Principles of Physics and Mathematics

The leaders of the Scientific Revolution (Galileo, Pascal, Huygens, Newton and others) were not Baconian in temperament, in trying to build up theories from data. Their project was that same as in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics: they hoped to find necessary principles that would show why the observations must be as they are. Their use of mathematics to do so expanded the Aristotelian project beyond the qualitative methods used by Aristotle and the scholastics. In many cases they succeeded.

The Book Eventics by Mohsen Fakhari published in 1989 and Expanded in 2017. It is re-edited and Expanded to 286 pages.
Eventum as the medium for Eventics. Eventum, coined in 1989 in the book of Eventics, is the medium of all world events of all types from the past to the future that are the subject of the field of Eventics with the building block of Eventon. This is to introduce for the first time into the Web what is described in the book of Eventics, published in 1989, pages 12 to 14. The terms Eventics, Eventum, Eventon and several others are coined and described in that book as a result of research and development since 1949. This book is re-edited and Expanded to 286 pages with expanded preface.

The principles of relativity and uncertainty represent two of the deepest and most encompassing propositions of the physical sciences. Indeed, much of our present knowledge of nature can be recapitulated in these important statements about the processes of motion and measurement. However, a question remains as to the precise logical connection between both principles. Here, we show a plausible and simple conceptual analysis linking the principles of relativity and uncertainty as logical requirements of the idea of physical measurement. The main conclusion points to the logical complementarity of both principles in order to justify the possibility of physical measurements, in which the uncertainty principle guarantees the applicability of the principle of relativity in all physically conceivable systems of reference.

Originally a script for a video on physics and perpetual motion, I have decided to use this in article format instead. It is my accustomed medium, anyhow. What is evinced is essentially a rhetorical view of perpetual motion, beginning with the "outer corners" of the argument, and proceeding (eventually) towards the core proofs of the theory. This is a work-in-progress.

Mathematics is the home ground of principles. Since Euclid, mathematics has been the model of a body of knowledge organized as a deductive structure based on self-evident axioms. The prestige of that model was highest in early modern times, lying after the vast extension of the realm of mathematics in the Scientific Revolution but before the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries and the foundational crises of the late nineteenth century. When the Jesuit missionaries chose Euclid as the first book to be translated into Chinese (Engelfriet 1998) and when Spinoza offered to exhibit ethics as a system demonstrated more geometrico from definitions and simple self-evident axioms, he paid tribute to the place of the Euclidean model at the summit of intellectual achievement. Seventeenth century thinkers who applied mathematics to physics – Stevin, Galileo, Descartes, Pascal, Huygens, Barrow, Newton, Leibniz, to name only the most prominent – were captivated by a model of applied mathematics...