Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure from:Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Life Quality in children and adolescents in Norwegian Sign Language

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC); QoL score (LQo 28) ' CA children and adolescents—complete sample ? Cl: bootstrapped confidence intervals Table 4 Internal consistency for the ILC

Table 4 The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC); QoL score (LQo 28) ' CA children and adolescents—complete sample ? Cl: bootstrapped confidence intervals Table 4 Internal consistency for the ILC

Related Figures (9)

~ AUECnhnnaren attend DotnN Mainstream and Geal SCNOO!l » Children attending the deaf school for 1-2 days a week combine this with two or more week-long stays during the school year; that is, total number of answers is greater than the number of participants C Racad an ranartc af aver having iicad a hearing aid Table 1 Hearing-related characteristics (parent report)
~ AUECnhnnaren attend DotnN Mainstream and Geal SCNOO!l » Children attending the deaf school for 1-2 days a week combine this with two or more week-long stays during the school year; that is, total number of answers is greater than the number of participants C Racad an ranartc af aver having iicad a hearing aid Table 1 Hearing-related characteristics (parent report)
Sign Language Skills based on the sum scores of the sign language production scale (SPS) and the sign language understanding scale (SUS); range 0-12. Highe scores indicate better communication skills Spoken Languages Skills based on the sum scores of Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR); range 0-12. Higher scores indicate better communication skills CA children and adolescents—complete sample 1 Significant difference between scores for Sign Language Skills (M=8.87, SD = 1.82) and Spoken Language Skills (M= 11.28, SD = 1.70) for ages 6-11; t(22) = — 5.53, p<.001 ? One extreme outlier with a sum score of 4 (> 3 SD) was found for ages 6 to 11 for spoken language skills Table 2 Language-related information based on parent report
Sign Language Skills based on the sum scores of the sign language production scale (SPS) and the sign language understanding scale (SUS); range 0-12. Highe scores indicate better communication skills Spoken Languages Skills based on the sum scores of Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR); range 0-12. Higher scores indicate better communication skills CA children and adolescents—complete sample 1 Significant difference between scores for Sign Language Skills (M=8.87, SD = 1.82) and Spoken Language Skills (M= 11.28, SD = 1.70) for ages 6-11; t(22) = — 5.53, p<.001 ? One extreme outlier with a sum score of 4 (> 3 SD) was found for ages 6 to 11 for spoken language skills Table 2 Language-related information based on parent report
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC): Range of item scores 1-5, 1= high QoL; QoL score (LQo_98): range 0-28, 28 = high Qo 1 CA: children and adolescents—complete sample Table 3 Mean and SD for ILC-NSL and ILC-NOR self-report item scores and QoL Score (LQ,_59)
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC): Range of item scores 1-5, 1= high QoL; QoL score (LQo_98): range 0-28, 28 = high Qo 1 CA: children and adolescents—complete sample Table 3 Mean and SD for ILC-NSL and ILC-NOR self-report item scores and QoL Score (LQ,_59)
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC); QoL score (LQ) 52); CA: children and adolescents—complete samp: 1 (CC intraclass correlation coefficients based on a two-way mixed effects model with absolute agreement Table 5 |CCs' between ILC-NSL and ILC-NOR self-report
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC); QoL score (LQ) 52); CA: children and adolescents—complete samp: 1 (CC intraclass correlation coefficients based on a two-way mixed effects model with absolute agreement Table 5 |CCs' between ILC-NSL and ILC-NOR self-report
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC); AVE: average variance extracted Table 6 Factor loadings and AVE of the ILC-NSL and ILC-NOR based on PLS-SEM CA: (children, adolescents, complete sample)
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC); AVE: average variance extracted Table 6 Factor loadings and AVE of the ILC-NSL and ILC-NOR based on PLS-SEM CA: (children, adolescents, complete sample)
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC) QoL score (LQo_59) ' CA children and adolescents—complete sample ? Cl bootstrapped confidence intervals Table 8 Spearman rank correlations for the LQ) 5 of the ILC-NOR self- and parent report
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC) QoL score (LQo_59) ' CA children and adolescents—complete sample ? Cl bootstrapped confidence intervals Table 8 Spearman rank correlations for the LQ) 5 of the ILC-NOR self- and parent report
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC); QoL score (LQp_g ' CA children and adolescents—complete sample 2 Cl bootstrapped confidence intervals Table 7 Spearman rank correlations for the LQo_23 of the ILC-NSL self- and parent report
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC); QoL score (LQp_g ' CA children and adolescents—complete sample 2 Cl bootstrapped confidence intervals Table 7 Spearman rank correlations for the LQo_23 of the ILC-NSL self- and parent report
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC) ' comb.: A potential combination of the written and signed versions ? CA children and adolescents—complete sample Table 9 The DHH children and adolescents’ preferences for presentation of the ILC
The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC) ' comb.: A potential combination of the written and signed versions ? CA children and adolescents—complete sample Table 9 The DHH children and adolescents’ preferences for presentation of the ILC