Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure from:Time-emotion paradox

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 2. Difference scores (p(long) emotion—p(long) neutral) plotted against stimulus durations, as a function of age groups, for the facial expressions of (a) anger and (0) fear. Diamonds, adults; squares, eight years; crosses, 5 years.

Figure 2 Difference scores (p(long) emotion—p(long) neutral) plotted against stimulus durations, as a function of age groups, for the facial expressions of (a) anger and (0) fear. Diamonds, adults; squares, eight years; crosses, 5 years.

Related Figures (6)

Figure 1. The temporal information processing model (Gibbon et al. 1984).
Figure 1. The temporal information processing model (Gibbon et al. 1984).
Figure 3. Difference scores (p(long) emotion—p(long) neutral) plotted against stimulus durations, as a function of age groups, for facial expressions of sadness. Diamonds, adults; squares, 8 years; crosses, 5 years. 1948 S. Droit-Volet & S. Gil Review. The time—emotion paradox
Figure 3. Difference scores (p(long) emotion—p(long) neutral) plotted against stimulus durations, as a function of age groups, for facial expressions of sadness. Diamonds, adults; squares, 8 years; crosses, 5 years. 1948 S. Droit-Volet & S. Gil Review. The time—emotion paradox
Figure 4. Difference scores (p(long) emotion—p(long) neutral) plotted against stimulus durations, as a function of age groups, for facial expressions of shame. Diamonds, adults; squares, 8 years; crosses, 5 years.
Figure 4. Difference scores (p(long) emotion—p(long) neutral) plotted against stimulus durations, as a function of age groups, for facial expressions of shame. Diamonds, adults; squares, 8 years; crosses, 5 years.
Figure 5. Examples of (a) elderly and (6) young women’s faces with a neutral expression.
Figure 5. Examples of (a) elderly and (6) young women’s faces with a neutral expression.
Figure 6. Proportion of long responses plotted against the stimulus duration value for (a) men and (6) women and the faces of a young man and woman and an elderly man and woman. Filled circles, elderly woman; open circles, young woman; filled squares, elderly man; open squares, young man.
Figure 6. Proportion of long responses plotted against the stimulus duration value for (a) men and (6) women and the faces of a young man and woman and an elderly man and woman. Filled circles, elderly woman; open circles, young woman; filled squares, elderly man; open squares, young man.
Figure 7. Difference scores (p(long) emotion—p(long) neutral) for the Caucasian participants seeing Chinese versus Caucasian faces, as a function of the participants’ empathy level. White bars, low empathics; black bars, high empathics.
Figure 7. Difference scores (p(long) emotion—p(long) neutral) for the Caucasian participants seeing Chinese versus Caucasian faces, as a function of the participants’ empathy level. White bars, low empathics; black bars, high empathics.