Figure 5 , the difference between field and simulation work for applied voltage for the 52 km pipeline
Related Figures (21)
Table 3, Anode paralleling factors (P) for various numbers of anodes (N) installed in parallel. [1] Results Table 2, Weights and dimensions of high silicon chromium-bearing cast iron anodes [1] Fig.s (2) and (3) show the pipelines description. Simulation inputs and outputs tabulated in Tables 8 through 15. Table 4, the first pipe stations current requirement, voltage; number of anodes Table 5, the second pipe stations current requirement, voltage; number of anodes used and need Table 8, Simulation results for zone 1 of the second pipeline Table 10, Simulation results for zone 3 of the second pipeline Table 11, Simulation results for zone 4 of the second pipeline Table 13, Simulation results for zone 2 of the first pipeline Table 14, Simulation results for zone 3 of the first pipeline Fig. 4, the difference between field and simulation work for applied voltage for the 28 km pipeline Fig. 6, the anode resistance variation between the simulation work and field for each station for the 28km pipeline Fig. 7, the relation between the anode resistance and applied voltage for the 28km pipeline Fig. 8, the relation between the anode numbers versus anode resistance for the 52 km pipeline
![Table 3, Anode paralleling factors (P) for various numbers of anodes (N) installed in parallel. [1] Results Table 2, Weights and dimensions of high silicon chromium-bearing cast iron anodes [1]](https://figures.academia-assets.com/84620866/table_001.jpg)
