Although the first academic discussion of *augustales dates back to the mid-nineteenth century, after almost two centuries of excellent research, the difficulty to get a grip on ‘the’ *augustales remains. Most scholars agree on the...
moreAlthough the first academic discussion of *augustales dates back to the mid-nineteenth century, after almost two centuries of excellent research, the difficulty to get a grip on ‘the’ *augustales remains. Most scholars agree on the basics: the title *augustalis (and all its 40 local variants found throughout the Roman Empire) refers to an honorary position in local society, mostly bestowed on wealthy freedmen who, because of their servile birth, could not partake in the official cursus honorum. The nomination itself, and the allotment of any further privileges or honours connected to it, was done by the city council. *Augustales were in every way the ‘odd duck’ of municipal life, taking up a hybrid position in local Roman society. Be it the yearly officers, those holding the title as an honorary token, or the former officers convening in associations, they are in between worlds, a group in social limbo: an elite formation, part of a servile world. The apparent need to find a single definition is one of the major difficulties that have plagued the research field. This project is a reaction against any attempt to amalgamate locally based institutions of the lower social strata. Instead of simplifying complex phenomena by labelling it with some all-purpose word, I endeavoured to trace subtle differences between individual *augustales expressed in epigraphy and appreciate these to the fullest. I used a corpus of seventeen hundred and eleven inscriptions from four hundred and fourteen cities. What we have, is research focussing on *augustales as a social structure, and detailed studies of local morphology and terminology. What we need, is a re-evaluation from the point of view of the *augustales and what their title meant for them. In five chapters, I covered many aspects of this *augustalitas in order to demonstrate the complexity of the phenomenon. Therefore, ‘integration’, ‘local development’, ‘differentiation’, and ‘visibility’ were crucial in this discussion. Where possible, I focussed on the individual *augustalis. In the chapter ‘Origin and Context’, a state of the art of some major discussions is given. This part aims to contextualise the origin of *augustales and the terminology used. It focuses, contrary to the rest of the discussion, on more general and institutional aspects: the potential predecessors or examples on which the *augustalitas was grafted, the genesis and raison d’être of *augustales the problems with the terminology used to indicate ‘the’ *augustales, the relevance and usefulness of the old honestiores-humiliores dichotomy and the plebs media debate. In the chapter on ‘Financial and Occupational Differentiation’ I discuss a number of expenditures and benefactions that express the wealth of *augustales, a proxy for their economic potential. Next, I focus on five aspects of the economic position of *augustales in Italy and Gaul; (1) How can occupational differentiation be used to further outline the complexity of the social world in which *augustales operated? (2) Trimalchio’s fictional life has been taken as a representation of the historical lives of former slaves. Despite the presence of this tradesman sevir augustalis in well-known literature, the research on their occupations is very scarce. (3) To outline the economic impact of *augustales, it is necessary to elaborate on the different sectors of the Roman economy. In which sectors are *augustales found most often? (4) Is there a differentiated geographical spread of both types of professional titles (profession and collegial membership)? Can we discern a geographically diverse inclination toward certain economic sectors? Two large commercial hubs were discussed more elaborately: the harbour city of Ostia and the capital city of Lugdunese Gaul, Lugdunum. (5) Are *augustales involved in the imperial and local annona frumentaria, the grain dole and -market? The chapter on ‘Respectability and Visibility’ discusses visibility techniques and different badges of honour. First, I focus on inscriptions listing names of yearly officers (so-called fasti), as well as hierarchical membership lists of the association (known as alba). A second section discusses ornamenta and insignia, ways in which *augustales could demonstrate their prominence in public. The final section discusses iconography on tombs of *augustales and how these inform us on professions in particular. Also, in some cities, buildings were identified as a schola or an aedes of the local *augustales. By becoming a part of the monumental structure of the city, these constructions dramatically enhanced the visibility of *augustales: the buildings were mostly situated on or close to the forum. The fifth chapter is devoted to social positioning, -differentiation and -mobility. How important was citizenship for *augustales? I also focussed on wealth, networks and trade routes, as well as on the importance of proximity to power, the apparitorial accensi and the summa honoraria. I ...