-6-3.45 Velltfvecy: 727, ¢
- Rn trae bnloon |» Bal
Pe nck ce6S Ra ade ood t Filer Cosa
era? Ra Var ie : ad trfechee eroacm0
- Sorected for tunnekwall effect. |-4 +3) :28-. Test: V.O.T. 1/76
pees ie ie B24 28 2 ee ee
Haiar hoch a Vsegrees) reforbed % rast thord Lid toctheiéon
Coneaties
ons i.~Teperd NA. 0.4. 004534
[eee vee
|25) # S024
ra g
Ei im eel
2 Tea .1« Soeo
| +
| 20 40 Sel
|
| 2 2 Fors
3 g
|e is 32 Sov
28] 14 28% ~or2|
Sok
a 28.248 on
Poe
8 g
20 o§ 208
Fe 83.168 So06|
ess
rl see Fi.
3 S12 ood
Se 4.08 §,ove|
sl | 208 |
3 ol i Tritt}, , #
é ails ee) Wl hon j8S7 ¥
er (dag orto for 3-.
od Pres (srneloms09 Nea MEabo0) 8-2] airforndo-r5-3.25%e-)
herbie Tiial ear org z la festectiee 4000
- Corrected for tunnel-wall effect. 7-4 Pr [Date: 10-/-34 Test: VOT. [17
a
Jingle of ettock. et (egrees) referred 10 ree! chord
‘roons —Teparet N. AO. A, 006848 () srt
20 2 4 6 8 10 12 ie
Lit coeticient Ce
Cents
515516
sweepback necessary to obtain the desired pitching
moment were determined by the method previously
given for computing pitching moments, except that
data for wings with trapezoidal tips were used. ‘The
24-80-8.50 wing has sufficient twist t6 obtain the
desired pitching moment using a cambered section
and 30° sweopback. ‘The 2R,-15-8.50 wing has the
same twist but helf the sweepback and a reflexed
airfoil section to obtain a positive pitching moment.
The 2R--15-0 airfoil has no twist and increased reflex.
A symmetrical section together with twist is used for
the 00-15-3.45 wing, while the last wing has the same
twist and sweepback as the previous wing but taper
ratio of 0.25,
‘The variable-density wind tunnel in which the tests
were made is described in reference 6 together with
tho method of making tests. The lift, drag, and
pitching moment of the wings were measured at a
‘tank pressure of 20 atmospheres.
‘The results of the tests, corrected for tunnel-wall
effect, are given in the form of dimensionless cooffi-
cients and ere plotted in figures 12 to 20. ‘Tho lift-
curve peak is given for two values of effective Reynolds
Number to indicate the scale effect. ‘Tho effective
Reynolds Number, at which the maximum lift coefii-
cients apply in flight, is the test Reynolds Number
multiplied by turbulence factor, 2.64.
In order to make possible a more accurate reading of
drag coefficients than can be mado from the plots
against angle of attack, a drag coefficient hes been
plotted against lift coefficient with the induced drag
{or elliptical span loading deducted; thet is
Ony=Co— Fe
‘The cocfiicont Cp, is called the “effective profile-drag
cocfficient” aid is useful for comparing the drag of
tapered wings, as it includes with the true profile drag
any additional induced drag caused by o departure
from tho ideal clliptical lift distribution. Notice
should be taken that Gp, eannot be used like a profile-
dmg coofficiont to compute the offect of change of
aspect ratio but applies only to the particular wings
tested. The values of Gp, have been corrected to the
effective Reynolds Number (references 7 and 8) by
allowing for the reduction in skin-fiction drag due to
lie change from the test to the effective Reynolds
Number. ‘The reduction amounted to Op=0.0011.
‘The pitching-moment coefficients plotted against the
Lift coefficient are given about an axis through the asro-
dynamic center of the wings in order to obtain a prac-
tically constant value of pitching-moment coefficient.
The acrodynamic center was determined from the
slope of the test pitching-moment curve, The loca-
tion of the aerodynamic center is given on the plots by
its distance from the lending edge and above the chord
‘of the root section. ‘These distances re given as
fractions of the ratio of area to span, S/b,
REPORT NO. 572 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTBE FOR ABRONAUTICS
‘Tho shapes of the lift and pitching-moment curves
near maximum lift provide information on the na-
ture of the stalling of the wings. The 24-0-0 wing
has a sherp drop in lift after the maximum, indicat-
ing that stalling occurs almost simultaneously over
considerable portion of the wing. Also the 0,
after tho stall is like that of normal wings. In
trast to this wing, the 2480-0 wing, which has the
same airfoil sections but 30° sweepback, has a rounded
lift-ourve peak, indicating that stalling occurs pro-
gressively along the span. The pitching-momont
coofficiont is positive after the stall, which shows that
stalling begins at sections behind the aerodynamic
center. Washout, as in the case of the 24-30-8.50
wing, reduces the tendency to stall of sections bebind
the eorodynamic center, which may bo verified by
reference to tho On, curve. Stalling, howover, still
begins behind the acrodynamio center, 2s the On, is
positive after the stall. All the wings, excopt “the
24-80-0 and 24~30-8.60, are stable after the stall.
‘Tho important test results for all the wings are
summarized in table V. ‘The coordinates of the aero-
Aynamic conter aro expressed as fractions of S/b. ‘Tho
24-0-0, 24-15-0, and 24-30-0 wings show a docronso of
Crna 98 tho sweepback is increased. For the 24-30-
8.50 wing, the effect of sweepback is partly compen
sated by twist, which reduces the tendency to stall
of the low Reynolds Number sections near the tips
‘and therefore incronses Craq., ‘The drag, however, is
‘also increased. Of the wings designed to have a small
positive Ong, the 2R,-15-0 wing has the highest ratio
f Cog! ne
COMPARISON OF TEST AND CALCULATED RESULTS
Pitching-moment characteristics, lift-curve slope,
‘and drag.—Tho lift distribution and other theorotical
data used to determine the desired pitching-momont
coofficient of the wings are now used to predict other
characteristics. In addition to Oyy, the aerodynamic-
conter position, the angle of zero lift, and the lift-curve
slope have been calculated. The values of a were cal-
culated from the formula in figure 2. In this formula
a-value of a corresponding to the a, for tho N. A. O. A.
0012 and 2412 sections at a Reynolds Number of
3,000,000 was used, inasmuch as the effect of variations
‘of dy with section and Reynolds Number is small. As
the valuo of ap used in the formula was derived from
tests of rectangular wings, a correction for square tips
hhas been applied in order to obtain a better value of tho
section lift-curve slope. The correction, derived from
tests of wings with rounded tips, is given in reference 9.
‘Tho caleulated values of the pitching-moment coofi-
cient at zero lift, the nerodynemie-conter position, the
angle of zero lift, and the lift-curve slope are generally
in good agresment with tho test values (tablo V1).
‘Tho agreement of the pitching-moment cocfficiont at
zero lift and the serodynamic-centar position, which areDETERMINATION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF TAPERED WINGS
‘ealculated from tho basic and additional lift distribu-
tions, respectively, indicate that the theoretical lift
distributions must also agreo reasonably well with the
actual distributions.
In addition to tho foregoing charactoristies, the drag
has been ealculated for the 00-0-0 and 24-0-0 airfoils.
‘Tho comparison between calculation and experiment
fs based on values of tho effective profile-drag cocffi-
‘cient. ‘Tho calculated values wore obtained from
Coen "eutty+ Oo. Si
In order to find tho valuo of tho intogral, values of
ea, woro determined as follows at several points along
tho semispan for convonient values of total wing C.-
For oach valuo of G,, the distribution across tho semi-
span of ci, Reynolds Number, and thickness ratio wore
calculated. ‘Then, for each point on the somispon,
Gay was found for the appropriate ¢, Reynolds Number,
16)
‘Sa
id Goes
42} Tali Begin
10}
00-15-3454: wing
e 2 ae
ve
ioons 21—Dteraialon ofthe Coat which tapered weg bls ota
70
and thickness ratio, using date that aro expected to be
published soon in a report concorning scale effect on
airfoils, From the values of cy a-curve of cae was
plotted ogainst y and the valuo of the integral was
dotermined from the area undor the curve. ‘The value
of Cp, was obtained for the formula previously given.
‘Pho calculated and test values of Gp, are compared in
figures 12 and 13. ‘The agreement is considered good.
Estimation of maximum lift coefficient—A final
characteristic to be estimated is the maximum lift
coofficient, which should be nearly equal to the C, at
which stalling begins. ‘Tho method of determining the
G, at which stalling begins is demonstrated for the
00-16-8.45 (4:1 taper) wing in figuro 21. ‘The lift
coefficient at which each section: along the semispan
stalls (chown by the dashed curve) was obtained by
517
using the maximum lift coefficients of the symmetrical
sections given in reference 10 but with the values of
Cemex increased 3 percent, This correction was made
for the same reason that a) was corrected; that is, to
allow for the effect of square tips and thereby to obtain
a closer approach to true section characteristics.
Better section characteristics will be obtained as a
result of an investigation in progress but the correction
‘used is sufficiently accurate for the present purposo.
As tho values of a4, given in reference 10 were for a
Reynolds Number of 3,000,000, correction increments
were applied to correct the values of Ong, to the actual
Reynolds Number of each section slong the span.
Correction increments applying to various airfoil sec
tions aro expected to be published in tho previously
mentioned report concerning scale effect on airfoils.
‘The curves of ¢; distribution for several values of
wing G, given in figure 21 were determined by the
method previously given for finding ¢; distribution.
As soon &s the ¢; curve becomes tangent to the stalling
Cimaz Curve, the section at that point reaches its maxi-
mum lift coefficient and stalling should soon sproad over
‘a considerable part of the wing. ‘Thus, for the 00-15~
3.45 (4:1 taper) wing, stalling is indicated as beginning
near the tips, at a C; of 1.31. Stalling, however, is so
closo to the tip that it may be modified by the tip
vortex. ‘The moasured Oiq,, is 1.32, but this value is
probebly low owing to the sweepback of the wing.
This method, when epplied to several other tapered
wings without sweepback but heving various taper
ratios and aspect ratios, gave « stalling C, that was
‘within a few percent of the measured rp, for all the
wings; therefore, the method should prove useful for
estimating the Ora, of tapered wings.
‘The 00-15-8.45 (4:1 taper) wing is an example of the
harmful effect of excessive taper on Cinay- Large taper
not only tends to cause a 1oW Cinar but also tends to
cause stalling near the tips, which Tesults in poor lateral
control ntlow speeds. Improvement could be obtained
by using less taper and thicker seotions noar the tips.
Although all of the characteristics of tapered wings
have not yet been satisfactorily calculated, it may be
concluded that the following important aerodynamic
characteristics—anglo of zero lift, the lift-curve slope,
the pitching-moment coefficient, the acrodynamic-
center position, and the span lift distribution—ean be
calculated with sufficient accuracy for engineering
purposes.
Lanorsr Mraonran Asnonavricat, Lasonarory,
Narrowan Apvisony Cosamrres ror Anonavzics,
Laxausy Prez, Va., May 1, 1986.518
REFERENCES
4, Glauert, H.: The Elements of Aerofoll and Airserew Theory.
Cambridge University Press, 192.
2. Glauert)H.,and Gates,8.B.: The Characteristics ofaTepered
‘and Twisted Wing with Sweop-Back. R. de ME. No. 1226,
British a. RL C,, 1028
8, Hueber, J: Die acrodynamischen Higonschaften von doppel-
trapesformigen Tragddgein. ZF. M., 13. Mat 1983, 8
249-251; 29. Mai 1083, 8. 260-272.
4. Anderson, Raymond F.: Charts for Determining the Pitching
Moment of Tapered Wings with Sweepbsck and Twit.
‘TN. No. 483, N. A.C. A, 1933,
5. Lippiseh, A.: Method for the Determinstion of the Span
‘wise Lift Distribution, ‘T. M. No. 778, N. A. O. A., 135.
REPORT NO. 672 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTER FOR AERONAUTICS
6. Jacobs, Bastman N., and Abbott, Ira HL: The N. A. C. A.
Variable-Deasity WindTunnel.’ [Link]. 416, N.A.C.A-
1032.
7. Jacobs, Bastman N., and Clay, William C.: Characteristin of
‘the N. A. C. A. 28012 Aisfoll from Teate in the Full-Sealo
‘and Variable-Density Tunnels. 'T.R. No. 620, N.A.0. A.,
1936.
8, Platt, Robert C.: Turbulence Factors of N. A. O. A. Wind
‘Tunnels as Determined by Sphere Tests. ‘T. R. No. 558,
N. A.C. A, 1080.
9, Jacobs, Eastman N., and Pinkerton, Robort M.: Tests of
N. A. C.A. Aisfoils in the Varlable-Denaity Wind Tunnel.
Series 290... N. No. 567, N. A. C. A., 1038.
410. Jacobs, Eastman N., Ward, Kenneth 1, and Pinkerton
Robert M.: The Characteristice of 78 Related Airfoil
eotions from Testa in the Variable-Density Wind Tunnel.
TR. No. 400, N. A.C. A, 1938.
‘TABUB 1.—BASIC SPAN LIFT-DISTRIBUTION DATA
VALUES OF Ly FOR TAPERED WINGS WITH ROUNDED TIPS cy="381,
[es [ee [eo [oe 7 oe [v0
SPANWISE STATION
iT
ag
4
B
SUSEERE
BBSbSEE
Ba
wise
i | | |teee| [imeemee| |eaeeeme| [meme | [pee
=| | aeeeommasens | « | ueeeraeees | _[sgexeeeemne | _ [ameemnmee | [pemeseome
= | © | meeuneneans | S| setmamnerne | 5 | ezeeennnee |< [agemmereme |
2 | eatemeamans | ¢ | seaman | | é | segeaceeam | §
=| E | eizmzeneans | © | tmmnemmans | F E | guawseenaens | 7
2 | * | uasnameeos | * | eeemmaneena | * | suenssomnene | * |saecaemmnees | * | pemeertem
:| Hemme) [Hemme) [eeeme| [ieee | [pene
=| | zeesimasee) | [Emmizeree| [seeemery| [pees] [seems
-| [Sua | [neem | [aemmee| [pemeee | [paces521
DETERMINATION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF TAPERED WINGS
ADDITIONAL SPAN LIPT-DISTRIBUTION DATA—Continued
‘TABLE I-
VALUES OF L, FOR TAPERED WINGS WITH ROUNDED TIPS, ¢,,.—
Ss
gqaguaaceseee SES 200 RESRRARARERRE
oo
apgeseennnnag
2 aegUREERSERRS qaaeesacegeee aausmaeaeeses
Je | | geeeaeezesess ageseggauaaae aapmynanaeng
ical | lino | |S ana eee |
3 BSEURECSRAREE aaqgagaggeega E
|| pe | pee E
3 guecgeaceztae | , | gesesezaeagas | , | gecuerceezess | 2°)
| @ t | 4 FS
3 | “S| aseezeusaueny | ~& | aueseczgagaas | 1 | gnauaranaeny ae
g g € e
3| & | dageaesgegaeg | = | geeaseeesasas | 2 23 EaESEaRR
2 : s ae
3 i agugucggegesa | £ | gaesesescuees i aenazngganese | 3h
J} g je je gg [eo
3 |” | saaaaeasgasgs | * — “| RRARRRERERERS Ee
4 ae
Te
Be
ag
BA
é
SIazRRRARRERS
‘TABLE IV-—CALCULATION OF LIFT DISTRIBUTION FOR ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE
é
aeegaabe_
te | te | Hee
b
RRASERGS
agegeces
Bette
‘SRRREESE522. REPORT NO. 572 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMAITYER FOR AERONAUTICS
‘TABLE V—SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ‘TABLE VI—COMPARISON OF CALOULATED AND
[etve Reyes numer porxintaly 800,00 eee eee
‘B85888889