Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure from:Analytical  Hierarchy Processes: An Application of the Risk Prioritation Assessment for Towns Affects to Natural Risks,  in the  Region of Aysen

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 7. Sensitive risk towns set for both scenarios Following Figure 7 compares towns classified with high or unacceptable risk level.

Figure 7 Sensitive risk towns set for both scenarios Following Figure 7 compares towns classified with high or unacceptable risk level.

Related Figures (10)

The quantitative values of the environmental risk index given by AHP were translated into a qualitativ: risk scale of intensity. This scale summarizes the vulnerability range in the following levels:
The quantitative values of the environmental risk index given by AHP were translated into a qualitativ: risk scale of intensity. This scale summarizes the vulnerability range in the following levels:
Figure 4. Towns ranking for scenario with geological risk According to the above definition, the towns were sorted and classified as indicated in next Figure for the scenario with geological risk included.
Figure 4. Towns ranking for scenario with geological risk According to the above definition, the towns were sorted and classified as indicated in next Figure for the scenario with geological risk included.
Figure 5. Graphical ranking for scenario with geological risk
Figure 5. Graphical ranking for scenario with geological risk
In this case, the town ranking is the following:
In this case, the town ranking is the following:
Figure 6. Town ranking for scenario without geological risk
Figure 6. Town ranking for scenario without geological risk
Following table and graphic show the final town vulnerability considering both scenarios. High or unacceptable risk situations are emphasized with bold font; towns with moderate risk have italic font while normal font is associated to low risk towns.
Following table and graphic show the final town vulnerability considering both scenarios. High or unacceptable risk situations are emphasized with bold font; towns with moderate risk have italic font while normal font is associated to low risk towns.
Following Figure 9 shows the above in a graphically view.
Following Figure 9 shows the above in a graphically view.
Figure 8. Comparison of town rankings for both scenarios
Figure 8. Comparison of town rankings for both scenarios