0
Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy led by a sovereign with unlimited power to maintain peace and order in society. He argued that individuals should give up certain rights in exchange for protection from the government. Hobbes's ideal government aimed to prevent the state of nature, which he viewed as chaotic and dangerous.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ross
Beau
RafaAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was Thomas Hobbes ideal form of government?
Thomas Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy as the ideal form of government. He argued that a strong central authority was necessary to maintain peace and prevent chaos in society. Hobbes believed that individuals should willingly surrender their rights to a ruler in exchange for protection and stability.
How did Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their view of the ideal form of government?
Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy as the ideal form of government to maintain order and prevent chaos. Rousseau, on the other hand, preferred a form of direct democracy where all citizens have a say in decision-making to promote freedom and equality.
What type of government did Thomas Hobbes promote?
Thomas Hobbes is known for promoting an absolute monarchy as the ideal form of government in his work "Leviathan." He believed that a powerful sovereign authority was necessary to prevent the chaos and violence that he associated with the state of nature.
What form of government was Thomas Hobbes in favor of?
Thomas Hobbes was in favor of an absolute monarchy as the ideal form of government. He believed that a strong central authority was necessary to prevent the chaos and violence that would result from individuals pursuing their own self-interest in a state of nature.
What did hobbes and Locke agree and disagree about with regard to government?
Hobbes and Locke both agreed that government is necessary to maintain order and protect people's rights. However, they disagreed on the nature of government. Hobbes believed in a strong, centralized government to prevent chaos, while Locke advocated for a limited government with power derived from the consent of the governed.
