DISPROVED
This has been solved in the negative.
- $1000
Can the smallest modulus of a covering system be arbitrarily large?
Described by Erdős as 'perhaps my favourite problem'. Hough
[Ho15], building on work of Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance, and Yu
[FFKPY07], has shown (contrary to Erdős' expectations) that the answer is no: the smallest modulus must be at most $10^{16}$.
An alternative, simpler, proof was given by Balister, Bollobás, Morris, Sahasrabudhe, and Tiba
[BBMST22], who improved the upper bound on the smallest modulus to $616000$.
The best known lower bound is a covering system whose minimum modulus is $42$, due to Owens
[Ow14].
View the LaTeX source
This page was last edited 28 December 2025.
Additional thanks to: Alfaiz and Desmond Weisenberg
When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:
T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #2, https://www.erdosproblems.com/2, accessed 2026-01-14