Arthroscopy

Background: Arthroscopy is often used to treat patients with chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). As there is a lack of evidence, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of arthroscopy in patients with chronic PFPS.

Introduction This project surveyed a group of orthopedic surgeons in order to identify the skills related to arthroscopic surgery which practicing surgeons consider important for surgical trainees to possess before performing in the operating room. Materials and methods The survey was composed of 35 questions outlining fundamental skills of arthroscopy and methods that a surgical trainee might use to develop such skills.

We investigated the feasibility of arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation of small coronoid fractures and the anterior capsule for treatment of patients with Regan and Morrey Types I and II (O'Driscoll Types I and II) coronoid fractures with instability of the ulnohumeral joint. Four consecutive patients with this fracture type underwent arthroscopically assisted treatment and were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year (mean, 76 weeks; range, 58-92 weeks). All patients achieved a functional range of motion with an average flexion/extension arc of 2.5°to 140°a nd full pronation and supination. No patient had recurrent elbow instability. One patient had removal of a prominent suture over the subcutaneous border of the ulna. Arthroscopically assisted management of coronoid fractures can provide excellent observation, enabling anatomic repair without extensive soft tissue dissection. Preservation of the soft tissue attachments of small coronoid fragments and repair of the capsule are possible with this technique. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Many studies that describe factors affecting outcome in primary rotator cuff repair (RCR) have been published, but so far there is no review that summarizes them. This systematic review was conducted to identify prognostic factors influencing functional (clinical) outcome and radiologically proven cuff integrity after RCR. Methods: A literature search was conducted up to July 2013 for prospective studies that describe prognostic factors affecting outcome in primary RCR. Inclusion criteria were open or arthroscopic repair of a fullthickness supraspinatus or infraspinatus tear. Included outcome measures were shoulder function and cuff integrity. Studies describing revision surgery, muscle transpositions, and subscapular or partial-thickness tears and those with retrospectively collected data were excluded, as were studies without linear or multivariate regression. The literature search resulted in 662 hits, and 12 of those studies were included in this review. Results: Moderate evidence was found for increasing age, larger tear size, and additional biceps or acromioclavicular procedures to have a negative influence on cuff integrity at follow-up as well as for Workers' Compensation Board status to have a negative influence on functional outcome after RCR. There is limited evidence that performance of an additional acromioclavicular procedure has a negative influence on functional outcome. There was insufficient evidence for other described prognostic factors. Conclusion: Several patient-specific factors influencing functional and radiologic outcome after RCR have been identified. These factors can guide orthopedic surgeons in their decision-making process as to whether to operate on their patients.

Twenty-two patients who underwent meniscal repair using the outsidein technique combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were submitted to an accelerated rehabilitation protocol that included immediate full range of motion and weightbearing. The patients were reviewed postoperatively by means of clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after an average of 28 months. Clinical evaluation was performed according to the International Knee Documentation Committee form, and sagittal knee laxity was measured with a KT-2000 arthrometer (MedMetric Corp, San Diego, CA). The MRI scans were obtained using a 0.2-T high-resolution MRI unit dedicated to the study of limbs, and the meniscal signal was graded according to a modified Crues classification. Overall, 77.3% of patients reported clinically good results. Loss of extension of <5 ° was detected in only 2 patients (9.1%). Three out of 22 patients showed clinical signs of meniscal retear. One of these patients had a second operation for a bucket-handle tear. The presence of a full-thickness rim at MRI evaluation, present in 10 patients (45.5%), did not correlate with the presence of clinical symptoms of retear. Instead, the 3 symptomatic patients presented a complete rim with a gap > 1 mm between the meniscal wall and the fragment of the posterior horn. This finding is believed to be a more reliable indicator for retear following meniscal repair. The low failure rate in this series suggests that an aggressive rehabilitation regimen may be prescribed without deleterious effects in subjects undergoing ACL reconstruction and concomitant meniscus repair.

To compare unilateral spinal block produced with small doses of hyperbaric ropivacaine with that produced by 2 doses of hyperbaric levobupivacaine, we randomly allocated 91 ASA physical status I-II outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy to receive unilateral spinal anesthesia with 7.5 mg of hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.5% (group Ropi-7.5, n ϭ 31) or either 7.5 mg (group Levo-7.5, n ϭ 30) or 5 mg (group Levo-5, n ϭ 30) of hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5%. Spinal anesthesia was performed at the L3-4 interspace using a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. The lateral decubitus position was maintained for 15 min after injection. Strictly unilateral sensory block was present in 73%, 50%, and 61% of cases in groups Ropi-7.5, Levo-7.5, and Levo-5, respectively, 30 min after injection (P ϭ 0.40), and unilateral motor block was observed in 94%, 93%, and 83% in groups Ropi-7.5, Levo-7.5, and Levo-5, respectively (P ϭ 0.31). One patient of group Ropi-7.5 required general anesthesia to complete surgery, and fentanyl supplementation was required in one patient of group Ropi-7.5 (3%) and one patient of group Levo-5 (3%) (P ϭ 0.42). The median (range) time for spinal block resolution was shorter in group min] than in group min) (P ϭ 0.04); whereas home discharge was shorter in groups min) and min) as compared with group Levo-7.5 (238 [219 -277] min) (P ϭ 0.02 and P ϭ 0.04, respectively). We conclude that 7.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine and 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine provide adequate spinal block for outpatient knee arthroscopy, with a faster home discharge as compared with 7.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine.

Purpose: Mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is not a well-known entity. Only 1 case of mucoid degeneration of the ACL has been reported in the English-language literature. This article describes 5 cases of mucoid degeneration of the ACL with clinical features, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and a method of arthroscopic management of these cases. Type of Study: Case series. Methods: Over a period of 21 months from 1999 to 2001, 5 patients were diagnosed to be suffering from mucoid degeneration of the ACL using MRI, histopathologic, and arthroscopic criteria. All patients presented with progressive knee pain and restriction of flexion without history of a significant trauma or instability preceding the symptoms. MRI showed an increased signal in the substance of the ACL both in the T1-and T2-weighted images, with a mass-like configuration that was reported as a partial or complete tear of the ACL by most radiologists. At arthroscopy, the ACL was homogenous, bulbous, hypertrophied, and taut, occupying the entire intercondylar notch. The ligamentum mucosum was absent in all patients. A debulking of the ACL was performed by a judicious excision of the degenerate mucoid tissue, taking care to leave behind as much of the intact ACL as possible. Releasing it and performing a notchplasty treated impingement of the ACL to the roof and lateral wall. The ACL was not fully excised in any of the patients. Results: All patients were pain free and had recovered full flexion except one who experienced painful flexion beyond 120°. None of the patients showed symptoms of instability. Postoperative MRI performed after at least 12 months in 2 patients showed some intact ACL fibers in a now-thinned ACL mass. Conclusions: Mucoid degeneration of the ACL is a clinical condition afflicting active middle-aged people without a single significant traumatic episode with a specific MRI picture. They respond well to a judicious arthroscopic release of the ACL with notchplasty. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Treatment of osteoarthritis in young and middle-aged patients, in whom joint replacement is usually not appropriate, is a challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. Arthroscopic techniques can help control patients&#39; symptoms. In particular, the microfracture procedure combined with management of the joint volume and a specific rehabilitation protocol shows good results in patients with osteoarthritis and cartilage defects by resurfacing the defect with a combination of types I and II cartilaginous tissue. Microfracture is a single-staged arthroscopic procedure that can be combined with any other arthroscopic treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee. With an appropriate rehabilitation protocol and techniques for controlling the joint volume, these treatments are very effective for pain relief and functional improvement. The described technique is our choice for initial surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.