0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10K views4 pages

Essa Comments

A group of leading English-language learner scholars says the Every Student Succeeds Act does more to address the needs of English-learners, but falls short in “addressing the value of bilingualism.” The Working Group on ELL Policy, a band of nationally-known researchers in the field, released a statement praising the law’s efforts to promote academic achievement and supply additional support for English-learners.

Uploaded by

corey_c_mitchell
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10K views4 pages

Essa Comments

A group of leading English-language learner scholars says the Every Student Succeeds Act does more to address the needs of English-learners, but falls short in “addressing the value of bilingualism.” The Working Group on ELL Policy, a band of nationally-known researchers in the field, released a statement praising the law’s efforts to promote academic achievement and supply additional support for English-learners.

Uploaded by

corey_c_mitchell
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

StatementfromtheWorkingGrouponELLPolicy

Re:EveryStudentSucceedsActof2015
January8,2016
Withthereauthorizationofthe1965ElementaryandSecondaryEducationAct(ESEA)astheEvery
1
StudentSucceedsAct(ESSA)of2015,theWorkingGrouponEnglishLanguageLearner(ELL)Policy
recognizesthecontinuingevolutionofthislandmarkfederallegislationtomorefullyincludeEnglish
Learners.Thisevolutionbeganwiththe1994ImprovingAmericasSchoolsActthatintroducedstate
academicstandardsintofederalrequirementsandaddedprovisionsfortheinclusionofEnglishLearners
instateassessmentsystems.The2001NoChildLeftBehindActaddedimportantrequirementsfor
Englishlanguageproficiencystandards,assessment,andaccountabilitythroughbothTitleIandTitleIII.
BuildingonlessonsfromstateESEAflexibilitywaiversandtheintroductionofcollegeandcareerready
standards,thenewESSAcontinuestoadvancetheinclusionofEnglishLearnersinFederallegislation
affectingstateandlocaleducationagencies.
TheWorkingGroupholdstoanumberofimportantguidingprinciplesthatarereflectedtovarying
[Link]:
[Link]
opportunitiestodevelopthesameconceptualunderstandings,contentareapractices,andsophisticated
usesoflanguagethatcollegeandcareerreadinessrequiresofallstudents.
[Link]
populationsuchthatELLswithdifferingeducationalbackgrounds,contexts,strengths,andneeds
receivenotonlyappropriatehighqualityinstruction,butalsoothersupportsnecessarytoensuretheir
successinschoolandinlife.
[Link]
thecapacityofeducatorsandsystemstoensurelanguagedevelopmentandacademicsuccessforall
ELLs,[Link]
supportscapacities,policies,andbehaviorsthatenableandmeaningfullymeasurethissuccessand
recognizesthedevelopmentalnatureoflanguagelearning.
[Link]
promotedforallstudentsintheU.S.,andaccountabilityprovisionsshouldnotunderminethisgoal.
Multilingualismenhancescognitiveandsocialgrowth,developmentofliteracyinEnglish,
competitivenessinaglobalmarketplace,nationalsecurity,andunderstandingofdiversepeoplesand
cultures.

TheWorkingGrouponELLPolicyconsistsofresearcherswithextensiveexperienceineducatingELLstudentsand
[Link]
combinedknowledgeofseveralleadinguniversitiesandeducationalresearchorganizationsacrosstheUnited
States(see[Link]
consultationwithDianeAugust,DonnaChristian,MichaelFix,DavidFrancis,PatriciaGndara,ClaudeGoldenberg,
MeganHopkins,JenniferODay,KarenThompson,andIlanaUmansky.

ThefollowinghighlightskeyfeaturesofthenewlawforELLeducatorsrelatedtothefirstthree
[Link].

TitleI:

Decisionmakingauthorityforaccountabilityismovedtostatesandlocalities,and
significantlylimitssecretarialauthorityinprovidingguidanceandallowingexceptions.
Statesmusthaverigorouscollegeandcareerreadystandardsinmathematics,
reading/languagearts,[Link]
proficiency(ELP)standardsthatreflectthelanguageskillsandpracticesELLsneedto
engagesuccessfullywiththoseacademicstandards.
Statesmustadministerandreportschoolperformanceonannualstandardsbased
assessmentsofcoreacademicsubjects2aswellasofEnglishlanguageproficiencyfor
[Link],ELPassessmentisnowfullyintegratedinTitleI.
Statesmustdeterminetheirownaccountabilitysystemsbyestablishing"longterm
goals"[Link]
timethisincludesaccountabilityforELsEnglishlanguageproficiencyunderTitleI.
Statesmusthaveamethodforidentifyingschoolsthatareinneedofcomprehensiveor
targetedassistanceandasystemofassistancethatisevidencebasedasdeterminedby
thestate.
Twooptionsareofferedforassessing,reporting,andincludinginaccountability
[Link]
thereading/languageartsassessmentandassessandincorporatetheseELstestresults
[Link],aswasthecaseunderNo
[Link]
reportresultsforthefirsttwoyears,butallowsstatestoexcludetheresultsoftheseELs
fromthestateaccountabilitysysteminthefirstyear,includeameasureofstudent
growthinthesecondyear,andincludeproficiencyontheacademicassessments
[Link].
FormerlyELclassifiedstudentsaretobeincludedintheELsubgroupforreportingand
accountabilitypurposesforaperiodofupto4yearsaftertheyhavebeenreclassified.
ThissuggeststhatELstudentsexitedatGrade5orbeyondmaybeincludedinthebase
forthecalculationofELgraduationrates.
Statesareencouragedtobeinnovativeintheirassessmentandaccountabilitysystems,
includingbeingallowedtouseavarietyofreadinessandengagementindicators
[Section(c)(4)(B)(v)]andencouragedtoseekdemonstrationgrantstouseinnovative
performancebasedassessmentsforstateconsortia.

Inmathematicsandreading/languageartsinGrades38andonceinhighschool,andinscienceonceineachof
gradespans35,69,and1012.

Parentandfamilyengagementisemphasizedandauthorizedataminimumof1%of
Subpart2throughSec.1010withprovisionstoremovebarrierstoparticipationfor
familiesofELs.

TitleII:

TitleIIismoreexplicitinmentioningELsregardingexpectationsofteacherdevelopment
[Link],thestateapplicationisrequiredtoshowhow
teachers,principalsandotherschoolleaderscanidentifyandprovideappropriate
instructionforELs;andlocalactivitiesmustaddressthelearningneedsofELs.

TitleIII:

Statesarerequiredtoadoptstandardizedstatewideproceduresandcriteriaforentry
[Link]
bedoneincloseconsultationwithageographicallyrepresentativesampleofschool
districtsinthestate.
[Link](ED)isallowedtodeterminethenumberofEnglish
learnersinastateusingacombinationofthemostaccurate,uptodatedatafromthe
AmericanCommunitySurveyandstatecountsofstudentsbeingassessedonthestate's
TitleIELPassessment.
SeveralLEAbiennialreportingrequirementsarespecified,includingELsmakingprogress
inEnglishlanguageproficiency;attainingEnglishlanguageproficiency;exitingELstatus
basedontheirattainmentofEnglishlanguageproficiency;meetingacademicstandards
foreachoffouryearsafterexit;andnotattainingEnglishlanguageproficiencywithin
fiveyearsofinitialELclassificationandfirstenrollmentinastate'sLEA.
BiennialreportingalsorequiresdisaggregationoftheperformanceofELsandformer
ELs(foruptofouryearsafterexit)withadisability.
Individualstatesareexplicitlyempoweredtoaddressearlychildhood,whichwilllikely
contributetoconsiderablevariationamongthestatesinprovidingasoundprimary
[Link]
withtheintentionofencouragingcoordinationwithotherearlychildhoodprograms,as
[Link]
aroundensuringconsistencyinELstudentidentification,appropriatelanguagerelated
instruction,anddatasharingacrossdepartments.

TitleVIII(formerlyTitleIX)

Ofrhetoricalsignificance,thelawreplacesLimitedEnglishProficientwithEnglish
Learner.

EnduringIssues
Despitetheadvancesnotedabove,ESSAremainssilentinaddressingthevalueofbilingualismand
[Link]
commitmentofstatesinrecentyearstofosterboththroughinitiativessuchasthesealofbiliteracy.3
TheWorkingGrouponELLPolicywillcontinuetocallattentiontothestrongandgrowingevidencebase
[Link]
incompatiblewithpromotinghighlevelsofEnglishproficiencyforEnglishlearners,whichisclearly
necessaryforsuccessinschoolandbeyond.
Thelawalsomissesanopportunitytosetexpectationsforstatestoestablishsystemsofschooland
[Link]
guidelinescenteredonfocused,concerted,[Link]
example,schoollevelvariablesassociatedwithimprovedachievementforELsincludelearninggoalsfor
allstudentsincludingELsthatareunderstoodandsupportedbyallstaff;assessmentpracticesthat
providerealtimeandactionableinformationonstudentscurrentstatusandnextstepsrelativetothese
goals;instructionalresourcesalignedwithlearninggoals;contextualized,ongoingsupportand
professionaldevelopmentforteacherstointerpretassessmentevidenceandpedagogicallyassist
studentsinattaininglearninggoals;andeffectiveschoolleadershipthatfostersaccountabilitywhile
supportingandencouragingteachersandstudentsworkingtowardlearninggoals.

RuleMaking
Therulemakingprocesstoimplementthenewlawneedstooccurbeforethelawtakeseffect
[Link]
process,[Link]
issueindepthanalysesincludingdatamodelsofalternativeinterpretationsofkeyreporting
andaccountabilityprovisionsduringtherulemakingperiod.

See[Link]

You might also like