Academia.eduAcademia.edu

The psychophysiological nature of premature ejaculation

1987, Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

The hypothesis that premature ejaculators (PEs) are less able than nonpremature ejaculators (NPEs) to evaluate accurately their level of physiologically determined sexual arousal was tested. Twenty-six men (13 PEs and 13 NPEs) viewed a variety of videotaped vignettes, some of which were excerpts from sexually explicit films. Concurrent subjective (selfreport) and objective (plethysmograph) ratings of sexual arousal were taken. Data revealed that both the PEs and NPEs were equally accurate in assessing their level of physiological sexual arousal. These results and those from a sexual history questionnaire were used to evaluate several hypotheses regarding the nature and etiology of premature ejaculation.

Key takeaways

  • She argued that, perhaps due to performance anxiety or some equally distracting source of subjective distress, premature ejaculators may be less able than normals to assess accurately their level of sexual arousal during intercourse (in particular, during those moments just prior to orgasm).
  • The 13 subjects in the PE group met the following criteria: Each reported that (i) the time from sexual penetration of his partner to ejaculation was less than 2 min on more than 50% of the occasions on which intercourse took place; (il) in general, he did not feel able to control the onset of his orgasms; and (iii) he felt that this lack of control was a problem for him.
  • Both the subjective and objective ratings of sexual arousal were made continuously throughout the 20-min experimental period.
  • There were marginally significant (p between 0.05 and 0.10) differences in sexual satisfaction (less for PEs) and sexual communication (less for PEs).
  • Results suggest that the psychophysiological nature of premature ejaculation is likely to be much more complex than the simple failure of these men to assess correctly the level of their sexual arousal.