2014, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Pierre Lemonnier's book elegantly demonstrates the role of material culture both in joint action (Shotter 1980) and in situated action (see, e.g., Costall and Leudar 1996); that physical things constitute a locus of tacit, embedded, or embodied knowledge around which the constellations of human action are structured (Adorno [1970] 2001; Dougherty and keller 1985). However, here I want to discuss the apparent paradoxes that arise when we compare, as Lemonnier does, the handmade fence, fish trap, and drum with the industrial products of the motor industry. I say paradox because mass production has been construed from the start as the antithesis of embedded knowledge: "In opulent and commercial societies to think or to reason comes to be. .. carried on by a very few people, who furnish the public with all the thought and reason possessed by the vast multitudes that labour" (Adam Smith quoted in Williams 1959: 38). And yet, as Andy Warhol ([1975] 2007: 100-1) pointed out, there is also a democratizing aspect to such products which irresistibly draws people into joint action, whether they like it or not: What's great about this country is that America started the tradition where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest.. .. A coke is a coke and no amount of money can get you a better coke than the one the bum on the corner is drinking. All the cokes are the same and all the cokes are good. Liz Taylor knows it, the President knows it, the bum knows it, and you know it. 1. From "Now Art has lost its mental charms" (William Blake).