NOT PROVABLE
Open in general, but there exist models of set theory where the result is false.
Let $\mathfrak{m}$ be an infinite cardinal and $G$ be a graph with chromatic number $\mathfrak{m}$. Is it true that, for every infinite cardinal $\mathfrak{n}< \mathfrak{m}$, there exists a subgraph of $G$ with chromatic number $\mathfrak{n}$?
A question of Galvin
[Ga73], who proved that this is true with $\mathfrak{m}=\aleph_0$. Galvin also proved that the stronger version of this statement, in which the subgraph is induced, implies $2^{\mathfrak{k}}<2^{\mathfrak{n}}$ for all cardinals $\mathfrak{k}<\mathfrak{n}$.
Komjáth
[Ko88b] proved it is consistent that\[2^{\aleph_0}=2^{\aleph_1}=2^{\aleph_2}=\aleph_3\]and that there exist graphs which fail this property (with $\mathfrak{m}=\aleph_2$ and $\mathfrak{n}=\aleph_1$).
Shelah
[Sh90] proved that, assuming the axiom of constructibility, the answer is yes with $\mathfrak{m}=\aleph_2$ and $\mathfrak{n}=\aleph_1$.
It remains open whether the answer to this question is yes assuming the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis, for example.
View the LaTeX source
This page was last edited 01 October 2025.
When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:
T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #739, https://www.erdosproblems.com/739, accessed 2026-01-16