Dual View Random Solved Random Open
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $k\geq 2$ and $q(n,k)$ denote the least prime which does not divide $\prod_{1\leq i\leq k}(n+i)$. Is it true that, if $k$ is fixed and $n$ is sufficiently large, we have\[q(n,k)<(1+o(1))\log n?\]
Disclaimer: The open status of this problem reflects the current belief of the owner of this website. There may be literature on this problem that I am unaware of, which may partially or completely solve the stated problem. Please do your own literature search before expending significant effort on solving this problem. If you find any relevant literature not mentioned here, please add this in a comment.
A problem of Erdős and Pomerance.

The bound $q(n,k)<(1+o(1))k\log n$ is easy. It may be true this improved bound holds even up to $k=o(\log n)$.

A heuristic argument in favour of this is provided by Tao in the comments.

See also [457].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 02 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Related OEIS sequences: A391668
Likes this problem Alfaiz
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Terence Tao

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #663, https://www.erdosproblems.com/663, accessed 2026-01-14