OPEN
This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
For $r\geq 3$ let $d_r(e)$ be the minimal $d$ such that\[\mathrm{ex}_r(n,\mathcal{F})=o(n^2),\]where $\mathcal{F}$ is the family of $r$-uniform hypergraphs on $d$ vertices with $e$ edges.
Prove that\[d_r(e)=(r-2)e+3\]for all $r,e\geq 3$.
A conjecture of Brown, Erdős, and Sós
[BES73], who proved that $d_r(e)\geq (r-2)e+3$ (see also
[1076]).
Ruzsa and Szemerédi
[RuSz78] proved $d_3(3)=6$ (see
[716]).
Erdős, Frankl, and Rödl
[EFR86] proved\[d_r(3)= (r-2)3+3\]for all $r\geq 3$. Sárközy and Selkow
[SaSe05] proved\[d_r(e) \leq (r-2)e+2+\lfloor \log_2 e\rfloor\]for all $r,e\geq 3$. Solymosi and Solymosi
[SoSo17] proved that $d_3(10)\leq 14$. Conlon, Gishboliner, Levanzov, and Shapira
[CGLS23] proved\[d_3(e)\leq e+O\left(\frac{\log e}{\log\log e}\right)\]for all $e\geq 3$.
In
[Er75b] Erdős even asks whether, if $\mathcal{F}$ is the family of $3$-uniform hypergraphs on $k$ vertices with $k-3$ edges,\[\mathrm{ex}_3(n,\mathcal{F})\asymp n r_{k-3}(n),\]where $r_{k-3}(n)$ is the maximal size of a subset of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$ that does not contain a non-trivial arithmetic progression of length $k-3$. He states that Ruzsa has proved the lower bound for $k=6,7,8$.
See
[1157] for the general case.
View the LaTeX source
This page was last edited 26 January 2026.
When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:
T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1178, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1178, accessed 2026-03-01