Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1974, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
The class of all rings that are Everett extensions of a ring in a variety U \mathfrak {U} by a ring in a variety B \mathfrak {B} is a variety U ⋅ B \mathfrak {U} \cdot \mathfrak {B} . With respect to this operation the set of all ring varieties is a partially ordered groupoid (under inclusion), that is not associative. A variety is idempotent iff it is the variety of all rings, or generated by a finite number of finite fields. No families of polynomial identities other than those equivalent to x = x x = x or x = y x = y are attainable on the class of all rings or on the class of all commutative rings.
Mathematical Notes, 1995
2018
We prove that the variety V of commutative multiplicatively idempotent semirings satisfying x + y + xyz = x + y is generated by single semirings. Moreover, we describe a normal form system for terms in V and we show that the word problem in V is solvable. Although V is locally finite, it is residually big.
Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
International Journal of Data Science and Analysis, 2018
The pioneer theorem of Weddernburn on commutativity of division rings was proved in the very beginning of twentieth century. Aside from its own intrinsic beauty and important role in many diverse parts of algebra specially, the theorem serves as the starting point for investigations of certain kinds of conditions that render a ring commutative. A large part of the results in this area was developed in the hands of many distinguished mathematicians like Jacobson, Herstein, Kaplansky, Faith, Martindale, Nakayama, Bell and many others. The purpose of the present paper is to investigate commutativity of a ring with unity 1 satisfying certain polynomial constraints. The main result of the first section asserts that a ring is commutative if at least one of the integral exponent used in the polynomial constraints of the theorem is zero and the ring also satisfies the property Q(n) Further, in the second section, commutativity of a ring with unity 1 has also been established under a set of different polynomial identities applying the most frequently used technique known as Streb's classification. Finally, in the last section, these results of the foregoing sections are further extended to a special class of rings called as one sided s-unital rings.
Filomat
In this paper, we focus on the semicommutative property of rings via idempotent elements. In this direction, we introduce a class of rings, so-called right e-semicommutative rings. The notion of right e-semicommutative rings generalizes those of semicommutative rings, e-symmetric rings and right e-reduced rings. We present examples of right e-semicommutative rings that are neither semicommutative nor e-symmetric nor right e-reduced. Some extensions of rings such as Dorroh extensions and some subrings of matrix rings are investigated in terms of right e-semicommutativity. We prove that if R is a right e-semicommutative clean ring, then the corner ring eRe is clean.
1995
Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use.
Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 1980
6] showed that a ring R with unity satisfying (xy)~=x2y 2 for all x, yER is necessarily commutative. In this direction we prove the following theorem.
Siberian Mathematical Journal, 1982
Revista Matemática Iberoamericana, 2014
In this paper we apply Ferrero-Sant'Ana's characterization of right distributive rings via saturations to prove that all right distributive rings are Armendariz relative to any unique product monoid. As an immediate consequence we obtain that all right distributive rings are Armendariz. We apply this result to give a new proof of the well-known fact that all right duo right distributive rings are right Gaussian. We also show that for any nontrivial unique product monoid S, the class of Armendariz rings relative to S is contained in the class of Armendariz rings, and we present an example of a unique product monoid S for which this containment is strict. m i=0 a i x i and g = n j=0 b j x j ∈ R[x], if f g = 0, then a i b j = 0 for all i and j. These rings were introduced by M. B. Rege and S. Chhawchharia in [20], and the name for them was chosen to honor E. P. Armendariz, who noted in [2] that all reduced rings satisfy this condition. Armendariz rings, as well as their numerous generalizations (see [15]), have recently been objects of intensive investigation. The aim of this paper is to examine relationships between the classes of right distributive rings and Armendariz rings. The main motivation for the study comes from the theory of commutative rings. According to L. Fuchs, [8], commutative
Algebra and Logic, 1973
Recently, Kleinfeld [4] and Thedy [7] considered two varieties of rings, each of which contains all the associative and commutative rings. Kleinfeld showed that each ring without divisors of zero and with characteristic # 2 or 3 of the first variety is either associative or commutative; Thedy proved an analogous result for simple rings of the second variety. In the present paper, the results of Kletnfeld and Thedy are extended to a more comprehensive variety of rings containing all the alternative and commutative rings.
Journal of Algebra, 1972
If k is a field and X and Y are indeterminates then the statement "consider R = Iz[X, Y] as a polynomial ring in one variable" is ambiguous, for there arc infinitely many possible choices for the ring of coefficients (e.g., If
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 1990
LetRbe an associative ring with unity. It is proved that ifRsatisfies the polynomial identity[xny−ymxn,x]=0(m>1,n≥1), thenRis commutative. Two or more related results are also obtained.
Asian-European Journal of Mathematics
It is known that an ideal of a direct product of commutative unitary rings is directly decomposable into ideals of the corresponding factors. We show that this does not hold in general for commutative rings and we find necessary and sufficient conditions for direct decomposability of ideals. For varieties of commutative rings, we derive a Mal’cev type condition characterizing direct decomposability of ideals and we determine explicitly all varieties satisfying this condition.
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, 1976
Throughout, R will denote an associative ring with center Z. For elements x, y of R and k a positive integer, we define inductively [x, y]0 = x, [x, y] = [x, y]1 = xy − yx, [x, y, y, hellip, y]k = [[x, y, y, hellip, y]k−1, y]. A ring R is said to satisfy the k-th Engel condition if [x, y, y, hellip, y]k = 0. By an integral domain we mean a nonzero ring without nontrivial zero divisors.
Let R be a ring whose set of idempotents E(R) is closed under multiplication. When R has an identity 1, E(R) is known to lie in the center of R, thus forming a Boolean algebra; moreover each idempotent e induces a decomposition eR ⊕ (1 − e)R of R. In this paper we consider what occurs if R has no identity, in which case E(R) is a possibly noncommutative variant of a generalized Boolean algebra. We explore the effects of E(R) on R with attention given to the decompositions of R induced from decompositions of E(R) as well as to the indecomposable cases.
Sbornik: Mathematics, 2009
The following problem of Kemer is solved for prime varieties of associative algebras with unit: it is shown that over an infinite field of positive characteristic, each prime variety of associative algebras with unit is generated by an algebraic algebra of bounded algebraicity index over this field. Bibliography: 10 titles.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.