Spring Giveaway Event!

$150 Amazon Gift Card or PayPal Cash__Spring '26_BUTTON.jpg
Welcome To The $150 Amazon eGift Card or PayPal Cash Giveaway!

Giveaway: 1 lucky winner a $150 Amazon eGift Card or PayPal Cash. The event is running from February 23rd to May 16th. Giveaway open Worldwide everywhere PayPal is negotiable & age 18+.

GIVEAWAY DETAILS

$150 Prize.jpg

Prize:

$150 Amazon eGift Card or PayPal Cash

One Lucky Winner Will Receive choice of: $150 Amazon eGift Card or PayPal Cash


Hosted/Sponsored By:VT '26_Small_TRANSP BG.png

WEBSITE ~ FACEBOOK ~ TWITTER/”X” ~ PINTEREST ~ INSTAGRAM ~ YOUTUBE

Check out Versatileer’s other giveaways!

Co-Hosted By:

SARCASTICALLY YOURS, JEN ~ THE FRUGAL GRANDMOM ~ DELICIOUSLY SAVVY ~ OTTAWA MOMMY CLUB ~ IT’S FREE AT LAST ~ BABUSHKA’S BAILE ~ THE ESOTERIC CAT

Spr MarM EarthM & MomD '25 – Co-Hosts- Thank You!!.jpg🎍 ☘️ 🦋🌹 💮 ⚘ 🌼 🌸 🥀 💠 🌺 🪷 🌷 💐 🏡 ⚜️ 🪻 🏵️

Rules: Use The Giveaway Tools Form To Enter Daily. The giveaway ends 05/16/26 at 11:59 PM (PST), and is open Worldwide. Entrants must be 18 years old to enter. The winner will be notified via email.

Now To The……Spr MarM EarthM & MomD '25 – Giveaway.jpg

Good Luck! Enter Below

This giveaway/sweepstakes is in no way endorsed, affiliated, or associated with Facebook, Twitter or any other Social Media Networking Site. This event is not sponsored or endorsed by Amazon or PayPal Company. The winner will have 48 hours to email their information back to Versatileer at gmail dot com or a new winner will be drawn, you may want to put this email address as safe as it could go to spam. The giveaway is not valid where prohibited! Once a winner is drawn and confirmed, the name will be announced on the Giveaway Tools form. Versatileer will be responsible for sending the winners their prizes. By entering you are authorizing us to collect the information on the form below, this information is used only to contact the winner! No purchase necessary, Void where prohibited by law, and the number of eligible entries received determines the odds of winning. Winners are chosen randomly by a random winner selection method. Twitter and Facebook dummy/fake accounts are ineligible for entry and will be blocked. Authentic accounts only are eligible to win. Next seasonal giveaway starts 3 hours before this giveaway ends, and the two giveaways will overlap for the three hour period. More giveaway terms and conditions are listed: HERE. No blog associated with this contest are responsible for prize fulfillment. If you would like to become a sponsor in a giveaway like this please email Jerry Marquardt at versatileer at gmail dot com or you can use the Contact Form. If you take an entry you must stay following for the entire contest or you will be disqualified.

Are You A Blogger? See the latest Blogger Opps HERE. Use the Contact Form to get a FREE Link added to One Of Our Giveaways. Just post and report!

If you are a brand/company or author and would like to work with Versatileer, or have any questions please use the Contact Form HERE or email Jerry at versatileer at gmail dot com.

Thank You For Visiting Today…Come Back Daily!

That’s a LOT to celebrate in one giveaway event, even one as big as this one! And here’s one more giveaway JUST at Reading Reality!

A+ #AudioBookReview: Inside Man by John McMahon

A+ #AudioBookReview: Inside Man by John McMahonInside Man (Head Cases, #2) by John McMahon
Narrator: Will Damron
Format: audiobook, eARC
Source: supplied by publisher via Edelweiss, supplied by publisher via Libro.fm
Formats available: hardcover, ebook, audiobook
Genres: mystery, suspense, thriller
Series: PAR Unit #2
Pages: 390
Published by Macmillan Audio, Minotaur Books on January 13, 2026
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKoboBookshop.orgBetter World Books
Goodreads

In this sequel to McMahon's electrifying series debut, Head Cases, Gardner Camden and the PAR team return to investigate potentially connected cases.
FBI Agent Gardner Camden is an analytical genius with an affinity for puzzles. He and his squad of brilliant yet quirky agents make up the Patterns and Recognition (PAR) unit, the FBI’s hidden edge, brought in for cases that no one else can solve.
PAR’s latest case involves a militia group stockpiling weapons. When their confidential informant in the case is killed, it quickly becomes clear that the militia did not kill him.
As the squad looks into the evidence surrounding his murder, an unidentified man is caught on camera with their informant. This mystery man’s picture is connected to another case at the FBI, an unsolved series of murdered women, buried in the ground in north Florida. Could they have uncovered a serial killer? And if so, what is his connection to their C.I.?
As PAR juggles an investigation into both the dead women and the militia, they enroll a new informant, only to find the case escalating in dangerous ways. How will PAR handle a case that increasingly looks like a terrorist plot? And in the serial case, with no puzzles or witnesses, and few leads, how will a group set up to decode riddles be successful?

My Review:

The first book in this series, Head Cases, set up the characters and the structure of the FBI unit they work in, the Patterns and Recognition Unit, or PAR. They’re the ‘head cases’, the freaks, the ones who solve cold cases that defy ordinary investigative methods because something about the case isn’t ordinary – and neither are they.

PAR is also a collection of agents who have pissed off the brass in ways that are not firing offenses. Like shooting into a pattern that read F-U-C-K C-O-N-G-R-E-S-S on the wall of targets at a federal gun range, while a senator was visiting said gun range. That sort of thing isn’t a crime, it isn’t illegal, but it is guaranteed to get someone sent to the equivalent of career Siberia. Or, in the case of this series, PAR.

In Head Cases, the unit was led by a senior FBI agent named Frank Roberts. But Frank kept too many secrets from his own team in the hopes of getting a supervisory assignment back out in the wider – and more respected – parts of the FBI before the PAR Unit got closed down. He made his own escape path and kind of left the rest of ‘his’ team hung out to dry.

Except the rest of that team, spearheaded by Agent Gardner Camden, solved the serial killings, saved the day, the PAR Unit and literally saved Frank’s ass. Frank got his reward back home in Texas, and Gardner got the supervisory position, always aware that the unit was one step away from being disbanded if they didn’t deliver.

Camden, often referred to by his fellow FBI agents as THE head case among the head cases, knows that his strengths lie in figuring out the pattern and not in supervision. Or management, or office politics. He’s doing his best, working with the skills he does have, to make it work. And it mostly does.

At least until their current case threatens to blow itself sky high. They’ve spent three months following a fraud, guns and racketeering case. A big one involving fraudulent unemployment accounts – and the money paid into those accounts, illegal arms sales, and domestic terrorism – facilitated by those illegal arms sales bought with those illegally gotten funds. It’s a criminal enterprise that crosses at least one state line (Florida to Georgia and back) and has left behind a trail of bodies – and will leave more if their leader’s plans and ambitions continue on the track he’s already laid out.

The FBI’s confidential information or CI (read that as either ‘inside man’ or snitch) has heard rumors about this domestic terrorism militia purchasing several thousand kits to make ‘ghost guns’ that would have no true manufacturer or serial number. (It’s a loophole in the law and it’s being exploited, potentially to devastating effect.) It’s the FBI’s mission to find those kits and stop them from being turned into guns before they start firing.

Which is when the case goes pear-shaped. (I can’t say it goes south as they are already nearly as far south in Florida as they can get.) They find their snitch shot dead in his trailer, along with plenty of evidence, including CASH, related to the financial parts of the case.

He wasn’t shot by the people he’s snitching on, or they’d have removed the evidence. They also wouldn’t be on the way to check in with the guy and figure out why HE hasn’t been checking in. So who killed the snitch? And how can they keep the case from blowing up and taking their careers and who knows how many innocent lives, along with them?

Camden and the PAR Unit know there must be a pattern, They just have to find it. Whether or not anyone in the FBI thinks it has anything at all to do with the case they started with. Because it must.

Escape Rating A+: This is a story that I began in audio, and was certainly enjoying in audio. The narration by Will Damron was very well done and he did an excellent job of sounding like I expected Camden to sound while still giving the rest of the characters their own distinct voices. But I got caught between the dilemma that the audio was good but my reading is considerably faster, and I couldn’t stand the idea of waiting over a weekend to continue the story. So I switched to text and couldn’t put the thing down.

That being said, I picked this up in the first place because I fell headlong into the first book in this series, Head Cases, late last summer. I was absolutely riveted AND it was also a case of the ‘right book at the right time’ to the nth degree. So I grabbed the eARC of the second book up before I was even finished with the first one. I knew it was going to be THAT good. And it was.

Very much like the first book, what makes this case interesting is the way that it spirals outward in directions that no one, including the team doing the investigating, expects AT ALL. They think they’ve got one thing, and they do have to deal with that thing because the idea of a gang of domestic terrorists with ghost guns shooting up Washington DC should give anyone pause. That it particularly gives ALL the federal agencies that would either be caught in the crossfire or whose lives and careers will be toast if they fail to stop it from happening an absolute mania to catch the would-be terrorists before they strike another round of terror is exactly what one would expect. And should.

However, as big as that crime is/would be/could be, it’s not what’s driving the PAR Unit. Their search for their CI’s killer has uncovered a serial killer. Their skills at pattern recognition have unearthed several body dumping sites. They’re off on an entirely different – and not completely sanctioned – race than the one the rest of the FBI is on, yet they’re involved in both up to their necks.

It’s fascinating – and not done all that often in fiction – to see this small unit try to work two high priorities at the same time. They can’t – and in real life probably wouldn’t be – focused entirely on a single case no matter how important. Also the way that resources are allocated at the level above them shines a spotlight on how upper level priorities affect funding which affects focus on what the political powers-that-be believe is most important.

So there was a lot going on throughout this whole story, and it kept me reading long after I should have quit for the night. I had to see what happened next – and what ultimately did or did not tie the two cases together. Because they shouldn’t have been but they absolutely were.

Part of what makes the series compelling to follow are the personalities of the members of the PAR Unit itself. They each bring a whole lot of quirks, a fair bit of irreverence regarding authority, and a lot of widely different experience to the table. They do an excellent job of filling the roles of a classic “five-man band”, especially when they get their fifth member back as this story progresses.

But speaking of the characters, it’s impossible for me to read Gardner Camden’s series without thinking of George Cross’ series that begins with The Dentist. I held off on reading my next book in THAT series until I finished this book because they are a bit too similar – even though they’re not actually as much alike as one might think.

Both Camden and Cross are on the autism spectrum, and both seem to be in the same part of that spectrum. Highly intelligent, often hyper focused, with low emotional affect and engagement. In other words, what was referred to as Asperger’s syndrome not that long ago and both would have been labelled so as children as they are both in their mid-to-late 30s. Both went into police work, but Camden with the FBI in the US and Cross on a local level in Britain. It would seem like their stories should be similar, and there are similarities, but not as many as the reader might think going in as their approaches to both themselves and the world they live in are different.

Cross is aware that he is different, but he expects the world and everyone around him to bend in order to work with those differences. His world revolves around himself and he believes that everyone else should make the adjustments. Camden, very much on the other hand, while he is just as certain of who he is and how he works best, also recognizes that the world is not made for him anymore than he is made for it. He adapts as much as he can to the way things work, and is very aware of when his hyperfocus gets in the way of getting the human-facing parts of the job done. In this book he is the supervisor of the PAR Unit, and is all too cognizant of that fact that he is no good at playing politics, and that he has to find a way to be a leader for the team and a mentor for their rookie whether those things are natural for him or not, if he wants to keep the job.

So this book managed to both give me a lot to think about, as I couldn’t stop comparing Camden to Cross, at least inside the confines of my own head, and I couldn’t stop reading late into the night/morning because I had to find out not just ‘whodunnit’ but who done each of the parts of the ‘it’ the PAR Unit was following.

I had a grand reading time, so I was just a bit sorry to read at the end that the author has a lot of writing irons in the fire and while he intends to come back to PAR, he isn’t exactly sure about when. While I’ll need to look up his other series, AND look for whatever direction his work takes him, in the meantime if I want to scratch at least around this particular itch I’m glad that I have more of the Cross series to read – and most likely soon because I’ve got a book hangover that needs to be assuaged somehow.

The Sunday Post AKA What’s on my (Mostly Virtual) Nightstand 2-22-26

This week’s schedule fell completely to bits, because last weekend turned out to be a lot busier than I thought it was going to be. One of the things that made it so busy was running out to get our new gaming chair. Which you wouldn’t think would be THAT big a deal, but it turned out to be. I’m thrilled with the chair as it’s a lot more supportive for my back when I play.

Luna is equally thrilled, as you can see from the picture. Not about the new chair, but about her sole possession of the old one, complete with additional pillows and lumbar seating and every other thing I stuffed into or onto it to make it incrementally better. For my back, it wasn’t enough. But all of those extra accoutrements turned the chair into Princess Luna’s perfect throne. She’s VERY happy to have it all to herself and have a cushier place from which to oversee all of her minions.

Current Giveaways:

$10 Gift Card or $10 Book in the Wish Big Giveaway Hop
$10 Gift Card or $10 in Books in the Winter 2025-2026 Seasons of Books Giveaway Hop

 

 

 

 

Blog Recap:

Wish Big Giveaway Hop
B+ #AudioBookReview: The Murder at World’s End by Ross Montgomery
Grade A #GuestReview: Waging a Good War by Thomas E. Ricks
#A- #AudioBookReview: Accidentally Yours by Christina Lauren
B+ #BookReview: Perūn’s Hammer by Ian Heller
Stacking the Shelves (693)

 

Coming This Week:

Inside Man by John McMahon (#AudioBookReview)
Spring Giveaway Event! (Begins 2/24 at Reading Reality)
A Pretender’s Murder by Christopher Huang (#BookReview)
At Star’s End by Anna Hackett (#BookReview)
Monster in the Moonlight by Annelise Ryan (#BookReview)

Stacking the Shelves (693)

There’s way more ‘pretty creepy’ than there is pretty in this stack. The one seriously pretty cover is What We Are Seeking. Although Alibi by Accident, Lost in the Summer of ’69, The Paris Match and The Pie & Mash Detective Agency certainly have cute covered. (Ahem, so to speak, pun intended and all that.)

Creepy is creeping all over this stack, between Headlights, Meat Bees and Wretch. The cover of Meat Bees is particularly shudder inducing, isn’t it?

The books I’m most curious about in this stack are the aforementioned Lost in the Summer of ’69 and The Pie & Mash Detective Agency, while the book I’m most looking forward to is obviously Fury in Death. But I also have one in the stack that I’m looking both forward and back to, and that’s At Star’s End. I read it over a decade ago, when it first came out, and loved it. It’s a science fiction romance that I’ve repeatedly referred to over the years because it simply epitomized the genre. The author just got her rights back and is republishing the entire Phoenix Adventures series (YAY!) with new covers and some added – or added back – content. I’m definitely looking forward to rereading these long-standing favorites!

For Review:
Alibi by Accident (Verona Montero #1) by Kayleigh Suggett
American Fantasy by Emma Straub
Anatomy of an Alibi by Ashley Elston
At Star’s End (Phoenix Adventures #1) by Anna Hackett
Fireflies in Winter by Eleanor Shearer
Fury in Death (In Death #63) by J.D. Robb
The Haul by Gary Phillips
Headlights by CJ Leede
How to Get Away with Murder by Rebecca Philipson
I’m Not the Only Murderer in My Retirement Home by Fergus Craig
Lost in the Summer of ’69 by Eliza Knight
The Man by Laura Sims
Meat Bees by Dane Erbach
Motor City Love Song (Dial Delights) by Lisa Peers
Nasty Little Secrets by Gabbie Hanks
The Paris Match by Kate Clayborn
The Pie & Mash Detective Agency by J.D. Brinkworth
Someone Else’s Husband by Kimberly McCreight
What We Are Seeking by Cameron Reed
Wretch: or, The Unbecoming of Porcelain Khaw by Eric LaRocca
You & Me and You & Me and You & Me by Josie Lloyd and Emlyn Rees


If you want to find out more about Stacking The Shelves, please visit the official launch page

Please link your STS post in the linky below:


#BookReview: Perun’s Hammer by Ian Heller

#BookReview: Perun’s Hammer by Ian HellerPerun's Hammer: A Novel by Ian Heller
Format: ebook
Source: borrowed from Amazon Kindle Unlimited
Formats available: paperback, ebook, audiobook
Genres: political thriller, science fiction, technothriller, thriller
Pages: 324
Published by Menlo Park Press on April 6, 2025
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleBetter World Books
Goodreads

What if you received a video showing exactly what happened to Amelia Earhart?

And then similar videos of the Battle of the Little Bighorn and the Tulsa Race Massacre? What would you do if historians and experts verified every detail, and none of the videos showed traces of CGI?

If you’re Rich Penton, lead reporter at the investigative news show, RECON, you’d try to figure out who made the videos, who sent them to you and what you’re supposed to do about them. The only thing you’d know for sure is that the existence of the videos is absolutely impossible.

For humans.

But when the RECON team receives a video showing Chicago destroyed by an asteroid in the near future, they decide they’d better take it seriously. That’s when they feel the full force of the U.S. military and intelligence agencies, which clearly don’t want RECON involved in whatever mess this is, and the Russians send an assassin to ensure that anybody who tries to broadcast the videos winds up dead.

Perun’s Hammer blends exciting and contemporary AI, foreign intrigue, murder, historical mysteries, hazardous asteroids, undercover agents, a bizarre cult, and a mysterious intelligence that seems to be able to see through time.

My Review:

It begins with the impossible delivery of an equally impossible video – even if all that Rich Penton and his crew at RECON are certain of at that point is that the delivery shouldn’t have been possible. The video looks like REALLY good CGI of a meteor crashing into downtown Chicago. RECON is a successful, award-winning news magazine TV series (sorta/kinda like 60 Minutes was back in the day) but based in Chicago and set in the mid-2020s.

Meaning that the team at RECON is used to getting unusual pitches for stories. And that they know all about cutting-edge CGI. But it also means that their network security is state-of-the-art, a state that means that videos should not be capable of ‘magically’ appearing in anyone’s email without getting checked. And it certainly means that once such an email is deleted – it STAYS deleted.

The painted picture on this bison hide shows the battle of the Little Bighorn, where the Plain Indians fought Lieut. Col. George Custer’s troops. By Cheyenne artist – Museum of the American Indian

Except this video isn’t behaving the way it’s supposed to.

Not that they can do anything with it or about it except for the security breach. There’s nothing attached to tell them who sent it, how it was filmed, or what the purpose of it might be. They assume it’s a pitch for something – they get those all the time, but usually with a lot more information than this.

Then the second video arrives, just as mysteriously as the first. A video that seemed to have been taken at the Battle of the Little Big Horn as it was happening. In 1876. A video that checks out in every particular except one. In spite of repeated attempts to figure out how it was made, there is ZERO evidence of it being CGI. It seems to be authentic right down to facial recognition of even minor characters – even the angle of the sun and shadows is not just internally consistent but consistent with the date, time and location of the battle.

Tulsa Race Massacre aftermath, June 1, 1921

Which is when Rich and his team at RECON start to really, really dig. Because one way or another, this is one hell of a story. But as videos keep coming in, from Amelia Earhart’s ultimately fatal crash in 1937 to the horrors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre to the tragic 1945 bombing of three German ships, the Deutschland, the Thielbek, and the Cap Arcona, filled to the gunwales with Jewish concentration camp inmates who were either killed by British bombs, or from being clubbed to death by Nazi soldiers and sympathizers waiting for the few survivors to wash up on shore.

As each of the later videos gets a YES in the column for historical accuracy and a NO in the column for being provably some sort of advanced CGI, it brings questions about the purpose of that first video of a meteor or asteroid striking Chicago, into terrible focus. If all the other videos are real recordings of historical events, then what was that first video? Was it a warning?

And if it was a warning – can they get the right people to believe in something so seemingly impossible in time to change the future before it becomes the present?

Escape Rating B+: First of all, in the interests of full disclosure, I received this book in a “friend of a friend of a friend” situation. Which I was honestly a bit salty about as I’m not all that fond of being committed to things by proxy.

Howsomever, (knowing this will completely undercut any and all arguments with the friend who got me into this), I’m not at all sorry about the whole thing. In fact, I’m pretty damn pleased with the result now that I’ve finished the book – and in spite of the quibbles I’m going to throw in near the end.

I had a damn good time reading this. Seriously. It was a thrill-a-minute ride from beginning to end in the best sorta/kinda SF movie thriller tradition. Movies like Armageddon, and Deep Impact.

What made Perūn’s Hammer just a bit different, and a whole lot more fun from this reader’s perspective, is that the story is set recognizably in Chicago. Not New York, not Washington DC, but Chicago. As someone who lived in Chicago for several years, I could picture all the scenes in the story AND just how big the devastation would be.

Which leads directly to the second fun thing. In most disaster movies, the disaster has either already happened or is past the point of no return. A big part of the plot and the point of Perūn’s Hammer is that those videos represent a future that ‘might’ be, not a fixed point in time. The worst of the crisis could be averted – if humanity can get its act together in time.

So the story isn’t the dystopia that comes after, or even the planning vs. panic scenario of an inevitable onrushing catastrophe. Instead, the ticking clock that drives the action is the investigation to figure out the nature of the message and then the mad scramble to act BEFORE it’s too late.

Neither of which could possibly be the job of a single human being – so even though parts of the story are told from Rich Penton’s first person perspective – which admittedly cuts the tension a bit because we know he survived otherwise he wouldn’t be around afterwards to do that telling – much of the story is told from a third person overview in order to follow the workings of the stellar team that make the show – and this story – possible.

Their team dynamic is absolutely top-notch. Each person is at the top of their respective game, and they each do their part to solve the mystery. It’s going to be up to Rich to convince the powers-that-be to put a multibillion dollar asset into space in the hopes of knocking the object off course. But he needs their collective very able assistance to put it all together and the investigation in all its many facets is a joy to follow.

Unfortunately, this is where my two huge quibbles with the story come in, and together they were enough to knock this from an A grade to a B+. Because I was compelled, but also extremely annoyed at this part.

In order for the reader – and the team – to truly appreciate just how high the stakes are in this story, one of the team members had to die. That’s the way thrillers like this work and it wasn’t exactly a shock for the reader when it happened. Especially considering that as far as solving the mystery goes, this particular team member had already completed their role. The problem I had with this was not the death, but the choice of character to die. The team member who was killed was the only gay person in the central cast, and the only character who was not or did not become part of a romantic couple. The “Bury Your Gays” trope is basically a cheap shot that did not need to be part of this story. Or, for that matter, any story.

It also leads directly to my other issue with the story, and that’s ‘villain fail’. There is a villain here. They’re not the ones who launched the object, but they are the ones trying to take advantage of it. In the international political climate of the past few years, the idea that the Russian Federation might be gleeful about an interstellar object flattening Chicago isn’t quite out of the bounds of plausibility. That Russia would engage in a campaign of misinformation and bribery in order to prevent the US from launching countermeasures in time is also not that far-fetched. Nor is the idea that they would have agents in the U.S. working to protect such a plan. However, the idea that all of that happened AND that the specific agent involved embodied all the worst possible racist, homophobic, sexist, psychopathic, sociopathic, violent and outright ‘bwahaha’ villain characteristics that have ever been assigned to a negative portrayal of an enemy agent in a single person put the whole thing way over the top and tripped my willing suspension of disbelief completely. To make a long harangue into a short sentence, the character of the villain of the piece slipped WAY over the line from CHARACTER into CARICATURE.

Amelia Earhart standing under nose of her Lockheed Model 10-E Electra. Gelatin silver print, 1937 by Underwood & Underwood

Very much on my other, and much more fascinated hand, I loved the deep dive into the historical incidents that were part of the vetting process for the videos. I wanted to say ‘happy’, but that’s the wrong word in this case. The historical analysis read as in-depth and extremely well done, which is something that I always love to see. However, I think it is important to note that all of the historical incidents with the exception of Amelia’s Earhart’s most likely sad end, were all true events that were horrifying in the extreme. They were also outright brutal tragedies of human inhumanity to other humans that were swept under the historical carpet because the victims were considered “other” from the perspective of the powers that be at the time.

A lot of the SFnal aspects of Perūn’s Hammer have been done before, in stories that reach as far back as Niven and Pournelle’s Lucifer’s Hammer through Kowal’s Lady Astronaut series and all the way up to last year’s When the Moon Hits Your Eye by way of at least two of the Star Trek movies (TMP and IV) as well as those disaster thrillers I started with.  Those familiar SFnal elements blend into a story that will keep readers on the edge of their seats, whether the parts that appeals are the historical mysteries, the technical breakthroughs, the political shenanigans and the spy games, or the surprisingly open-ended conclusion.

In spite of my quibbles, I had a grand time with Perūn’s Hammer. I think those quibbles hit so hard BECAUSE I was having such a grand reading time and those flaws disappointed me in a book that was otherwise really terrific.

All of which means that I’m glad that the author has already promised a sequel, tentatively titled Perūn Rises. I’m looking forward to seeing what happens next.

A- #AudioBookReview: Accidentally Yours by Christina Lauren

A- #AudioBookReview: Accidentally Yours by Christina LaurenAccidentally Yours by Christina Lauren
Narrator: Dominique Salvacion, Andrew Gibson
Format: audiobook, ebook
Source: borrowed from Amazon Kindle Unlimited
Formats available: ebook, audiobook
Genres: contemporary romance, romantic comedy, workplace romance
Series: Improbable Meet-Cute: Second Chances #1
Pages: 93
Length: 1 hour and 44 minutes
Published by Amazon Original Stories on January 20, 2026
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazon
Goodreads

Serendipity works wonders for a woman and her seemingly unattainable crush in a funny and flirty short story by Christina Lauren, New York Times bestselling author of The Unhoneymooners and My Favorite Half-Night Stand.
When marketing consultant Veronica accidentally crashes the wrong Zoom meeting and brutally critiques their presentation, she’s shocked to receive a job offer from the company’s intriguing CEO. Their professional email exchanges quickly turn flirty, but Veronica’s mind keeps drifting to her reserved but gorgeous new neighbor. As Valentine’s Day approaches, she’ll discover that sometimes the most improbable meet-cute can lead to the perfect match.
Christina Lauren’s Accidentally Yours is part of The Improbable Meet-Cute: Second Chances, stories for star-crossed lovers and hopeless romantics. They can be read or listened to in one sitting. Let’s do it again.

My Review:

In case it’s not obvious, this week kind of fell apart for me. Or ON me. I read something really heavy over the weekend and needed something TOTALLY light and fluffy to counteract the gloom. And I sorta/kinda promised myself I’d read a romance this week – because Valentine’s Day was last weekend and it seemed like the thing to do.

Which led me straight to Improbable Meet-Cute Second Chances, the Valentine’s Day collection from Amazon Original Stories for Valentine’s Day 2026. I expected to get a short, sweet, listening treat to pick up my week, and that’s EXACTLY what I got with Accidentally Yours.

Although I’m not quite sure about the “second chances” part of this collection’s formula as it relates to this story. The “meet-cute”, absolutely. But a second chance, not exactly. The romance between Veronica Cochran and Jude Tilde wasn’t so much a second chance as two SIMULTANEOUS opportunities at their first one. Let me explain…

Veronica Cochran is a marketing genius. Really, truly. But the company who practically wined and dined her to get her onboard after her MBA program turned out to be just another gang of entitled, misogynistic, techbros who were happy to take her ideas but never give her the credit, the promotion or the BONUSES she deserved. Then they let her go with a measly six months severance which she knows she’s going to wait forever to receive.

Job hunting is brutal, and she’s pretty much down on the whole experience. Her savings are running low, her ancient refrigerator is dying, her nibling destroyed her laptop and her office chair sounds like it’s about to wheeze its last. So she isn’t exactly filled with hope when she logs into her next job interview. Which is when the situation surprisingly starts looking up.

Not because it’s her interview – but because it ISN’T. Instead, it’s a session full of techbros who sound just like the ones at her old company. The group is going through a marketing slide deck that is SO BAD, SO VERY BAD, that she takes her name off her Zoom presence and lets her inner snark monster out to play. To delightfully devastating effect.

She tells this ‘pitch’ of techbros (I had to look up the collective noun because they needed one and it’s just too apropos in this case) just how terrible the slide deck is in no uncertain – but certainly professional and absolutely on point – terms. She lets them have the full effect of her genius on their marketing lameness then drops the mic and peaces out of the chat.

Leaving Veronica feeling much better about pretty much everything. Admittedly, these weren’t the techbros that disregarded her for four years – but they were close enough for her epic vent to let off some serious steam.

She leaves the techbros slack-jawed on both Zoom and their actual Slack channel, trying to figure out who she is and whether or not she’s available to be hired as THEIR marketing genius. Because Veronica Cochran is exactly what Codify.com and its new CEO need for their company.

All it’s going to take to get her onboard is a hefty monthly consulting contract, a brand-new state of the art laptop, and the office chair of her dreams.

The chemistry between Veronica and Jude, well, that’s extra. As they eventually find out – it’s extra times two.

Escape Rating A-: This turned out to be exactly the light and fluffy and frothy reading pick-me-up I was looking for. The way that Veronica and Jude banter their way into romance meant that it worked especially well on audio, as ably batted back and forth by Dominique Salvacion as Veronica and Andrew Gibson as Jude.

The romance between Veronica and Jude happens, not in two time streams or time periods, but through two entirely different mediums at the same time. Initially, all of their communication is electronic – and mostly professional. With admittedly a bit of casual, sometimes snarky, occasionally flirty, banter. But still, they have a business relationship. I can’t say it’s a workplace romance because there’s no workPLACE. It’s potentially a bit squicky, so they take that slow because they both recognize that they need each other professionally no matter how interesting they find each other personally.

Their entire relationship is conducted through a technical intermediary. They’ve never met. They’ve never seen each other’s faces. And it’s just when they make plans to do exactly that that the situation nearly goes off the rails.

Because they have seen each other’s faces, and whole entire persons, and have very much liked what they’ve seen. They just don’t know each other’s names. They live in the same North Loop apartment building in Chicago. She’s 4C and he’s 2C. They’ve seen each other in the lobby plenty of times white seemingly their entire building gathers, waiting for their surprisingly friendly and clockwork-like mail carrier to arrive every afternoon at 2.

They don’t know each other’s names until a piece of his mail finds its way into her mailbox on their mail carrier’s day off. And it’s while she knows but he doesn’t that she hears something that makes her wonder if she’s really ever known him at all.

But she has and she does so of course in the end they figure everything out and it makes for lovely and well-earned happy ever after.

The way this story works itself out – and keeps its would-be lovers apart and unaware in a way that does actually work – reminded me a lot of stories from two of the holiday story collections, specifically All Wrapped Up in You by Rosie Danan from Home Sweet Holidays in 2025 and Only Santas In the Building by Alexis Daria from 2024’s Under the Mistletoe. So if you like this kind of story, the way that the would-be lovers manage to get to know each other without knowing each other, all three stories are sweet little treats. I’m glad I picked this one up when I needed one.

And just as glad that I have the other stories in this collection (along with last year’s Improbable Meet-Cute) to look forward to the next time I need a short and sweet romance to pick me up and tide me over a slump of any kind!

Grade A #GuestReview: Waging a Good War by Thomas E. Ricks

Grade A #GuestReview: Waging a Good War by Thomas E. RicksWaging a Good War: A Military History of the Civil Rights Movement, 1954-1968 by Thomas E. Ricks
Format: ebook
Source: purchased from Amazon
Formats available: hardcover, paperback, ebook, audiobook
Genres: African American History, American History, Civil Rights Movement, nonfiction, U.S. history
Pages: 448
Published by Farrar Straus & Giroux on October 4, 2022
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKoboBookshop.orgBetter World Books
Goodreads

In Waging a Good War, the bestselling author Thomas E. Ricks offers a fresh perspective on America’s greatest moral revolution—the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s—and its legacy today. While the Movement has become synonymous with Martin Luther King, Jr.’s ethos of nonviolence, Ricks, a Pulitzer Prize–winning war reporter, draws on his deep knowledge of tactics and strategy to advance a surprising but revelatory idea: the greatest victories for Black Americans of the past century were won not by idealism alone, but by paying attention to recruiting, training, discipline, and organization—the hallmarks of any successful military campaign.

An engaging storyteller, Ricks deftly narrates the Movement’s triumphs and defeats. He follows King and other key figures from Montgomery to Memphis, demonstrating that Gandhian nonviolence was a philosophy of active, not passive, resistance—involving the bold and sustained confrontation of the Movement’s adversaries, both on the ground and in the court of public opinion. While bringing legends such as Fannie Lou Hamer and John Lewis into new focus, Ricks also highlights lesser-known figures who played critical roles in fashioning nonviolence into an effective tool—the activists James Lawson, James Bevel, Diane Nash, and Septima Clark foremost among them. He also offers a new understanding of the Movement’s later difficulties as internal disputes and white backlash intensified. Rich with fresh interpretations of familiar events and overlooked aspects of America’s civil rights struggle, Waging a Good War is an indispensable addition to the literature of racial justice and social change—and one that offers vital lessons for our own time.

My Review:

In his influential but incomplete work, On War, military theorist Carl von Clausewitz defines war as “an act of violence intended to compel our opponent to fulfil our will”. Martin Luther King, Jr., of course followed the example of Mohandas Gandhi in preaching and practicing nonviolence during the Civil Rights Movement and afterwards.

Violence on the one hand, nonviolence on the other. What does Clausewitz have to say to King? Quite a lot, actually, for what King was seeking was indeed to compel his opponents to accede to his will and liberate his compatriots from an unjust system. While the instruments of King’s will did not include bombs or guns directed at his oppressors, they did include thousands of people trained and sent on campaigns to sap the will of their opponents until they ultimately fell back.

Does this sound like a war? In his book Waging a Good War: A Military History of the Civil Rights Movement, 1954-1968, war correspondent Thomas E. Ricks makes the case that a military analysis of the strategies, operations, and tactics of the Civil Rights Movement offers a useful point of view for understanding its history — and applying its lessons to current and future conflicts.

Reality Rating A: While the idea of doing Clausewitzian analysis of King’s strategy is not new, military theory is not exactly the most common framework for viewing the Civil Rights Movement. Presumably few, if any, civil rights leaders were referring to their well-thumbed copies of Clausewitz. However, Ricks’ book makes it clear that the movement included many aspects of a series of military campaigns. For example, just as a U.S. soldier is not dropped onto a battlefield without having going through extensive training in their arms and tactics, civil rights protesters received extensive training on how to conduct themselves. That training was essential; very few people are naturally inclined to sit down in the face of mobs, howling dogs, and fire hoses without either fleeing or striking back.

The Civil Rights Movement conducted detailed reconnaissance of enemy territory before engaging in a campaign. Those campaigns included significant advance planning of the aims of the campaign as well as the logistics required – safe houses, escape routes, lists of sympathizers, and plain old cash. The very strategy of nonviolent direct action was very intentional.

Quoting King from “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”:

You may well ask: “Why direct action? Why sit ins, marches and so forth? Isn’t negotiation a better path?” You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. My citing the creation of tension as part of the work of the nonviolent resister may sound rather shocking. But I must confess that I am not afraid of the word “tension.” I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth. Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. The purpose of our direct action program is to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation. I therefore concur with you in your call for negotiation. Too long has our beloved Southland been bogged down in a tragic effort to live in monologue rather than dialogue.

Jesse Jackson with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. ( ca. 1966)

The Civil Rights Movement of course would have had little hope of forcing negotiations by violent actions; one against nine are never good odds. But what it could do was highlight injustice and create situations to encourage the state to overreact in the name of preserving that injustice. Fortunately for the protesters, that overreaction often ended up on the nightly television news. Over time, the will to maintain Jim Crow was whittled away as the contradictions revealed by the protests made the status quo untenable. (It is interesting to note the degree to which many of the opponents of the Civil Rights Movement were tactically and strategically stupid. Had more Southern police chiefs acted like Laurie Pritchett rather than Bull Connor by minimizing brutal responses to the protests, the Civil Rights Movement could easily have required much more time to achieve its aim.)

The foregoing just scratches the surface of Ricks’ book, which details the strategies and tactics of several campaigns including the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the lunch counter sit-ins, the Freedom Rides, and the March on Washington — as well as failed campaigns such as the one in Albany, Georgia. As such, it also serves as a useful capsule history of the Civil Rights Movement during 1954-1968, including the many leaders, foot-soldiers, and organizations involved — as well as their many disagreements. As with any war, the Civil Rights Movement has its casualties, which Ricks describes as well.

From one point of view, the Civil Rights Movement ended successfully with the passage of the Civil Rights Act. From another point of view, there is much left to do to pursue justice. These old challenges — as well as new threats to democracy — make Ricks’ military history of the Civil Rights Movement essential reading for those who want a clear-eyed history of its strategies and how they can be applied to current problems.

#AudioBookReview: The Murder at World’s End by Ross Montgomery

#AudioBookReview: The Murder at World’s End by Ross MontgomeryThe Murder at World's End (Stockingham & Pike, #1) by Ross Montgomery
Narrator: Joe Jameson, Derek Jacobi
Format: audiobook, eARC
Source: supplied by publisher via Edelweiss, supplied by publisher via Libro.fm
Formats available: hardcover, ebook, audiobook
Genres: historical fiction, historical mystery, mystery
Series: Stockingham & Pike #1
Pages: 336
Length: 9 hours and 59 minutes
Published by HarperAudio, William Morrow on January 6, 2026
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKoboBookshop.orgBetter World Books
Goodreads

Secrets, murder, and mayhem collide as this unlikely sleuthing duoan under-butler and a foul-mouthed octogenarianhunt a killer in a manor sealed against the end of the world.
Cornwall, 1910. On a remote tidal island, the Viscount of Tithe Hall is absorbed in feverish preparations for the apocalypse that he believes will accompany the passing of Halley's Comet. The Hall must be sealed from top to bottom—every window, chimney, and keyhole closed off before night falls. But what the pompous, dishonest Viscount has failed to take into account is the danger that lies within... By morning, he will be dead in his sealed study, murdered by his own ancestral crossbow.
All eyes turn to Steven Pike, Tithe Hall's newest under-butler. Fresh out of Borstal for a crime he didn't commit, he is the wrong man in the wrong place at the wrong time. His unlikely ally? Miss Decima Stockingham, the foul-mouthed, sharp as a tack, eighty-year-old family matriarch. Fearless and unconventional, she relishes chaos and puzzles alike, and a murder is just the thrill she's been waiting for.
Together, this mismatched duo must navigate secret passages, buried grudges, and rising terror to unmask the killer before it's too late...

My Review:

This isn’t merely a “locked room” mystery in the classic, “Golden Age” tradition, it goes two steps further to being a locked mansion and even a locked island mystery. Admittedly, by way of a day trip to, well, Crazytown.

Because Viscount Conrad Stockingham-Welt is out of his very tiny mind – not that he’d ever admit either that his mind is tiny or that he’d left all sense behind. He believes he’s a scientific genius. Then again, he also believes that the gases in the tail of Halley’s Comet are poisonous and that the Earth’s imminent 1910 transit through the comet’s tail is going to wipe out all life on the planet.

Except for the few members of Conrad’s family and staff that he has invited to his remote estate off the coast of Cornwall – at World’s End – to wait out the event sealed into the house with him, cut off from the outside world. Literally and figuratively, as Tithe Hall is on a spit of land that will be cut off from the mainland by the tides, AND because he’s ordered that every single person in the house be sealed ALONE into their rooms by blocking all the windows, doors, and even the keyholes from anything outside.

The scientific establishment of the day would tell him he was wrong – no matter how much of a panic the comet is causing in the newspapers and among the general populace. The scientific community certainly knows better and if Conrad were as much of a leading light in that community as he claimed, then he should have as well. Instead, even his non-scientific relatives are certain he’s lost the plot completely. But he controls all the family money and estates, and if he’s wrong that will be proven in the morning when the world survives the cataclysm he believes is coming.

Not that Conrad will be alive to deal with his mistaken beliefs. Because someone at Tithe Hall has taken advantage of the confusion to kill the odious man, leaving an obvious murder victim (no one can shoot a crossbow bolt into their OWN eye), a locked room, a confounding puzzle, and a plethora of possible suspects who should all be in the clear because they were all sealed inside their own rooms.

Except for two people. Either of whom should make a dandy scapegoat for the incompetent police inspector assigned to the case. And he certainly does try. But Decima Stockingham and Steven Pike are more than a match for a glory-seeking incompetent. And even for a diabolically clever murderer.

The Bayeaux Tapestry (late 11th century) depicting Halley’s Comet arrival in 1066

Escape Rating B+: This is going to be one of the most mixed of mixed feelings reviews. I feel as if I’m on the horns of multiple dilemmas with this book, and that I’m literally being poked by every single one of those horns.

The mystery itself is compelling, riveting, and all of the things it should be. I’m not quite sure it’s exactly a fair play mystery like the Golden Age mysteries that it pays homage to, but it does an excellent job of keeping the reader guessing until almost the very last page.

I mean, I was starting to get glimmers really close to the end, but I wasn’t there yet until the villain finally revealed their previously hidden hands and motives.

Part of what makes this much fun is that the victim so obviously deserved it. And had, in fact, spent decades courting it even as they counted on their privilege to keep it from happening. He was such a complete arsehole – even beyond what we see in the story’s current events – that it’s not a surprise that one of his many victims took the opportunity he handed to them on a silver platter to do him in.

Howsomever, what kept bogging the pace down was the choice of perspective. Or rather, both of the choices of perspective. The story is told from the first-person point of view of Steven Pike, the brand-new under-footman who arrives just as Tithe Hall is closing down for the comet. On the one hand, Pike’s lack of knowledge of or investment in any of the characters makes him a perfect outside observer for the very much insider events. OTOH, he’s an ex-con, a secret that the butler seems to be willing to keep for him. Which leaves Pike a) beholden to the butler in a really big way; and b) scared out of his wits every single minute once the murder is discovered because his outsider status AND his big secret make him an easy scapegoat for everyone.

Because we’re in Pike’s head (very much so with the excellent vocal narration by Joe Jameson) we suffer with him every time he panics internally. And he panics a lot for very good reasons. Howsomever, he panics a LOT.

Being inside his head makes us empathize with him, which means that we feel it whenever he or any of the Hall’s servants get mistreated – which is all the time. They’re treated abominably, expected to cook and clean and bow and scrape, verbally abused at every single turn, AND expected to be grateful for it. (I’m still reflexively cringing at my own past reading of mysteries like this one where that behavior was common and expected and this reader didn’t bat an eye at it.)

There’s also a second narrator, a third person omniscient perspective, who is both observing the movements of the murderer in the shadows AND reading the (real, true) newspaper headlines of the time period. That second narrator is voiced by Sir Derek Jacobi, and, while I enjoyed his parts of the story, I found myself wondering what he was doing here and how he was induced to do this. From a story perspective, the newspaper articles were informative but the attempt at adding suspense by showing the hidden killer’s movements worked less well, at least for this reader. (And Jacobi’s voice sounded a lot like he did when he played Claudius in I, Claudius way back when, which was both nostalgic and just a bit weird. YMMV)

What makes this story ultimately work – and keeps the reader following along – isn’t Pike because he’s not really the protagonist. He is not the one moving events – he’s just reacting to those events, often by quite reasonably quaking in his boots.

The protagonist, the true mover and shaker of this story, is eighty-year-old Decima Stockingham. She’s got a fouler mouth than any sailor, says “fuck” pretty much every other word with great vigor due to constant, extreme provocation by the world and everyone and everything in it – and is absolutely determined to solve the murder.

Just as Pike pushes Decima in her bath chair, she pushes Pike forward, out of his comfort zone, into extreme danger AND manages to corner the killer and save the day.

In the end, as much as the underpinnings of the story, along with Pike’s justified but constant refrain of “Oh, woe is me!” often slowed the pace down – the mystery itself is a delightfully twisted puzzle. It’s very much a combination of Agatha Christie’s And Then There Were None with the scientific misinformation and “locked island” vibes of Erik Larson’s No One Goes Alone, combined with the attitudes of the movie Gosford Park and the public panic of the War of the Worlds 1938 radio broadcast and an ending right out of the TV series Mrs. Bradley Mysteries featuring Dame Diana Rigg and Neil Dudgeon (Rigg was younger than Decima at the time and Dudgeon was a lot better able to stand up for himself than Pike but I think the resemblance between the relationships holds all the same).

All of which leads right into this being the first book in a projected series, featuring Decima Stockingham as a private detective and Steven Pike as her assistant and bath-chair pusher. I’m curious as hell to see how that’s going to go.

Wish Big Giveaway Hop

Welcome to the Wish Big Giveaway Hop, hosted by Mama the Fox and Mom Does Reviews!

Today is also Presidents Day. Or as an old friend used to quip, Birthington’s Washday. Make of that what you will.

But this is the “Wish Big” hop, which means that you might be wishing you had this holiday off. Or that it was a longer weekend. Or both! While you’re wishing, why not “WISH BIG” like the hop theme says?

It’s a small wish around here – or not so small considering the size of both George and Tuna – but we got a new gaming chair this weekend and we’re wishing that one or more of the cats would pose on either the new chair or the old chair now that we’ve set it up in a prime corner of the living room. But cats are a bit perverse, they NEVER do what their humans want them to, so I expect we’ll be waiting awhile and when it happens neither of us will have a camera-equivalent device within reach!

So, what’s at the top of your wish list right now? Share in the widget for your chance at Reading Reality’s usual giveaway hop prize, the winner’s choice of a $10 Amazon Gift Card or $10 in Books.

For more wish-granting opportunities, be sure to visit the other stops on this hop!

MamatheFox, Mom Does Reviews, and all participating blogs are not held responsible for sponsors who fail to fulfill their prize obligations.

The Sunday Post AKA What’s on my (Mostly Virtual) Nightstand 2-15-26

Yesterday was Valentine’s Day, so it seemed like a good idea to include a lovely picture of one of our little loves. This is obviously Princess Luna of the little white feets, catching a nap in a sunbeam and looking cute and adorable. As she does. She’s certainly more ‘beautifully’ posed than last week’s snap of her brother Tuna!

This is one of those week’s where there’s both a BOOK of the week and an AUDIOBOOK of the week. Agnes Aubert’s Mystical Cat Shelter was a lot of fun, filled with magic and cats and even a cat who takes off with the villain of the piece. Because cats.

Trailbreaker was just every bit as compelling as Homemaker – and even a bit more. I’ve been talking the series up with every reader I know. Any story that could keep me riveted by both its mystery AND its domesticity is definitely something to shout about!

Current Giveaways:

Autographed copies of Homemaker and Trailbreaker and MORE from the authors of Trailbreaker
$10 Gift Card or $10 in Books in the Winter 2025-2026 Seasons of Books Giveaway Hop

Blog Recap:

A- #BookReview: The Rainseekers by Matthew Kressel
Grade A #BookReview: Agnes Aubert’s Mystical Cat Shelter by Heather Fawcett
A- #BookReview: After the Fall by Edward Ashton
Grade A #AudioBookReview: Trailbreaker by Ruthie Knox and Annie Mare + Giveaway
B #BookReview: The Midnight Taxi by Yosha Gunasekera
Stacking the Shelves (692): Valentines Day Edition

Coming This Week:

Wish Big Giveaway Hop
The Murder at World’s End by Ross Montgomery (#AudioBookReview)
The Patient by Tim Sullivan (#BookReview)
Perun’s Hammer by Ian Heller (#BookReview)
Remember That Day by Mary Balogh (#BookReview)