Dual View Random Solved Random Open
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative. - $1000
Can the smallest modulus of a covering system be arbitrarily large?
Described by Erdős as 'perhaps my favourite problem'. Hough [Ho15], building on work of Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance, and Yu [FFKPY07], has shown (contrary to Erdős' expectations) that the answer is no: the smallest modulus must be at most $10^{16}$.

An alternative, simpler, proof was given by Balister, Bollobás, Morris, Sahasrabudhe, and Tiba [BBMST22], who improved the upper bound on the smallest modulus to $616000$.

The best known lower bound is a covering system whose minimum modulus is $42$, due to Owens [Ow14].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 28 December 2025.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Related OEIS sequences: A160559
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None

Additional thanks to: Alfaiz and Desmond Weisenberg

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #2, https://www.erdosproblems.com/2, accessed 2026-01-14