Physics Forums Insights
  • Physics
    • Physics Articles
    • Physics Tutorials
    • Physics Guides
    • Physics FAQs
  • Math
    • Math Articles
    • Math Tutorials
    • Math Guides
    • Math FAQs
  • Bio/Chem/Tech
    • Bio/Chem Articles
    • Computer Science Tutorials
    • Technology Guides
  • Education
    • Education Articles
    • Education Guides
  • Interviews
  • Quizzes
  • Forums
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
basickinematics

Learn Basic Kinematics in Classical Mechanics

July 1, 2016/8 Comments/in Physics Tutorials/by wrobel
📖Read Time: 3 minutes
📊Readability: Advanced 📐 (Technical knowledge needed)
🔖Core Topics: frame, acceleration, velocity, angular, classical

There is an interesting thing in teaching of Classical Mechanics. Several theorems which presented below form a core part of kinematics for all Russian textbooks in Classical Mechanics (excluding Classical Mechanics for physicists)  but European and USA textbooks contain this material just partly and from time to time. Perhaps I just do not know enough about western and American style of teaching of this subject. It would be very interesting for me to hear comments about teaching of this part of the course of Classical Mech in USA and EU.

Assume  we have a fixed coordinate frame ##Oxyz##,  a moving frame ##A\xi\eta\zeta## and a point ##M## which moves in accordance to a law of motion $$\boldsymbol {OM}=\boldsymbol {OM}(t)=x(t)\boldsymbol e_x+y(t)\boldsymbol e_y+z(t)\boldsymbol e_z.$$

1

Velocity and acceleration of ##M## obviously are $$\boldsymbol v^M=\dot x(t)\boldsymbol e_x+\dot y(t)\boldsymbol e_y+\dot z(t)\boldsymbol e_z,\quad \boldsymbol a^M=\ddot x(t)\boldsymbol e_x+\ddot y(t)\boldsymbol e_y+\ddot z(t)\boldsymbol e_z.$$

If ##\boldsymbol {AM}(t)=\xi(t)\boldsymbol e_\xi+\eta(t)\boldsymbol e_\eta+\zeta(t)\boldsymbol e_\zeta## then by definition the velocity and acceleration of ##M## relative to the frame ##A\xi\eta\zeta## are given by the formulas

$$\boldsymbol v_r^M=\dot \xi(t)\boldsymbol e_\xi+\dot\eta(t)\boldsymbol e_\eta+\dot\zeta(t)\boldsymbol e_\zeta,\quad \boldsymbol a_r^M=\ddot \xi(t)\boldsymbol e_\xi+\ddot \eta(t)\boldsymbol e_\eta+\ddot \zeta(t)\boldsymbol e_\zeta.$$

Definition. Let us imagine that the point ##M## is attached rigidly to the moving frame ##A\xi\eta\zeta## i.e. its coordinates ##\xi,\eta,\zeta## do not change. Under this assumption the point ##M## is connected with the moving frame would possess a certain velocity and a certain acceleration relative to the fixed frame. These velocity and acceleration are called the velocity of transport and the acceleration of transport and denoted by ##\boldsymbol v_t^M,\boldsymbol a_t^M## respectively.

Let ##\boldsymbol \omega_t## stand for the angular velocity of the frame ##A\xi\eta\zeta## and ##\boldsymbol \epsilon_t=\dot{\boldsymbol\omega}_t## be the angular acceleration of the frame ##A\xi\eta\zeta##.

Definition. The vector ##\boldsymbol a_c^M=2\boldsymbol\omega_t\times \boldsymbol v_r^M## is called the Coriolis acceleration.

Theorem. The following formulas hold

$$\boldsymbol v^M=\boldsymbol v_r^M+\boldsymbol v_t^M,\quad \boldsymbol a^M=\boldsymbol a_r^M+\boldsymbol a_t^M+\boldsymbol a_c^M;$$ and

$$\boldsymbol v_t^M=\boldsymbol v^A+\boldsymbol\omega_t\times\boldsymbol{AM},\quad \boldsymbol a_t^M=\boldsymbol a^A+\boldsymbol \epsilon_t\times \boldsymbol{AM}+\boldsymbol\omega_t\times(\boldsymbol\omega_t\times\boldsymbol{AM}).$$

 

Now assume that we have a moving rigid body and its angular velocity and angular acceleration are ##\boldsymbol \omega,\boldsymbol\epsilon.## Let  ##\boldsymbol \omega_r,\boldsymbol\epsilon_r## stand for angular velocity and angular acceleration of the rigid body relative to the frame ##A\xi\eta\zeta##.

2

Theroem. The following formulas hold

$$\boldsymbol \omega=\boldsymbol \omega_t+\boldsymbol \omega_r,\quad \boldsymbol \epsilon=\boldsymbol \epsilon_t+\boldsymbol \epsilon_r+\boldsymbol \omega_t\times\boldsymbol \omega_r.$$

Read my next article: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/servo-constraints-in-mechanics/

wrobel

PhD – Interested in differential equations and classical mechanics

More Related Articles

  • Presenting a Rare Kinematic Formula
  • Elementary Construction of the Angular Velocity
Tags: Kinematics, mechanics
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/basickinematics.png 135 240 wrobel https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png wrobel2016-07-01 15:27:122020-12-26 09:52:27Learn Basic Kinematics in Classical Mechanics
You might also like
errors springs Frequently Made Errors in Mechanics: Springs
kinematic errors Frequently Made Errors in Mechanics: Kinematics
Variable Mass Systems How to Apply Newton’s Second Law to Variable Mass Systems
kinematics Presenting a Rare Kinematic Formula
Multi-Atwood Machine Assembly How to Solve a Multi-Atwood Machine Assembly
MIT course corrections Corrections to MIT Open Courseware: Systems of Varying Mass
8 replies
  1. fog37 says:
    September 18, 2016 at 12:57 pm

    Hello, I have tried to expand my horizon on "basic" kinematics and I run into the concept of Mozzi axis of instantaneous rotation. Have you heard about it before?If so, I have some follow up questions. Thanks

    Log in to Reply
  2. ZapperZ says:
    July 20, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    I think that the title is a bit misleading. This is not "basic kinematics". For most people, or at least for me, basic kinematics are the kinematical equations that intro physics students see for motion with constant acceleration.This article, which include rigid body motion and coriolis force, is way more advanced than those kinematical equations.Zz.

    Log in to Reply
  3. TheAdmin says:
    July 20, 2016 at 2:41 pm

    Thanks @wrobel!

    Log in to Reply
  4. wrobel says:
    July 2, 2016 at 5:18 pm

    O now I see how it is taught in the western tradition

    Log in to Reply
  5. vanhees71 says:
    July 2, 2016 at 3:35 pm

    E.g., you find it inKibble, Berkshire, Classical Mechanics, Imperial College PressI guess, in fact, you find it in any university theoretical-physics textbook.

    Log in to Reply
  6. wrobel says:
    July 2, 2016 at 3:02 pm

    in these fromulas it is important that the moving frame moves in arbitrary way it can rotate for example

    Log in to Reply
  7. wrobel says:
    July 2, 2016 at 2:48 pm

    Thanks. Do know textbooks in English that contain this material?

    Log in to Reply
  8. vanhees71 says:
    July 2, 2016 at 2:15 pm

    Here in Germany this is usually taught in the theory course (at Goethe University Frankfurt even already in the 1st semester!) in the context of rigid-body motion (basic theory of the spinning top).

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trending Articles

  • What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions
  • Scientific Inference: Do We Really Need Induction?
  • Animal Speed Scaling: Body-Lengths per Second Across Sizes
  • Tensors Explained: Scalars, Vectors, Matrices & Math
  • Unity Orbital Mechanics and AR Scaling: Implementation Guide
  • The 7 Basic Rules of Quantum Mechanics
  • Math Self-Study Roadmap: Topics & Book Recommendations
  • How to Better Define Information in Physics
  • Android Rooting & Magisk Guide: Systemless Root Tips
  • Exploring the Anatomy of Compton Scattering

Physics Forums

  • Classical Physics
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
  • Quantum Physics
  • Special and General Relativity
  • Beyond the Standard Model
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Cosmology
  • Other Physics Topics

Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Blog Information

  • Become a Member!
  • Write for Us!
  • Table of Contents
  • Blog Author List

Popular Topics

astronomy (17) black holes (17) classical physics (35) cosmology (16) education (23) electromagnetism (19) general relativity (19) gravity (24) interview (21) mathematics (39) mathematics self-study (21) Physicist (26) programming (18) Quantum Field Theory (31) quantum mechanics (36) quantum physics (24) relativity (40) Special Relativity (16) technology (19) universe (21)
2026 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - Contact Us - Privacy Policy - About PF Insights
  • Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Link to: Klein’s Erlangen Program: Groups Define Geometry Link to: Klein’s Erlangen Program: Groups Define Geometry Klein’s Erlangen Program: Groups Define GeometrygroupsandgeometryLink to: Integration Paradoxes: Indefinite Integrals and Constants Link to: Integration Paradoxes: Indefinite Integrals and Constants integralmisconceptionsIntegration Paradoxes: Indefinite Integrals and Constants
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top