![Ss] bid., 287. 3¢Keith Miller’s Perspectives on an Evolving Creation (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003) gives several different views on Adam and Eve. James Hurd’s article in the compen- dium, “Hominids in the Garden,” presents the difficulty of an ex nihilo view scripturally, yet he still attempts to “harmonize the paleontological record with the biblical account” (p. 224), once again showing the deep-seated con- cordism that is causing the problems. This ends up tacking an Adam and Eve on the tail end of evolutionary processes simply to try “to have one’s cake and eat it too.” For more examples, see Darrell Falk, Coming to Peace with Science (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004) where in the last pages of the book he says it “certainly is still possible that Adam and Eve were real individuals who lived in real 38Michael Reiss, a former director of education for the Royal Society, stepped down from his position as a result of misinterpretations regarding comments on creationism. Reiss felt that science teachers should take the time to explain why creationism is not a valid scientific theory. Many took this to mean he was advocating the teaching of creationism in Britain’s science classrooms. Ian Sample, “Professor Steps Down over Creationism Row,” The Guard- ian, 17 September 2008 [newspaper on-line];available from www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2008/sep/17/ mainsection/uknews; Internet; accessed 4 October 2008.](https://figures.academia-assets.com/2698057/figure_001.jpg)
Figure 1 Ss] bid., 287. 3¢Keith Miller’s Perspectives on an Evolving Creation (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003) gives several different views on Adam and Eve. James Hurd’s article in the compen- dium, “Hominids in the Garden,” presents the difficulty of an ex nihilo view scripturally, yet he still attempts to “harmonize the paleontological record with the biblical account” (p. 224), once again showing the deep-seated con- cordism that is causing the problems. This ends up tacking an Adam and Eve on the tail end of evolutionary processes simply to try “to have one’s cake and eat it too.” For more examples, see Darrell Falk, Coming to Peace with Science (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004) where in the last pages of the book he says it “certainly is still possible that Adam and Eve were real individuals who lived in real 38Michael Reiss, a former director of education for the Royal Society, stepped down from his position as a result of misinterpretations regarding comments on creationism. Reiss felt that science teachers should take the time to explain why creationism is not a valid scientific theory. Many took this to mean he was advocating the teaching of creationism in Britain’s science classrooms. Ian Sample, “Professor Steps Down over Creationism Row,” The Guard- ian, 17 September 2008 [newspaper on-line];available from www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2008/sep/17/ mainsection/uknews; Internet; accessed 4 October 2008.