Scribd
Upload
48 views1 page

Peer Review Assessment Guidelines

The document provides a peer review assessment for a group project, asking members to rate each other on a scale of 0-100 based on how well they fulfilled their responsibilities and contributed to completing homework assignments as part of the team. The ratings should reflect each individual's level of participation, effort, and sense of responsibility rather than academic ability. Group members are to provide the name, rating, and brief reason for any rating below satisfactory for each member of the group including themselves.

Uploaded by

Malik Kirby
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
48 views1 page

Peer Review Assessment Guidelines

The document provides a peer review assessment for a group project, asking members to rate each other on a scale of 0-100 based on how well they fulfilled their responsibilities and contributed to completing homework assignments as part of the team. The ratings should reflect each individual's level of participation, effort, and sense of responsibility rather than academic ability. Group members are to provide the name, rating, and brief reason for any rating below satisfactory for each member of the group including themselves.

Uploaded by

Malik Kirby
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

EKC 462

sem1 2014/2015
Group Assignment: Peer review assessment
Group:
Peer review assesments
Please write the names of all team members, and rate the degree to which each member fulfilled his/her responsibilities in completing the homework assignments including you.
Thepossibleratings areasfollows:
Indicator
(i2).Recognise the importance of each individuals
Roles in the team by successfully completing the
delegated assigned tasks by the team.

Marks
91-100

Rating
Excellent

81-90

Verygood

Consistently didwhathe/shewas supposedtodo,very well


preparedand cooperative

71-80

Satisfactory

Usually didwhathe/she was supposed todo, acceptably


preparedand cooperative

61-70

Ordinary

51-60

Marginal

41-50

Deficient

31-40

Unsatisfactory

21-30

Superficial

Often didwhathe/shewassupposed todo, minimally


preparedand cooperative
Sometimesfailedtoshowupor completeassignments,
rarely prepared
Oftenfailedtoshowup or completeassignments,rarely
prepared
Consistentlyfailedtoshowupor complete assignments,
unprepared
Practically noparticipation

0-20

Noshow

No participationatall

Consistently wentaboveandbeyondtutoredteammates,
carriedmorethanhis/herfairshareof theload

These ratings should reflect each individuals level of participation and effort and sense of responsibility, to achieve the goals of the team/group not his or her academic ability.
Group:
Name

Rating and
marks

ReasonforRating<Satisfactory

1.
(yourself)
2
3
4
5

Reference:DeborahB. KaufmanAndRichardM.Felder. 2000. Accounting forIndividualEffort InCooperativeLearning Teams, J. Engr. Education,89(2), 133140

You might also like