0% found this document useful (0 votes)
74 views12 pages

BPI Tax Credit Refund Case Review

This document is a Supreme Court of the Philippines decision regarding a petition for review filed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue against the Court of Appeals decision concerning tax credits of the Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI). The Supreme Court annulled the Court of Appeals decision and reinstated the decision of the Court of Tax Appeals, holding that BPI was barred from claiming a refund of excess tax credits for tax year 1998 because it had previously exercised its irrevocable option to carry over these credits to subsequent tax years.

Uploaded by

MuslimeenSalam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
74 views12 pages

BPI Tax Credit Refund Case Review

This document is a Supreme Court of the Philippines decision regarding a petition for review filed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue against the Court of Appeals decision concerning tax credits of the Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI). The Supreme Court annulled the Court of Appeals decision and reinstated the decision of the Court of Tax Appeals, holding that BPI was barred from claiming a refund of excess tax credits for tax year 1998 because it had previously exercised its irrevocable option to carry over these credits to subsequent tax years.

Uploaded by

MuslimeenSalam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

COMMISSIONER OF

INTERNAL REVENUE,
Petitioner,




- versus -




BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINEISLANDS,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 178490

Present:

YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.,
Chairperson,
CHICO-NAZARIO,
VEASCO, !R.,
NACH"RA, and
PERATA, JJ.

Pro#$%&ated:


!$%' (, )**+
,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -,


- E C I S I O N


CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:


This is a Petition .or Re/ie0 assai%in& the -e1ision
234
dated )+ Apri% )**5
and the Reso%$tion dated )* Apri% )**( o. the Co$rt o. Appea%s in CA-G.R. SP
No. ((655, 0hi1h ann$%%ed and set aside the -e1ision dated 3) 7ar1h )**8 o. the
Co$rt o. Ta, Appea%s 9CTA: in CTA Case No. 6)(6, 0herein the CTA he%d that
respondent ;an< o. the Phi%ippine Is%ands 9;PI: a%read' e,er1ised the irre/o1a=%e
option to 1arr' o/er its e,1ess ta, 1redits .or the 'ear 3++> to the s$11eedin& 'ears
3+++ and )*** and 0as, there.ore, no %on&er entit%ed to 1%ai# the re.$nd or
iss$an1e o. a ta, 1redit 1erti.i1ate .or the a#o$nt thereo..

On 35 Apri% 3+++, ;PI .i%ed 0ith the ;$rea$ o. Interna% Re/en$e 9;IR: its
.ina% ad?$sted Corporate Ann$a% In1o#e Ta, Ret$rn 9ITR: .or the ta,a=%e 'ear
endin& on 31 D!"#$ 1998, sho0in& a ta,a=%e in1o#e o. P3,((8,)86,(@5.**
and a tota% ta, d$e o. P%0&,900,493.00.

Aor the sa#e ta,a=%e 'ear 3++>, ;PI a%read' #ade in1o#e ta, pa'#ents .or
the .irst three B$arters, 0hi1h a#o$nted to P'%3,'47,470.4%.
2)4
The =an< a%so
re1ei/ed in1o#e in 3++> .ro# /ario$s third persons, 0hi1h, 0ere a%read' s$=?e1ted
to e,panded 0ithho%din& ta,es a#o$ntin& to P7,%8',887.90. ;PI additiona%%'
a1B$ired .orei&n ta, 1redit 0hen it paid the "nited States &o/ern#ent ta,es in the
a#o$nt o. C353,@6(.**, or the eB$i/a%ent o. P%,190,014.4%, on the operations o.
.or#erDs Ne0 Yor< ;ran1h. Aina%%', respondent ;PI had 1arried o/er e,1ess ta,
1redit .ro# the prior 'ear, 3++(, a#o$ntin& to P'9,4&4,&&&.00.

Creditin& the a.ore#entioned a#o$nts a&ainst the tota% ta, d$e .ro# it at the
end o. 3++>, ;PI 1o#p$ted an o/erpa'#ent to the ;IR o. in1o#e ta,es in the
a#o$nt o.P33,947,101.00. The 1o#p$tation o. ;PI is reprod$1ed =e%o0:

Tota% In1o#e Ta,es -$e P6*),+**,@+8.**
ess: Ta, Credits:
Prior 'earDs ta, 1redits P5+,@)@,))).**
E$arter%' pa'#ents 568,5@(,@(*.@6
Credita=%e ta,es 0ithhe%d (,6>5,>>(.+*
Aorei&n ta, 1redit 6,3+*,*3@.** 686,>@(,5+@.**
------------------- -------------------
Net Ta, Pa'a=%eF9Re.$nda=%e: P988,+@(,3*3.**:


;PI opted to 1arr' o/er its 3++> e,1ess ta, 1redit, in the a#o$nt
o. P88,+@(,3*3.**, to the s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ear endin& 31 D!"#$ 1999.
284
Aor 3+++, ho0e/er, respondent ;PI ended $p 0ith 93: a net %oss in the a#o$nt
o. P%1',74&,10&.00G 9): its sti%% $napp%ied e,1ess ta, 1redit 1arried o/er .ro# 3++>,
in the a#o$nt o. P33,947,101.00(and 98: #ore e,1ess ta, 1redit, a1B$ired in 3+++,
in the s$# o. P1&,97',7'0.00. So in 3+++, the tota% e,1ess ta, 1redits o. ;PI
in1reased to P4%,9&&,8'1.00, 0hi1h it on1e #ore opted to 1arr' o/er to the
.o%%o0in& ta,a=%e 'ear.

Aor the ta,a=%e 'ear endin& 31 D!"#$ &000, respondent ;PI de1%ared in
its Corporate Ann$a% ITR: 93: )$o ta,a=%e in1o#eG 9): e,1ess ta, 1redit 1arried
o/er .ro# 3++> and 3+++, a#o$ntin& to P4%,9&&,8'1.00G and 98: e/en #ore e,1ess
ta, 1redit, &ained in )***, in the a#o$nt o. P&',&07,939.00. This ti#e, ;PI .ai%ed
to indi1ate in its ITR its 1hoi1e o. 0hether to 1arr' o/er its e,1ess ta, 1redits or to
1%ai# the re.$nd o. or iss$an1e o. a ta, 1redit 1erti.i1ate .or the a#o$nts thereo..

On 8 Apri% )**3, ;PI .i%ed 0ith petitioner Co##issioner o. Interna%
Re/en$e 9CIR: an ad#inistrati/e 1%ai# .or re.$nd in the a#o$nt
o. P33,947,101.00, representin& its e,1ess 1redita=%e in1o#e ta, .or 3++>.

The CIR .ai%ed to a1t on the 1%ai# .or ta, re.$nd o. ;PI. Hen1e, ;PI .i%ed a
Petition .or Re/ie0 =e.ore the CTA, do1<eted as CTA Case No. 6)(6.

The CTA pro#$%&ated its -e1ision in CTA Case No. 6)(6 on 3) 7ar1h
)**8, r$%in& therein that sin1e ;PI had opted to 1arr' o/er its 3++> e,1ess ta,
1redit to 3+++ and )***, it 0as =arred .ro# .i%in& a 1%ai# .or the re.$nd o. the
sa#e.

The CTA re%ied on the irrevocability rule %aid do0n in Se1tion (6 o. the
Nationa% Interna% Re/en$e Code 9NIRC: o. 3++(, 0hi1h states that on1e the
ta,pa'er opts to 1arr' o/er and app%' its e,1ess in1o#e ta, to s$11eedin& ta,a=%e
'ears, its option sha%% =e irre/o1a=%e .or that ta,a=%e period and no app%i1ation .or
ta, re.$nd or iss$an1e o. a ta, 1redit sha%% =e a%%o0ed .or the sa#e.

The CTA -e1ision ad?$d&ed:

A 1%ose s1r$tin' o. the 3++> in1o#e ta, ret$rn o. 2;PI4 re/ea%s that it
opted to 1arr' o/er its e,1ess ta, 1redits, the a#o$nt s$=?e1t o. this 1%ai#, to the
s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ear =' p%a1in& an H,I #ar< on the 1orrespondin& =o, o. said
ret$rn 9E,hi=its A-) J 8-a:. Aor the 'ear 3+++, 2;PI4 a&ain #ani.ested its
intention to 1arr' o/er to the s$11eedin& ta,a=%e period the s$=?e1t 1%ai# to&ether
0ith the 1$rrent e,1ess ta, 1redits 9E,hi=it !:. Sti%% $na=%e to app%' its prior 'earDs
e,1ess 1redits in 3+++ as it ended $p in a net %oss position, petitioner a&ain 1arried
o/er the said e,1ess 1redits in the 'ear )*** 9E,hi=it K:.

The 1o$rt a%read' 1ate&ori1a%%' r$%ed in a n$#=er o. 1ases that on1e the
option to 1arr'-o/er and app%' the e,1ess B$arter%' in1o#e ta, a&ainst the in1o#e
ta, d$e .or the ta,a=%e B$arters o. the s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ears has =een #ade,
s$1h option sha%% =e 1onsidered irre/o1a=%e and no app%i1ation .or 1ash re.$nd or
iss$an1e o. a ta, 1redit 1erti.i1ate sha%% =e a%%o0ed there.ore 9Pi%ipinas Transport
Ind$stries /s. Co##issioner o. Interna% Re/en$e, CTA Case No. 6*(8, dated
7ar1h 3, )**)G Pi%ipinas Hino, In1. /s. Co##issioner o. Interna% Re/en$e, CTA
Case No. 6*(@, dated Apri% 3+, )**)G Phi%a# Asset 7ana&e#ent, In1. /s.
Co##issioner o. Interna% Re/en$e, CTA Case No. 6)3*, dated 7a' ), )**)G The
Phi%ippine ;an<in& Corporation 9no0 <no0n as G%o=a% ;$siness ;an<, In1.: /s.
Co##issioner o. Interna% Re/en$e, CTA Reso%$tion, CTA Case No. 6)>*,
A$&$st 36, )**3. Sin1e 2;PI4 a%read' e,er1ised the irre/o1a=%e option to 1arr'
o/er its e,1ess ta, 1redits .or the 'ear 3++> to the s$11eedin& 'ears 3+++ and
)***, it is, there.ore, no %on&er entit%ed to 1%ai# .or a re.$nd or iss$an1e o. a ta,
1redit 1erti.i1ate.
2@4

In the end, the CTA de1reed:

IN VIEL OA A THE AOREGOING, the instant petition .or re/ie0 is
here=' -ENIE- .or %a1< o. #erit.
254


;PI .i%ed a 7otion .or Re1onsideration o. the .ore&oin& -e1ision, =$t the
CTA denied the sa#e in a Reso%$tion dated 8 !$ne )**8.

;PI .i%ed an appea% 0ith the Co$rt o. Appea%s, do1<eted as CA-G.R. SP No.
((655. On )+ Apri% )**5, the Co$rt o. Appea%s rendered its -e1ision, re/ersin&
that o. the CTA and ho%din& that ;PI 0as entit%ed to a re.$nd o. the e,1ess in1o#e
ta, it paid .or 3++>.

The Co$rt o. Appea%s 1on1eded that ;PI indeed opted to 1arr' o/er its
e,1ess ta, 1redit in 3++> to 3+++ =' p%a1in& an H,I #ar< on the 1orrespondin& =o,
o. its 3++> ITR. Nonethe%ess, there 0as no a1t$a% 1arr'in& o/er o. the e,1ess ta,
1redit, &i/en that ;PI s$..ered a net %oss in 3+++, and 0as not %ia=%e .or an' in1o#e
ta, .or said ta,a=%e period, a&ainst 0hi1h the 3++> e,1ess ta, 1redit 1o$%d ha/e
=een app%ied.

The Co$rt o. Appea%s added that e/en i. Se1tion (6 0as to =e 1onstr$ed
stri1t%' and %itera%%', the irrevocability rule 0o$%d sti%% not =ar ;PI .ro# see<in& a
ta, re.$nd o. its 3++> e,1ess ta, 1redit despite pre/io$s%' optin& to 1arr' o/er the
sa#e. The phrase H.or that ta,a=%e periodI B$a%i.ied the irre/o1a=i%it' o. the
option o. ;IR to 1arr' o/er its 3++> e,1ess ta, 1redit to on%' the 3+++ ta,a=%e
periodG s$1h that, 0hen the 3+++ ta,a=%e period e,pired, the irre/o1a=i%it' o. the
option o. ;PI to 1arr' o/er its e,1ess ta, 1redit .ro# 3++> a%so e,pired.

The Co$rt o. Appea%s .$rther reasoned that the &o/ern#ent 0o$%d =e
$n?$st%' enri1hed sho$%d the appe%%ate 1o$rt ho%d that the irrevocability rule =arred
the 1%ai# .or re.$nd o. a ta,pa'er, 0ho pre/io$s%' opted to 1arr'-o/er its e,1ess
ta, 1redit, =$t 0as not a=%e to $se the sa#e =e1a$se it s$..ered a net %oss in the
s$11eedin& 'ear.

Aina%%', the appe%%ate 1o$rt 1ited BPI-Family Savings Bank, Inc. v. Court of
Appeals
264
0herein this Co$rt he%d that i. a ta,pa'er s$..ered a net %oss in a 'ear,
th$s, in1$rrin& no ta, %ia=i%it' to 0hi1h the ta, 1redit .ro# the pre/io$s 'ear 1o$%d
=e app%ied, there 0as no reason .or the ;IR to 0ithho%d the ta, re.$nd 0hi1h
ri&ht.$%%' =e%on&ed to the ta,pa'er.
2(4

In a Reso%$tion dated )* Apri% )**(, the Co$rt o. Appea%s denied the 7otion
.or Re1onsideration o. the CIR.
2>4

Hen1e, the CIR .i%ed the instant Petition .or Re/ie0, a%%e&in& that:

I

THE CO"RT OA APPEAS CO77ITTE- A REVERSI;E ERROR IN
HO-ING THAT THE HIRREVOCA;IITY R"EI "N-ER SECTION (6 OA
THE TAM CO-E -OES NOT OPERATE TO ;AR PETITIONER ARO7
ASKING AOR A TAM REA"N-.

II

THE CO"RT OA APPEAS CO77ITTE- GRAVE ERROR LHEN IT
REVERSE- AN- SET ASI-E THE -ECISION OA THE CO"RT OA TAM
APPEAS AN- HE- THAT RESPON-ENT IS ENTITE- TO THE
CAI7E- TAM REA"N-.


The Co$rt .inds #erit in the instant Petition.

The Co$rt o. Appea%s erred in re%'in& on BPI-Family, #issin& si&ni.i1ant
detai%s that rendered said 1ase inapp%i1a=%e to the one at =ar.

In BPI-Family, therein petitioner ;PI-Aa#i%' de1%ared in its Corporate
Ann$a% ITR .or 3+>+ e,1ess ta, 1redits o. P3>5,**3.** .ro# 3+>>
and P33),@+3.** .ro# 3+>+, tota%in& P)+(,@+).**. ;PI-Aa#i%' 1%ear%' indi1ated
in the sa#e ITR that it 0as 1arr'in& o/er said e,1ess ta, 1redits to the .o%%o0in&
'ear. ;$t on 33 O1to=er 3++*, ;PI-Aa#i%' .i%ed a 1%ai# .or re.$nd o.
its P33),@+3.** ta, 1redit .ro# 3+>+. Lhen no a1tion .ro# the ;IR 0as
.orth1o#in&, ;PI-Aa#i%' .i%ed its 1%ai# 0ith the CTA. The CTA denied the 1%ai#
.or re.$nd o. ;PI-Aa#i%' on the &ro$nd that, sin1e the =an< de1%ared in its 3+>+
ITR that it 0o$%d 1arr' o/er its ta, 1redits to the .o%%o0in& 'ear, it sho$%d =e
pres$#ed to ha/e done so. In its 7otion .or Re1onsideration .i%ed 0ith the CTA,
;PI-Aa#i%' s$=#itted its .ina% ad?$sted ITR .or 3+>+ sho0in& that it
in1$rred P5),@>*,3(8.** net %oss in 3++*. Sti%%, the CTA denied the 7otion .or
Re1onsideration o. ;PI-Aa#i%'. The Co$rt o. Appea%s %i<e0ise denied the appea%
o. ;PI-Aa#i%' and #ere%' a..ir#ed the ?$d&#ent o. the CTA. The Co$rt,
ho0e/er, re/ersed the CTA and the Co$rt o. Appea%s.

This Co$rt de1ided to &rant the 1%ai# .or re.$nd o. ;PI-Aa#i%' a.ter .indin&
that the =an< had presented s$..i1ient e/iden1e to pro/e that it in1$rred a net %oss
in 3++* and, th$s, had no ta, %ia=i%it' to 0hi1h its ta, 1redit .ro# 3+>+ 1o$%d =e
app%ied. The Co$rt stressed in BPI Family that Hthe $ndisp$ted .a1t is that 2;PI-
Aa#i%'4 s$..ered a net %oss in 3++*G a11ordin&%', it in1$rred no ta, %ia=i%it' to
0hi1h the ta, 1redit 1o$%d =e app%ied. ConseB$ent%', there is no reason .or the ;IR
and this Co$rt to 0ithho%d the ta, re.$nd 0hi1h ri&ht.$%%' =e%on&s to the 2;PI-
Aa#i%'4.I It 0as on the =asis o. this .a1t that the Co$rt &ranted the appea% o. ;PI-
Aa#i%', =r$shin& aside a%% pro1ed$ra% and te1hni1a% o=?e1tions to the sa#e thro$&h
the .o%%o0in& prono$n1e#ents:

Aina%%', respondents ar&$e that ta, re.$nds are in the nat$re o. ta,
e,e#ptions and are to =e 1onstr$ed strictissimi uris a&ainst the 1%ai#ant. "nder
the .a1ts o. this 1ase, 0e ho%d that 2;PI-Aa#i%'4 has esta=%ished its 1%ai#. 2;PI-
Aa#i%'4 #a' ha/e .ai%ed to stri1t%' 1o#p%' 0ith the r$%es o. pro1ed$reG it #a'
ha/e e/en =een ne&%i&ent. These 1ir1$#stan1es, ho0e/er, sho$%d not 1o#pe% the
Co$rt to disre&ard this 1o%d, $ndisp$ted .a1t: that petitioner s$..ered a net %oss in
3++*, and that it 1o$%d not ha/e app%ied the a#o$nt 1%ai#ed as ta, 1redits.

S$=stantia% ?$sti1e, eB$it' and .air p%a' are on the side o. 2;PI-
Aa#i%'4. Te1hni1a%ities and %e&a%is#s, ho0e/er e,a%ted, sho$%d not =e #is$sed ='
the &o/ern#ent to <eep #one' not =e%on&in& to it and there=' enri1h itse%. at the
e,pense o. its %a0-a=idin& 1itiNens. I. the State e,pe1ts its ta,pa'ers to o=ser/e
.airness and honest' in pa'in& their ta,es, so #$st it app%' the sa#e standard
a&ainst itse%. in re.$ndin& e,1ess pa'#ents o. s$1h ta,es. Indeed, the State #$st
%ead =' its o0n e,a#p%e o. honor, di&nit' and $pri&htness.
2+4

It is ne1essar' .or this Co$rt, ho0e/er, to e#phasiNe that BPI-
Family in/o%/ed ta, 1redit a1B$ired =' the =an< in 3+>+, 0hi1h it initia%%' opted to
1arr' o/er to 3++*. The pre/ai%in& ta, %a0 then 0as the NIRC o* 198', Se1tion
(+
23*4
o. 0hi1h pro/ided:

Se1. (+. Final A!ustment "eturn. - E/er' 1orporation %ia=%e to ta, $nder
Se1tion )@ sha%% .i%e a .ina% ad?$st#ent ret$rn 1o/erin& the tota% net in1o#e .or the
pre1edin& 1a%endar or .is1a% 'ear. I. the s$# o. the B$arter%' ta, pa'#ents #ade
d$rin& the said ta,a=%e 'ear is not eB$a% to the tota% ta, d$e on the entire ta,a=%e
net in1o#e o. that 'ear the 1orporation sha%% either:

9a: Pa' the e,1ess ta, sti%% d$eG or

9=: ;e re.$nded the e,1ess a#o$nt paid, as the 1ase #a' =e.

In 1ase the 1orporation is entit%ed to a $*+,- o. the e,1ess esti#ated
B$arter%' in1o#e ta,es-paid, the re.$nda=%e a#o$nt sho0n on its .ina% ad?$st#ent
ret$rn #a' =e !$-./- a&ainst the esti#ated B$arter%' in1o#e ta, %ia=i%ities .or
the ta,a=%e B$arters o. the s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ear. 9E#phases o$rs.:


;' /irt$e o. the a.ore-B$oted pro/ision, the ta,pa'er 0ith e,1ess in1o#e ta,
0as &i/en the option to either 93: re.$nd the a#o$ntG or 9): 1redit the sa#e to its
ta, %ia=i%it' .or s$11eedin& ta,a=%e periods.

Se1tion (+ o. the NIRC o. 3+>5 0as reprod$1ed as Se1tion (6 o. the NIRC
o* 1997,
2334
0ith the addition o. one i#portant senten1e, 0hi1h %aid do0n
the irrevocability rule:

Se1tion (6. Final A!ustment "eturn. - E/er' 1orporation %ia=%e to ta,
$nder Se1tion )@ sha%% .i%e a .ina% ad?$st#ent ret$rn 1o/erin& the tota% net in1o#e
.or the pre1edin& 1a%endar or .is1a% 'ear. I. the s$# o. the B$arter%' ta, pa'#ents
#ade d$rin& the said ta,a=%e 'ear is not eB$a% to the tota% ta, d$e on the entire
ta,a=%e net in1o#e o. that 'ear the 1orporation sha%% either:

9a: Pa' the e,1ess ta, sti%% d$eG or

9=: ;e re.$nded the e,1ess a#o$nt paid, as the 1ase #a' =e.

In 1ase the 1orporation is entit%ed to a $*+,- o. the e,1ess esti#ated
B$arter%' in1o#e ta,es paid, the re.$nda=%e a#o$nt sho0n on its .ina% ad?$st#ent
ret$rn #a' =e !$-./- a&ainst the esti#ated B$arter%' in1o#e ta, %ia=i%ities .or
the ta,a=%e B$arters o. the s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ears. O,! /0 o1/.o, /o !2$$34
o5$ 2,- 21163 /0 7!88 9+2$/$63 .,!o" /27 2:2.,8/ .,!o" /27 -+ *o$
/0 /272#6 9+2$/$8 o* /0 8+!!-.,: /272#6 32$8 028 #, "2-, 8+!0
o1/.o, 80266 # !o,8.-$- .$$5o!2#6 *o$ /02/ /272#6 1$.o- 2,- ,o
2116.!2/.o, *o$ /27 $*+,- o$ .88+2,! o* 2 /27 !$-./ !$/.*.!2/ 80266 #
266o;- /0$*o$. 9E#phases o$rs.:


Lhen BPI-Family 0as de1ided =' this Co$rt, it did not 'et ha/e
the irrevocability rule to 1onsider. Hen1e, BPI-Family 1annot =e 1ited as a
pre1edent .or this 1ase.

The .a1t$a% =a1<&ro$nd o. P#ilam Asset $anagement, Inc. v. Commissioner
of Internal "evenue,
23)4
1ited =' the CIR, is 1%oser to the instant Petition. ;oth
in/o%/e ta, 1redits a1B$ired and 1%ai#s .or re.$nd .i%ed #ore than a de1ade a.ter
those in BPI-Family, to 0hi1h Se1tion (6 o. the NIRC o. 3++( a%read' app%'.

The Co$rt, in P#ilam, re1o&niNed the t0o options o..ered =' Se1tion (6 o.
the NIRC o. 3++( to a ta,a=%e 1orporation 0hose tota% B$arter%' in1o#e ta,
pa'#ents in a &i/en ta,a=%e 'ear e,1eeds its tota% in1o#e ta, d$e. These options
are: 93: .i%in& .or a ta% refun! or 9): a/ai%in& o. a ta% cre!it. The Co$rt .$rther
e,p%ained:

The .irst option is re%ati/e%' si#p%e. An' ta, on in1o#e that is paid in
e,1ess o. the a#o$nt d$e the &o/ern#ent #a' =e re.$nded, pro/ided that a
ta,pa'er proper%' app%ies .or the re.$nd.

The se1ond option 0or<s =' app%'in& the re.$nda=%e a#o$nt, as sho0n on
the 2Aina% Ad?$st#ent Ret$rn 9AAR:4 o. a &i/en ta,a=%e 'ear, a&ainst the esti#ated
B$arter%' in1o#e ta, %ia=i%ities o. the s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ear.

T08 /;o o1/.o,8 +,-$ S!/.o, 7% 2$ 26/$,2/.5 ., ,2/+$. T0
!0o.! o* o, 1$!6+-8 /0 o/0$. Indeed, in P#ilippine Bank of
Communications v. Commissioner of Internal "evenue, the Co$rt r$%ed that a
1orporation #$st si&ni.' its intention -- 0hether to reB$est a ta, re.$nd or 1%ai# a
ta, 1redit -- =' #ar<in& the 1orrespondin& option =o, pro/ided in the AAR. Lhi%e
a ta,pa'er is reB$ired to #ar< its 1hoi1e in the .or# pro/ided =' the ;IR, this
reB$ire#ent is on%' .or the p$rpose o. .a1i%itatin& ta, 1o%%e1tion.

One 1annot &et a ta, re.$nd and a ta, 1redit at the sa#e ti#e .or the sa#e
e,1ess in1o#e ta,es paid.
2384
, , ,


The Co$rt 1ate&ori1a%%' de1%ared in P#ilam that: HS!/.o, 7% $"2.,8 !62$
2,- +,9+.5o!26. O,! /0 !2$$34o5$ o1/.o, .8 /2<,, 2!/+2663 o$
!o,8/$+!/.563, ./ #!o"8 .$$5o!2#6.I It #entioned no e,1eption or
B$a%i.i1ation to the irrevocability rule.

Hen1e, the 1ontro%%in& .a1tor .or the operation o. the irrevocability rule is
that the ta,pa'er 1hose an optionG and on1e it had a%read' done so, it 1o$%d no
%on&er #a<e another one. ConseB$ent%', a.ter the ta,pa'er opts to 1arr'-o/er its
e,1ess ta, 1redit to the .o%%o0in& ta,a=%e period, the B$estion o. 0hether or not it
a1t$a%%' &ets to app%' said ta, 1redit is irre%e/ant. Se1tion (6 o. the NIRC o. 3++(
is e,p%i1it in statin& that on1e the option to 1arr' o/er has =een #ade, Hno
app%i1ation .or ta, re.$nd or iss$an1e o. a ta, 1redit 1erti.i1ate sha%% =e a%%o0ed
there.or.I

The %ast senten1e o. Se1tion (6 o. the NIRC o. 3++( reads: HOn1e the option
to 1arr'-o/er and app%' the e,1ess B$arter%' in1o#e ta, a&ainst in1o#e ta, d$e .or
the ta,a=%e B$arters o. the s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ears has =een #ade, s$1h
option 80266 # !o,8.-$- .$$5o!2#6 *o$ /02/ /272#6 1$.o- and no
app%i1ation .or ta, re.$nd or iss$an1e o. a ta, 1redit 1erti.i1ate sha%% =e a%%o0ed
there.or.I The phrase H.or that ta,a=%e periodI #ere%' identi.ies the e,1ess in1o#e
ta,, s$=?e1t o. the option, =' re.errin& to the ta,a=%e period 0hen it 0as a1B$ired
=' the ta,pa'er. In the present 1ase, the e,1ess in1o#e ta, 1redit, 0hi1h ;PI opted
to 1arr' o/er, 0as a1B$ired =' the said =an< d$rin& the ta,a=%e 'ear 3++>. The
option o. ;PI to 1arr' o/er its 3++> e,1ess in1o#e ta, 1redit is irre/o1a=%eG it
1annot %ater on opt to app%' .or a re.$nd o. the /er' sa#e 3++> e,1ess in1o#e ta,
1redit.

The Co$rt o. Appea%s #ista<en%' $nderstood the phrase H.or that ta,a=%e
periodI as a pres1ripti/e period .or the irrevocability rule. This 0o$%d #ean that
sin1e the ta, 1redit in this 1ase 0as a1B$ired in 3++>, and ;PI opted to 1arr' it o/er
to 3+++, then the irre/o1a=i%it' o. the option to 1arr' o/er e,pired =' the end o.
3+++, %ea/in& ;PI .ree to a&ain ta<e another option as re&ards its 3++> e,1ess
in1o#e ta, 1redit. This 1onstr$a% e..e1ti/e%' renders n$&ator' the irrevocability
rule. The e/ident intent o. the %e&is%at$re, in addin& the %ast senten1e to Se1tion (6
o. the NIRC o. 3++(, is to <eep the ta,pa'er .ro# .%ip-.%oppin& on its options, and
a/oid 1on.$sion and 1o#p%i1ation as re&ards said ta,pa'erDs e,1ess ta, 1redit. The
interpretation o. the Co$rt o. Appea%s on%' de%a's the .%ip-.%oppin& to the end o.
ea1h s$11eedin& ta,a=%e period.

The Co$rt si#i%ar%' disa&rees in the de1%aration o. the Co$rt o. Appea%s that
to den' the 1%ai# .or re.$nd o. ;PI, =e1a$se o. the irrevocability rule, 0o$%d =e
tanta#o$nt to $n?$st enri1h#ent on the part o. the &o/ern#ent. The Co$rt
addressed the /er' sa#e ar&$#ent in P#ilam, 0here it e%$1idated that there 0o$%d
=e no $n?$st enri1h#ent in the e/ent o. denia% o. the 1%ai# .or re.$nd $nder s$1h
1ir1$#stan1es, =e1a$se there 0o$%d =e no .or.eit$re o. an' a#o$nt in .a/or o. the
&o/ern#ent. The a#o$nt =ein& 1%ai#ed as a re.$nd 0o$%d re#ain in the a11o$nt
o. the ta,pa'er $nti% $ti%iNed in s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ears,
23@4
as pro/ided in Se1tion
(6 o. the NIRC o. 3++(. It is 0orth' to note that $n%i<e the option .or re.$nd o.
e,1ess in1o#e ta,, 0hi1h pres1ri=es a.ter t0o 'ears .ro# the .i%in& o. the AAR,
there is no pres1ripti/e period .or the 1arr'in& o/er o. the sa#e. There.ore, the
e,1ess in1o#e ta, 1redit o. ;PI, 0hi1h it a1B$ired in 3++> and opted to 1arr' o/er,
#a' =e repeated%' 1arried o/er to s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ears, i.e., to 3+++, )***,
)**3, and so on and so .orth, $nti% a1t$a%%' app%ied or 1redited to a ta, %ia=i%it' o.
;PI.

Aina%%', 0hi%e the Co$rt, in P#ilam, 0as .ir# in its position that the 1hoi1e
o. option as re&ards the e,1ess in1o#e ta, sha%% =e irre/o1a=%e, it 0as %ess ri&id in
the deter#ination o. 0hi1h option the ta,pa'er a1t$a%%' 1hose. It did not %i#it
itse%. to the indi1ation =' the ta,pa'er o. its option in the ITR.

Th$s, .ai%$re o. the ta,pa'er to #a<e an appropriate #ar<in& o. its option in
the ITR does not a$to#ati1a%%' #ean that the ta,pa'er has opted .or a ta,
1redit. The Co$rt ratio1inated in G.R. No. 35668(
2354
o. P#ilam:

One 1annot &et a ta, re.$nd and a ta, 1redit at the sa#e ti#e .or the sa#e
e,1ess in1o#e ta,es paid. F2.6+$ /o 8.:,.*3 o,=8 .,/,/.o, ., /0 FAR -o8
,o/ "2, o+/$.:0/ #2$$.,: o* 2 526.- $9+8/ *o$ 2 $*+,-, 80o+6- o, 8/.66
!0oo8 /0.8 o1/.o, 62/$ o,. A ta, 1redit sho$%d =e 1onstr$ed #ere%' as an
a%ternati/e re#ed' to a ta, re.$nd $nder Se1tion (6, s$=?e1t to prior /eri.i1ation
and appro/a% =' respondent.

T0 $28o, *o$ $9+.$.,: /02/ 2 !0o.! # "2- ., /0 FAR +1o, ./8
*.6.,: .8 /o 28 /27 2-".,.8/$2/.o,, parti1$%ar%' the se%.-assess#ent and
1o%%e1tion aspe1ts. A ta,pa'er that #a<es a 1hoi1e e,presses 1ertaint' or
pre.eren1e and th$s de#onstrates 1%ear di%i&en1e. Con/erse%', a ta,pa'er that
#a<es no 1hoi1e e,presses $n1ertaint' or %a1< o. pre.eren1e and hen1e sho0s
si#p%e ne&%i&en1e or p%ain o/ersi&ht.

, , , ,

, , , -espite the .ai%$re o. 2Phi%a#4 to #a<e the appropriate #ar<in& in
the ;IR .or#, the *.6.,: o* ./8 ;$.//, !62." **!/.563 8$58 28 2, 71$88.o,
o* ./8 !0o.! /o $9+8/ 2 /27 $*+,-, instead o. a ta, 1redit. To assert that an'
.$t$re 1%ai# .or a ta, re.$nd 0i%% =e instant%' hindered =' a .ai%$re to si&ni.'
oneDs intention in the AAR is to render n$&ator' the 1%ear pro/ision that a%%o0s .or
a t0o-'ear pres1ripti/e period.
2364
9E#phases o$rs.:


P#ilam re/ea%s a #eti1$%o$s 1onsideration =' the Co$rt o. the e/iden1e
s$=#itted =' the parties and the 1ir1$#stan1es s$rro$ndin& the ta,pa'erDs option
to 1arr' o/er or 1%ai# .or re.$nd. Lhen 1ir1$#stan1es sho0 that a 1hoi1e has
=een #ade =' the ta,pa'er to 1arr' o/er the e,1ess in1o#e ta, as 1redit, it sho$%d
=e respe1tedG =$t 0hen ind$=ita=%e 1ir1$#stan1es 1%ear%' sho0 that another 1hoi1e
O a ta, re.$nd O is in order, it sho$%d =e &ranted. HTe1hni1a%ities and %e&a%is#s,
ho0e/er e,a%ted, sho$%d not =e #is$sed =' the &o/ern#ent to <eep #one' not
=e%on&in& to it and there=' enri1h itse%. at the e,pense o. its %a0-a=idin& 1itiNens.I

There.ore, as to 0hi1h option the ta,pa'er 1hose is &enera%%' a #atter o.
e/iden1e. It is a,io#ati1 that a 1%ai#ant has the =$rden o. proo. to esta=%ish the
.a1t$a% =asis o. his or her 1%ai# .or ta, 1redit or re.$nd. Ta, re.$nds, %i<e ta,
e,e#ptions, are 1onstr$ed stri1t%' a&ainst the ta,pa'er.
23(4

In the Petition at =ar, ;PI 0as $na=%e to dis1har&e the =$rden o. proo.
ne1essar' .or the &rant o. a re.$nd. ;PI e,press%' indi1ated in its ITR .or 3++>
that it 0as 1arr'in& o/er, instead o. re.$ndin&, the e,1ess in1o#e ta, it paid d$rin&
the said ta,a=%e 'ear. ;PI 1onsistent%' reported the said a#o$nt in its ITRs .or
3+++ and )*** as 1redit to =e app%ied to an' ta, %ia=i%it' the =an< #a' in1$rG on%',
no s$1h opport$nit' arose =e1a$se it s$..ered a net %oss in 3+++ and in1$rred Nero
ta, %ia=i%it' in )***. In G.R. No. 36)**@ o.P#ilam, the Co$rt .o$nd:

Airst, the .a1t that it .i%%ed o$t the portion HPrior YearDs E,1ess CreditsI in
its 3+++ AAR #eans that it 1ate&ori1a%%' a/ai%ed itse%. o. the 1arr'-o/er option. In
.a1t, the %ine that pre1edes that phrase in the ;IR .or# 1%ear%' states Hess: Ta,
CreditsFPa'#ents.I The 1ontention that it #ere%' .i%%ed o$t that portion =e1a$se it
0as a reB$ire#ent O and that to ha/e done other0ise 0o$%d ha/e =een tanta#o$nt
to .a%si.'in& the AAR O is a %on& shot.

The AAR is the #ost re%ia=%e .irsthand e/iden1e o. 1orporate a1ts
pertainin& to in1o#e ta,es. In it are .o$nd the ite#iNation and s$##ar' o.
additions to and ded$1tions .ro# in1o#e ta,es d$e. These entries are not 0itho$t
rh'#e or reason. The' are reB$ired, =e1a$se the' .a1i%itate the ta, ad#inistration
pro1ess.
23>4


;PI itse%. ne/er denied that its ori&ina% intention 0as to 1arr' o/er the
e,1ess in1o#e ta, 1redit it a1B$ired in 3++>, and on%' 1hose to re.$nd the said
a#o$nt 0hen it 0as $na=%e to app%' the sa#e to an' ta, %ia=i%it' in the s$11eedin&
ta,a=%e 'ears. There 1an =e no do$=t that ;PI opted to 1arr' o/er its e,1ess
in1o#e ta, 1redit .ro# 3++>G it on%' s$=seB$ent%' 1han&ed its #ind O 0hi1h it 0as
=arred .ro# doin& =' the irrevocability rule.

The 1hoi1e =' ;PI o. the option to 1arr' o/er its 3++> e,1ess in1o#e ta,
1redit to s$11eedin& ta,a=%e 'ears, 0hi1h it e,p%i1it%' indi1ated in its 3++> ITR, is
irre/o1a=%e, re&ard%ess o. 0hether it 0as a=%e to a1t$a%%' app%' the said a#o$nt to a
ta, %ia=i%it'. The reiteration =' ;PI o. the 1arr' o/er option in its ITR .or 3+++
0as a%read' a s$per.%$it', as .ar as its 3++> e,1ess in1o#e ta, 1redit 0as
1on1erned, &i/en the irre/o1a=i%it' o. the initia% 1hoi1e #ade =' the =an< to 1arr'
o/er the said a#o$nt. Aor the sa#e reason, the .ai%$re o. ;PI to indi1ate an'
option in its ITR .or )*** 0as a%read' i##ateria% to its 3++> e,1ess in1o#e ta,
1redit.

>HEREFORE, the instant Petition .or Re/ie0 o. the Co##issioner .or
Interna% Re/en$e is GRANTED. The -e1ision dated )+ Apri% )**5 and the
Reso%$tion dated )* Apri% )**( o. the Co$rt o. Appea%s in CA-G.R. SP No. ((655
are REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The -e1ision dated 3) 7ar1h )**8 o. the
Co$rt o. Ta, Appea%s in CTA Case No. 6)(6, den'in& the 1%ai# o. respondent
;an< o. the Phi%ippine Is%ands .or the re.$nd o. its 3++> e,1ess in1o#e ta, 1redits,
is REINSTATED. No 1osts.


SO ORDERED.

You might also like