Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure from:2008 - Jonsson et al - J Chromatography A.pdf

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 4. De-conjugated APs in fish bile taken from PW exposed and control fish (n=5 for each of the three groups). Peak abbreviations are decoded in Table 1. *Significantly different (p <0.05) from control group. Error bars indicate 1 SD. There seems to be a general trend of increasing metabo- lite concentration with increasing degree of alkylation when

Figure 4 De-conjugated APs in fish bile taken from PW exposed and control fish (n=5 for each of the three groups). Peak abbreviations are decoded in Table 1. *Significantly different (p <0.05) from control group. Error bars indicate 1 SD. There seems to be a general trend of increasing metabo- lite concentration with increasing degree of alkylation when

Related Figures (8)

Fig. 1. Reconstructed ion chromatogram of a calibration standard. Peak numbers correspond to the numbers listed in Table 1. Calibration curves (nine levels, concentrations ranged from 3 to 1500 ng/g) for quantitative analysis were fitted by least-
Fig. 1. Reconstructed ion chromatogram of a calibration standard. Peak numbers correspond to the numbers listed in Table 1. Calibration curves (nine levels, concentrations ranged from 3 to 1500 ng/g) for quantitative analysis were fitted by least-
Abbreviations and chromatography parameters for alkylphenols
Abbreviations and chromatography parameters for alkylphenols
Alkylphenols. Abbreviations of individual alkylphenols are defined in Table 1 > Signal to noise ratios are 3:1 for average values. “ Standard deviation. 1 Not determined due to high background levels. Instrumental and overall limits of detection (LODs) for determination of alkylphenols in fish bile
Alkylphenols. Abbreviations of individual alkylphenols are defined in Table 1 > Signal to noise ratios are 3:1 for average values. “ Standard deviation. 1 Not determined due to high background levels. Instrumental and overall limits of detection (LODs) for determination of alkylphenols in fish bile
Fig. 2. Ion chromatograms of free (A) and TMS-derivatized (B) APs when analysed in high (upper chromatograms) and low (lower chromatograms) con- centrations. Peak abbreviations are decoded in Table 1.
Fig. 2. Ion chromatograms of free (A) and TMS-derivatized (B) APs when analysed in high (upper chromatograms) and low (lower chromatograms) con- centrations. Peak abbreviations are decoded in Table 1.
* Alkylphenols. Abbreviations of individual alkylphenols are defined in Table 1. > Standard deviation. © Nominal concentrations calculated from average AP concentration in PW storage containet 4 Not detected.
* Alkylphenols. Abbreviations of individual alkylphenols are defined in Table 1. > Standard deviation. © Nominal concentrations calculated from average AP concentration in PW storage containet 4 Not detected.
@ Alkylphenols. Abbreviations of individual alkylphenols are defined in Table 1. > Standard deviation. Recoveries of alkylphenols from spiked fish bile Table 4
@ Alkylphenols. Abbreviations of individual alkylphenols are defined in Table 1. > Standard deviation. Recoveries of alkylphenols from spiked fish bile Table 4
Fig. 3. De-conjugated APs in bile taken from PW exposed and control fish (n=5 for each of the three groups). Peak abbreviations are decoded in Table 1. *Significantly different (p <0.05) from control group. Error bars indicate 1 SD.
Fig. 3. De-conjugated APs in bile taken from PW exposed and control fish (n=5 for each of the three groups). Peak abbreviations are decoded in Table 1. *Significantly different (p <0.05) from control group. Error bars indicate 1 SD.
Fig. 5. Ion chromatograms of (A) 2,4,6-TMP, (B) 4-n-PenP, (C) 2,5-DIPP and (D) 4-t-OP in bile taken from PW exposed and control fish. Peak abbreviations and numbers are decoded in Table 1.
Fig. 5. Ion chromatograms of (A) 2,4,6-TMP, (B) 4-n-PenP, (C) 2,5-DIPP and (D) 4-t-OP in bile taken from PW exposed and control fish. Peak abbreviations and numbers are decoded in Table 1.