Dual View Random Solved Random Open
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $n_1<n_2<\cdots$ be a lacunary sequence of integers and $f\in L^2([0,1])$. Estimate the growth of, for almost all $\alpha$,\[\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}f(\{ \alpha n_k\}).\]For example, is it true that, for almost all $\alpha$,\[\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}f(\{ \alpha n_k\})=o(N\sqrt{\log\log N})?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
Erdős [Er49d] constructed a lacunary sequence and $f\in L^2([0,1])$ such that, for every $\epsilon>0$, for almost all $\alpha$\[\limsup_{N\to \infty}\frac{1}{N(\log\log N)^{\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon}}\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}f(\{\alpha n_k\})=\infty.\]Erdős also proved that, for every lacunary sequence and $f\in L^2$, for every $\epsilon>0$, for almost all $\alpha$,\[\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}\sum_{1\leq k\leq N}f(\{\alpha n_k\})=o( N(\log N)^{\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon}).\]Erdős [Er64b] thought that his lower bound was closer to the truth.

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #995, https://www.erdosproblems.com/995, accessed 2026-01-14