Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Women, Development and the State: On the Theoretical Impasse

1986, Development and Change

Abstract

Asoka Bandarage is to be applauded for her massive review of the literature on women and development which appeared in Development and Change (15[3], 1984) in her article on 'Women, in Development: Liberalism, Marxism and Marxism-Feminism'. She discusses important linkages that need to be taken into account in this field and confirms the necessity for making gender central to development studies. After a thoroughgoing critique of what she calls liberal feminism, she outlines Marxist-feminist approaches which she then concludes now to be at a theoretical impasse. To move beyond this theoretical impasse in ways which give historical and comparative depth to the field involves, I would argue, focus on the state,' on bureaucracy and on the ways they institutionalize male privilege in an increasingly heavy-handed and hierarchical fashion. Moreover, the glib discussion of liberal feminism in women and development needs re-examination; a twoway categorization of the field as liberal and Marxist obscures more than reveals. Indeed, as Gita Sen for Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era (DAWN) so eloquently develops, a great variety of feminisms exists, united in their 'common opposition to gender oppression and hierarchy' (1985: 13). WHAT IS THIS 'LIBERAL' FEMINISM? The so-called liberal feminist approach to women and development focuses on women's work, its value, male privilege and genderdifferentiated access to resources. It encompasses a mix of disciplines, is both theoretical and applied, and uses qualitative and