OPEN
This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Do the squares contain arbitrarily long quasi-progressions? That is, does there exist some constant $C>0$ such that, for any $k$, the squares contain a sequence $x_1,\ldots,x_k$ where, for some $d$ and all $1\leq i<k$,\[x_i+d\leq x_{i+1}\leq x_i+d+C.\]Do the squares contain arbitrarily large cubes\[a+\left\{ \sum_i \epsilon_ib_i : \epsilon_i\in \{0,1\}\right\}?\]
A question of Brown, Erdős, and Freedman
[BEF90]. It is a classical fact that the squares do not contain arithmetic progressions of length $4$.
An affirmative answer to the first question implies an affirmative answer to the second.
Solymosi
[So07] conjectured the answer to the second question is no. Cilleruelo and Granville
[CiGr07] have observed that the answer to the second question is no conditional on the
Bombieri-Lang conjecture.
View the LaTeX source
When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:
T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #782, https://www.erdosproblems.com/782, accessed 2026-01-16