Citations

All papers published in this conference proceedings have been peer reviewed through a peer review process administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a conference proceedings.

The enemies’ speeches in the psalms reflect a theological controversy: is God really acting in aid of the pious and poor? By inserting its adversaries’ sayings in its own psalmic oration, the “I” of the Psalms arranges a space of relational encounter between ‘himself – the adversary – God’, in which their mutual relations are negotiated. However, in Ps 9/10 and Ps 73 the pious is in danger to adopt the wicked’s sayings and therefore to become wicked himself. Both Psalms can be used to express doubt and to reassure faith.

RESUMO: Neste trabalho, exploramos o uso da citação em textos acadêmico-científicos, focalizando os limites da apropriação do dizer do outro na escrita de estudantes universitários. Para orientar nossas reflexões, utilizamos, como base teórica, os estudos de Hilgert (2002), Santos (2000), Paiva (2005), Eco (1991), entre outros. O corpus é composto de textos escritos (monografias de graduação) por estudantes do ensino superior, recortados de banco de dados de pesquisas que temos desenvolvido no Grupo de Pesquisa em Produção e Ensino do Texto (GPET). A análise mostra dificuldades de parafraseamento ou reformulação de um texto por parte dos estudantes do ensino superior, resultando, consequentemente, em manifestação de plágio. Essa dificuldade se dá em casos de reprodução literal das palavras do texto-fonte, mascaradas pela explicitação do nome de seu autor e pela ausência de aspas, evidenciando que o autor não se deu ao trabalho de expressar com suas próprias palavras o dito no texto-fonte, não conseguindo, portanto, realizar uma atividade de reformulação textual. Essa constatação sinaliza para uma maior atenção por parte dos professores do ensino superior, orientadores e examinadores de textos acadêmico-científicos, de todas as áreas do conhecimento, no sentido de serem mais vigilantes na orientação e na correção de textos. Além disso, esses resultados apontam para a necessidade de instigar cada vez mais o exercício da paráfrase, como estratégia de reformulação textual, desde o início da formação acadêmica, na perspectiva de ajudar os estudantes a superarem as dificuldades de interpretar e construir sentidos para os textos que leem. ABTRACT: This work explores the uses of quotation in academic scientific texts focus on the limits that undergraduate students take other's words when they write. To guide our reflections we took a theory base from scholars like Hilgert (2002), Santos (2000), Paiva (2005), Eco (1991), among others. The research corpus is formed by written text (graduate monograph works) from undergraduate students. This corpus was taken from a larger data bank in which our group research has been worked (Grupo de Pesquisa em Produção e Ensino do Texto-GPET). The analysis shows that there are difficulties in paraphrase or in reformulating texts by students in undergraduate level at the university, consequently they do plagiarism. Those difficulties occur in case that undergraduate students have to reproduce literal words from source text quoted where the writer put the name of the author and do not use quotes, so this can show that the student-writer did not paraphrase source text in his own words, this way he did not get success in reformulate text. This fact can sign that Professors, testers, and members that read academic monograph works need to a greater attention when guide undergraduate students in all area knowledge, in

De l’histoire de l’art européen à la réalisation des autoportraits de Morimura Yasumasa, il n’y a qu’un pas entre ce que nous appelons communément citation et pastiche. Néanmoins, la production de l’artiste chemine entre les concepts du "mitate" et du remake à partir d’images appartenant à la mémoire collective. Cette approche de l’œuvre de Morimura donne lieu à une nouvelle version de l’image répétée à travers le corps travesti de l’artiste, vecteur d’une "japonisation" sous-entendue.

The history of European art to the achievement of self-portraits Morimura Yasumasa, there is a thin border between what we commonly call "citation/quotation" and pastiche. However, the work of the artist progresses between concepts of "mitate" and "remake" from images belonging to the collective memory. This approach Morimura's production gives rise to a new version of the image repeated through the cross-dressing of body of the artist, a vector implied "Japanisation".

El estilo APA es un conjunto de estándares creados por la Asociación Americana de Psicología, con el fin de unificar la presentación de textos académicos y de investigación a nivel internacional. Es utilizado por muchas personas en todo el mundo especialmente en la psicología y ciencias de la salud y otras disciplinas para la presentación de textos académicos y de investigación. Uno de los aspectos más importantes de utilizar las Normas APA, es el respeto por los derechos de autor con el fin de evitar el plagio, homogeneizar forma de citar y de referenciar autores que alimentan las obras, organizar los textos de acuerdo a patrones de estilo definidos y transmitir las ideas en forma clara y precisa (American Psychological Association, 2019).
The APA style is a set of standards created by the American Psychological Association, in order to unify the presentation of academic and research texts at an international level. It is used by many people around the world especially in psychology and health sciences and other disciplines for the presentation of academic and research texts. One of the most important aspects of using the APA Norms is respect for copyright in order to avoid plagiarism, homogenize the way of citing and referencing authors who feed the works, organize the texts according to style patterns defined and convey ideas clearly and precisely (American Psychological Association, 2019).

In 2010, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society published a 32-page brochure, "The Origin of Life", with the intention of supporting its view that life was created by a divine source, as declared in the Hebrew Scriptures. The purpose of this Critique is to examine the manner in which the brochure employs information from scientists to support the Watchtower's position. Their brochure does not claim that any of the cited scientists supports its stance on Creation and indeed makes it very clear that the scientists are evolutionists. When the brochure provides information from a scientist, it appeals to the reader's subjective opinion, asking whether it is possible that unaided Nature could have resulted in the outcomes witnessed by scientists. This is the brochure's strategy and agenda. Truth would thus be determined through subjective opinion. However, this very same information is used by scientists in their support for evolution.

Info on citation of research articles on environmental science, life science, water science; the cited publications belong to a series of relevant publications of the researcher at Lomonosov Moscow State University, an award winner S.A.Ostroumov (the total number of citations of his works is more than 5000, according to Rus. Index of Sci. Citation). The publications or their abstracts are available online free. See the links here: 800 publications and files (biology, environmental science, water, ecology, ecotoxicology): simple improved format, several links were added; papers free on Academia.edu; see the list of the 800 titles with links here: https://www.academia.edu/51255901/ ;
__
https://www.academia.edu/54561395/ ;

Esta es una  guía breve de las normas APA 7ma ed. A diferencia de las guías habituales (que abordan más cosas, como el formato y el uso de gráficos), nos centramos en la consulta más habitual: cómo se referencian las diversas fuentes. Por ello, damos ejemplos de las referencias más comunes y las explicamos.

Son, entendemos:

1. Libros
2. Capítulos de libros
3. Artículos de revistas académicas
4. Documentos institucionales

De este modo, los/as estudiantes solo deben reemplazar los datos del formato provisto por los de su referencia. Esperamos que esta guía les sea de utilidad.

Maģistra darbā “Žurnāla “Letonica” bibliometriskā analīze” analizētas 15091 bibliogrāfiskās norādes, lai noteiktu citētākos autorus un izmantotos informācijas avotus žurnāla “Letonica” zinātniskajos rakstos, tādējādi raksturojot zinātnisko žurnālu “Letonica” un tā pārstāvētās četras nozares: literatūrzinātne, folkloristika, teātra zinātne un mākslas zinātne. Pētījumā par metateoriju izvēlēta hermeneitika, par nozares teorijām izvēloties informācijas horizontu teoriju un bibliometriju. Iegūto bibliogrāfisko datu pētniecībai teoriju kontekstā izvēlēts kvantitatīvi statistisks bibliometrisko metožu kopums, kurš papildināt ar daļēji strukturētām žurnāla “Letonica” galveno redaktoru intervijām. Pētījumā izvirzītas četras hipotēzes: tiek ievērots noteiktais citēšanas stils, žurnāla rakstus ir lasījuši 10% rakstu autoru, arhīva materiālus izmanto pamatā folkloristikā un žurnāla rakstu autori orientējas vairāk nekā trīs valodās.
Pētījumā atklājās, ka citētākie autori žurnālā “Letonica” ir Jānis Pliekšāns, Pēteris Šmits un Jānis Jaunsudrabiņš, savukārt citētākie avoti ir laikraksts “Austrums”, “Latgaļu folklora” un latviešu sakāmvārdu datorfonds. Lai gan viens no citētākajiem avotiem ir elektronisks, tomēr 91% gadījumu autori izvēlas drukātos informācijas avotus. Katrai nozarei izdalās savi citētākie autori un avoti, piemēram, folkloristikai – Latviešu folkloras krātuves kolekcijas, literatūrzinātnei – Latvijas Valsts vēstures arhīva materiāli, teātra zinātnei – Jāņa Pliekšāna luga “Jāzeps un viņa brāļi” un mākslas zinātnei – laikraksts “Rota”. 21,93% žurnāla autoru citē paši savus rakstus, savukārt ~25% rakstu autoru neizmanto noteikto citēšanas stilu atbilstoši noteikumiem. 30,32% rakstu autoru lasa citus žurnāla “Letonica” rakstus un tos citē. 67% arhīvu un muzeju materiālus izmanto folkloristikā. Rakstu autori izmanto vairāk nekā desmit valodas informācijas avotu ieguvei, no kurām biežāk izmantotās ir latviešu (63%), angļu (16%), vācu (10%) un krievu valoda (6%).

Atslēgvārdi: bibliometrija, Letonica, zinātnisks žurnāls, informācijas horizontu teorija, humanitārās zinātnes, citējamība

Increasingly, academics have to demonstrate that their research has academic impact. Universities normally use journal rankings and journal impact factors to assess the research impact of individual academics. More recently, citation counts for individual articles and the h-index have also been used to measure the academic impact of academics. There are, however, several serious problems with relying on journal rankings, journal impact factors and citation counts. For example, articles without any impact may be published in highly ranked journals or journals with high impact factor, whereas articles with high impact could be published in lower ranked journals or journals with low impact factor. Citation counts can also be easily gamed and manipulated and the h-index disadvantages early career academics. This paper discusses these and several other problems and suggests alternatives such as post-publication peer review and open-access journals.

In this paper I explore the ways in which academic citation practices contribute to the construction of disciplinary knowledge.  Based on the analysis of a computer corpus of 80 research articles and interviews with experienced writers, the study investigates the contextual variability of citations in eight disciplines and suggests how textual conventions point to distinctions in the ways knowledge is typically negotiated and confirmed within different academic communities. Clear disciplinary differences are identified in both the extent to which writers refer to the work of others and in how they depict the reported information. Writers in the humanities and social sciences employed substantially more citations than scientists and engineers, and were more likely to use integral structures, to employ discourse reporting verbs, and to represent cited authors as adopting a stance to their material.  It is argued that these differences in citation practices are related to the fact that academics actively participate in knowledge construction as members of professional groups and that their discoursal decisions are influenced by, and deeply embedded in, the epistemological and social conventions of their disciplines.

1000 publications that cited articles of this series of papers and books on environmental science, biology, ecology, water: the papers and books which were cited are here, on this big list of the titles with links to files on academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/49404407/ ; the previous draft of the series, 370 links, prior to the removal of some items: https:// www.academia.edu/49361879/ ; 1000 публикаций, которые цитировали эту серию работ (статей и книг) по тематике: экология, биология, эти работы здесь: https://www.academia.edu/49404407/ ;

https://www.academia.edu/51075200/ ;

« Heureux ceux qui n'ont point vu la fumeé des fetes de l'etranger, et qui ne se sont assis qu'aux festins de leurs peres ! »-p. 76 « OC Rene, si tu crains les troubles du coeur, defie-toi de la solitude : les grandes passions sont solitaires, et les transporter au deśert, c'est les rendre à leur empire. Accableś de soucis et de craintes, exposeś à tomber entre les mains des Indiens ennemis, à etre engloutis dans les eaux, piqueś des serpents, devoreś des betes, trouvant difficilement une chetive nourriture, et ne sachant plus de quel côté tourner nos pas, nos maux semblaient ne pouvoir plus s'accroıtre, lorsqu'un accident y vint mettre le comble. »-p. 78 « Il y a des justes dont la conscience est si tranquille, qu'on ne peut approcher d'eux sans participer à la paix qui s'exhale, pour ainsi dire, de leur coeur et de leurs discours. »-p. 85

This collective statement provides a general overview of the Cite Black Women movement, its principles, intellectual genealogy, charge, and history. It is both a reflection and an outline of the project's primary principles, hopes, and dreams.

Productivity metrics provoke mixed responses from the research community. The Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) facilitates an open and clear data infrastructure to handle publication products. ORCID is a unique identifier that accepts data interoperability for funders, industries, and publishers by exploring indicators for research aspects that they aspire to evaluate instead of using current indicators because they are readily accessible. This manuscript examines the use of ORCID for publication metrics, grant applications, management and reporting platforms. The benefits of ORCID offer a quick way to promote and organize a researcher's work as well as to foster better communication among researchers.

Les historiens des sciences accordent à Francesco Redi le mérite d’avoir réfuté, sur la base d’un rigoureux empirisme, la croyance millénaire dans la génération spontanée, c'est-à-dire l’idée que les êtres vivants pourraient se développer à partir de la matière. Pourtant, la lecture en contexte de l’œuvre de Redi, ainsi que sa comparaison avec la littérature érudite de son temps, mettent radicalement en discussion cette image.
En 1668, Redi publie les 'Esperienze intorno alla generazione degl’insetti' (Expériences sur la génération des insectes), œuvre qui, déjà dans le choix du vulgaire et dans son titre 'Esperienze', dénonce la volonté de Redi d’adhérer à l’école galiléenne.  Pourtant, cet article met en relief toute une série de contradictions entre la façade galiléenne des 'Esperienze' et leur contenu. Premièrement, en insistant sur le fait que les citations – d’auteurs anciens et modernes, de traités d’histoire naturelle mais aussi des classiques de la littérature - sont extrêmement abondantes dans le traité de Redi. Mais également en montrant, par une analyse détaillée des sources utilisées par cet auteur, que ce dernier a largement (et tacitement) exploité le travail de l’érudit français Samuel Bochart.

Deuxièmement, contrairement à ce que Redi proclame dans les premières pages des 'Esperienze', le débat théorique au sujet de la génération spontanée est bien présent à son esprit quand il compose ce traité. On peut même dire que les 'Esperienze' sont conçues comme une réplique polémique dans laquelle l’érudition se trouve manipulée –j’analyse en particulier la relation dialectique entre le texte de Redi et les écrits du célèbre Athanasius Kircher (qui à son tour a pillé l’œuvre très influente de Fortunio Liceti).

The construction industry contributes significantly to economic development worldwide, yet it is one of the most hazardous industries where numerous accidents and fatalities happen every year. Little research to date has shed light on the impact of economic development on construction safety research. In this paper, we conduct an analysis of construction safety articles published in the 21st century via a bibliometrics approach. We have analysed: (1) construction safety in developed and developing countries; (2) the major organisations that have conducted construction safety research; (3) authors and territories of the research and (4) topics in construction safety and future research directions. The largest number of published construction safety documents were published by scholars from the US and China; the total number of published articles by these two countries was 1,125, at 56% of the 2000 articles that were published. Both countries showed high levels of research collaboration. While our results suggest that economic development may drive academic construction safety research, there has been an increase in construction safety research conducted by developing countries in recent years, probably due to an improvement in their economic development. While authors' keywords evidenced the popularity of research on safety management and climate, the network analysis on all keywords, i.e. keywords given by Web of Science and authors, suggest that construction safety research focused on three areas: construction safety management, the relationship between people and construction safety, and the protection and health of workers' impact on construction safety. We found that there is a new interdisciplinary research trend where construction safety combines with digital technologies, with the largest number involving deep learning. Other trends focus on machine learning, Building Information Modelling, machine learning and visualisation.

The subject of the book is the examination of the stages of research and writing a scientific study. The types of scientific papers are presented and library data are provided for the compilation of bibliography, as well as research tools for each field of scientific research and study. The steps of conducting a scientific study, the way of conducting research and writing a questionnaire, the process of collecting and processing material, the creation of archival databases and the way of compiling and evaluating a scientific text are examined.
The book is especially helpful for students and especially for freshmen because it can guide them step by step on how to compose a scientific paper depending on the course of study they are attending. Essentially, the main purpose is to guide students how to work methodically to write scientific studies, how to manage and use digital and print sources, how to search and compile bibliography, how to know the stages and organization scientific research, and how to present a paper.

სამეცნიერო სივრცეში ავტორთა დიფერენცირება/რანჟირება ხორციელდება მათ მიერ მეცნიერების ამა თუ იმ სფეროში შეტანილი წვლილის, განხორციელებული გავლენის მიხედვით. გავლენა, რომელსაც ახორციელებს ესა თუ ის ტექსტი იზომება იმის მიხედვით, თუ რამდენად ხვდება ეს ტექსტი სხვა მეცნიერთა მიერ წარმოებულ კვლევებში, რაც ვლინდება განხორციელებულ მითითებებში (ციტირებებში). ის თუ როდის, ვის მიერ და რომელ ტექსტშია გამოყენებული სხვა ავტორთა ნააზრევი, დღევანდელ სამეცნიერო სივრცეში დგინდება ე.წ. პროგრამული უზრუნველყოფის მეშვეობით, რაც, გამოყენებათა რაოდენობის სისტემურ, თვისობრივ და რაოდენობრივ აღრიცხვას გულისხმობს. წარმოდგენილ სტატიაში საუბარი მექნება იმ პრობლემურ საკითხზე, რომელსაც აწყდებიან ავტორები, რომლებიც ტექსტებს ქართულ ენაზე წერენ და გამოსცემენ საქართველოში არსებულ პერიოდულ გამოცემებში. ყველაზე პოპულარული (ხშირად მითითებადი) ტექსტები/ავტორები მაინც ვერ ხვდებიან პროგრამული უზრუნველყოფის ალგორითმის აღქმად არეალში, რაც წარმოქმნის დისბალანსს, რეალურად ტექსტის სხვა ავტორთა მიერ გამოყენების რაოდენობასა და ალგორითმის მიერ აღქმულ რაოდენობას შორის. ნაშრომში განხილულია არსებული პრობლემის საფუძვლები და შემოთავაზებულია გადაჭრის გზები, როგორც ავტორთათვის, ასევე გამომცემლებისათვის.

Citation in Russia.
Остроумов С.А., доктор биол. наук (МГУ). Кто цитировал этого ученого в России. 2762 автора.
РАСПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ЦИТИРУЮЩИХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ ПО АВТОРАМ.
Анализ: ПУБЛИКАЦИИ, ЦИТИРУЮЩИЕ С.А.ОСТРОУМОВА. Данные РИНЦ, 2016. 44 стр.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311714484 ;
публикации этого автора, линки на тексты онлайн:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309549177 ;
citation in U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Netherlands, other countries: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311451822  ;
https://www.academia.edu/31589282/ ;
 

№ Автор                                         Статей
1 118
2 Кондакова Любовь Владимировна 64
3 Домрачева Людмила Ивановна 55
4 Розенберг Геннадий Самуилович (член-корр. РАН, директор института РАН) 48
5 Воробейчик Евгений Леонидович 44
6 Ашихмина Тамара Яковлевна 43
7 Огородникова Светлана Юрьевна 32
8 Мухачева Светлана Валерьевна 30
9 Васильев Андрей Витальевич 27
10 Безель Виктор Сергеевич 25
11 Терехова Вера Александровна 24
12 Котелевцев Сергей Васильевич 22
13 Кудинова Галина Эдуардовна 22
14 Бельский Евгений Анатольевич 18
15 Кантор Григорий Яковлевич 17
16 Заболотских Влада Валентиновна 16
17 Веселкин Денис Васильевич 15
18 Ромашов Борис Витальевич 15
19 Сарапульцева Елена Игоревна 15
20 Соломонова Елена Анатольевна 15
21 Дабах Елена Валентиновна 14
22 Давыдова Юлия Алексеевна 14
23 Саксонов Сергей Владимирович 14
24 Фокина Анна Ивановна 14
25 Шестакова Татьяна Владимировна 14
26 Большаков Владимир Николаевич (академик РАН)13 ;

"Čikago standard, stil i način citiranja,
funkcionalne razlike i obilježja u teoriji i praktičnoj primjeni

Rezime:
Predmet istraživanja predstavljaju standardne odrednice čikago stila citiranja, njegovih općih I funkcionalne karakteristika i općih upotrebnih odrednica. U istraživanju se koristi kvalitativni pristup i u istraživanju je korištena analitička metoda.Rad donosi analizu razlika među načinima dvaju stilova i njihovih dvaju načina navođenja izvora i referenci. Rezultati istaživanja su predstavljeni tabelarno. Istraživanje donosi opće upotrebne odrednice čikago standarda i stila cititanja naučno-istraživačkih radova za humanističke, prirodne, sociološke, sportske i psihološke nauke.

Ključne riječi: čikago standard, čikago stil, čikako format, čikago forme, humanistički stil, CSE stil, autor- datum stil,"

Was als fremde und was als eigene Rede gelten kann, ist Ansichtssache, ihr Vorhandensein die Folge einer Perspektivierung. Beide entstehen im Ergebnis eines sprachlichen Verfahrens, durch das Teile einer Äußerung einer anderen, "fremden" Sprecherinstanz zugewiesen werden, die von der aktuellen "eigenen" unterscheidbar ist. Fremde Rede in der eigenen kann als "fremde Stimme", 1 aber auch als "fremder Text" in Erscheinung treten.

The AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology (IJCSIT) is devoted to fields of Computer Science and Information Systems. The IJCSIT is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published in electronic form as well as print form. The mission of this journal is to publish original contributions in its field in order to propagate knowledge amongst its readers and to be a reference publication.

The dramatic expansion of the use of metrics in higher education institutions worldwide has brought with it gaming and manipulation practices designed to enhance artificially both individual and institutional reputation, including coercive citation, forced joint authorship, ghostwriting, H-index manipulation, and many others. This article maps these emerging practices from a social action system perspective and analyzes their linkages with the norms and processes that support academic celebrity and stardom as well as the character of academic systems. It analyzes with a social system approach some recently-proposed strategies for containing the proliferations of these practices and for mitigating their negative impacts.

Bibliometrics can be defined as the statistical analysis of publications. Bibliometrics has focused on the quantitative analysis of citations and citation counts which is complex. It is so complex and specialized that personal knowledge and experience are insufficient for understanding trends and then making decisions. We need tools for analysis of bibliometrics information to recognize the research trends and evaluate scientific/institution/country’s research productivity.  This presentation will provide procedure to write a Bibliometrics paper.