Table 2 Simulation results for @ = (A = 2.0,a = 0.5)T
Related Figures (21)
Figure 1. PDF shapes for the GRL distribution considering different values of A and a. Figure 2. Hazard rat function shapes for the GRL considering different values of A and a. The GRL distribution can be expressed as a two-component mixture Table 1. Mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis of the GRL distribution for different values of the parameters A and a Proposition 3. The r—th central moment for the GRL distribution is given by where the elements of the observed Fisher information matrix H(A,«) are given by with respect to A and w. Or equivalently, the OLSEs follow by solving the non-linear equations From the expressions al (g;t) =0, 21 (p;t) = 0, we get the likelihood equations Table 12. Goodness-of-fit statistics, MLEs and SEs for leukaemia data Table 13. Goodness-of-fit statistics, MLEs and SEs for epicenter data Table 14. The parameter estimates under various estimation methods and the goodness-of-fit statistics for leukaemia data Figure 3. PDFs and CDFs of the fitted models for leukaemia data Table 15. The parameter estimates under various estimation methods and the goodness-of-fit statistics for epicenter data Figure 5. The HRF plot of the GRL distribution and TTT plot for leukaemia date Figure 6. The HRF plot of the GRL distribution and TTT plot for epicenter data Table 5. Simulation results for @ = (A = 2.0,a = 3.5)T Table 9. Simulation results for @ = (A = 3.1,a = 3.5)T
