Dual View Random Solved Random Open
PROVED This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $k(N)$ denote the size of the largest set $A\subseteq \{1,\ldots,N\}$ such that the sets\[S_r = \{ a_1+\cdots +a_r : a_1<\cdots<a_r\in A\}\]are disjoint for distinct $r\geq 1$. Estimate $k(N)$ - in particular, is it true that $k(N)\sim 2N^{1/2}$?
Straus [St66] calls such sets admissible, and proved that\[\limsup \frac{k(N)}{N^{1/2}}\leq \frac{4}{\sqrt{3}}=2.309\cdots,\]and that $A=(N-k,N]\cap \mathbb{N}$ has this property for $k=2m-1$ if $N\in [m^2,m^2+m)$ and for $k=2m$ if $N\in [m^2+m,(m+1)^2)$, which implies that\[\liminf \frac{k(N)}{N^{1/2}}\geq 2.\]Erdős, Nicolas, and Sárközy [ENS91] improved the upper bound to\[\limsup \frac{k(N)}{N^{1/2}}\leq (143/27)^{1/2}=2.301\cdots.\]The conjecture was proved (for all large $N$) by Deshouillers and Freiman [DeFr99], who further show that in some cases the largest such $A$ has the form $(N-k,N]\cap \mathbb{N}$ as above.

See also [186] and [789]. For an infinite version of this problem see [875].

View the LaTeX source

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Related OEIS sequences: Possible
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #874, https://www.erdosproblems.com/874, accessed 2026-01-16