PROVED
This has been solved in the affirmative.
Let $f(z)=\sum_{k\geq 1}a_k z^{n_k}$ be an entire function of finite order such that $\lim n_k/k=\infty$. Let $M(r)=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$ and $m(r)=\min_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$. Is it true that\[\limsup\frac{\log m(r)}{\log M(r)}=1?\]
A problem of Pólya
[Po29]. Results of Wiman
[Wi14] imply that if $(n_{k+1}-n_k)^2>n_k$ then $\limsup \frac{m(r)}{M(r)}=1$. Erdős and Macintyre
[ErMa54] proved this under the assumption that\[\sum_{k\geq 2}\frac{1}{n_{k+1}-n_k}<\infty.\]This was solved in the affirmative by Fuchs
[Fu63], who proved that in fact for any $\epsilon>0$\[\log m(r)> (1-\epsilon)\log M(r)\]holds outside a set of logarithmic density $0$.
Kovari
[Ko65] has shown that the $\limsup$ is also $1$ for an arbitrary entire function given the stronger assumption that $n_k>k(\log k)^{2+c}$ for some $c>0$. It is conjectured that this condition can be replaced with $\sum \frac{1}{n_k}<\infty$. This would be best possible, as Macintyre
[Ma52] has shown that, given any $n_k$ with $\sum \frac{1}{n_k}=\infty$, there is a corresponding entire function which tends to zero along the positive real axis.
In
[Er61] this is asked with $m(r)=\max_n \lvert a_nr^n\rvert$, but with this definition the desired equality is a simple consequence of
[Wi14] (see the comment by Quanyu Tang).
View the LaTeX source
This page was last edited 28 December 2025.
Additional thanks to: Quanyu Tang and Terence Tao
When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:
T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #516, https://www.erdosproblems.com/516, accessed 2026-01-16