Colonoscopy

1 ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP) as the preferred technique for removal of diminutive polyps (size ≤ 5 mm). This technique has high rates of complete resection, adequate tissue sampling for histology, and low complication rates. (High quality evidence, strong recommendation.) 2 ESGE suggests CSP for sessile polyps 6 - 9 mm in size because of its superior safety profile, although evidence comparing efficacy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) is lacking. (Moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation.) 3 ESGE suggests HSP (with or without submucosal injection) for removal of sessile polyps 10 - 19 mm in size. In most cases deep thermal injury is a potential risk and thus submucosal injection prior to HSP should be considered. (Low quality evidence, strong recommendation.) 4 ESGE recommends HSP for pedunculated polyps. To prevent bleeding in pedunculated colorectal polyps with head ≥ 20 mm or a stalk ≥ 10 mm in diameter, ESGE recommends pretreatment of the stalk with injec...

Removal of colorectal adenomas during colonoscopy reduces the incidence of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and CRC-related mortality [1 -4]. Despite surveillance of patients after resection of adenomas [5] the risk of developing CRC remains higher than in the general population [6]. Moreover, it is known that CRC can be detected in the interval between scheduled surveillance colonoscopies [7]. One of the important causes for interval carcinomas is incomplete removal of the original adenoma [8 -10]. As residual adenomatous tissue has been shown to be capable of rapid regeneration , incomplete resection may result in local recurrence . Several studies have indicated that incomplete removal contributes to a higher subsequent incidence of CRC [5, 9, 14 -16].

Background Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are accepted strategies for colorectal-cancer screening in the average-risk population. Methods In this randomized, controlled trial involving asymptomatic adults 50 to 69 years of age, we compared one-time colonoscopy in 26,703 subjects with FIT every 2 years in 26,599 subjects. The primary outcome was the rate of death from colorectal cancer at 10 years. This interim report describes rates of participation, diagnostic findings, and occurrence of major complications at completion of the baseline screening. Study outcomes were analyzed in both intention-to-screen and as-screened populations. Results The rate of participation was higher in the FIT group than in the colonoscopy group (34.2% vs. 24.6%, P<0.001). Colorectal cancer was found in 30 subjects (0.1%) in the colonoscopy group and 33 subjects (0.1%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.64; P = 0.99). Advanced adenomas were detected in 514 subjects (1.9%) in the colonoscopy group and 231 subjects (0.9%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.69; P<0.001), and nonadvanced adenomas were detected in 1109 subjects (4.2%) in the colonoscopy group and 119 subjects (0.4%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 9.80; 95% CI, 8.10 to 11.85; P<0.001). Conclusions Subjects in the FIT group were more likely to participate in screening than were those in the colonoscopy group. On the baseline screening examination, the numbers of subjects in whom colorectal cancer was detected were similar in the two study groups, but more adenomas were identified in the colonoscopy group.

Purpose The aim of our prospective study was to compare patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen (LFT) versus traditional cathartic cleansing (TC). Materials and methods 264 patients, at average risk for development of colorectal cancer (105 men and 159 women; mean age 62 years ± 5 SD), underwent 32 rows CT colonography. Patients were alternatively placed into 2 study groups: Group 1 (n = 132) followed TC and Group 2 (n = 132) LFT. TC protocol consisted of no fiber diet and Phospho-lax® 80 mL in 2 L of water the day before imaging. LFT protocol consisted of no fiber diet and ingestion with meals of 30 mL of water-soluble iodinated contrast agent (Gastrografin®) for 2 days before imaging. No frank laxative drugs were administered. All studies were reviewed in a combined fashion, primary 2D followed by 3D endoluminal and dissected views. After the examination all patients were asked to provide a feedback about tolerance to the each bowel preparation. The first 30 patients of each group were also investigated with optical colonoscopy (OC) used as gold standard to confirm our diagnosis (Group 1* and Group 2*). Conclusions LFT reduces discomfort and seems to improve diagnostic accuracy of CTC.

Background Colonoscopy findings compared with findings at time of surgery have a discrepancy rate of 3-21%. The objective of our study was to investigate this discrepancy and provide potential resolutions. Methods In this retrospective study, we identified 400 patients who underwent colonoscopy followed by colon resection at our community hospitals in 1999-2006. Discrepancies between colonoscopy and intraoperative findings were noted. Each discrepancy was classified as major if the surgical procedure had to be altered, the lesion was missed, an unnecessary segment was removed, or the incision was extended. A discrepancy was classified as minor if there was no alteration in planned surgery. Results Of the 400 cases, 160 (40%) were located in the right colon, 13 (3%) were in the transverse colon, 185 (46%) were in the left colon, and 42 (11%) were in the rectum. A total of 48 (12%) discrepancies between colonoscopy and intraoperative findings were identified: 26 (54%) were major and 22 (46%) were minor. Thirteen (27%) were in the proximal colon (3 major and 10 minor discrepancies), 3 (6.3%) were in the transverse colon (all major), 22 (46%) were in the distal colon (17 major and 5 minor), and 10 (21%) were in the rectum (3 major, 7 minor). Major discrepancies were significantly higher in the left colon (17 of the 185 left-sided lesions; 9.1%) than in the right colon (3/160; 1.9%; P = 0.045). Conclusions In our study, colonoscopy has an error rate of 12% when used to localize tumors; more than half of these patients require significant unanticipated changes in their surgery. The discrepancies are significantly higher in left side of colon.

Force on Colorectal Cancer sets a target of cecal intubation in at least 90% of colonoscopies. We conducted a population-based study to determine the colonoscopy completion rate and to identify factors associated with incomplete procedures. Methods: Men and women 50 to 74 years of age who underwent a colonoscopy in Ontario between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2003, were identified. The first (index) colonoscopy was classified as complete or incomplete. A generalized estimating equations model was used to evaluate the association between patient, endoscopist (specialty, colonoscopy volume), and setting (academic hospital, community hospital, private office) factors and incomplete colonoscopy. Results: A total of 331,608 individuals had an index colonoscopy, of which 43,483 (13.1%) were incomplete. Patients with an incomplete colonoscopy were older (odds ratio [OR] 1.20 per 10-year increment; 95% confidence interval [CI] ‫؍‬ 1.18 -1.22), more likely to be female (OR 1.35; 95% CI: 1.30 -1.39), have a history of prior abdominal surgery (OR 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05-1.09) or prior pelvic surgery (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06). For colonoscopies done in a private office, the odds of an incomplete procedure were more than 3-fold greater than for procedures done in an academic hospital (OR 3.57; 95% CI: 2.55-4.98). Conclusions: In usual clinical practice in Ontario, 13.1% of colonoscopies are incomplete. The factors most strongly associated with incomplete colonoscopy were increased patient age, female sex, and having the procedure in a private office. Quality improvement programs are needed to improve colonoscopy completion rates.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based gut lavage solutions are safe and effective, but require consumption of large volumes of fluid. We compared a new 2 L solution of PEG plus ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) with standard 4 L PEG with electrolytes (PEG + E) for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy to determine efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether digital video is suitable for the documentation of colonoscopy. Standards are required for the visual documentation of endoscopic findings and to optimize image quality while limiting file size and bandwidth requirements. Methods: Video recordings of colonoscopy procedures were encoded using a common video compression method at selected data rates and resolutions. Twelve reviewers were selected, each of whom was assigned 8 video review sessions, each consisting of 5 colonoscopy procedures. The reviewers rated the following: level of confidence that the cecum was demonstrated, subjective quality of the video compared with actual videocolonoscopy, and whether the video was of ''diagnostic quality.'' Results: Reviewers were confident that the cecum was demonstrated in all cases except at the lowest data rate. The 1.0 Mbps standard interchange format video provided an optimal balance between quality and file size. Conclusions: For the documentation of colonoscopy, 1.0 Mbps is acceptable and results in a file size of 7.5 Mbytes/min, which is manageable for most modern hospital and telehealth networks.

Background: No objective measure of the level of sedation is universally accepted. However, bispectral index monitoring is currently used to objectively measure sedation levels in several clinical settings. This study compares the temporal relationship of bispectral index levels versus the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale for sedation during endoscopy and proposes a functional bispectral index range for endoscopic procedures. Methods: Fifty consecutive adults undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, colonoscopy, or esophagogastroduodenoscopy by a single endoscopist were studied. Intravenous sedation was achieved with diazepam and meperidine. Bispectral index levels (0 to 100) and OAA/S scores (1 to 5) were recorded every 3 minutes by a single trained observer. Results: There were significant temporal correlations between bispectral index levels and OAA/S scores (r = 0.59, p < 0.0001). Bispectral index levels and OAA/S scores corresponded with the need for additional sedation as determined clinically by the endoscopist. An OAA/S score of 3 corresponded to a bispectral index level of 81.49 ± 9.78. Conclusions: Bispectral index monitoring temporally correlates with the OAA/S scale and therefore provides an objective measure of sedation during endoscopy. This preliminary, observational study suggests that a bispectral index level near 82 corresponds with sufficient and functional sedation levels for endoscopy. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:192-6.)

Background: Magnetic resonance follow-through (MRFT) is a new cross-sectional imaging modality with the potential to accurately stage ileal Crohn's disease (CD), while avoiding ionizing radiation and the discomfort associated with enteroclysis. We aimed to assess the reliability of this technique in assessing the extent and activity of ileal CD, and to assess its influence on subsequent management.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is limited by suboptimal uptake. We compared screening uptake of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) vs colonoscopy in this population. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 329 asymptomatic FDRs of patients with CRC who were randomly assigned to groups examined by CCE (PillCam, second generation; n [ 165) or colonoscopy (n [ 164) at a tertiary hospital in Spain from July 2012 through December 2013. Crossover was permitted for patients who did not wish to undergo the assigned procedure. Subjects assigned to CCE who had a significant lesion (polyp ‡10 mm, >2 polyps of any size, or CRC) were invited to undergo colonoscopy. RESULTS: One hundred twenty subjects in the CCE group and 113 in the colonoscopy group were eligible for inclusion. In the intention-to-screen analysis, uptake was similar between groups (55.8% CCE vs 52.2% colonoscopy; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51L1.44; P [ .57); 57.4% of subjects crossed over from the CCE group, and 30.2% crossed over from the colonoscopy group (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.51L6.41; P [ .002). Unwillingness to repeat bowel preparation in the case of a positive result was the main reason that subjects assigned to the CCE group crossed over; fear of colonoscopy was the reason that most patients in this group crossed over. A significant lesion was detected in 14 subjects (11.7%) in the CCE group and 13 subjects (11.5%) in the colonoscopy group (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.45L2.26; P [ .96). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, similar numbers of FDRs of patients with CRC assigned to undergo CCE or colonoscopy agreed to participate, but most preferred to undergo colonoscopy. CCE was as effective as colonoscopy in detecting significant lesions; it could be a valid rescue strategy for subjects who reject screening colonoscopy. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01557101.

Existing endoclip closure devices have difficulty in closing large colonic perforation. We developed a novel endoscopic multi-firing-clip applicator (EMFCA) system to address these limitations, and report on its initial evaluation. The functionality and efficacy of the prototype EMFCA equipped with re-openable clamp and preloaded with four clips were assessed using standardized 1.5 cm incisions created in ex-vivo porcine colonic segments. Endoscopic closure of the lacerations with two, three and four clips (n = five for each group) was followed by measurement of the leakage pressure of the three groups. Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to validate the clip behavior and reliability during deployment. All 15 perforations were sealed without leakage until fully distended. The leakage pressures of colonic lacerations sealed with two, three, and four clips were 26.1 ± 2.8 mmHg, 37.3 ± 7.3 mmHg and 42.3 ± 7.4 mmHg, respectively. The mean operation time to deploy one clip was 25...

Purpose A randomized study was performed to assess whether new technologies offer advantages over the conventional technique on the clinical and functional outcome of patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence, submitted to Altemeier's procedure with levatorplasty. Methods Between January 1999 and December 2003, 58 patients (55 females; mean age, 70.9 ± 11.3 years) with full-thickness rectal prolapse were evaluated with continence score, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, anal electromyography, and sacral reflex latency; 40 of them were selected and randomly assigned to two groups: 20 patients (Group 1; 19 females, 73.4 ± 10.4 years) were submitted to a conventional operation with monopolar electrocautery and handsewn anastomosis, and 20 (Group 2; 18 females, 71.5 ± 12.2 years) using harmonic scalpel and circular stapler. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography, with mean follow-up 29.3 ± 8.5 and 27.5 ± 9.2 months in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Results Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in Group 2 (P < 0.001), whereas no differences were found in pain score, time to return to normal activity, morbidity, and mortality. Complications were two (10 percent) stenosis in Group 1. Fecal continence score significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.01), whereas anorectal manometry and neurophysiologic data were not significantly modified by the operation. Recurrence rates were 15 and 10 percent in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P= not significant). Conclusions The clinical and functional long-term results of perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty are not influenced by surgical instruments and type of coloanal anastomosis. The clinical relevance of the short-term results in high-risk patients should be specifically investigated.

The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate surveillance for patients with a history of adenomatous polyps whose last colonoscopic examination was normal. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a database of 7,677 colonoscopies (1990 to 1996). In patients under colonoscopic surveillance, we reviewed cases of patients who had received three colonoscopies (an index (initial) colonoscopy positive for adenomas and 2 follow-up colonoscopies (interim and final)). The risk of adenomas and cancers at final follow-up colonoscopy was compared between patients having a normal interim colonoscopy and those with a positive interim colonoseopy. The risk at final colonoscopy was also stratified by time interval and the size and number of adenomas at the initial index colonoscopy. RESULTS: Two hundred four patients undergoing surveillance for adenomas met inclusion criteria. At index colonoscopy the median polyp size was 1 cm and median frequency was three polyps. At all follow-up colonoscopies, we detected 493 adenomas and one cancer (median follow-up, 55 months). At 36 months patients with a normal interim colonoscopy (n = 91) had significantly fewer polyps than patients with a positive interim colonoscopy (1: = 113; 15 vs. 40 percent; P = 0.0001). By 40 months, adenomas were detected in more than 40 percent of patients in both groups. The risk after a normal interim colonoscopy was not affected by time interval or number or size of polyps. Adenomas found subsequent to a normal interim colonoscopy were dispersed throughout the colon in 28 patients and isolated to the rectosigmoid in 6 patients. CONCLU-SIONS: In patients with a history of adenomas, a normal follow-up colonoscopy is associated with a statistically but not clinically significant reduction in the risk of subsequent colonic neoplasms. These patients require follow-up surveillance colonoscopy at a four-year to five-year interval. [Key words: Colonoscopy; Surveillance; Polyps] Btmnberg D, Opelka FG, Hicks TC, Timmcke AE, Beck DE. Significance of a normal surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a history of adenomatous polyps. Dis Colon

Background-To perform a colonoscopy, the endoscopist maneuvers the colonoscope through a series of loops by applying force to the insertion tube. Colonoscopy insertion techniques are operator dependent but have never been comprehensively quantified. Objective-To determine whether the Colonoscopy Force Monitor (CFM), a device that continually measures force applied to the insertion tube, can identify different force application patterns among experienced endoscopists. Design-Observational study of 6 experienced endoscopists performing routine diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in 30 patients. Setting-Outpatient ambulatory endoscopy center. Patients-Adult male and female patients between 30 and 75 years of age undergoing routine colonoscopy. Interventions-CFM monitoring of force applied to the colonoscope insertion tube during colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements-Maximum and mean linear and torque force, time derivative of force, combined linear and torque vector force, and total manipulation time. Results-The CFM demonstrates differences among endoscopists for maximum and average push/ pull and mean torque forces, time derivatives of force, combined push/torque force vector, and total manipulation time. Endoscopists could be grouped by force application patterns. Limitations-Only experienced endoscopists using conscious sedation in the patients were studied. Sample size was 30 patients. Conclusions-This study demonstrates that CFM allows continuous force monitoring, characterization, and display of similarities and differences in endoscopic technique. CFM has the potential to facilitate training by enabling trainees to assess, compare, and quantify their techniques and progress.

Background: Conscious sedation is standard for GI endoscopy. Propofol increasingly is used as an alternative drug to avoid unwanted effects of the commonly used benzodiazepines. Although propofol in the hands of nonanesthesiologists is still controversial, this study characterized the safety profile of propofol administered by nurses under supervision of the gastroenterologist. Methods: All patients undergoing any endoscopic procedure between September 2000 and December 2001 in the gastroenterology department of an academic tertiary medical center were eligible for inclusion in this prospective observational study. Sedation was voluntary. Demographic data, type of endoscopic procedure, and clinical features were recorded. A structured personal history led to a 5-class risk stratification based on the criteria of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. A total of 3475 procedures were performed in 2574 patients using propofol administered by registered nurses. Results: No major complications occurred because of the use of propofol, but overall decreases in the mean values for oxygen saturation (-2%), arterial pressure (-18%), and pulse rate (-10%) were observed. Severe respiratory depression requiring intervention occurred in less than 0.3% of all patients given propofol. Conclusion: The administration of propofol by registered nurses, with careful monitoring under the supervision of the gastroenterologist, is safe for conscious sedation during GI endoscopic procedures. (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:664-71.) Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses L Heuss, P Schnieper, J Drewe, et al.

This is an official guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR). It addresses the clinical indications for the use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC). A targeted literature search was performed to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of CTC. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Main recommendations 1 ESGE/ESGAR recommend computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend barium enema in this setting (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). 2 ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC, preferably the same or next day, if colonoscopy is incomplete. Delay of CTC should be considered following endoscopic resection. In the case of obstructing colorectal ca...

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cause of non-tobacco-related cancer deaths in Canadian men and women, accounting for 10% of all cancer deaths. An estimated 7800 men and women will be diagnosed with CRC, and 3250 will die from the disease in Ontario in 2007. Given that CRC incidence and mortality rates in Ontario are among the highest in the world, the best opportunity to reduce this burden of disease would be through screening. The present report describes the findings and recommendations of Cancer Care Ontario&#39;s Colonoscopy Standards Expert Panel, which was convened in March 2006 by the Program in Evidence-Based Care. The recommendations will form the basis of the quality assurance program for colonoscopy delivered in support of Ontario&#39;s CRC screening program.

Background and Objective: Overuse injuries of the hand, wrist, forearm, and shoulder are common among endoscopists and may be from repetitive pinching and gripping forces or awkward posturing. In this pilot study, we evaluated distal upper-extremity musculoskeletal load during colonoscopy (1) to confirm the feasibility of performing ergonomic measurements in endoscopists and (2) to identify tasks that may contribute to overuse injuries.

Intussusception of the appendix is a rare condition. Most cases are diagnosed during operation of the patients suspected to have appendicitis. In this report we present a seventy one year-old man with a history of periumbilical intermittent abdominal pain for several months. None of the paraclinical tests were useful for determining the diagnosis. Colonoscopy performed during the last episode of abdominal pain revealed the prolapsed appendix in the cecum and the patient was sent to the operating room. Macroscopic appearance of the appendix was normal and microscopic examination revealed follicular hyperplasia and acute focal appendicitis. Appendiceal intussusception should be considered in differential diagnosis of intermittent abdominal pain and colonoscopic diagnosis could be very important to avoid dangerous or unnecessary decision making.

Colonic adenomatous polyps are premalignant lesions; early recognition and use of a polypectomy for these polyps can reduce the occurrence of colorectal cancer. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the complications of polypectomy and the relationship between the morphology and size of colonic polyps and their histology. Data on colonic polyps from 324 patients who received a polypectomy between April 1998 and December 2001 were collected. These included 207 men and 117 women, ranging in age between 17 and 86 years old, and who had had a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopic examination. A polypectomy was performed on those colonic polyps discovered, and their morphology, size, and histology were analyzed. The histological findings of these polyps included adenoma, carcinoma, hyperplastic, and inflammatory polyps. One and a half percent (n = 6) were carcinomas, all of which belonged to the Yamada III or IV polyp group and were more than 1 cm in size, except for 1 polyp which was 0.7 ...

Background: Our experience with colovesical fistula (CVF) over a 12-year period was reviewed to clarify its clinical presentation and diagnostic confirmation. Methods: Twelve patients with CVF were identified. Presenting symptoms, etiologic factors, diagnostic investigations, and subsequent treatment were reviewed. Results: Underlying etiologies were diverticular disease (75%), colon cancer (16%), and bladder cancer (8%). Pneumaturia (77%) was the most common presentation, followed by urinary tract infections, dysuria and frequency (45%), fecaluria (36%), hematuria (22%), and orchitis (10%). The ability of various preoperative investigations to identify a CVF were: computed tomography (CT) (90%), barium enema (BE) (20%), and cystography (11%), whereas cystoscopy, intravenous pyelogram (IVP), and colonoscopy were nondiagnostic. All patients underwent single-or multiple-staged repair of the fistula. Conclusions: In patients with a suspected CVF, we recommend CT followed by a colonoscopy as a first-line investigation to rule out malignancy as a cause of CVF. Other modalities should only be used if the diagnosis is in doubt or additional information is needed to plan operative management. Published by Excerpta Medica Inc.

The following article contains new recommendations for colorectal cancer screening, the first set we have published since 2003 (Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544 -560.) The current recommendations have emerged through the participation of multiple national societies, taking into consideration newly emerging technologies.

articles and guidelines. 6,19-22 In contrast, more recent theories de-emphasize these anatomic mechanisms, and instead posit inflammation, microbiome shifts, visceral hypersensitivity, and abnormal motility as potential etiologic factors, especially for chronic diverticular disease.

Purpose To assess the intercoccygeal angle of asymptomatic patients (without coccydynia), to study if there is a diVerence of angle between types of coccyx and between genders with the same type of coccyx. Materials and methods Ninety-two patients (42 females, 50 males, range of ages 8-86, mean 50) who underwent computed tomography (CT) angiography and colonoscopy were included in the study. CT images with slice thickness of 1 or 1.5 mm were evaluated with 3D sagittal reformats and intercoccygeal angle, type of coccyx were examined. Results Twenty-one females and 18 males had type 1 coccyx with mean intercoccygeal angle 36.4° § 10.56 (33.29°f or females and 40.05° for males) and the diVerence of the angles between genders is statistically signiWcant (P = 0.044). Among 36 patients (14 were females and 22 were males) with type 2 coccyx demonstrated mean intercoccygeal angle of 56.36° § 10.8. 15 patients were shown to have type 3 coccyx and the mean intercoccygeal angle was 72.1° § 31.86. No signiWcant diVerence of angles was seen between genders. Type 4 coccyx was not seen and two coccyx could not be classiWed. There was a signiWcant diVerence of intercoccygeal angle between the groups overall. Conclusion Type 1 is the most common coccyx type in asymptomatic patients. SigniWcant diVerence of intercoccygeal angle was deWned between the types of coccyx. These values may be reference for the patients underwent surgery for the coccydynia and a new classiWcation may be needed since exceptional shape of coccyx exists that could not be deWned according to the known classiWcation.

The "serrated neoplastic pathway" describes the progression of serrated polyps, including sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas, to colorectal cancer. The recognition of this pathway during the last 15 years has led to a paradigm shift in our understanding of the molecular basis of colorectal cancer and significant changes in clinical practice. These findings are particularly relevant to prevention of interval cancers through colonoscopy surveillance programs-an important issue for colonoscopists. In the past, all serrated polyps were classified simply as hyperplastic polyps and were considered to have no malignant potential. Reappraisal of this view was largely driven by increasing recognition of the malignant potential of hyperplastic polyposis.

Background: This study was undertaken to evaluate demographics, clinical manifestations, laboratory ¿ ndings and outcomes of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Turkey. Methods: We analyzed the medical records of 127 children diagnosed with IBD (under 18 years old) between January 2004 and January 2012 in 8 pediatric gastroenterology centers. Results: Of the 127 patients, 90 (70.9%) suffered from ulcerative colitis (UC), 29 (22.8%) from Crohn's disease (CD), and 8 (6.3%) from IBD unclassified. The mean age of the 127 patients was 11.6±4.1 years, and 11.8% of the patients were below 5 years old. Of the patients, 49.6% were male, and males were more predominant in patients with CD than in those with UC (72.4% vs. 42.2%, P=0.008; a male/female ratio of 2.62 in CD, P=0.0016). Approximately one fifth of the patients had extra-intestinal manifestations and 13.3% of the patients had associated diseases. Extraintestinal manifestations and associated diseases were more common in early onset disease [P=0.017, odds ratio (OR)=4.02; P=0.03, OR=4.1]. Of the patients, 15% had normal laboratory parameters including anemia, high platelet count, hypoalbuminemia, hypoferritinemia, and high sedimentation rate. Area under receiver operation characteristics was used to predict pancolitis in patients with UC. The values of C-reactive protein, sedimentation rate and pediatric ulcerative colitis activity were 0.61 (P=0.06), 0.66 (P=0.01) and 0.76 (P=0.0001), respectively. Four (4.4%) patients with UC underwent colectomy, and ¿ nally two (1.5%, 95% confidence interval: 0-3.7%) patients died from primary disease or complications. Conclusions: IBD is an increasing clinical entity in Turkey. Features of IBD are similar to those in other populations, but prospective multicenter studies are needed to analyze the true incidence of IBD in Turkish children.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is third most common cancer in the United States for both men and women. Approximately 150,000 newly diagnosed cases and 50,000 deaths attributed to CRC were projected for 2008. Overall, CRC accounts for 9% of all cancer deaths annually. 1 Fortunately, most of these deaths are preventable by a combination of screening and early treatment of precursor lesions. The survival rate for CRC is correlated to the stage at which the cancer is discovered. When the cancer is diagnosed at an early stage and remains localized, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 90%. When the cancer is diagnosed after regional metastasis to adjacent organs or lymph nodes, the survival rate decreases to 68%. 1 Early detection of CRC is essential to decreasing mortality. The overall incidence of CRC has decreased over the last 20 years from 66.3 cases per 100,000 population in 1985 to 49.5 cases per 100,000 population in 2003. The sharpest decline in CRC occurred between 1998 and 2004, with a decreased incidence of 2.3% per year due to increased screening. 1 Mortality rates have also decreased over the past 2 decades, with the sharpest decline occurring between 2002 and 2004. During this time period, there was a 4.7% decrease in the mortality rate of CRC. This change reflects improvements in early detection and treatment of CRC. 1 SCREENING FOR CRC Most CRC arises in adenomatous polyps as a precursor lesion. The incidence of these polyps increases to as high as 30% in adults who are aged 50 years old and older. 2 Most patients remain asymptomatic until advanced disease is present. The symptoms of advanced disease are vague and include abdominal cramping and changes in