Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Physics Articles
    • Physics Tutorials
    • Physics Guides
    • Physics FAQs
  • Math
    • Math Articles
    • Math Tutorials
    • Math Guides
    • Math FAQs
  • Bio/Chem/Tech
    • Bio/Chem Articles
    • Computer Science Tutorials
    • Technology Guides
  • Education
    • Education Articles
    • Education Guides
  • Interviews
  • Quizzes
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
complexexponents

Understanding Exponents: Real, Irrational & Imaginary

January 31, 2016/5 Comments/in Mathematics Tutorials/by Multiple_Authors
📖Read Time: 3 minutes
📊Readability: Moderate (Standard complexity)
🔖Core Topics: exponents, imaginary, complex, number, ln

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Definitions and basic properties
  • ex and the general definition of xy
  • Consistency with familiar rules (short proofs)
  • Irrational exponents
  • Imaginary exponents and Euler’s formula
  • Combining real and imaginary exponents
  • Operations on the complex plane
  • Conclusion and thanks
    • More Related Articles

Introduction

This is how both you and I learned exponents back in elementary school:

53 = 5 × 5 × 5

Using repeated multiplication you can raise anything to a whole-number power. But what about fractions, negatives, irrationals, or imaginary exponents? Fractional and negative exponents are introduced in algebra: 5-3 = 1 / 53 and 53/2 = √(53). Those follow from repeated multiplication and its inverses (roots). For irrational and imaginary exponents the “repeated multiplication” idea breaks down: what does it mean to multiply something by itself an irrational or imaginary number of times? To handle those cases we need a more general definition of exponentiation.

Definitions and basic properties

First, a few definitions and simple properties we will use:

  • 0! = 1
  • x0 = 1 (for x ≠ 0)
  • x1 = x
  • e = 1/0! + 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + … ≈ 2.718
  • i2 = -1, so i3 = -i, i4 = 1, and the powers of i repeat every 4 steps

If you understand these facts and the standard laws of exponents, you are ready for the broader definitions below. (See also: related background.)

ex and the general definition of xy

The exponential function is defined by its power series:

ex = 1 + x/1! + x2/2! + x3/3! + … = ∑n=0∞ xn/n!.

Using the exponential and the natural logarithm we define general exponentiation (for x > 0):

xy := ey ln(x),

where ln(x) is the natural logarithm, the inverse of ex, so eln(x) = x.

This definition extends exponentiation beyond whole numbers and rationals: because ex is defined for every real (and complex) x via its series, the expression ey ln(x) makes sense even when y is irrational.

Consistency with familiar rules (short proofs)

The series definition makes common identities transparent. For example:

  • e = e1 = 1 + 1/1! + 1/2! + … (the series at x = 1)
  • e0 = 1 + 0 + 0 + … = 1 (the series at x = 0)
  • For x > 0, xy = ey ln(x) so identities like xy+z = xy × xz follow from properties of the exponential: e(y+z)ln x = ey ln x × ez ln x.

Thus the series/exponential definition is consistent with repeated multiplication where that interpretation applies, and it extends exponentiation to all real exponents in a consistent way.

Irrational exponents

Irrational exponents are covered by xy = ey ln(x) because ln(x) is a real number and y can be irrational. For example eπ means e raised to the irrational power π; the exponential series or the ey ln(x) definition evaluates it unambiguously. You can also think of an irrational as a limiting or infinite sum (decimal expansion), but the cleaner approach is via the exponential and logarithm definitions.

Imaginary exponents and Euler’s formula

Imaginary exponents introduce rotation. A standard and deep fact is Euler’s formula:

eix = cos(x) + i sin(x).

Geometrically, consider the complex plane with the real axis horizontal and the imaginary axis vertical. The complex number 1 sits at (1, 0). Multiplying by eix corresponds to rotating that point counterclockwise by x radians around the origin. If x = π, the rotation sends 1 to -1 (half a turn); for other values of x you generally get a complex number with both real and imaginary parts, which is exactly cos(x) + i sin(x). (See also: background on real numbers.)

Combining real and imaginary exponents

A complex exponent a + ib behaves multiplicatively via ea+ib = ea eib = ea (cos b + i sin b). The real part a scales the magnitude (a stretching or compression), and the imaginary part b rotates the point on the complex plane. This gives a clean geometric interpretation: real exponents change size, imaginary exponents change angle.

Operations on the complex plane

You can view the four basic operations on complex numbers as actions on the plane:

  • Adding/subtracting a real number moves points left/right.
  • Adding/subtracting an imaginary number moves points up/down.
  • Multiplying/dividing by a real number stretches or compresses distances from the origin.
  • Multiplying/dividing by a complex number with unit magnitude rotates points around the origin (and if the magnitude is not 1, it rotates and scales).

As you work with complex numbers more, these geometric interpretations make algebraic identities and transformations easier to understand and visualize. (See also: more on real numbers and views on complex numbers.)

Conclusion and thanks

In summary, defining exponentiation via the exponential series and the natural logarithm unifies whole-number, rational, irrational, and imaginary exponents into a single consistent framework. Repeated multiplication becomes a special-case consequence of these broader definitions when exponent values are whole numbers.

Thank you to Professor Tom Imbo for helping me learn this material.

Multiple_Authors

This article was authored by several Physics Forums members with PhDs in physics or mathematics.

More Related Articles

  • Lessons From My Experience Teaching Math
  • Things Which Can Go Wrong with Complex Numbers
  • Hear the Case for Learning Complex Math
Tags: complex numbers
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/complexexponents.png 135 240 Multiple_Authors https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png Multiple_Authors2016-01-31 15:11:172026-01-21 16:52:52Understanding Exponents: Real, Irrational & Imaginary
You might also like
complexmath Hear the Case for Learning Complex Math
complex numbers Fixing Things Which Can Go Wrong With Complex Numbers
complexnumbers Things Which Can Go Wrong with Complex Numbers
complex numbers views Views On Complex Numbers
5 replies
  1. Isaac0427 says:
    May 19, 2016 at 6:21 pm

    “I took me some time to more or less get what you were saying here:
    “You can also have real and imaginary exponents at the same time. If you think about the unit circle, to raise e it to a real exponent x, means you stretch or compress it by x, and you do that x times. After that, you stretch it by e and you then apply the imaginary exponents.””
    If I knew how to make and add in an animation of this, it would have probably made that section of the article more understandable.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Samy_A says:
    May 19, 2016 at 6:21 pm

    Very good.

    What’s a compliment worth without a nitpick or two:
    I would specify in “Unless x is a multiple of Ï€/2, you will get a combination of imaginary and real numbers.” that it must be an integer multiple of Ï€/2.

    I took me some time to more or less get what you were saying here:
    “You can also have real and imaginary exponents at the same time. If you think about the unit circle, to raise e it to a real exponent x, means you stretch or compress it by x, and you do that x times. After that, you stretch it by e and you then apply the imaginary exponents.”

    Log in to Reply
  3. Isaac0427 says:
    May 19, 2016 at 6:21 pm

    “Congratulations on a fine Insights post. Very nice. :smile:”
    Thank you very much :smile:.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Borg says:
    May 19, 2016 at 6:21 pm

    Congratulations on a fine Insights post. Very nice. :smile:

    Log in to Reply
  5. Ronie Bayron says:
    February 1, 2016 at 3:02 pm

    Way up ahead! Brilliant, Isaac!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trending Articles

  • What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions
  • Scientific Inference: Do We Really Need Induction?
  • Animal Speed Scaling: Body-Lengths per Second Across Sizes
  • Tensors Explained: Scalars, Vectors, Matrices & Math
  • Unity Orbital Mechanics and AR Scaling: Implementation Guide
  • The 7 Basic Rules of Quantum Mechanics
  • Math Self-Study Roadmap: Topics & Book Recommendations
  • How to Better Define Information in Physics
  • Android Rooting & Magisk Guide: Systemless Root Tips
  • Exploring the Anatomy of Compton Scattering

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

astronomy (17) black holes (17) classical physics (35) cosmology (16) education (23) electromagnetism (19) general relativity (19) gravity (24) interview (21) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) programming (18) Quantum Field Theory (31) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (16) technology (19) universe (21)
2026 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Link to: Knut Lundmark and the Forgotten Dark Matter Discovery Link to: Knut Lundmark and the Forgotten Dark Matter Discovery Knut Lundmark and the Forgotten Dark Matter DiscoverydarkmatterLink to: Struggles with the Continuum: Quantum Electrodynamics Link to: Struggles with the Continuum: Quantum Electrodynamics spacetime5Struggles with the Continuum: Quantum Electrodynamics
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top