Scribd
Upload
159 views1 page

Robbery Liability Under Section 390

A is accused of robbing B. The document discusses the law around robbery as defined in section 390, including that theft followed by one of the acts in section 390 constitutes robbery. It also discusses case law distinguishing robbery from mere theft. The conclusion is that A may be held liable for robbery against B as defined in section 390 and punishable under section 392.

Uploaded by

AFA
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
159 views1 page

Robbery Liability Under Section 390

A is accused of robbing B. The document discusses the law around robbery as defined in section 390, including that theft followed by one of the acts in section 390 constitutes robbery. It also discusses case law distinguishing robbery from mere theft. The conclusion is that A may be held liable for robbery against B as defined in section 390 and punishable under section 392.

Uploaded by

AFA
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ROBBERY

The parties in this issue are A, as the accused and B, as the victim. The issue is whether A may be held liable for committing robbery as defined under section 390 and punishable under section 392 for the act committed to B. LAW PRINCIPLE STATE SECTION 390 (1). STATE SECTION 390 (2). IF THEFT-> ROBBERY Nga Po Thet - the essence of robbery is that he offender, for committing theft, or in carrying away of in attempting to carry away of property obtained by theft, commits one or the other wrongful acts mention in section 390. Bishambhar Nath v Emperor appellant tried luck at carnival fight with manager for prizes remove cash from table fight was not meant to rob only convicted for theft. STATE SECTION 390 (3). IF EXTORTION -> ROBBERY EXTORTION -> ROBBERY =ILLUSTRATION (b) & (c) OF SECTION 390

APPLICATION

CONCLUSION In conclusion, A may be held liable for committing robbery as defined under section 390 and punishable under section 392 for the act committed to B. )

You might also like