Dual View Random Solved Random Open
40 solved out of 72 shown (show only solved or open or formalised or unformalised)
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation. - $250
If $p(z)\in\mathbb{C}[z]$ is a monic polynomial of degree $n$ then is the length of the curve $\{ z\in \mathbb{C} : \lvert p(z)\rvert=1\}$ maximised when $p(z)=z^n-1$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58]. It is also listed as Problem 4.10 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

Let the maximal length of such a curve be denoted by $f(n)$.

  • The length of the curve when $p(z)=z^n-1$ is $2n+O(1)$, and hence the conjecture implies in particular that $f(n)=2n+O(1)$.

  • Dolzhenko [Do61] proved $f(n) \leq 4\pi n$, but few were aware of this work.

  • Pommerenke [Po61] proved $f(n)\ll n^2$.

  • Borwein [Bo95] proved $f(n)\ll n$ (Borwein was unaware of Dolzhenko's earlier work). The prize of \$250 is reported by Borwein [Bo95].

  • Eremenko and Hayman [ErHa99] proved the full conjecture when $n=2$, and $f(n)\leq 9.173n$ for all $n$.

  • Danchenko [Da07] proved $f(n)\leq 2\pi n$.

  • Fryntov and Nazarov [FrNa09] proved that $z^n-1$ is a local maximiser, and solved this problem asymptotically, proving that\[f(n)\leq 2n+O(n^{7/8}).\]

  • Tao [Ta25] has proved that $p(z)=z^n-1$ is the unique (up to rotation and translation) maximiser for all sufficiently large $n$.




Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58] also ask whether the length is at least $2\pi$ if $\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert<1\}$ is connected (which $z^n$ shows is the best possible). This was proved by Pommerenke [Po59].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem TerenceTao
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Geoffrey Irving

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #114, https://www.erdosproblems.com/114, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
If $p(z)$ is a polynomial of degree $n$ such that $\{z : \lvert p(z)\rvert\leq 1\}$ is connected then is it true that\[\max_{\substack{z\in\mathbb{C}\\ \lvert p(z)\rvert\leq 1}} \lvert p'(z)\rvert \leq (\tfrac{1}{2}+o(1))n^2?\]
The lower bound is easy: this is $\geq n$ and equality holds if and only if $p(z)=z^n$. The assumption that the set is connected is necessary, as witnessed for example by $p(z)=z^2+10z+1$.

The Chebyshev polynomials show that $n^2/2$ is best possible here. Erdős originally conjectured this without the $o(1)$ term but Szabados observed that was too strong. Pommerenke [Po59a] proved an upper bound of $\frac{e}{2}n^2$.

Eremenko and Lempert [ErLe94] have shown this is true, and in fact Chebyshev polynomials are the extreme examples.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Stefan Steinerberger

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #115, https://www.erdosproblems.com/115, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $p(z)=\prod_{i=1}^n (z-z_i)$ for $\lvert z_i\rvert \leq 1$. Is it true that\[\lvert\{ z: \lvert p(z)\rvert <1\}\rvert>n^{-O(1)}\](or perhaps even $>(\log n)^{-O(1)}$)?
Conjectured by Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58]. The lower bound $\gg n^{-4}$ follows from a result of Pommerenke [Po61]. The lower bound $\gg (\log n)^{-1}$ was proved by Krishnapur, Lundberg, and Ramachandran [KLR25].

Wagner [Wa88] proves, for $n\geq 3$, the existence of such polynomials with\[\lvert\{ z: \lvert p(z)\rvert <1\}\rvert \ll_\epsilon (\log\log n)^{-1/2+\epsilon}\]for all $\epsilon>0$. Krishnapur, Lundberg, and Ramachandran [KLR25] improved this upper bound to $\ll (\log\log n)^{-1}$.

In [EHP58] they also ask to determine the polynomials which achieve the minimum possible value of this measure.

Pólya [Po28] showed the upper bound\[\lvert\{ z: \lvert p(z)\rvert <1\}\rvert \leq \pi\]always holds, and this is achieved only when the $z_i$ are identical.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 24 October 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Boris Alexeev, Alfaiz, and Dustin Mixon

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #116, https://www.erdosproblems.com/116, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation. - $100
Let $z_i$ be an infinite sequence of complex numbers such that $\lvert z_i\rvert=1$ for all $i\geq 1$, and for $n\geq 1$ let\[p_n(z)=\prod_{i\leq n} (z-z_i).\]Let $M_n=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=1}\lvert p_n(z)\rvert$.

Is it true that $\limsup M_n=\infty$?

Is it true that there exists $c>0$ such that for infinitely many $n$ we have $M_n > n^c$?

Is it true that there exists $c>0$ such that, for all large $n$,\[\sum_{k\leq n}M_k > n^{1+c}?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
This is Problem 4.1 in [Ha74] where it is attributed to Erdős.

The weaker conjecture that $\limsup M_n=\infty$ was proved by Wagner [Wa80], who show that there is some $c>0$ with $M_n>(\log n)^c$ infinitely often.

The second question was answered by Beck [Be91], who proved that there exists some $c>0$ such that\[\max_{n\leq N} M_n > N^c.\]Erdős (e.g. see [Ha74]) gave a construction of a sequence with $M_n\leq n+1$ for all $n$. Linden [Li77] improved this to give a sequence with $M_n\ll n^{1-c}$ for some $c>0$.

The third question seems to remain open.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Winston Heap

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #119, https://www.erdosproblems.com/119, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let\[ f(\theta) = \sum_{0\leq k\leq n}c_k e^{ik\theta}\]be a trigonometric polynomial all of whose roots are real, such that $\max_{\theta\in [0,2\pi]}\lvert f(\theta)\rvert=1$. Then\[\int_0^{2\pi}\lvert f(\theta)\rvert \mathrm{d}\theta \leq 4.\]
This is Problem 4.20 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

This was solved independently by Kristiansen [Kr74] (only in the case when $c_k\in\mathbb{R}$) and Saff and Sheil-Small [SSS73] (for general $c_k\in \mathbb{C}$).

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Winston Heap, Vjekoslav Kovac, and Karlo Lelas

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #225, https://www.erdosproblems.com/225, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED (LEAN) This has been solved in the affirmative and the proof verified in Lean.
Is there an entire non-linear function $f$ such that, for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$, $x$ is rational if and only if $f(x)$ is?
This is Problem 2.31 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

More generally, if $A,B\subseteq \mathbb{R}$ are two countable dense sets then is there an entire function such that $f(A)=B$?

Solved by Barth and Schneider [BaSc70], who proved that if $A,B\subset\mathbb{R}$ are countable dense sets then there exists a transcendental entire function $f$ such that $f(z)\in B$ if and only if $z\in A$. In [BaSc71] they proved the same result for countable dense subsets of $\mathbb{C}$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Boris Alexeev, Dustin Mixon, and Terence Tao

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #226, https://www.erdosproblems.com/226, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative.
Let $f=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nz^n$ be an entire function which is not a polynomial. Is it true that if\[\lim_{r\to \infty} \frac{\max_n\lvert a_nr^n\rvert}{\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert}\]exists then it must be $0$?
Clunie (unpublished) proved this if $a_n\geq 0$ for all $n$. This was disproved in general by Clunie and Hayman [ClHa64], who showed that the limit can take any value in $[0,1/2]$.

See also [513].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 06 January 2026.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Yongxi Lin

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #227, https://www.erdosproblems.com/227, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Does there exist, for all large $n$, a polynomial $P$ of degree $n$, with coefficients $\pm 1$, such that\[\sqrt{n} \ll \lvert P(z) \rvert \ll \sqrt{n}\]for all $\lvert z\rvert =1$, with the implied constants independent of $z$ and $n$?
Originally a conjecture of Littlewood. The answer is yes (for all $n\geq 2$), proved by Balister, Bollobás, Morris, Sahasrabudhe, and Tiba [BBMST20].

In Problem 4.31 of [Ha74] Erdős asks whether there exists a constant $c>0$ such that $\max_{\lvert z\rvert=1}\lvert P(z)\rvert > (1+c)\sqrt{n}$ for all large $n$.

See also [230].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Mehtaab Sawhney and Wouter van Doorn

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #228, https://www.erdosproblems.com/228, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED (LEAN) This has been solved in the affirmative and the proof verified in Lean.
Let $(S_n)_{n\geq 1}$ be a sequence of sets of complex numbers, none of which have a finite limit point. Does there exist an entire transcendental function $f(z)$ such that, for all $n\geq 1$, there exists some $k_n\geq 0$ such that\[f^{(k_n)}(z) = 0\textrm{ for all }z\in S_n?\]
This is Problem 2.30 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

Solved in the affirmative by Barth and Schneider [BaSc72].

This problem has been formalised in Lean as part of the Google DeepMind Formal Conjectures project.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: AlphaProof and team, Zachary Chase, and Terence Tao

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #229, https://www.erdosproblems.com/229, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative.
Let $P(z)=\sum_{1\leq k\leq n}a_kz^k$ for some $a_k\in \mathbb{C}$ with $\lvert a_k\rvert=1$ for $1\leq k\leq n$. Does there exist a constant $c>0$ such that, for $n\geq 2$, we have\[\max_{\lvert z\rvert=1}\lvert P(z)\rvert \geq (1+c)\sqrt{n}?\]
This is Problem 4.31 in [Ha74], in which it is described as a conjecture of Erdős and Newman.

The lower bound of $\sqrt{n}$ is trivial from Parseval's theorem. The answer is no (contrary to Erdős' initial guess). Kahane [Ka80] constructed 'ultraflat' polynomials $P(z)=\sum a_kz^k$ with $\lvert a_k\rvert=1$ such that\[P(z)=(1+o(1))\sqrt{n}\]uniformly for all $z\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\lvert z\rvert=1$, where the $o(1)$ term $\to 0$ as $n\to \infty$.

For more details see the paper [BoBo09] of Bombieri and Bourgain and where Kahane's construction is improved to yield such a polynomial with\[P(z)=\sqrt{n}+O(n^{\frac{7}{18}}(\log n)^{O(1)})\]for all $z\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\lvert z\rvert=1$.


See also [228].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Mehtaab Sawhney

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #230, https://www.erdosproblems.com/230, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $n\geq 1$ and $f(n)$ be maximal such that for every $a_1\leq \cdots \leq a_n\in \mathbb{N}$ we have\[\max_{\lvert z\rvert=1}\left\lvert \prod_{i}(1-z^{a_i})\right\rvert\geq f(n).\]Estimate $f(n)$ - in particular, is it true that there exists some constant $c>0$ such that\[\log f(n) \gg n^c?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Erdős and Szekeres [ErSz59] proved that $\lim f(n)^{1/n}=1$ and $f(n)>\sqrt{2n}$. Erdős proved an upper bound of $\log f(n) \ll n^{1-c}$ for some constant $c>0$ with probabilistic methods. Atkinson [At61] showed that $\log f(n) \ll n^{1/2}\log n$.

This was improved to\[\log f(n) \ll n^{1/3}(\log n)^{4/3}\]by Odlyzko [Od82].

If we denote by $f^*(n)$ the analogous quantity with the assumption that $a_1<\cdots<a_n$ then Bourgain and Chang [BoCh18] prove that\[\log f^*(n)\ll (n\log n)^{1/2}\log\log n.\]Atkinson [At61] noted this is related to the Chowla cosine problem [510], in that if for any set of $n$ integers $A$ there exists $\theta$ such that $\sum_{n\in A}\cos(n\theta) < -M_n$ then\[\log f^*(n) \ll M_n \log n.\]The answer to the specific question asked is no - Belov and Konyagin [BeKo96] proved that\[\log f(n) \ll (\log n)^4.\]

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 15 September 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem Quanyu_Tang
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult Quanyu_Tang
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Zachary Chase, Stefan Steinerberger, and Quanyu Tang

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #256, https://www.erdosproblems.com/256, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
If $z_1,\ldots,z_n\in \mathbb{C}$ with $\lvert z_i\rvert=1$ then is it true that the probability that\[\lvert \epsilon_1z_1+\cdots+\epsilon_nz_n\rvert \leq \sqrt{2},\]where $\epsilon_i\in \{-1,1\}$ uniformly at random, is $\gg 1/n$?
A reverse Littlewood-Offord problem. Erdős originally asked this with $\sqrt{2}$ replaced by $1$, but Carnielli and Carolino [CaCa11] observed that this is false, choosing $z_1=1$ and $z_k=i$ for $2\leq k\leq n$, where $n$ is even, since then the sum is at least $\sqrt{2}$ always.

Solved in the affirmative by He, Juškevičius, Narayanan, and Spiro [HJNS24]. The bound of $1/n$ is the best possible, as shown by taking $z_k=1$ for $1\leq k\leq n/2$ and $z_k=i$ otherwise.

See also [498].

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Zach Hunter

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #395, https://www.erdosproblems.com/395, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f(k)$ be the minimum number of terms in $P(x)^2$, where $P\in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ ranges over all polynomials with exactly $k$ non-zero terms. Is it true that $f(k)\to\infty$ as $k\to \infty$?
This is Problem 4.4 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

First investigated by Rényi and Rédei [Re47]. Erdős [Er49b] proved that $f(k)<k^{1-c}$ for some $c>0$. The conjecture that $f(k)\to \infty$ is due to Erdős and Rényi.

This was solved by Schinzel [Sc87], who proved that\[f(k) > \frac{\log\log k}{\log 2}.\]In fact Schinzel proves lower bounds for the corresponding problem with $P(x)^n$ for any integer $n\geq 1$, where the coefficients of the polynomial can be from any field with zero or sufficiently large positive characteristic.

Schinzel and Zannier [ScZa09] have improved this to\[f(k) \gg \log k.\]

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Related OEIS sequences: Possible
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Stefan Steinerberger

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #485, https://www.erdosproblems.com/485, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
If $A\subset \mathbb{C}$ is a finite set and $k\geq 1$ then let\[A_k = \{ z_1+\cdots+z_k : z_i\in A\textrm{ distinct}\}.\]For $k>2$ does the multiset $A_k$ (together with the size of $A$) uniquely determine the set $A$?
A problem of Selfridge and Straus [SeSt58], who prove that this is true if $k=2$ and $\lvert A\rvert \neq 2^l$ (for $l\geq 0$). On the other hand, there are examples with two distinct $A,B$ both of size $2^l$ such that $A_2=B_2$.

Selfridge and Straus [SeSt58] also show that the answer is yes if $k=3$ and $\lvert A\rvert>6$ or $k=4$ and $\lvert A\rvert>12$.

More generally, they prove that $A$ is uniquely determined by $A_k$ if $\lvert A\rvert$ is divisible by a prime greater than $k$.

Kruyt notes that this is trivially false if $\lvert A\rvert=k$ then rotating $A$ around an appropriate point produces a distinct set with the same sum. Presumably some condition like '$\lvert A\rvert$ sufficiently large' is intended. Tao also notes that this is false if $\lvert A\rvert=2k$.

Gordon, Fraenkel, and Straus [GFS62] proved that, for all $k$, the multiset $A_k$ uniquely determines $A$ provided $\lvert A\rvert$ is sufficiently large.

(In [Er61] Erdős states this problem incorrectly, replacing sums with products. This product formulation is easily seen to be false, as observed by Steinerberger: consider the case $k=3$ and subsets of the 6th roots of unity corresponding to $\{0,1,2,4\}$ and $\{0,2,3,4\}$ (as subsets of $\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}$). The correct problem statement can be found in the paper of Selfridge and Straus that Erdős cites.)

This is mentioned in problem C5 of Guy's collection [Gu04].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 14 October 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Daniel Kruyt, msellke, Stefan Steinerberger, and Terence Tao

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #494, https://www.erdosproblems.com/494, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $z_1,\ldots,z_n\in\mathbb{C}$ with $1\leq \lvert z_i\rvert$ for $1\leq i\leq n$. Let $D$ be an arbitrary disc of radius $1$. Is it true that the number of sums of the shape\[\sum_{i=1}^n\epsilon_iz_i \textrm{ for }\epsilon_i\in \{-1,1\}\]which lie in $D$ is at most $\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$?
A strong form of the Littlewood-Offord problem. Erdős [Er45] proved this is true if $z_i\in\mathbb{R}$, and for general $z_i\in\mathbb{C}$ proved a weaker upper bound of\[\ll \frac{2^n}{\sqrt{n}}.\]This was solved in the affirmative by Kleitman [Kl65], who also later generalised this to arbitrary Hilbert spaces [Kl70].

See also [395].

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Stijn Cambie

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #498, https://www.erdosproblems.com/498, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f(z)\in\mathbb{C}[z]$ be a monic non-constant polynomial. Can the set\[\{ z\in \mathbb{C} : \lvert f(z)\rvert \leq 1\}\]be covered by a set of circles the sum of whose radii is $\leq 2$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Cartan proved this is true with $2$ replaced by $2e$, which was improved to $2.59$ by Pommerenke [Po61]. Pommerenke [Po59] proved that $2$ is achievable if the set is connected (see [1046]).

The generalisation of this to higher dimensions was asked by Erdős as Problem 4.23 in [Ha74].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #509, https://www.erdosproblems.com/509, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
If $A\subset \mathbb{Z}$ is a finite set of size $N$ then is there some absolute constant $c>0$ and $\theta$ such that\[\sum_{n\in A}\cos(n\theta) < -cN^{1/2}?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Chowla's cosine problem. Ruzsa [Ru04] (improving on an earlier result of Bourgain [Bo86]), proved an upper bound of\[-\exp(O(\sqrt{\log N})).\]Polynomial bounds were proved independently by Bedert [Be25c] and Jin, Milojević, Tomon, and Zhang [JMTZ25]. The best bound follows from the method of Bedert [Be25c], which proved the existence of some $c>0$ such that, for all $A$ of size $N$,\[\sum_{n\in A}\cos(n\theta) < -cN^{1/7}.\]The example $A=B-B$, where $B$ is a Sidon set, shows that $N^{1/2}$ would be the best possible here.

This problem is Problem 81 on Green's open problems list.

This is related to [256].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 28 September 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Desmond Weisenberg

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #510, https://www.erdosproblems.com/510, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative.
Let $f(z)\in \mathbb{C}[z]$ be a monic polynomial of degree $n$. Is it true that, for every $c>1$, the set\[\{ z\in \mathbb{C} : \lvert f(z)\rvert< 1\}\]has at most $O_c(1)$ many connected components of diameter $>c$ (where the implied constant is in particular independent of $n$)?
This is Problem 4.9 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranien [EHP58], who ask more generally whether\[\sum_C \mathrm{diam}(C) \leq n2^{1/n}\]and\[\sum_{C}\max(0, \mathrm{diam}(C)-1)\ll 1\]for all such $f$, where $C$ ranges over the connected components of the set in question. The example $f(z)=z^n-1$ has $\sum_C \mathrm{diam}(C)=(1+o(1))n2^{1/n}$.

They also asked whether, if the roots of $f$ are all in the disc $\{\lvert z\rvert\leq 1\}$, the total number of connected components with diameter $>1$ is absolutely bounded, but noted in an addendum that the answer is no: consider $z^n+1$ and move the zeros $e^{i\pi/n}$ and $e^{-i\pi/n}$ a short distance along the circle towards $1$. The set $\{z: \lvert f(z)\rvert \leq 1\}$ for $f(z)=z^n+1$ looks like $n$ 'leaves' joined at $0$, and this moving of two roots makes $\approx n/2$ of the leaves become disconnected at $0$. Each of the resulting components has diameter $>2^{1/n}-\epsilon$, and hence there are $\gg n$ components of diameter $>1$.

In [Er61] Erdős asks the weaker question given here, with the definition of the set altered so that $<1$ is replaced by $\leq 1$.

Pommerenke [Po61] proved that the answer is no to most of these questions, by showing that, for any $0<d<4$ and $k\geq 1$ there exist monic polynomials $f\in \mathbb{C}[x]$ such that $\{z: \lvert f(z)\rvert\leq 1\}$ has at least $k$ connected components of diameter $\geq d$.

This was independently proved by Huang [Hu25] (unaware of the previous work of Pommerenke). Pólya [Po28] showed that $4$ is the best possible here, in that no connected component can have diameter $>4$.

A picture of the set in question for $z^5-1$ is here.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Zach Hunter

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #511, https://www.erdosproblems.com/511, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Is it true that, if $A\subset \mathbb{Z}$ is a finite set of size $N$, then\[\int_0^1 \left\lvert \sum_{n\in A}e(n\theta)\right\rvert \mathrm{d}\theta \gg \log N,\]where $e(x)=e^{2\pi ix }$?
Littlewood's conjecture, proved independently by Konyagin [Ko81] and McGehee, Pigno, and Smith [MPS81].

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #512, https://www.erdosproblems.com/512, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nz^n$ be a transcendental entire function. What is the greatest possible value of\[\liminf_{r\to \infty} \frac{\max_n\lvert a_nr^n\rvert}{\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert}?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
It is trivial that this value is in $[1/2,1)$. Kövári (unpublished) observed that it must be $>1/2$. Clunie and Hayman [ClHa64] showed that it is $\leq 2/\pi-c$ for some absolute constant $c>0$. Some other results on this quantity were established by Gray and Shah [GrSh63].

See also [227].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 28 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Kevin Barreto and Quanyu Tang

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #513, https://www.erdosproblems.com/513, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f(z)$ be an entire function. Does there exist a path $L$ so that, for every $n$,\[\lvert f(z)/z^n\rvert \to \infty\]as $z\to \infty$ along $L$?

Can the length of this path be estimated in terms of $M(r)=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$? Does there exist a path along which $\lvert f(z)\rvert$ tends to $\infty$ faster than a fixed function of $M(r)$ (such that $M(r)^\epsilon$)?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Boas (unpublished) has proved the first part, that such a path must exist.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #514, https://www.erdosproblems.com/514, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f(z)$ be an entire function, not a polynomial. Does there exist a locally rectifiable path $C$ tending to infinity such that, for every $\lambda>0$, the integral\[\int_C \lvert f(z)\rvert^{-\lambda} \mathrm{d}z\]is finite?
Huber [Hu57] proved that for every $\lambda>0$ there is such a path $C_\lambda$ such that this integral is finite.

This is true. The case when $f$ has finite order was proved by Zhang [Zh77]. The general case was proved by Lewis, Rossi, and Weitsman [LRW84], who in fact proved this with $\lvert f\rvert$ replaced by $e^u$ where $u$ is any subharmonic function.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 19 October 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Cedric Pilatte, Mark Sellke, and Desmond Weisenberg

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #515, https://www.erdosproblems.com/515, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f(z)=\sum_{k\geq 1}a_k z^{n_k}$ be an entire function of finite order such that $\lim n_k/k=\infty$. Let $M(r)=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$ and $m(r)=\min_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$. Is it true that\[\limsup\frac{\log m(r)}{\log M(r)}=1?\]
A problem of Pólya [Po29]. Results of Wiman [Wi14] imply that if $(n_{k+1}-n_k)^2>n_k$ then $\limsup \frac{m(r)}{M(r)}=1$. Erdős and Macintyre [ErMa54] proved this under the assumption that\[\sum_{k\geq 2}\frac{1}{n_{k+1}-n_k}<\infty.\]This was solved in the affirmative by Fuchs [Fu63], who proved that in fact for any $\epsilon>0$\[\log m(r)> (1-\epsilon)\log M(r)\]holds outside a set of logarithmic density $0$.

Kovari [Ko65] has shown that the $\limsup$ is also $1$ for an arbitrary entire function given the stronger assumption that $n_k>k(\log k)^{2+c}$ for some $c>0$. It is conjectured that this condition can be replaced with $\sum \frac{1}{n_k}<\infty$. This would be best possible, as Macintyre [Ma52] has shown that, given any $n_k$ with $\sum \frac{1}{n_k}=\infty$, there is a corresponding entire function which tends to zero along the positive real axis.

In [Er61] this is asked with $m(r)=\max_n \lvert a_nr^n\rvert$, but with this definition the desired equality is a simple consequence of [Wi14] (see the comment by Quanyu Tang).

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 28 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Quanyu Tang and Terence Tao

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #516, https://www.erdosproblems.com/516, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f(z)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty a_kz^{n_k}$ be an entire function (with $a_k\neq 0$ for all $k\geq 1$). Is it true that if $n_k/k\to \infty$ then $f(z)$ assumes every value infinitely often?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A conjecture of Fejér and Pólya.

Fejér [Fe08] proved that if $\sum\frac{1}{n_k}<\infty$ then $f(z)$ assumes every value at least once, and Biernacki [Bi28] proved that if $\sum\frac{1}{n_k}<\infty$ then $f(z)$ assumes every value infinitely often.

Pólya [Po29] proved that if $f$ has finite order then $f(z)$ assumes every value infinitely often under the assumption that $\limsup (n_{k+1}-n_k)=\infty$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #517, https://www.erdosproblems.com/517, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $z_1,\ldots,z_n\in \mathbb{C}$ with $z_1=1$. Must there exist an absolute constant $c>0$ such that\[\max_{1\leq k\leq n}\left\lvert \sum_{i}z_i^k\right\rvert>c?\]
A problem of Turán, who proved that this maximum is $\gg 1/n$. This was solved by Atkinson [At61b], who showed that $c=1/6$ suffices. This has been improved by Biró, first to $c=1/2$ [Bi94], and later to an absolute constant $c>1/2$ [Bi00]. Based on computational evidence it is likely that the optimal value of $c$ is $\approx 0.7$.

See also [973].

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #519, https://www.erdosproblems.com/519, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $(\epsilon_k)_{k\geq 0}$ be independently uniformly chosen at random from $\{-1,1\}$. If $R_n$ counts the number of real roots of $f_n(z)=\sum_{0\leq k\leq n}\epsilon_k z^k$ then is it true that, almost surely,\[\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{R_n}{\log n}=\frac{2}{\pi}?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Erdős and Offord [EO56] showed that the number of real roots of a random degree $n$ polynomial with $\pm 1$ coefficients is $(\frac{2}{\pi}+o(1))\log n$.

It is ambiguous in [Er61] whether Erdős intended the coefficients to be uniformly chosen from $\{-1,1\}$ or $\{0,1\}$. In the latter case, the constant $\frac{2}{\pi}$ should be $\frac{1}{\pi}$ (see the discussion in the comments).

In the case of $\{-1,1\}$ Do [Do24] proved that, if $R_n[-1,1]$ counts the number of roots in $[-1,1]$, then, almost surely,\[\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{R_n[-1,1]}{\log n}=\frac{1}{\pi}.\]See also [522].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 19 October 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating Vjeko_Kovac
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable TerenceTao, Vjeko_Kovac

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #521, https://www.erdosproblems.com/521, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f(z)=\sum_{0\leq k\leq n} \epsilon_k z^k$ be a random polynomial, where $\epsilon_k\in \{-1,1\}$ independently uniformly at random for $0\leq k\leq n$.

Is it true that, if $R_n$ is the number of roots of $f(z)$ in $\{ z\in \mathbb{C} : \lvert z\rvert \leq 1\}$, then\[\frac{R_n}{n/2}\to 1\]almost surely?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Random polynomials with independently identically distributed coefficients are sometimes called Kac polynomials - this problem considers the case of Rademacher coefficients, i.e. independent uniform $\pm 1$ values. Erdős and Offord [EO56] showed that the number of real roots of a random degree $n$ polynomial with $\pm 1$ coefficients is $(\frac{2}{\pi}+o(1))\log n$.

There is some ambiguity whether Erdős intended the coefficients to be in $\{-1,1\}$ or $\{0,1\}$ - see the comments section.

A weaker version of this was solved by Yakir [Ya21], who proved that\[\frac{R_n}{n/2}\to 1\]in probability. (This weaker claim was also asked by Erdős, and also appears in a book of Hayman [Ha67].) More precisely,\[\lim_{n\to \infty} \mathbb{P}(\lvert R_n-n/2\rvert \geq n^{9/10}) =0.\]See also [521].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 06 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem BraydenLetwin
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable BraydenLetwin

Additional thanks to: Michal Bassan, Zachary Chase, and Vjekoslav Kovac

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #522, https://www.erdosproblems.com/522, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f(z)=\sum_{0\leq k\leq n} \epsilon_k z^k$ be a random polynomial, where $\epsilon_k\in \{-1,1\}$ independently uniformly at random for $0\leq k\leq n$.

Does there exist some constant $C>0$ such that, almost surely,\[\max_{\lvert z\rvert=1}\left\lvert \sum_{k\leq n}\epsilon_k(t)z^k\right\rvert=(C+o(1))\sqrt{n\log n}?\]
Salem and Zygmund [SZ54] proved that $\sqrt{n\log n}$ is the right order of magnitude, but not an asymptotic.

This was settled by Halász [Ha73], who proved this is true with $C=1$.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Adrian Beker

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #523, https://www.erdosproblems.com/523, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
For any $t\in (0,1)$ let $t=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \epsilon_k(t)2^{-k}$ (where $\epsilon_k(t)\in \{0,1\}$). What is the correct order of magnitude (for almost all $t\in(0,1)$) for\[M_n(t)=\max_{x\in [-1,1]}\left\lvert \sum_{k\leq n}(-1)^{\epsilon_k(t)}x^k\right\rvert?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A problem of Salem and Zygmund [SaZy54]. Chung showed that, for almost all $t$, there exist infinitely many $n$ such that\[M_n(t) \ll \left(\frac{n}{\log\log n}\right)^{1/2}.\]Erdős (unpublished) showed that for almost all $t$ and every $\epsilon>0$ we have $\lim_{n\to \infty}M_n(t)/n^{1/2-\epsilon}=\infty$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 27 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem msawhney
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable msawhney

Additional thanks to: Quanyu Tang

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #524, https://www.erdosproblems.com/524, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Is it true that all except at most $o(2^n)$ many degree $n$ polynomials with $\pm 1$-valued coefficients $f(z)$ have $\lvert f(z)\rvert <1$ for some $\lvert z\rvert=1$?
What is the behaviour of\[m(f)=\min_{\lvert z\rvert=1}\lvert f(z)\rvert?\]
Random polynomials with independently identically distributed coefficients are sometimes called Kac polynomials - this problem considers the case of Rademacher coefficients, i.e. independent uniform $\pm 1$ values. The first problem asks whether $m(f)<1$ almost surely. Littlewood [Li66] conjectured that the stronger $m(f)=o(1)$ holds almost surely.

The answer to both questions is yes: Littlewood's conjecture was solved by Kashin [Ka87], and Konyagin [Ko94] improved this to show that $m(f)\leq n^{-1/2+o(1)}$ almost surely. This is essentially best possible, since Konyagin and Schlag [KoSc99] proved that for any $\epsilon>0$\[\limsup_{n\to \infty} \mathbb
(m(f) \leq \epsilon n^{-1/2})\ll \epsilon.\]Cook and Nguyen [CoNg21] have identified the limiting distribution, proving that for any $\epsilon>0$\[\lim_{n\to \infty} \mathbb
(m(f) > \epsilon n^{-1/2}) = e^{-\epsilon \lambda}\]where $\lambda$ is an explicit constant.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Related OEIS sequences: Possible
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Mehtaab Sawhney

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #525, https://www.erdosproblems.com/525, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $a_n\in \mathbb{R}$ be such that $\sum_n \lvert a_n\rvert^2=\infty$ and $\lvert a_n\rvert=o(1/\sqrt{n})$. Is it true that, for almost all $\epsilon_n=\pm 1$, there exists some $z$ with $\lvert z\rvert=1$ (depending on the choice of signs) such that\[\sum_n \epsilon_n a_n z^n\]converges?
It is unclear to me whether Erdős also intended to assume that $\lvert a_{n+1}\rvert\leq \lvert a_n\rvert$.

It is 'well known' that, for almost all $\epsilon_n=\pm 1$, the series diverges for almost all $\lvert z\rvert=1$ (assuming only $\sum \lvert a_n\rvert^2=\infty$).

Dvoretzky and Erdős [DE59] showed that if $\lvert a_n\rvert >c/\sqrt{n}$ then, for almost all $\epsilon_n=\pm 1$, the series diverges for all $\lvert z\rvert=1$.

This is true, and was proved by Michelen and Sawhney [MiSa25], who in fact proved that the set of such $z$ has Hausdorff dimension $1$.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #527, https://www.erdosproblems.com/527, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation. - $250
Given $a_{i}^n\in [-1,1]$ for all $1\leq i\leq n<\infty$ we define $p_{i}^n$ as the unique polynomial of degree $n-1$ such that $p_{i}^n(a_{i}^n)=1$ and $p_{i}^n(a_{i'}^n)=0$ if $1\leq i'\leq n$ with $i\neq i'$. We similarly define\[\mathcal{L}^nf(x) = \sum_{1\leq i\leq n}f(a_i^n)p_i^n(x),\]the unique polynomial of degree $n-1$ which agrees with $f$ on $a_i^n$ for $1\leq i\leq n$ (that is, the sequence of Lagrange interpolation polynomials).


Is there such a sequence of $a_i^n$ such that for every continuous $f:[-1,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ there exists some $x\in [-1,1]$ where\[\limsup_{n\to \infty} \sum_{1\leq i\leq n}\lvert p_{i}^n(x)\rvert=\infty\]and yet\[\mathcal{L}^nf(x) \to f(x)?\]Is there such a sequence such that\[\limsup_{n\to \infty} \sum_{1\leq i\leq n}\lvert p_{i}^n(x)\rvert=\infty\]for every $x\in [-1,1]$ and yet for every continuous $f:[-1,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ there exists $x\in [-1,1]$ with\[\mathcal{L}^nf(x) \to f(x)?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Bernstein [Be31] proved that for any choice of $a_i^n$ there exists $x_0\in [-1,1]$ such that\[\limsup_{n\to \infty} \sum_{1\leq i\leq n}\lvert p_{i}^n(x)\rvert=\infty.\]Erdős and Vértesi [ErVe80] proved that for any choice of $a_i^n$ there exists a continuous $f:[-1,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ such that\[\limsup_{n\to \infty} \lvert \mathcal{L}^nf(x)\rvert=\infty\]for almost all $x\in [-1,1]$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 06 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: qawsed

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #671, https://www.erdosproblems.com/671, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Is there an entire non-zero function $f:\mathbb{C}\to \mathbb{C}$ such that, for any infinite sequence $n_1<n_2<\cdots$, the set\[\{ z: f^{(n_k)}(z)=0 \textrm{ for some }k\geq 1\}\]is everywhere dense?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Erdős [Er82e] writes that this was solved in the affirmative 'more than ten years ago', but gives no reference or indication who solved it. From context he seems to attribute this to Barth and Schneider [BaSc72], but this paper contains no such result.

Tang points out that the problem is trivial if we take $f$ to be a polynomial, so presumably it is intended the function $f$ is transcendental.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 01 October 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem Quanyu_Tang
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Quanyu Tang

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #906, https://www.erdosproblems.com/906, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be such that $f(x+h)-f(x)$ is continous for every $h>0$. Is it true that\[f=g+h\]for some continuous $g$ and additive $h$ (i.e. $h(x+y)=h(x)+h(y)$)?
A conjecture of Erdős from the early 1950s. Answered in the affirmative by de Bruijn [dB51].

See also [908].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 30 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #907, https://www.erdosproblems.com/907, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be such that $f(x+h)-f(x)$ is measurable for every $h>0$. Is it true that\[f=g+h+r\]where $g$ is continuous, $h$ is additive (so $h(x+y)=h(x)+h(y)$), and $r(x+h)-r(x)=0$ for every $h$ and almost all (depending on $h$) $x$?
A conjecture of de Bruijn and Erdős. Answered in the affirmative by Laczkovich [La80].

See also [907].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 30 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #908, https://www.erdosproblems.com/908, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $n\geq 2$. Is there a space $S$ of dimension $n$ such that $S^2$ also has dimension $n$?
The space of rational points in Hilbert space has this property for $n=1$. This was proved for general $n$ by Anderson and Keisler [AnKe67].

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #909, https://www.erdosproblems.com/909, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED (LEAN) This has been solved in the negative and the proof verified in Lean.
Let $1<a_1<\cdots $ be a sequence of integers such that $\sum\frac{1}{a_i}<\infty$. Is it true that, for every $t\in \mathbb{R}$,\[1+\sum_{k}\frac{1}{a_k^{1+it}}\neq 0?\]
A question of Erdős and Ingham [ErIn64]. The simplest case they could not decide this question for was the finite sequence $\{2,3,5\}$.

Their interest in this problem arose from their proof that the statement that there are no such zeros is equivalent to the fact that, for any non-decreasing $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ which is bounded on every bounded interval and is $=0$ for $x<1$, the relationship\[f(x)+\sum_k f(x/a_k)=\left(1+\sum_k \frac{1}{a_k}+o(1)\right)x\]implies $f(x)=(1+o(1))x$.

A related question on MathOverflow concerns the vanishing of $2^{-1-it}+3^{-1-it}+5^{-1-it}$, and GH shows that the Four Exponentials conjecture implies this never vanishes.

Yip [Yi25] has proved that this is not always true - in fact, for any real $t\neq 0$, there exists a sequence of integers $1<a_1<\cdots$ such that $\sum \frac{1}{a_i}<\infty$ and $1+\sum_{k}\frac{1}{a_k^{1+it}}=0$.

It remains open whether this is true for every finite sequence of integers.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 20 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: marinov

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #967, https://www.erdosproblems.com/967, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Does there exist a constant $C>1$ such that, for every $n\geq 2$, there exists a sequence $z_i\in \mathbb{C}$ with $z_1=1$ and $\lvert z_i\rvert \geq 1$ for all $1\leq i\leq n$ with\[\max_{2\leq k\leq n+1}\left\lvert \sum_{1\leq i\leq n}z_i^k\right\rvert < C^{-n}?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
This is Problem 7.3 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

Erdős proved (as described on p.35 of [Tu84b]) that such a sequence does exist with $\lvert z_i\rvert\leq 1$. Indeed, Erdős' construction gives a value of $C\approx 1.32$.

In [Er92f] (a different) Erdős refines this analysis, proving that if\[M_2=\min_{z_j} \max_{2\leq k\leq n+1} \left\lvert \sum_{1\leq j\leq n}z_j^k\right\rvert,\]where the minimum is take over all $z_j\in \mathbb{C}$ with $\max \lvert z_j\rvert=1$, then\[(1.746)^{-n} < M_2 < (1.745)^{-n}.\]Tang notes in the comments that Theorem 6.1 of [Tu84b] implies that, if $\lvert z_i\rvert \geq 1$ for all $i$, then\[\max_{2\leq k\leq n+1}\left\lvert \sum_{1\leq i\leq n}z_i^k\right\rvert \geq (2e)^{-(1+o(1))n}.\]See also [519].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem Quanyu_Tang
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Quanyu Tang and Terence Tao

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #973, https://www.erdosproblems.com/973, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $z_1,\ldots,z_n\in \mathbb{C}$ be a sequence such that $z_1=1$. Suppose that the sequence of\[s_k=\sum_{1\leq i\leq n}z_i^k\]contains infinitely many $(n-1)$-tuples of consecutive values of $s_k$ which are all $0$. Then (essentially)\[z_j=e(j/n),\]where $e(x)=e^{2\pi ix}$.
A conjecture of Turán. Erdős speculates that this may be true if there are two distinct $(n-1)$-tuples of consecutive values of $s_k$ which are $0$. He does not elaborate on what the 'essentially' may mean precisely.

This is true (in the stronger form with only two such tuples) - in fact if $n$ is odd then the $z_i$ must be exactly the $n$th roots of unity, and if $n$ is even they must be the vertices of two regular $(n/2)$-gons with the same circumscribed circle centred at the origin. This was first proved by Tijdeman [Ti66]. An independent proof of this was given in the comments section by Hu, Tang, and Zhang.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 01 October 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Koishi Chan, Tao Hu, and Quanyu Tang

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #974, https://www.erdosproblems.com/974, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $x_1,x_2,\ldots \in (0,1)$ be an infinite sequence and let\[A_k=\limsup_{n\to \infty}\left\lvert \sum_{j\leq n} e(kx_j)\right\rvert,\]where $e(x)=e^{2\pi ix}$.

Is it true that\[\limsup_{k\to \infty} A_k=\infty?\]Is it possible for $A_k=o(k)$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
This is Problem 7.21 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

Erdős [Er64b] remarks it is 'easy to see' that\[\limsup_{k\to \infty}\left(\sup_n\left\lvert \sum_{j\leq n} e(kx_j)\right\rvert\right)=\infty.\]Erdős [Er65b] later found a 'very easy' proof that $A_k\gg \log k$ for infinitely many $k$. Clunie [Cl67] proved that $A_k\gg k^{1/2}$ infinitely often, and that there exist sequences with $A_k\leq k$ for all $k$. Tao has independently found a proof that $A_k\gg k^{1/2}$ infinitely often (see the comment section).

Liu [Li69] showed that, for any $\epsilon>0$, $A_k\gg k^{1-\epsilon}$ infinitely often, under the additional assumption that there are only a finite number of distinct points. Clunie observed in the Mathscinet review of [Li69], however, that under this assumption in fact $A_k=\infty$ infinitely often.

The question of whether $A_k=o(k)$ is possible (repeated in [Er65b] and [Ha74]) seems to still be open.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Terence Tao

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #987, https://www.erdosproblems.com/987, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f=a_0+\cdots+a_dx^d\in \mathbb{C}[x]$ be a polynomial. Is it true that, if $f$ has roots $z_1,\ldots,z_d$ with corresponding arguments $\theta_1,\ldots,\theta_d\in [0,2\pi]$, then for all intervals $I\subseteq [0,2\pi]$\[\left\lvert (\# \theta_i \in I) - \frac{\lvert I\rvert}{2\pi}d\right\rvert \ll \left(n\log M\right)^{1/2},\]where $n$ is the number of non-zero coefficients of $f$ and\[M=\frac{\lvert a_0\rvert+\cdots +\lvert a_d\rvert}{(\lvert a_0\rvert\lvert a_d\rvert)^{1/2}}.\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Erdős and Turán [ErTu50] proved such an upper bound with $n$ replaced by $d$.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #990, https://www.erdosproblems.com/990, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative.
Let $E\subseteq (0,1)$ be a meaurable subset with Lebesgue measure $\lambda(E)$. Is it true that, for almost all $\alpha$,\[\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{1\leq k\leq n}1_{\{k\alpha \}\in E}=\lambda(E)\]for all $E$?
A conjecture of Khintchine [Kh23].

In fact this is false, and was disproved by Marstrand [Ma70].

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #994, https://www.erdosproblems.com/994, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $n_1<n_2<\cdots$ be a lacunary sequence of integers and $f\in L^2([0,1])$. Estimate the growth of, for almost all $\alpha$,\[\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}f(\{ \alpha n_k\}).\]For example, is it true that, for almost all $\alpha$,\[\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}f(\{ \alpha n_k\})=o(N\sqrt{\log\log N})?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Erdős [Er49d] constructed a lacunary sequence and $f\in L^2([0,1])$ such that, for every $\epsilon>0$, for almost all $\alpha$\[\limsup_{N\to \infty}\frac{1}{N(\log\log N)^{\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon}}\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}f(\{\alpha n_k\})=\infty.\]Erdős also proved that, for every lacunary sequence and $f\in L^2$, for every $\epsilon>0$, for almost all $\alpha$,\[\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}f(\{\alpha n_k\})=o( N(\log N)^{\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon}).\]Erdős [Er64b] thought that his lower bound was closer to the truth.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #995, https://www.erdosproblems.com/995, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $n_1<n_2<\cdots$ be a lacunary sequence of integers, and let $f\in L^2([0,1])$. Let $f_n$ be the $n$th partial sum of the Fourier series of $f(x)$. Is there an absolute constant $C>0$ such that, if\[\| f-f_n\|_2 \ll \frac{1}{(\log\log\log n)^{C}}\]then\[\lim_{N\to\infty}\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k\leq N}f(\{\alpha n_k\})=\int_0^1 f(x)\mathrm{d}x\]for almost every $\alpha$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Raikov proved the conclusion always holds (for every $f\in L^2([0,1])$, with no assumption on $\| f-f_n\|_2$) if $n_k=a^k$ for some integer $a\geq 2$. Erdős [Er64b] also asked whether this is true for $n_k=\lfloor a^k\rfloor$ for some $a>1$.

Kac, Salem, and Zygmund [KSZ48] proved that the conclusion holds if\[\| f-f_n\|_2 \ll \frac{1}{(\log n)^{c}}\]for some constant $c>1$. Erdős [Er49d] proved that the conclusion holds if\[\| f-f_n\|_2 \ll \frac{1}{(\log\log n)^{c}}\]for some constant $c>1$. Matsuyama [Ma66] improved this to $c>1/2$.

In [Er64b] Erdős asked whether the conclusion holds for all bounded functions $f$ and lacunary sequences $n_k$.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #996, https://www.erdosproblems.com/996, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Call $x_1,x_2,\ldots \in (0,1)$ well-distributed if, for every $\epsilon>0$, if $k$ is sufficiently large then, for all $n>0$ and intervals $I\subseteq [0,1]$,\[\lvert \# \{ n<m\leq n+k : x_m\in I\} - \lvert I\rvert k\rvert < \epsilon k.\]Is it true that, for every $\alpha$, the sequence $\{ \alpha p_n\}$ is not well-distributed, if $p_n$ is the sequence of primes?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
The notion of a well-distributed sequence was introduced by Hlawka and Petersen [Hl55].

Erdős proved that, if $n_k$ is a lacunary sequence, then the sequence $\{ \alpha n_k\}$ is not well-distributed for almost all $\alpha$.

He also claimed in [Er64b] to have proved that there exists an irrational $\alpha$ for which $\{\alpha p_n\}$ is not well-distributed. He later retracted this claim in [Er85e], saying "The theorem is no doubt correct and perhaps will not be difficult to prove but I never was able to reconstruct my 'proof' which perhaps never existed ."

The existence of such an $\alpha$ was established by Champagne, Le, Liu, and Wooley [CLLW24].

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #997, https://www.erdosproblems.com/997, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $\alpha$ be an irrational number. Is it true that if, for all large $n$,\[\#\{ 1\leq m\leq n : \{ \alpha m\} \in [u,v)\} = n(v-u)+O(1)\]then $u=\{\alpha k\}$ and $v=\{\alpha \ell\}$ for some integers $k$ and $\ell$?
A problem of Erdős and Szüsz. Hecke [He22] and Ostrowski ([Os27] and [Os30]) proved the converse.

This is true, and was proved by Kesten [Ke66].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 05 October 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Wouter van Doorn

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #998, https://www.erdosproblems.com/998, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
For any $0<\alpha<1$, let\[f(\alpha,n)=\frac{1}{\log n}\sum_{1\leq k\leq n}(\tfrac{1}{2}-\{ \alpha k\}).\]Does $f(\alpha,n)$ have an asymptotic distribution function?

In other words, is there a non-decreasing function $g$ such that $g(-\infty)=0$, $g(\infty)=1$,
and\[\lim_{n\to \infty}\lvert \{ \alpha\in (0,1): f(\alpha,n)\leq c\}\rvert=g(c)?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Kesten [Ke60] proved that if\[f(\alpha,\beta,n)=\frac{1}{\log n}\sum_{1\leq k\leq n}(\tfrac{1}{2}-\{\beta+\alpha k\})\]then $f(\alpha,\beta,n)$ has asymptotic distribution function\[g(c)=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\rho c}\frac{1}{1+t^2}\mathrm{d}t,\]where $\rho>0$ is an explicit constant.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1002, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1002, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Determine the infimum and supremum of\[\lvert \{ x\in \mathbb{R} : \lvert f(x)\rvert < 1\}\rvert\]as $f\in \mathbb{R}[x]$ ranges over all non-constant monic polynomials, all of whose roots are real and in the interval $[-1,1]$.
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58], who proved that the measure of the set in question is always at most $2\sqrt{2}$ under the assumption that all the roots are in $\{-1,1\}$, and conjecture this is the best possible upper bound.

They also note that the infimum of the set in question is less than $2$, as witnessed by $f(x)=(x+1)(x-1)^m$ for $m\geq 3$. They further note that if the roots are restricted to $[-2,2]$ then the infimum is zero, as witnessed by a small perturbation of the Chebyshev polynomials.

They further conjectured that, if the roots are restricted to $[-2,2]$, then\[\lvert \{ x\in \mathbb{R} : \lvert f(x)\rvert < 1\}\rvert\geq n^{-c}\]for an absolute constant $c>0$. This was proved by Pommerenke [Po61], who in fact showed that this set must contain an interval of width $\gg n^{-4}$.

The current best known bounds (see the discussion in the comments) are\[1.519\approx 2^{4/3}-1\leq \inf \leq 1.835\cdots\]and\[\sup = 2\sqrt{2}\approx 2.828.\]

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 11 January 2026.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem TerenceTao, zach_hunter
Interested in collaborating TerenceTao
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable BorisAlexeev, TerenceTao

Additional thanks to: Koizumi, Yongxi Lin, natso26, and Terence Tao

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1038, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1038, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f(z)=\prod_{i=1}^n(z-z_i)\in \mathbb{C}[z]$ with $\lvert z_i\rvert \leq 1$ for all $i$. Let $\rho(f)$ be the radius of the largest disc which is contained in $\{z: \lvert f(z)\rvert< 1\}$.

Determine the behaviour of $\rho(f)$. In particular, is it always true that $\rho(f)\gg 1/n$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian, who note that $f(z)=z^n-1$ has $\rho(f) \leq \frac{\pi/2}{n}$.

Pommerenke [Po61] proved that\[\rho(f) \geq \frac{1}{2en^2}.\]Krishnapur, Lundberg, and Ramachandran [KLR25] proved\[\rho(f) \gg \frac{1}{n\sqrt{\log n}}.\]

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 27 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Quanyu Tang and qawsed

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1039, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1039, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $F\subseteq \mathbb{C}$ be a closed infinite set, and let $\mu(F)$ be the infimum of\[\lvert \{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert < 1\}\rvert,\]as $f$ ranges over all polynomials of the shape $\prod (z-z_i)$ with $z_i\in F$.

Is $\mu(F)$ determined by the transfinite diameter of $F$? In particular, is $\mu(F)=0$ whenever the transfinite diameter of $F$ is $\geq 1$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58], who show that the answer is yes if $F$ is a line segment or disc, and that if the transfinite diameter is $<1$ then $\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert < 1\}$ always contains a disc of radius $\gg_F 1$.

Erdős and Netanyahu [ErNe73] proved that if $F$ is also bounded and connected, with transfinite diameter $0<c<1$, then $\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert < 1\}$ always contains a disc of radius $\gg_c 1$.

The transfinite diameter of $F$, also known as the logarithmic capacity, is defined by\[\rho(F)=\lim_{n\to \infty}\sup_{z_1,\ldots,z_n\in F}\left(\prod_{i<j}\lvert z_i-z_j\rvert\right)^{1/\binom{n}{2}}.\]

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 15 September 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1040, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1040, accessed 2026-01-16
FALSIFIABLE Open, but could be disproved with a finite counterexample.
Let $f(z)=\prod_{i=1}^n(z-z_i)\in \mathbb{C}[z]$ with $\lvert z_i\rvert < 1$ for all $i$.

Must there always exist a path of length less than $2$ in\[\{z: \lvert f(z)\rvert < 1\}\]which connects two of the roots of $f$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58], who proved that this set always has a connected component containing at least two of the roots.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 06 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: msellke and qawsed

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1041, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1041, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $F\subset\mathbb{C}$ be a closed set of transfinite diameter $1$ which is not contained in any closed disc of radius $1$.

If $f(z)=\prod_{i=1}^n(z-z_i)\in\mathbb{C}[x]$ with all $z_i\in F$ then can\[\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert < 1\}\]have $n$ connected components?

If the transfinite diameter of $F$ is $<1$ then must this set only have at most $(1-c)n$ connected components, where $c>0$ depends only on $F$ (or just the transfinite diameter of $F$)?
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranien [EHP58], who proved that if $F$ is the disc of radius $1$ then this set can have $n$ connected components (for example $f(z)=z^n+1$).

The transfinite diameter of $F$, also known as the logarithmic capacity, is defined by\[\rho(F)=\lim_{n\to \infty}\sup_{z_1,\ldots,z_n\in F}\left(\prod_{i<j}\lvert z_i-z_j\rvert\right)^{1/\binom{n}{2}}.\]This was solved by Ghosh and Ramachandran [GhRa24], who proved that, if $d$ is the transfinite diameter of $F$, then

  • if $0<d<1$ then the set has at most $(1-c)n$ connected components for some $c>0$ depending on $F$;

  • if $d\leq 1/4$ and $F$ is connected then the set has only one connected component;

  • there are examples with $d=1$ such that, for infinitely many $n$, the set can have $n$ connected components.


They also note that the answer cannot depend only on the transfinite diameter of $F$ - for example, both $F_1=\{ z: \lvert z\rvert\leq 1/2\}$ and $F_2=[-1,1]$ have transfinite diameter $1/2$, but the former always has one connected component, and the latter can have $\gg n$ many connected components.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 15 September 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1042, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1042, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED (LEAN) This has been solved in the negative and the proof verified in Lean.
Let $f\in \mathbb{C}[x]$ be a monic non-constant polynomial. Must there exist a straight line $\ell$ such that the projection of\[\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert\leq 1\}\]onto $\ell$ has measure at most $2$?
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58].

Pommerenke [Po61] (using his previous work [Po59]) proved that the answer is no, and there exists such an $f$ for which the projection of this set onto every line has measure at least $2.386$. On the other hand, Pommerenke also proved there always exists a line such that the projection has measure at most $3.3$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 06 January 2026.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? Yes
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Yongxi Lin and Mark Sellke

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1043, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1043, accessed 2026-01-16
SOLVED This has been resolved in some other way than a proof or disproof.
Let $f(z)=\prod_{i=1}^n(z-z_i)\in\mathbb{C}[x]$ where $\lvert z_i\rvert\leq 1$ for all $i$. If $\Lambda(f)$ is the maximum of the lengths of the boundaries of the connected components of\[\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert<1\}\]then determine the infimum of $\Lambda(f)$.
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58].

This has been resolved by Tang, who proved that the infimum of $\Lambda(f)$ over all such $f$ is $2$. Tang also suggests that, if the degree $n$ is fixed, then the the infimum over all such $f$ of degree $n$ is attained by $f_n(z)=z^n-1$ (and proves this for $n=1$ and $n=2$).

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 16 January 2026.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Quanyu Tang

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1044, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1044, accessed 2026-01-16
FALSIFIABLE Open, but could be disproved with a finite counterexample.
Let $z_1,\ldots,z_n\in \mathbb{C}$ with $\lvert z_i-z_j\rvert\leq 2$ for all $i,j$, and\[\Delta(z_1,\ldots,z_n)=\prod_{i\neq j}\lvert z_i-z_j\rvert.\]What is the maximum possible value of $\Delta$? Is it maximised by taking the $z_i$ to be the vertices of a regular polygon?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58], who proved that, for any monic polynomial $f$, if $\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert <1\}$ is connected and $f$ has roots $z_1,\ldots,z_n$ then $\prod_{i\neq j}\lvert z_i-z_j\rvert <n^n$.

The value of $\Delta$ when the $z_i$ are the vertices of a regular polygon is $n^n$ when $n$ is even and\[\cos(\pi/2n)^{-n(n-1)}n^n \sim e^{\pi^2/8}n^n\]when $n$ is odd.

Pommerenke [Po61] proved that $\Delta \leq 2^{O(n)}n^n$ for all $z_i$ with $\lvert z_i-z_j\rvert \leq 2$.

Hu and Tang (see the comments) found examples when $n=4$ and $n=6$ that show that vertices of a regular polygon do not maximise $\Delta$. Cambie (also in the comments) showed that, in general, the vertices of a regular polygon are not a maximiser for all even $n\geq 4$.

There is a lot of discussion of this problem in the comments. It is now known that, for even $n$,\[\liminf \frac{\max \Delta}{n^n}\geq C\]for some $C>0$. This was proved with $C\approx 1.0378$ by Sothanaphan [So25]. An alternative construction by Cambie, Dong, and Tang (see the comments by Stijn Cambie) achieves $C\approx 1.304457$ for $6\mid n$, and $C\approx 1.26853$ for all even $n$.


It remains possible that the regular polygon is a maximiser for odd $n$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 30 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem StijnC, Quanyu_Tang, epistemologist
Interested in collaborating StijnC, Quanyu_Tang, epistemologist
Currently working on this problem Quanyu_Tang
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Stijn Cambie, Nat Sothanaphan, and Quanyu Tang

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1045, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1045, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative.
Let $f\in \mathbb{C}[x]$ be a monic polynomial and\[E=\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert <1\}.\]If $E$ is connected then is $E$ contained in a disc of radius $2$?
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58], who also ask, if $\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert\leq 1\}$ is connected, then what are the least possible diameter and greatest possible width of this set, and conjecture the answer is $2$ in both cases.

Their guess that the width is always at most $2$ is false, as Pommerenke [Po59] gave an example with width $>\sqrt{3}2^{1/3}\approx 2.18$.

The condition that $E$ is connected is equivalent to $E$ containing all zeros of $f'$.

The answer is yes, and in fact the centre of this disc can be taken to be $\frac{z_1+\cdots+z_n}{n}$, where the $z_i$ are the roots of $f$, as shown by Pommerenke [Po59].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 15 September 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1046, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1046, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative.
Let $f\in \mathbb{C}[x]$ be a monic polynomial with $m$ distinct roots, and let $c>0$ be a constant small enough such that $\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert\leq c\}$ has $m$ distinct connected components.

Must all these components be convex?
A question of Grunsky, which was reported by Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58].

The answer is no, as shown by Pommerenke [Po61], who showed that, if $k$ is sufficiently large, and $f(z)=z^k(z-a)$ where $a$ is sufficiently close to $(1+\frac{1}{k})k^{\frac{1}{k+1}}$, then $\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert\leq 1\}$ has two components, and the component which contains $0$ is not convex.

Goodman [Go66] proved that one of the three components of\[\{ z: \lvert (z^2+1)(z-2)^2\rvert < 5^{3/2}/4\}\]is not convex (depicted here, and constructed an example with simple roots, of degree $4$. The referee of the paper also gave the example of $\lvert z(z^5-1)\rvert<5.6^{-6/5}$ (depicted here).

Goodman raises the question of the maximum number of non-convex components that are possible as a function of the degree of $f$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 28 October 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1047, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1047, accessed 2026-01-16
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative.
If $f\in \mathbb{C}[x]$ is a monic polynomial with all roots satisfying $\lvert z\rvert \leq r$ for some $r<2$, then must\[\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert <1\}\]have a connected component with diameter $>2-r$?
A problem of Erdős, Herzog, and Piranian [EHP58].

Pommerenke [Po61] proved the answer is no for $r>1$, showing that if $f(z)=z^n-r^n$ then $\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert \leq 1\}$ has $n$ connected components, all with diameter $\to 0$ as $n\to \infty$.

On the other hand, if $0<r\leq 1$, then the answer is yes, as also shown by Pommerenke [Po61]. Indeed, Pommerenke showed that:

  • If $0\leq r\leq 1/2$ then the component which contains $0$ must have diameter $\geq 2$, which $f(z)=z^n$ shows is best possible,

  • If $1/2<r\leq \frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}$ then the component which contains $0$ must have diameter $>1/r$, and

  • If $\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}\leq r\leq 1$ then the component which contains $0$ must have diameter $>2-r^2$.

  • The example\[f(z)=(z^n+1)(z-1)^2(z-\omega)^{-1}(z-\overline{\omega})^{-1},\]where $\omega=e^{i\pi/n}$, shows one can have the maximum diameter $<1+o(1)$ when $r=1$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 15 September 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1048, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1048, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f(x)\in \mathbb{R}[x]$ be a polynomial of degree $n$ whose roots $\{a_0<\cdots<a_n\}$ are all real and form an arithmetic progression.

The differences between consecutive zeros of $f'(x)$, beginning from the midpoint of $(a_0,a_m)$ towards the endpoints, are monotonically increasing.
All the zeros of $f'(x)$ are all distinct real numbers in $(a_0,a_m)$ by Rolle's theorem.

This was proved by Balint [Ba60b]. Balint gives no source for the conjecture - presumably it was from Erdős in personal communication. Some generalisations of this were given by Lorch [Lo76].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Alfaiz

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1114, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1114, accessed 2026-01-16
SOLVED This has been resolved in some other way than a proof or disproof.
Let $f(z)$ be an entire function of finite order, and let $\Gamma$ be a rectifiable path on which $f(z)\to \infty$. Let $\ell(r)$ be the length of $\Gamma$ in the disc $\lvert z\rvert<r$.

Find a path for which $\ell(r)$ grows as slowly as possible, and estimate $\ell(r)$ in terms of $M(r)=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$.

In particular, can such a path $\Gamma$ be found for which $\ell(r)\ll r$?
A problem originally due to Hayman [Ha60], according to [GoEr79], although (confusingly) in the book [Ha74] by Hayman it is attributed to Erdős, as Problem 2.41.

Hayman [Ha60b] proved that if $\log M(r) \ll (\log r)^2$ then there exists a path $\Gamma$ on which $f(z)\to \infty$ and $\ell(r)=r$.

Disproved by Gol'dberg and Eremenko [GoEr79] who proved that for any function $\phi(r)$ which $\to \infty$ as $r\to \infty$ there is an entire function $f$ such that\[\log M(r) \ll \phi(r)(\log r)^2\]and there is no path $\Gamma$ on which $f(z)\to \infty$ and $\ell(r) \ll r$. They also construct such functions of any prescribed finite order in $[0,\infty)$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Alfaiz

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1115, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1115, accessed 2026-01-16
SOLVED This has been resolved in some other way than a proof or disproof.
For a meromorphic function $f$ let $n(r,a)$ count the number of roots of $f(z)=a$ in the disc $\lvert z\rvert <r$. Does there exist a meromorphic (or entire) $f$ such that for every $a\neq b$\[\limsup_{r\to \infty}\frac{n(r,a)}{n(r,b)}=\infty?\]
This is Problem 1.25 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

Gol'dberg [Go78] and Toppila [To76] have constructed entire functions with this property.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1116, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1116, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f(z)$ be an entire function which is not a monomial. Let $\nu(r)$ count the number of $z$ with $\lvert z\rvert=r$ such that $\lvert f(z)\rvert=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$. (This is a finite quantity if $f$ is not a monomial.)

Is it possible for\[\limsup \nu(r)=\infty?\]Is it possible for\[\liminf \nu(r)=\infty?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
This is Problem 2.16 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

The answer to the first question is yes, as shown by Herzog and Piranian [HePi68]. The second question is still open, although an 'approximate' affirmative answer is given by Glücksam and Pardo-Simón [GlPa24].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1117, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1117, accessed 2026-01-16
SOLVED This has been resolved in some other way than a proof or disproof.
Let $f(z)$ be a non-constant entire function such that, for some $c$, the set $E(c)=\{ z: \lvert f(z)\rvert >c\}$ has finite measure.

What is the minimum growth rate of $f(z)$?

If $E(c)$ has finite measure then must there exist $c'<c$ such that $E(c')$ has finite measure?
This is Problem 2.40 in [Ha74] where it is attributed to Erdős. Hayman conjectured that\[\int_0^\infty \frac{r}{\log\log M(r)}\mathrm{d}r<\infty\]is true, and best possible, where $M(r)=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$.

Hayman's strong conjecture was proved independently by Camera [Ca77] and Gol'dberg [Go79b].

The second question was answered in the negative by Gol'dberg [Go79b], who proved that if $T=\{ c>0 : \lvert E(c)\rvert <\infty\}$ then for any $m>0$ there exist entire functions $f$ such that $T=[m,\infty)$ or $T=(m,\infty)$. (It is clear that $T=\emptyset$ and $T=(0,\infty)$ are also possible.)

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 29 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1118, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1118, accessed 2026-01-16
INDEPENDENT Independent of the usual axioms of set theory (ZFC).
Let $\mathfrak{m}$ be an infinite cardinal with $\aleph_0<\mathfrak{m}<\mathfrak{c}=2^{\aleph_0}$. Let $\{f_\alpha\}$ be a family of entire functions such that, for every $z_0\in \mathbb{C}$, there are at most $\mathfrak{m}$ distinct values of $f_\alpha(z_0)$. Must $\{f_\alpha\}$ have cardinality at most $\mathfrak{m}$?
This is Problem 2.46 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős.

Erdős [Er64g] proved (answering a question of Wetzel) that if there are only countably many distinct values for each $f_\alpha(z_0)$ then, if $\mathfrak{c}>\aleph_1$, the family $\{f_\alpha\}$ is itself countable, and also showed this is false if $\mathfrak{c}=\aleph_1$.

In [Ha74] it is written that it is 'easy to see' the answer is yes if $\mathfrak{m}^+<\mathfrak{c}$, and also that it is possible that the question is undecidable.

Indeed, it has been shown that this is undecidable if $\mathfrak{m}^+=\mathfrak{c}$: Kumar and Shelah [KuSh17] have shown that there is a model in which $\mathfrak{c}=\aleph_2$ such that the answer is yes (with $\mathfrak{m}=\aleph_1$), while Schilhan and Weinert [ScWe24] have shown the answer can be no, in a different model with $\mathfrak{c}=\aleph_2$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 31 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Jake Mallen

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1119, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1119, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $f\in \mathbb{C}[z]$ be a monic polynomial of degree $n$, all of whose roots satisfy $\lvert z\rvert\leq 1$. Let\[E= \{ z : \lvert f(z)\rvert \leq 1\}.\]What is the shortest length of a path in $E$ joining $z=0$ to $\lvert z\rvert =1$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
This is Problem 4.22 in [Ha74], where it is attributed to Erdős. In [Ha74] it is reported that Clunie and Netanyahu (personal communication) showed that a path always exists which joins $z=0$ to $\lvert z\rvert=1$ in $A$.

Erdős wrote 'presumably this tends to infinity with $n$, but not too fast'.

The trivial lower bound for the length of this path is $1$, which is achieved for $f(z)=z^n$. The interesting side of this question is what the worst case behaviour is (as a function of $n$).

See also [1041].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 30 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem thomas
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1120, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1120, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be such that\[2f(x) \leq f(x+h)+f(x+2h)\]for every $x\in \mathbb{R}$ and $h>0$. Must $f$ be monotonic?
A problem of Kemperman [Ke69], who proved it is true if $f$ is measurable. Erdős [Er81b] wrote 'if it were my problem I would offer \$500 for it'.

This was solved by Laczkovich [La84].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 30 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1125, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1125, accessed 2026-01-16
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
If\[f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)\]for almost all $x,y\in \mathbb{R}$ then there exists a function $g$ such that\[g(x+y)=g(x)+g(y)\]for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$ such that $f(x)=g(x)$ for almost all $x$.
Proved independently by de Bruijn [dB66] and Jurkat [Ju65].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 30 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1126, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1126, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
For $x_1,\ldots,x_n\in [-1,1]$ let\[l_k(x)=\frac{\prod_{i\neq k}(x-x_i)}{\prod_{i\neq k}(x_k-x_i)},\]which are such that $l_k(x_k)=1$ and $l_k(x_i)=0$ for $i\neq k$.

Describe which choice of $x_i$ minimise\[\Lambda(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=\max_{x\in [-1,1]} \sum_k \lvert l_k(x)\rvert.\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
The functions $l_k(x)$ are sometimes called the fundamental functions of Lagrange interpolation, and $\Lambda$ is sometimes called the Lebesgue constant.

Faber [Fa14] proved\[\Lambda(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\gg \log n\]for all choices of $x_i$, and Bernstein [Be31] proved it is $>(\frac{2}{\pi}-o(1))\log n$. Erdős [Er61c] improved this to\[\Lambda(x_1,\ldots,x_n)> \frac{2}{\pi}\log n-O(1).\]This is best possible, since taking the $x_i$ as the roots of the $n$th Chebyshev polynomial yields\[\Lambda(x_1,\ldots,x_n)< \frac{2}{\pi}\log n+O(1).\]Erdős thought that the minimising choice is characterised by the property that the sums\[\max_{x\in [x_i,x_{i+1}]}\sum_k \lvert l_k(x)\rvert\]are all equal for $0\leq i\leq n$ (where $x_0=-1$ and $x_{n+1}=1$).

If $x_1=-1$ and $x_n=1$ then there is a unique minimising set of $x_i$, which are symmetric around $0$. (Such a choice is called canonical.)

The minimising canonical choice is known only for $n\leq 4$. For $n=2$ the points are $-1,1$ (with $\Lambda=1$). For $n=3$ the points are $-1,0,1$ (with $\Lambda=1.25$), as shown by Bernstein [Be31]. Rack and Vajda [RaVa15] have shown that for $n=4$ the points are $-1,-t,t,1$ where $t\approx 0.4177$ is an explicit algebraic constant (with $\Lambda \approx 1.4229$).

In [Er67] Erdős suggests that an easier variant might be to have the $x_i\in \mathbb{C}$ with $\lvert x_i\rvert=1$, and seek to minimise $\max_{\lvert z\rvert=1}\sum_{k}\lvert l_k(z)\rvert$, adding it 'seems certain' that the minimising $x_i$ are the $n$th roots of unity. This was proved by Brutman [Br80] for odd $n$ and by Brutman and Pinkus [BrPi80] for even $n$.

See also [1130] and [1132].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 31 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1129, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1129, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
For $x_1,\ldots,x_n\in [-1,1]$ let\[l_k(x)=\frac{\prod_{i\neq k}(x-x_i)}{\prod_{i\neq k}(x_k-x_i)},\]which are such that $l_k(x_k)=1$ and $l_k(x_i)=0$ for $i\neq k$.

Let $x_0=-1$ and $x_{n+1}=1$ and\[\Upsilon(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=\min_{0\leq i\leq n}\max_{x\in[x_i,x_{i+1}]} \sum_k \lvert l_k(x)\rvert.\]Is it true that\[\Upsilon(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\ll \log n?\]Describe which choice of $x_i$ maximise $\Upsilon(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$.
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
The functions $l_k(x)$ are sometimes called the fundamental functions of Lagrange interpolation.

Erdős [Er47] could prove\[\Upsilon(x_1,\ldots,x_n)< \sqrt{n}.\]Erdős thought that the maximising choice is characterised by the property that the sums\[\max_{x\in [x_i,x_{i+1}]}\sum_k \lvert l_k(x)\rvert\]are all equal for $0\leq i\leq n$ (where $x_0=-1$ and $x_{n+1}=1$), which would be the same (conjectured) characterisation as [1129].

See also [1129].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 31 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1130, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1130, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
For $x_1,\ldots,x_n\in [-1,1]$ let\[l_k(x)=\frac{\prod_{i\neq k}(x-x_i)}{\prod_{i\neq k}(x_k-x_i)},\]which are such that $l_k(x_k)=1$ and $l_k(x_i)=0$ for $i\neq k$.

What is the minimal value of\[I(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=\int_{-1}^1 \sum_k \lvert l_k(x)\rvert^2\mathrm{d}x?\]In particular, is it true that\[\min I =2-(1+o(1))\frac{1}{n}?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Erdős first conjectured this minimum was achieved by taking the $x_i$ to be the roots of the integral of the Legendre polynomial, since Fejer [Fe32] had earlier shown these to be minimisers of\[\max_{x\in [-1,1]}\sum_k \lvert l_k(x)\rvert^2.\]This was disproved by Szabados [Sz66] for every $n>3$.

Erdős, Szabados, Varma, and Vértesi [ESVV94] proved that\[2-O\left(\frac{(\log n)^2}{n}\right)\leq \min I\leq 2-\frac{2}{2n-1}\]where the upper bound is witnessed by the roots of the integral of the Legendre polynomial as above.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 31 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1131, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1131, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
For $x_1,\ldots,x_n\in [-1,1]$ let\[l_k(x)=\frac{\prod_{i\neq k}(x-x_i)}{\prod_{i\neq k}(x_k-x_i)},\]which are such that $l_k(x_k)=1$ and $l_k(x_i)=0$ for $i\neq k$.

Let $x_1,x_2,\ldots\in [-1,1]$ be an infinite sequence, and let\[L_n(x) = \sum_{1\leq k\leq n}\lvert l_k(x)\rvert,\]where each $l_k(x)$ is defined above with respect to $x_1,\ldots,x_n$.

Must there exist $x\in (-1,1)$ such that\[L_n(x) >\frac{2}{\pi}\log n-O(1)\]for infinitely many $n$?

Is it true that\[\limsup_{n\to \infty}\frac{L_n(x)}{\log n}\geq \frac{2}{\pi}\]for almost all $x\in (-1,1)$?
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A result of Bernstein [Be31] implies that the set of $x\in(-1,1)$ for which\[\limsup_{n\to \infty}\frac{L_n(x)}{\log n}\geq \frac{2}{\pi}\]is everywhere dense.

Erdős [Er61c] proved that, for any fixed $x_1,\ldots,x_n\in [-1,1]$,\[\max_{x\in [-1,1]}\sum_{1\leq k\leq n}\lvert l_k(x)\rvert>\frac{2}{\pi}\log n-O(1).\]See also [1129] for more on $L_n(x)$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 31 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1132, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1132, accessed 2026-01-16
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $C>0$. There exists $\epsilon>0$ such that if $n$ is sufficiently large the following holds.

For any $x_1,\ldots,x_n\in [-1,1]$ there exist $y_1,\ldots,y_n\in [-1,1]$ such that, if $P$ is a polynomial of degree $m<(1+\epsilon)n$ with $P(x_i)=y_i$ for at least $(1-\epsilon)n$ many $1\leq i\leq n$, then\[\max_{x\in [-1,1]}\lvert P(x)\rvert >C.\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Erdős proved that, for any $C>0$, there exists $\epsilon>0$ such that if $n$ is sufficiently large and $m=\lfloor (1+\epsilon)n\rfloor$ then for any $x_1,\ldots,x_m\in [-1,1]$ there is a polynomial $P$ of degree $n$ such that $\lvert P(x_i)\rvert\leq 1$ for $1\leq i\leq m$ and\[\max_{x\in [-1,1]}\lvert P(x)\rvert>C.\]The conjectured statement would also imply this, but Erdős in [Er67] says he could not even prove it for $m=n$.

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 31 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1133, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1133, accessed 2026-01-16