Collaboration

Public Goods and Action Groups

To support the ongoing efforts of the Consortium for Cancer Implementation Science, a collection of public goods (widely available tools and resources) has been developed by the CCIS action groups to address key challenges and advance the implementation science agenda in cancer. If you are interested in getting involved with an action group, please contact us.

Active Action Groups

8 groups

Community Participation in Implementation Science

Est. 2020

The goal of this action group is to advance implementation science through identifying, elevating, and enhancing community-engaged research. Major goals include building competencies in research design and evaluation.

Chair
Samantha Harden, PhD, RYT 500Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Vice Chair
Elizabeth Cohn, RN, NP, PhD, FAANCity University of New York

Complex/Multi-level Contexts and Interventions

Est. 2020

The goals of this action group are to explore the interface of complex/multilevel interventions and implementation science, and to produce goods, tools, and tutorials to guide others seeking to apply implementation science to understand, design, and evaluate complex/multilevel interventions.

Chair
Katelyn Fox, PhD, RDBrown University
Vice Chair
Rachel Meadows, PhD, MPHJPS Health Network

Contextual Drivers in Implementation Science

Est. 2019

The Contextual Drivers of Implementation in Cancer Control action group focuses on understanding and addressing multi-level contextual factors that influence fair and ethical implementation of evidence-based practices along the cancer control continuum.

Chair
Callie Walsh-Bailey, PhD, MPHNorthwestern University
Vice Chair
Junqiang Zhao, PhDUniversity of Rochester

Environmental and Occupational Health in Implementation Science

Est. 2023

The goals of this action group are to foster transdisciplinary, multi-sectoral interactions and collaborations, and to learn to address key environmental and occupational health challenges using and advancing implementation science.

Chair
Cory Bradley, PhD, MPH, MSWNorthwestern University
Vice Chair
Virginia (Ginger) McKay, PhD, MAWashington University in St. Louis

Implementation and Technology

Est. 2019

The goal of this action group is to identify effective, evidence-based technologies; understand best practices, barriers, and facilitators of their adoption; and identify and address the evidence gaps that must be filled to move the field forward. This action group focuses on how health information and digital technologies can support the provision of guideline-concordant cancer prevention and care.

Chair
Melanie Powis, PhDUniversity of Toronto; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Vice Chair
Thomas Odeny, MD, MPH, PhDWashington University in St. Louis

Implementation Science in Global Health

Est. 2020

The goal of this action group is to focus on implementation science research and practice for global cancer control through collaboration and capacity building. The group aims to identify opportunities and potential strategies to increase the translation of evidence-based cancer control interventions into practice in both scalable and sustainable ways.

Chair
Godfrey Sama Philipo, MD, MPH, MGSCEast, Central, Southern Africa Health Community Secretariat
Vice Chair
Thembekile Shato, PhD, MPHWashington University in St. Louis

Learning Healthcare Systems as Natural Laboratories

Est. 2021

The goal of this action group is to identify opportunities and challenges to employing implementation science in learning healthcare system development, innovation, and evaluation. The action group hopes to promote and guide implementation research that examines the individual and collective importance of patient, clinician, and organizational/administrative attributes driving the systematic uptake of proven-effective interventions within learning healthcare systems.

Chair
Jennifer LeLaurin, PhDUniversity of Florida
Vice Chair
Maram Museitif, DrPH, MPH, CPHUT MD Anderson

Public Health Strategies in Implementation Science

Est. 2019

Our group facilitates work at the intersection of cancer implementation science and legislation, regulation, and public health decision-making, and their impact on cancer control. We will do this by bringing together experts to understand the landscape, develop strategies, and create public goods.

Chair
Amanda Petrik, PhDKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Vice Chair
Jessica Currier, PhDOregon Health & Science University Knight Cancer Institute

Inactive / Archived Groups

These action groups have completed their primary objectives or are currently on hiatus. Some have produced valuable public goods that remain available.

Economics and Cost in Implementation Science

Years Active: 2019 - 2020

The goal of this action group was to better understand implementation costs and who bears them, and to distinguish between the intervention and implementation costs.

Implementation Science Study Designs

Years Active: 2019 - 2022

The goal of this action group was to identify optimal research methods and study designs that accommodate rapid changes in context and responsive adaptations in the intervention and outcomes.

Precision Health and Big Data in Implementation Science

Years Active: 2019 - 2020

The goal of this action group was to guide and support efforts on emerging precision health activities along the cancer care continuum; build capacity through training programs for precision health researchers, clinicians, and communities; establish networks to develop measures and analytic tools specific to precision health and big data; and conduct pragmatic studies using learning health care system models.

Rapid Cycle Design in Implementation Science

Years Active: 2019 - 2020

The goal of this action group was to develop guidance for advancing methodology related to rapid cycle designs.

Funding Statement

The Consortium for Cancer Implementation Science is supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P30CA016086. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.