Relativity

Part I – Spirilla Theory and Cosmology
Stephen Hawking once proclaimed that String Theory may be able to unify the various forces although later he became disillusioned thinking that there may be no Theory of Everything. This very condensed book pulls together the various forces into the Spirilla Theory which supersedes String Theory and introduces the Relativity of Consciousness.

The foundation of the Spirilla Theory is based on the writings of H. P. Blavatsky, A. B. Bailey, and A. Besant. By overlaying the works of Einstein, Bohm, de Broglie, Dirac, Bell and other great scientific minds, on top of the foundation, the unification of the various forces and theories starts to appear; each field of study supplying a part of the puzzle but only a holistic view of ALL endeavors will solve the mystery. The book starts by laying the groundwork through the Introduction, a review of Bell’s Theorem and p-adic mathematics; following this, each major section begins with a quote from the foundational works followed by the quotes from scientific papers demonstrating the current known thinking on the various topics; no attempts are made to edit the works (except with a few exceptions for clarity and/or length) of the various authors and references to the scientists’ works are maintained. Each section is pulled together so that a picture can be seen.
This section;
1. Redefines the atom with the addition of a subquark;
2. Defines the Spirilla Theory which unifies Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, and explains Quantum Entanglement;
3. Defines new particles;
4. Redefines time and space;
5. Defines and solves the mystery of Black Holes and links the cosmic and quantum black hole through the spirillae;
6. Delves into the mystery of the Macroverse;
7. Outlines the steps in the origins of the universe;
8. Adds an equation to Einstein’s original 1905 paper on relativity which sees the speed of light approaching infinity;
9. Gives the foundation for developing space travel; and, as an appendix,
10. Gives detailed information for the development of a new energy source – Quantum Energy.

Part II - Ontology, Epistemology & Manifestations
Part II is divided into three sections:
1. Ontology and the fundamental concepts of reality which discusses:
a. consciousness and delves into the mystery of human consciousness having cosmic origins;
b. reincarnation and gives the various laws affecting rebirth, with a discussion on the principle of mutation and the perfecting of form;
c. the work of form-building, transmutation of form and the building of a human form.
2. Epistemology which covers a great deal of topics however; for the purposes of NOE the subject is restricted to;
a. evolution including a definition of the Law of Evolution, the cyclic ebb and flow and the rhythmic work of creation, the process of substitution, the evolution of man and the genesis of the pithecoid stocks; and
b. death including the processes of death, two main reasons for cremation and the sequence of events at death.
3. Manifestations of the various religions including:
a. why Christians don’t believe in reincarnation;
b. the coming science of invocation and evocation;
c. Quantum Entanglement Over Time (QEoT) or The Law of Cause and Effect, and The Law of Karma with a discussion on The Golden Rule ; and
d. The New World Religion.

Assuming the fundamental importance of division algebras, we introduced the division algebra of quaternions as a framework for description of four-dimensional space-time intervals. We derived the quaternion form of the Lorentz time dilation and presented an intuitive physical interpretation of the space-time transformations in the source and observer reference frames. We showed that the resulting physical interpretation is inseparable from experimental measurements. Also, we suggested that the positive direction of the quaternion stationary time is the arrow-of-time and that the length of the quaternion space-time interval is positive in the direction from the beginning to end.  Then, we used quaternion algebra to develop quaternion calculus by choosing the correct quaternion form of the differential operators. We applied the new differentiation to the generalized potential function and suggested that the results can be interpreted as the two unified force fields. We repeated the differentiation, assuming that the second derivative of the potential function can be interpreted as the unified matter density. This resulted in the four unified matter density equations and a unified quaternion form of Maxwell equations. Then, we applied the unified fields and unified Maxwell equations to electromagnetic and gravitational interactions. Notably, the expressions for electromagnetic and gravitational interactions are similar as they  they were derived from the same quaternion potential function, pointing to a possible procedure for unification of electromagnetism and gravitation. The novel components appearing in  expressions for the force fields and Maxwell equations originated from scalar fields and velocity dependent potentials, and require further theoretical and experimental investigation.  In particular, we showed that the gradient of the scalar field generates the main current density component for slow varying fields.  Consequently, the proposed quaternion framework may be suitable as the foundation for a classical unified theory of space-time and matter, while enhancing the traditional theories of special and general relativity.

From a new insight about the internal structure and dynamics of quantum particles such as photons and electrons, a conclusion has been reached that the exact point on the detector screen of a double-slit experiment where a photon will land is completely predetermined by fine tuning the initial conditions of the photon and the electron during emission. This means that where exactly a photon lands on the detecting screen is completely predetermined by its initial conditions, just as where exactly a ball lands on the ground is predetermined by its initial conditions. This means that an interference pattern or any arbitrary pattern could be formed on the detector screen by (almost) infinitely fine-tuning the initial conditions of the photon during emission, regardless of whether one or both slits are open, regardless of the distance between the slits, regardless of the distance of the detecting screen. In principle, a mechanical version of particle interference patterns can be created by repeatedly kicking a ball towards a hole ("slit") in a wall, with a "detector" wall at some arbitrary distance from the hole(s). This would require almost "infinite" fine tuning of the initial conditions of the ball, that is initial velocity, initial direction and other parameters. The interference pattern occurred just because of infinite fine tuning of the initial conditions of the ball and not because the ball "interfered" with itself. We just made a successful simulation, and created the pattern as if the ball interfered with itself. A supernatural football player can create an "interference" pattern on the net by accurately deflecting the ball from either pole. The interference pattern in the photon and electron double-slit experiment is fundamentally the same. The conclusion is that aiming a photon to a particular atom on the screen requires (almost) infinite fine-tuning during emission. This raises the burning question: WHO fine-tunes the photons during emission so that they form an interference pattern or a Gaussian pattern? The emitting atom? The light source conspiring with the detecting screen? Atoms have infinitely small intelligence as to do the infinitely complex task of fine-tuning a photon. The conclusion is that a super natural being is fine-tuning and, literally, aiming each and every photon emitted not only from the light source of a double slit experiment, but also all photons emitted from all light sources in the universe. The overwhelming evidence of divine intervention is that photons and electrons cannot by themselves behave both as waves and as particles simultaneously. LITERALLY, God has been behind all confusing light speed experiments and observations made over centuries. It has been discovered that the correct model of the speed of light is a novel, seamless fusion of ether theory and emission theory (Apparent Source Theory). Photons cannot by themselves exhibit this dual nature. Literally, all dualities observed so far in light, electromagnetism and gravity are possible ONLY by DIRECT divine intervention.

We present a novel derivation of both the Minkowski metric and Lorentz transformations from the consistent quantification of a causally ordered set of events with respect to an embedded observer. Unlike past derivations, which have relied on assumptions such as the existence of a 4-dimensional manifold, symmetries of space-time, or the constant speed of light, we demonstrate that these now familiar mathematics can be derived as the unique means to consistently quantify a network of events. This suggests that space-time need not be physical, but instead the mathematics of space and time emerges as the unique way in which an observer can consistently quantify events and their relationships to one another. The result is a potential foundation for emergent space-time.

Quantum entanglement, a term coined by Erwin Schrodinger in 1935, is a mechanical phenomenon at the quantum level wherein the quantum states of two (or more) particles have to be described with reference to each other though these particles may be spatially separated. This phenomenon leads to paradox and has puzzled us for a long time. The behaviour of entangled particles is apparently inexplicable, incomprehensible and like magic at work. Locality has been a reliable and fruitful principle which has guided us to the triumphs of twentieth century physics. But the consequences of the local laws in quantum theory could seem "spooky" and nonlocal, with some theorists questioning locality itself. Could two subatomic particles on opposite sides of the universe be really instantaneously connected? Is any theory which predicts such a connection essentially flawed or incomplete? Are the results of experiments which demonstrate such a connection being misinterpreted? These question...

Space and Time are continuous absolute quantities. They don't change with anything at all. However, the dimension and duration of an object or event can change with the local gravitational field and aging of the universe. This is because that Wu's Unit Length (diameter) and Wu's Unit Time (period) of Wu's Pairs (building blocks of the universe) in an object or event can be affected by the bombardment of gravitons complying with gravitational field in accordance to Graviton Radiation and Contact Interaction Theory, and also the shrinkage of Wu's Pairs due to aging of the universe in compliance with Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB). According to Wu's Spacetime Shrinkage Theory and intrinsic atomic and subatomic structures, a linear relationship is proposed between the quantities of the property of a corresponding identical object or event and the gravitational field and aging of the universe. In addition, under Thermodynamic Equilibrium and local Subatomic Equilibrium, three fundamental principles: Principle of Equilibrium, Principle of Parallelism and Principle of Correspondence are derived, such that the correlations of the quantities of the properties between two objects or events at the same location and time (same gravitational field and aging of the universe) can be established. Furthermore, based on Wu's Spacetime Equation t yy = γl yy 3/2 , Wu's Unit Length and Wu's Unit Time of Wu's Pair are correlated to each other. As a result, the correlations of the simple properties such as dimension and duration, or the composite properties such as velocity and acceleration of an object or event, with respect to the gravitational field and aging of the universe, or further to Wu's Unit Length of a reference corresponding identical subatomic particle at the same location and time (same gravitational field and aging of the universe) can be established. This can be used successfully to interpret many important physical phenomena, such as Deflection of Light, Perihelion Precession of Mercury, Cosmological Redshift, Hubble's Law, Einstein's General Relativity, Spacetime and Field Equations.

The non-equilibrium thermodynamics of relativistic systems have a rich phenomenology. The simplest phenomenon in the class of dissipative processes is that of heat. This letter presents a brief summary of the efforts made to tackle the problem of relativistic heat conduction. In particular, we focus on the multi-fluid approach to relativistic dissipation.

It is imperative "now" to go beyond our anthropological limits, through an upright mental position, which I have called Conscious Evolutionary Consciousness PaleontoLogicaMente ISOCIC.  It is necessary to get out from under Einstein's skirts and finish the work he courageously started but left unfinished.

As I commented several times, trying to attract the attention of the unconscious to be unconscious, therefore nicknamed inCoScientists, is about time to step forward - evolutionary forward - with respect to Einstein’s “happiest thought”.

What causes the wave formation of the reality / particle duality to collapse is the interference of the same "conscious measurement" which absurdly does not want to take into account itself.  This can be done "simply" by accepting relativity without distinction between inertial and accelerated mass in an "infinitely accelerated" hypersphere of the universe as it is now accepted where any ray has the same number of points before any inertial observer "all about all "consciously conscious instantly entangled" causing "the collapse of the formation of the waves of reality.

Viktor T.Toth on QUORA

What is the simplest and easiest to understand way to explain how mass increases with velocity?

The simplest way: Mass does not increase with velocity.

Seriously. Mass does not increase with velocity.

When you move relative to an object (remember: motion is always relative, so an object moving relative to you or you moving relative to that object mean literally the same thing) that object does not change. It does not even know that you are moving relative to it. However, in your frame of reference, it is that object that moves, and as a result, it has kinetic energy as calculated by you. (For another observer, moving along with the object, the object is at rest and has zero kinetic energy.)

Some authors, especially in the older literature, combined this kinetic energy and the rest mass-energy of the object into a quantity called relativistic mass.

This quantity is meaningless. It differs for different observers moving at different speeds relative to the object. It really has no practical use whatsoever. It only confuses people, rather badly, about relativity theory.


Geoffrey Edwards on QUORA


As velocity increases the mass of the object increases in a linear fashion until infinite energy is required to move an infinite mass. Is time dilation a result of the gravitational field generated by the mass of the object?

No. Mass does not increase. The momentum of an object increases with velocity like this:

p = \gamma*m*v

where p is the usual letter for momentum and \gamma is the relativistic gamma factor. Early on, people noticed that you could absorb the gamma into the m, call it ‘relativistic mass’ (M = gamma*m) and recover the usual Newtonian relation:

p = Mv

As well, this mass had the usual property that if you pushed on the object along the direction of motion with force F you got an acceleration a = F/M. However, this particular analogy probably started to die when people first calculated the acceleration induced by a transverse force and found that it was NOT F/M.

Most analogies about relativity are fundamentally bad ideas because they explicitly break the fundamental basis of relativity, which is that intrinsic velocity, if it exists, cannot be measured. The mass of an object is what we would measure in the frame of reference of an object. It has to be invariant with velocity - a so called ‘scalar’. The orbits of the planets around the sun, for example, cannot depend on the sun’s motion through space (else we could use the orbits to measure the sun’s intrinsic velocity).

Most analogies have limits and are useful only inside those limits. The limit of this particular analogy is to simplify a single question …

If I apply an external force F along the line of motion of an object with velocity v, what is the acceleration?

… and that is it. The mass does not really increase. Because of this, the concept of relativistic mass has been discarded by pretty much everyone because it is invariably applied outside its domain of applicability.

E imperativo “ora” andare oltre i nostri limiti antropologici, tramite una stazione eretta mentale, che ho chiamato coscienza evolutiva cosciente PaleontoLogicaMente ISOCIC. Occorre uscire da sotto le sottane di Einstein e finire il lavoro da lui coraggiosamente iniziato ma lasciato incompiuto.

Come ho più volte commentato cercando di attirare l'attenzione dell'inconscio, essere inconsci, quindi soprannominati inCoScientists, è giunto il momento di fare un passo avanti - in avanti evolutivo - rispetto al "pensiero più felice" di Einstein.

Che fa collassare la formazione d’onda della dualità realtà/particelle è l'interferenza della stessa “misurazione cosciente” che assurdamente non vuole tenere conto di se stessa. Questo può essere fatto "semplicemente" accettando la relatività senza distinzione tra massa inerziale e accelerata in un'ipersfera dell'universo "infinitaMente accelerato" come è ora accettato in cui qualsiasi raggio ha lo stesso numero di punti prima di qualsiasi osservatore inerziale "tutto su tutto" coscientemente cosciente istantaneamente impigliato "  causando” il collasso della formazione delle onde della realtà.

Viktor T.Toth su Quora

Qual è il modo più semplice e facile da capire per spiegare come la massa aumenta con la velocità?

Il modo più semplice: la massa non aumenta con la velocità.

Sul serio.  La massa non aumenta con la velocità.

Quando ti muovi rispetto a un oggetto (ricorda: il movimento è sempre relativo, quindi un oggetto che si muove rispetto a te o tu che ti muovi rispetto a quell'oggetto significa letteralmente la stessa cosa) quell'oggetto non cambia.  Non sa nemmeno che ti stai muovendo rispetto ad esso.  Tuttavia, nel tuo sistema di riferimento, è quell'oggetto che si muove e, di conseguenza, ha energia cinetica calcolata da te.  (Per un altro osservatore, muovendosi insieme all'oggetto, l'oggetto è fermo e ha energia cinetica zero.)

Alcuni autori, specialmente nella letteratura più antica, combinarono questa energia cinetica e l'energia massa a riposo dell'oggetto in una quantità chiamata massa relativistica.


Questa quantità è priva di significato.  Differisce per diversi osservatori che si muovono a velocità diverse rispetto all'oggetto.  Non ha davvero alcuna utilità pratica.  Confonde solo le persone, piuttosto gravemente, sulla teoria della relatività.


Geoffrey Edwards su Quora


All'aumentare della velocità, la massa dell'oggetto aumenta in modo lineare fino a quando è necessaria un'energia infinita per spostare una massa infinita.  La dilatazione del tempo è il risultato del campo gravitazionale generato dalla massa dell'oggetto?

No. La massa non aumenta.  La quantità di moto di un oggetto aumenta con la velocità in questo modo:

p = \gamma*m*v

dove p è la solita lettera per la quantità di moto e \gamma è il fattore gamma relativistico.  All'inizio, le persone hanno notato che potevi assorbire la gamma nella m, chiamarla "massa relativistica" (M = gamma*m) e recuperare la solita relazione newtoniana:

p = Mv

Inoltre, questa massa aveva la solita proprietà che se si spingeva sull'oggetto lungo la direzione del moto con forza F si otteneva un'accelerazione a = F/M.  Tuttavia, questa particolare analogia probabilmente iniziò a scomparire quando le persone calcolarono per la prima volta l'accelerazione indotta da una forza trasversale e scoprirono che NON era F/M.

La maggior parte delle analogie sulla relatività sono fondamentalmente cattive idee perché rompono esplicitamente la base fondamentale della relatività, che è che la velocità intrinseca, se esiste, non può essere misurata.  La massa di un oggetto è ciò che misureremmo nel quadro di riferimento di un oggetto.  Deve essere invariante con la velocità - un cosiddetto "scalare".  Le orbite dei pianeti attorno al sole, ad esempio, non possono dipendere dal movimento del sole nello spazio (altrimenti potremmo usare le orbite per misurare la velocità intrinseca del sole).

La maggior parte delle analogie ha dei limiti e sono utili solo all'interno di quei limiti.  Il limite di questa particolare analogia è semplificare una sola domanda...

Se applico una forza esterna F lungo la linea di movimento di un oggetto con velocità v, qual è l'accelerazione?

... e basta.  La massa non aumenta davvero.  Per questo motivo, il concetto di massa relativistica è stato scartato praticamente da tutti perché è invariabilmente applicato al di fuori del suo dominio di applicabilità.

This work dates from January 2016 as a result of my remarks related to physics made during my high studies. I try in this work to explain the cause behind the inability of Newtonian mechanics to describe correctly many phenomena where the studied object rotates at a very high linear speed. I proved that, in this case, the velocity field is not equiprojective and that the famous formula for changing the reference frame is not correct. I made an application to the case of the GPS system satellites, then I presented a new method for studying a rotating system velocity without needing the conventional steps of changing reference frames. I finished my work by demonstrating the formulas of the main differential operators and I presented them with all the related steps and calculations by using the elementary surfaces. I am eager to discuss the results of this work further with physics and mathematics specialists, and I hope that my formulas will help to simplify the study of many difficult physics phenomena.

When presented with temporally displaced audiovisual events, observers shift their point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) in the direction of this prior lag. This effect, known as temporal recalibration (TR), has been inferred previously using single audiovisual events. Here we investigate TR using an audiovisual synchrony search paradigm employing spatiotemporally cluttered visual displays. By manipulating the relative modulation frequency of the adaptor (0.72 Hz) and test (0.36, 0.72 Hz) we find that following lag-adaptation, PSS shifts preserve the relative phase—not the latency—of the adapted lag. Applying this cross-frequency design to a classic simultaneity discrimination task, we find TR is unaffected by the relative frequency of adaptor and test in terms of latency rather than phase. This dissociation implies that under conditions of low spatial certainty TR obeys a relativistic (phase-conserving) temporal scaling law, whereas high spatial certainty affords PSS shifts, which operate in absolute (latency-conserving) temporal coordinates.

La cosmología es una de las ciencias más jóvenes de la naturaleza, aunque sus ideas filosófi-cas sean muy antiguas. El tiempo juega un papel singular en cosmología, que involucra ideas antiguas (el tiempo universal) y muy modernas (el tiempo depende del Sistema de Referencia). Se examina el papel que todas estas ideas juegan en crear la noción de tiempo cosmológico, se intenta aclarar las ambigüedades asociadas con el tiempo en un contexto cosmológico y se examina su relación con las nociones de cambio cosmológico.

Before the name Albert Einstein become synonymous with genius, an obscure professor of physics labored away for many years rewriting the laws of physics. He had only been moderately successful, managing to gain the respect of his peers and climbing the academic ladder. After more than a decade, he finally received the recognition he craved. When British astronomers came back from the solar eclipse expedition of 1919 and analyzed what they saw that day, they confirmed his revolutionary hypothesis. The expedition members eagerly announced to the scientific community and the press that they had caught light bending in ways that could be perfectly explained with his new theory. The following day, newspapers ran the story of a rebellious prodigy who had dethroned Newton by arguing that that the universe was four-dimensional, that time and space were no longer absolute, and that they could shrink and expand in usual ways. The news set experts and the public alike abuzz with excitement, opening up new puzzles and paradoxes. For the rest of his life, Einstein dedicated himself to forging a new place for science in society. Privately, he struggled to fit within an oversized public persona which haunted his friendships, love life, and contributions to science. Brilliant, ambitious, and insecure, Einstein remains to this day the ultimate representative of genius.

Via decrement of mass of planets, we can send the entire planets to far space orbital allocations. We can convert physical matter into energy, it can either get irradiated to outer space, get transmitted back to Earth's potential energy, get used as a self-propellant, or it can get used in a complex model of these systems; it decreases the mass of the planet. By conversion of the matter to energy, Earth will lose some mass that decreases the gravitational fields for Earth; the formulas of the current research are deduced to control the movements of the planets. Celestial bodies, like any other mechanical systems which follow, and are based on, the physical laws of mechanics and dynamical systems, follow these laws. So since the celestial object “A” exerts the “F” force on the celestial object “B”, the celestial object “B” exerts an interactive force “F” on the celestial object “A” also. All celestial objects exert gravitational influences on each other. Scientists believe, once upon a time, the Sun would be much hotter than what it is today. By that point, this high temperature leads to extinction of the entire existence of life on Earth. When the gravitational force changes, a space particle may either get departed from the other particle or come closer to the other particle.

Radar guns provide an excellent means of explaining and demonstrating some of Einstein's theories in a very simple and undeniable way. Specifically, radar guns demonstrate how the speed of the emitter cannot add to the speed of the light being emitted, but the speed of light can be combined with the speed of the receiver. In practice, this directly conflicts with basic tenets of mathematicians who somehow believe that all motion is relative, and the speed of light will therefore always be the same for the emitter as for the receiver. A step by step analysis of how radar guns work shatters those tenets.

The role of the light postulate in special relativity is reexamined. The existing theory of relativity without light shows that one can deduce Lorentz-like transformations with an undetermined invariant speed based on homogeneity of space and time, isotropy of space and the principle of relativity. However, since the transformations can be Lorentzian or Galilean, depending on the finiteness of the invariant speed, a further postulate is needed to determine the speed in order to establish a real connection between the theory and special relativity. In this paper, I argue that the discreteness of space-time, whose existence is strongly suggested by the combination of quantum theory and general relativity, may result in the existence of a maximum and invariant speed when combing with the principle of relativity, and thus can determine the finiteness of the speed in the theory. According to this analysis, the speed constant c in special relativity is not the actual speed of light, but the ratio between the minimum length and the shortest time of discrete space-time. This suggests a more complete theory of relativity without light, the theory of relativity in discrete space-time, which is based on the principle of relativity and the constancy of the minimum size of discrete space-time.

Presentism is, roughly, the metaphysical doctrine that maintains that whatever
exists, exists in the present. The compatibility of presentism with the theories of
special and general relativity was much debated in recent years. It has been argued
that at least some versions of presentism are consistent with time-orientable models
of general relativity. In this paper we confront the thesis of presentism with relativistic
physics, in the strong gravitational limit where black holes are formed. We
conclude that the presentist position is at odds with the existence of black holes and
other compact objects in the universe. A revision of the thesis is necessary, if it is
intended to be consistent with the current scientific view of the universe.

The velocity of light is measured by a light-specific method (mirrored double paths, uninterrupted photons, etc.). In this study an experiment is presented with a single photon and one way path. Thus, the increasing speed of the distance between the photon and its source can be measured and the essence of special relativity theory can be questioned. If this experiment can be realized, Earth's momentary universal speed can be detected. The measurement direction which gives maximum and minimum values will be interpreted about current expanding speed of universe and expanding direction.

Lagrange equation is universal law, it could applied on universe scale as it can be applied also to small scales like sub nucleus. Holy Quran also universal and multi dimensions because it is the God speech to human and Jinn over all ages. So many Verses in Quran have scientific facts and it should because God created universe and put in Quran the catalog so as to understand it.
Almighty Allah says:
(It is Allah who created the heavens and the earth and sent down rain from the sky and produced thereby some fruits as provision for you and subjected for you the ships to sail through the sea by His command and subjected for you the rivers. And He subjected for you the sun and the moon, continuous [in orbit], and subjected for you the night and the day. And He gave you from all you asked of Him. And if you should count the favor of Allah, you could not enumerate them. Indeed, mankind is [generally] most unjust and ungrateful.) . surat Ibrahim Verses 31,32, 33,34

On this article I discussed one verse says:
(And if their evasion is difficult for you, then if you are able to seek a tunnel into the earth or a stairway into the sky to bring them a sign, [then do so]. But if Allah had willed, He would have united them upon guidance. So never be of the ignorant.)  Surat Al-Anaam verse 35
This verse connects the “Ascension in Heaven” with “walking into a Tunnel”, how that, and what is the resemblance between them and Lagrange concept? All that have been discussed through these topics.
• What is Lagrange equation and the concept of least action?
• Lagrange equation is universal law.
• Characteristics of Lagrange equation.
• The meaning of conservative Force and Momentum.
• The meaning of coordinate dependence.
• The meaning of containing all newton laws of conservation motion.
• Nature using Lagrange to make disasters (Hurricanes for example).
• Lagrange equation and geodesic equation.
• Holy Quran and Lagrange concept.

From you to eternity and consciously back in an infinite/eternal stand still hypersphere

To show you how unconsciously unconscious you are, I'll just begin with asking rhetorically what you know about your dreams, that constitute the great majority of your mind’s lifetime. Basically nothing …

Then I’ll proceed by showing that you are totally unable to make yourself really understood by anybody: Direct conscious communication without contextual triangulation and observe monopoly cooperation zero.

Now think of the media Putin, Mussolini, Salvini, etc.  and that you do not understand that they are not real characters but only your unconsciously unconscious media projections, of whose reality you know nothing.

Geometry (trigonometry) shows us how to infer a segment by knowing an angle and a side within a circle ⭕️

From this you can project your conscious consciousness on the entire universe by extending the idea that at any radius a sphere also has the same number of points.

This "conscious" conceptual extension can probably be extended to space-time through Lorentz transformations.

Finally - and relatively to Einstein’s happiest thought that everything is “moving” in a (ndr: evolutionary, adaptive, antropologicaMindly) flexible space time with reference to a standstill inertial ALL ON ALL POV - consider that C stands “also” for consciousness:)

PS: To verify you can ConsciousMindly”  "integrate" that your unconscious unconsciousness follows from Gödel's incompleteness, that McLuhan explains your media mirage with the medium = message and that ultra-Darwinism includes "technology" in human evolution, such as any material culture and language.

Da te all'eternità e torna consapevolmente in un'infinita/eterna ipersfera ferma

Per mostrarti quanto sei inconsciamente incosciente, inizierò semplicemente chiedendo retoricamente cosa sai dei tuoi sogni, che costituiscono la grande maggioranza della vita della tua mente.  Praticamente niente…

Poi procederò mostrando che sei totalmente incapace di farti capire davvero da nessuno: comunicazione diretta cosciente, senza triangolazione contestuale e cooperazione dell’osservatore cosciente monopolistica, zero. 

Ora pensa ai mediatici Putin, Mussolini, salvini ecc. e che non capisci che non sono personaggi reali ma solo tue proiezioni mediatiche inconsciamente inconsce, della cui realtà non sai nulla.

La geometria (trigonometria) ci mostra come dedurre un segmento conoscendo un angolo e un lato all'interno di un cerchio ⭕️

Da ciò puoi proiettare la tua coscienza cosciente sull'intero universo estendendo l'idea che in qualsiasi raggio anche una sfera abbia lo stesso numero di punti.

Questa estensione concettuale “consapevole” può essere verosimilMente estesa allo spazio tempo attraverso le trasformazioni di Lorentz.

Infine - e relativamente al pensiero più felice di Einstein che tutto è "in movimento" in uno spazio-tempo (ndr: evolutivo, adattivo, antropologico) flessibile con riferimento a uno stallo inerziale ALL ON ALL POV - si consideri che C sta anche per coscienza:)

PS: per verificare puoi coscienteMente “integrare” che la tua incosciente incoscienza consegue dell'incompletezza di Gödel, che McLuhan spiega il tuo miraggio dei media con il mezzo=messaggio e che l’ultradarwinismo include la “tecnologia” nell’evoluzione umana, come qualsiasi cultura materiale e linguaggio.

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance of con-straints in the theory of relativity and, in particular, what philosophical work they do for Einstein's views on the laws of physics. Einstein presents a view of local structure laws which he characterizes as the most appropriate form of physical laws. Einstein was committed to a view of science, which presents a synthesis be-tween rational and empirical elements as its hallmark. If scientific constructs are free inventions of the human mind, as Einstein, held, the question arises how such rational constructs, including the symbolic formulation of the laws of physics, can represent physical reality. Representation in turn raises the question of realism. Einstein uses a number of constraints in the theory of relativity to show that by imposing constraints on the rational elements a certain fit between theory and reality can be achieved. Fit is to be understood as satisfaction of constraint. His emphasis on...

Special Relativity Theory (SRT) has two postulates, one stating that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, and the other stating that the speed of light is the constant 186,000 miles per second, regardless of any reference frames. As a result of these postulates, SRT renders predictions such as: 1) No object can travel faster than 186,000 miles per second (the speed of light itself); 2) On approaching the speed of light, a moving object contracts in length in the direction of motion, while 3) a clock traveling with the object slows down; 4) The mass of an object multiplied by the square of the speed of light gives energy ( E mc2 ); i.e., mass could be converted to energy and vice versa; 5) Observers do not agree on the simultaneity of events - two events that are simultaneous for one observer might not be simultaneous for another.

There are evident inconsistencies among these predictions. There is also a philosophical problem relating to the nature of reality. Could there be more than one reality in Nature; that is, can reality be subjective, and only a matter of interpretation? This paper explores the evident inconsistencies and the philosophical problem by developing arguments and providing numerical examples.

This article is the transcript of the audio-visual presentation titled ‘Wormholes: Science Fiction or Pure Fantasy?’ [7] prior to Hollywood’s release of the movie ‘Interstellar’, the plot of which involves astronauts travelling through a wormhole to save the Human Race. It is explained in simply terms why the wormhole has no relation to reality, just as the black hole has no relation to reality.

Like in Newtonian kinematics, the relativistic change of reference frame must be a vector system of transformation laws for position, velocity and acceleration. In special relativity, when changing the reference frame the coordinates of a moving point is transformed using Lorentz transformation. But the velocity-addition formula that transforms velocity is in a too different mathematical form than the Lorentz transformation. And for acceleration, there is not a transformation at all. The theory of Time relativity that I develop provides a coherent vector system of transformation laws for position, velocity and acceleration.

Mindful of the anomalous perihelion precession of Mercury discovered by Le Verrier in
the second half of the nineteenth century and its successful explanation by Einstein with
his General Theory of Relativity in the early years of the twentieth century, discrepancies
among observed effects in our Solar system and their theoretical predictions on
the basis of the currently accepted laws of gravitation applied to known matter-energy
distributions have the potential of paving the way for remarkable advances in fundamental
physics. This is particularly important now more than ever, given that most of
the universe seems to be made of unknown substances dubbed Dark Matter and Dark
Energy. Should this not be directly the case, Solar system’s anomalies could anyhow
lead to advancements in either cumulative science, as shown to us by the discovery of
Neptune in the first half of the nineteenth century, and technology itself. Moreover, investigations
in one of such directions can serendipitously enrich the other one as well.
The current status of some alleged gravitational anomalies in the Solar system is critically
reviewed. They are: (a) Possible anomalous advances of planetary perihelia. (b)
Unexplained orbital residuals of a recently discovered moon of Uranus (Mab). (c) The
lingering unexplained secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon. (d)
The so-called Faint Young Sun Paradox. (e) The secular decrease of the mass parameter
of the Sun. (f) The Flyby Anomaly. (g) The Pioneer Anomaly. (h) The anomalous
secular increase of the astronomical unit

A complete theoretical and mathematical description of how electric fields change due to relative motion that includes an in-depth analysis of relativistic electric fields and the methods to effect motion.

This new description is based on James Maxwell's original bi-quaternion that includes descriptions and examples of how to use these electric field differences to create an all new propellant-less spacecraft propulsion device.

Thomas Kuhn defined the characteristics of scientific revolutions based to a large extent upon his knowledge of the first and second Scientific Revolutions. He concluded that scientific revolutions are the result of crises faced by previous theoretical paradigms. However, he missed some important clues of how revolutions develop. Instead of emphasizing the crises, historians should look at the major trends in scientific and human thought prior to the revolutions. By doing so, they could actually gain a better understanding of how scientific revolutions emerge during the normal course of scientific evolution and progress. Instead of defining revolutions by the crises that precede them, revolutions actually emerge from the successes of previous theoretical attempts while each revolution contains the seeds for the next revolution that follows. These seeds eventually grow into the crises that trigger revolutions. Under these circumstances, it can be shown that the space-time revolution of relativity theory was never completed, thus laying the foundations for the next revolution in science. Knowing this, we can consider the possibility that we have already entered a pre-revolutionary period for the Third Scientific Revolution.

Twenty-first Theoretical Physics is undergoing a profound "Paradigmatic-Shift" from the Old "Material-Causal" Paradigm underlying both Relativity Theory (RT) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) to the New "G-d's Physics" ("Computational Unified Field Theory", CUFT) Paradigm; The New 'G-d's Physics' Paradigm has been shown capable of resolving the apparent "theoretical inconsistency" between Relativity Theory (RT) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) and offer an alternative theoretical explanation for the accelerated expansion of the physical universe (which cannot be explained by the purely hypothetical and undetectable "dark-matter" and "dark-energy" concepts); Based on the discovery of a singular higher-ordered "Universal Computational/Consciousness
Principle" (UCP) which simultaneously computes every exhaustive spatial pixel in the universe at the incredible rate of "c2/h" = 1.36-50 sec'(!) this New 21st Century Physics Paradigm challenged and revised the basic "MaterialCausal" assumption of the Old 20th century Old RT & QM Models: challenging the "Big-Bang" Model, Einstein's Equations, QM's assumed "collapse" of the target's probability wave function (following its assumed direct physical interaction with the corresponding subatomic probe element) etc. Instead, due to the New 'G-d's Physics'
additional "Computational Invariance Principle" and "Universal Consciousness Reality" theoretical postulates indicating that only the "computationally invariant" UCP may be considered as "constant" and "real", whereas the "computationally variant" four basic physical features of "space", "energy", "mass" and "time" may only be regarded as "phenomenal" and "transient" – i.e., existing only "during" each consecutive "Universal Frame" (UF) being solely computed by the singular UCP, but "dissolving" back into this singular UCP "in-between" any two consecutive UF's frames; forces us to regard the whole existence of the entire physical universe (and its associated
apparent "physical laws") as existing only "transiently" and "phenomenally" – as "manifestations" of this singular higher-ordered "Universal Computational/Consciousness Reality" (UCR)!

Many researchers argue that strings break when discussing Bell's spaceship paradox. This is described under the premise that the length contraction is correct. However, I studied the spaceship parable from the point of view of length expansion, not length contraction. I examined whether there were logical contradictions among observers, and I also examined the relationship between the basic rule of relativity and causality.

The goal of the present paper is to reconstruct the history of Minkowski spacetime, focusing on the specific understanding that Minkowski had of his own model in the context of his worldview. To achieve it, we will first take a look at Minkowski’s personal academic history. By exploring his scientific development, certain key elements in his approach to mathematics and physics will be highlighted, so that his worldview is put into perspective and supported by evidence. Afterwards, a brief summary of Einstein’s work on special relativity is presented, with the aim to speculate on Einstein’s own way of interpreting spacetime. This will also set up the foundation for a comparison with Minkowski. Then, we will analyze the main lectures through which Minkowski presented his geometric model of spacetime to the German scientific community, focusing especially on Raum und Zeit. Here, Minkowski’s worldview is further articulated. Last but not least, we will endorse that, despite Minkowski’s work becoming crucial for Einstein and Einstein's interpretation of spacetime most likely growing closer to Minkowski's, the two scientists ultimately shared crucial differences in weltanschauung.

The legacy analysis of the transverse arm of the Michelson-Morley type of experiments is found to be incorrect. The transverse arm has a time delay independent of the experiment velocity through space. This requires reanalysis of time dilation and length contraction described in special relativity and Lorentz aether theory.

The No-communication Theorem has been seen as the bar to communication by quantum state collapse. The essence of this theory is the procedure of taking the partial trace on an entangled, hence inseparable multi-particle system. This mathematical procedure applied unthinkingly, strikes out the off-diagonal elements from the ensemble density matrix and renders the reduced trace matrix representative of a mixed state. Decoherence theory is able to justify this mathematical procedure and we review it to show: the partial trace results for both unitary and non-unitary processes (hence measurement) on one, several or all particles of the ensemble; and that a unitary process keeps interference terms in the trace reduced matrix.

This article discusses an apparent paradox between perceived time and externally measured time during dreamed body movement. An appeal to concepts regarding space in special relativity may help to resolve the puzzle and perhaps point to a two-way perceptual relativity of dream and waking phenomenology.

In this paper , equations of Magnetism are rediscovered by using Special Relativity and Coulomb's law with different method and various cases are studied . Magnetic field near a current carrying conductor is redefined as ratio of relativistic electric field experienced by reference frame of a moving charge near the conductor to velocity of that reference frame with respect to the conductor. Mathematically, it is found that the existing formulas of magnetism given by Biot- Savart Law are valid only for normal velocities and completely fail for higher or microscopic velocities of moving charge. 'Fleming's Right/Left Hand Rules' can easily be explained by Relativity as just interaction between charges. Unlike existing idea, a magnet or current carrying conductor can exert some force even on charges at rest. Magnetic field due to a current carrying conductor is nothing but ratio of approximate relativistic electric field to the velocity of reference frame. Lorentz force ...

The accelerating electrons explain not only the Maxwell Equations and the Special Relativity, but the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation, the Wave-Particle Duality and the electron’s spin also, building the Bridge between the Classical and Quantum Theories.
The Planck Distribution Law of the electromagnetic oscillators explains the electron/proton mass rate and the Weak and Strong Interactions by the diffraction patterns. The Weak Interaction changes the diffraction patterns by moving the electric charge from one side to the other side of the diffraction pattern, which violates the CP and Time reversal symmetry.
The diffraction patterns and the locality of the self-maintaining electromagnetic potential explains also the Quantum Entanglement, giving it as a natural part of the relativistic quantum theory.

The method which was used in development of Fundamental Electro-Magneto-Mechanics theory is: "Within existing confirmed and affirmed physics, identify the essential, fundamental phenomena, equations, and concepts, base their definitions exclusively on facts, and make only and exclusively the commonsense, simple, and unambiguous conclusions, immediately derived from facts, immediately relying on facts.". In one sentence: "Try to reach optimum of consistency and completeness, with minimal abstraction.". Briefly and concretely, the starting base consists of elementary energy (a photon), space and time, and their most basic relations and properties. The results obtained are unprecedented, in each and every respect.

The formal, cinematic language specific to immersive motion pictures is an area of cinema theory that has been neglected up until now. This paper investigates a new language of cinematic montage specific to immersive cinema, somatic montage, while it examines historical precedents in the sciences, arts, and cinema of the twentieth century. We propose somatic montage as a model for developing new poetic structures in time-based works that inhabit a three-dimensional, architectonic space – a space of embodiment, motion, perception, and participation in the reception of a work of art. In this paper, we consider cinema as a four-dimensional artwork conceptually engendered by the principles of hyper-dimensions, the outgrowth of scientific discoveries made at the turn of the twentieth century. The expanded cinema mediums of fulldome cinema, immersive video and film installation, virtual reality, and extended reality, when approached as four-dimensional cinema space, allow for a spatialized, non-linear juxtaposition of the cinematic elements. Somatic montage is presented here as an extended, supra-dimensional notion of what Sergei Eisenstein called the ‘disjunctive method of narration’.

Keywords
Immersive cinema, Somatic montage, 20th-century avant-garde, Modernism, Relativity theory, N-dimensional geometry, Montage, Sergei Eisenstein

The emergence of intelligence is likely a relatively recent phenomena throughout the cosmos. The total number of habitable extraterrestrial planets within the Milky Way capable of supporting advanced, intelligent life within the next 500 Myr is <5,162. Almost all of which are earth-like orbiting around a single star with mass ranges from 0.628 to 1 solar mass. No exomoons are capable of supporting advanced life, and a negligible number of low mass binary systems (<0.628 solar mass) are habitable. The nearest extraterrestrial industrial civilization lies at least 88.7 million light years away, and possibly 111 million light years beyond. No extraterrestrial civilization arises before 232.74 Mya within the observable universe, and no extraterrestrial civilization arises before 270.95 Mya within the universe by co-moving distance. Despite great distances between the nearest civilizations and the low probability of emergence within our vicinity, given the sheer size of the univers...